A staple of The Beatles’ live act for some years, ‘Mr Moonlight’ was recorded by the group during sessions for their fourth LP, Beatles For Sale.
‘Mr Moonlight’ was written by Roy Lee Johnson. The first known recording was by blues pianist Piano Red, recording as Dr Feelgood and the Interns. It was released as the b-side of ‘Dr Feelgood’, a minor R&B hit in 1962.
Disc, 14 November 1964
In the studio
The Beatles attempted to record ‘Mr Moonlight’ twice in the studio in 1964. The first time was on 14 August, when they recorded four takes – the last of these was for a time considered the best.
Anthology 1 contains takes one and four. The first broke down almost immediately; take four was complete, and featured a frantic slide guitar solo by George Harrison.
The Beatles re-made the song on 18 October. Again they recorded four takes, the last two of which featured Paul McCartney’s somewhat gaudy Hammond organ solo.
Despite a blistering vocal from John Lennon, ‘Mr Moonlight’ is held by many Beatles fans as one of the least successful songs in their catalogue.
I loved this song because of its pop atypicality, the aforementioned Lennon vocals, and the organ solo.
One of the great Beatles song? No, but a fine way to add more texture to “Beatles ’65.”
Good word choice on “blistering” to describe John’s vocal! While some might say this was a not great song, I say not so! Each time John sings “And the night you don’t come my way…”, possibly totaling 10-15 seconds worth of Beatles history, is emblazoned in my mind as perhaps the best 15 seconds in musical history! His raw energy and total commitment there (and in so many other songs) is fantastic! Whenever I think of the particular vocal quality that John had that I loved the most, I think of this song and that line as its quintessential expression. That energy is what made John John. That makes Mr. Moonlight a top-10 greatest Beatle song in my book!
you are absolutely right…and besides…anyone who can cover a song that is somewhat a-typical of their style…and completely own it…well , they deserve a hell of a lot of credit !!!
If The Beatles were Burgers on this one:
John would be flame broiled
Paul would be with cheese
It is a true talent to keep a song that simple – yet perfect.
Thoroughly agree with you. And thoroughly disagree with the assessment above that it can in any way be described as “least successful”. If anything it is the most energised vocal performance John has left us. A five star recording.
I always like singing along with this one. Not always easy, as ever, because you have the three-part harmonies…at which they were excellent…
So glad to read so many positive comments on Mr Moonlight given the negativity it has received over the years. I’ve always loved it, John’s brilliant vocal is one of his best…and the way their voices blend together on some phrases sends chills!
This Is a great track. Lennon absolutely nailed the vocal. I enjoy the Anthology version because It shows the difficulty of the opening lyric, “MISTE-E-ER MOONLI-IGHT!”
The above comment is the best one that I have read in this particular Beatle website as of this date.
Hopefully more comments like this will appear relating to the Beatles and their songs.
Burnin’ and J. Brush have got it right. John never thought his voice was all that good, but music lovers know that John’s voice was one of the most recognizable sounds of the 20th century. Paul’s too !
r
Yeah, I never thought this one was so bad either, and I agree that it made for a nice little diversion on Beatles ’65/For Sale. Nicely weird instrumentation and a great vocal. And how appropriate that it immediately follows “I’ll Follow the Sun”!
I always loved this song. IMHO, one of best Lennon vocals as a Beatle.
Bad Boy. An even better Lennon vocal than Twist and Shout!
One of the most underrated Beatles rockers imo. What a great tune John absolutely killed it on this song.
So, just lurking and reading comments, I was curious to see what people said about Mr. Moonlight. The reason is IMO if there was ever Beatle “filler” song material, this has to be it. While I can understand the song having fans who like it, to me it just hardly seems worthy of the solid, original rockers and hits they were capable of writing by that time, especially coming off A Hard Days Night, their first album with all original songs. Of course this is only one more opine to throw into the mix since there are only a few Beatle songs I really don’t like. This just happens to be one.
Even crediting Lennon’s effort on the vocal, I find it a horrible song (lyrically and musically.) As the B-side of a minor R and B single it says something that the most remembered version is a cover used as filler on Beatles For Sale: one, that the Beatles could take a second rate R&B tune and improve it shows how good they were, but two that Mr. Moonlight was really a forgettable song. Almost anything original by Lennon between ’63 and ’64 is 1000 times better: “I’m A Loser,” “You Can’t Do That,” “It Won’t Be Long,” “All I’ve Got To Do,” etc.
I was like you and felt this was probably a filler. It probably was, but this is Lennon at his best. I always wandered why they picked this tune. They obviously saw some value in it.
The melodic content of the song is actually quite good and every single syllable by Lennon is simply fantastic.
I suspect that liking of not liking the song has to do with the age of the listener. When I 1st heard this tune I was 14 and it clearly made an imprint. I am not sure I would have loved the song if I 1st heard it at age 40.
Wouldn’t all covers be worse than Lennon’s songs of ’64?
The song isn’t great but it has a charm I can’t resist.
Having said that, is it on my top 50 Beatles songs? no
If you read Geof Emerick’s “Here there and everywhere” he paints a pretty negative picture of George on this one. Apparently they tried multiple times to record a fairly straight ahead melodic solo and Geroge kept flubbing it. Although Paul – at this point probably George’s equal or better on the guitar – could have played it, for the sake of face saving he laid down the organ solo instead. Obviously, by the end of the their career George was a gifted muscian, but Emerick really seemed disappointed/contemptuous in his description of this studio work.
GE was also quite negative about GH solo in I’ll Follow The Sun. IMHO, the solo for this tune is perfect (including the guitar tone).
Regarding Mr M: A guitar solo as not right for the song and that is why GH had trouble. Some songs do not need a guitar solo.
George was a gifted musician then, but the biggest commitment The Beatles had was not to do the same thing twice, or at least over and over. That puts a serious demand on a lead guitarist who hadn’t any formal training. It’s easy to notice George’s acumen as a musician and soloist found new heights after he began to study sitar, which, it’s my guess, lead him to a better understanding of musical theory, which in turn made it easier for him to then come up with innovative solos much quicker than in the early days.
The thing I liked least about Emerick’s book was his condescending attitude toward George.
Yes. If Geoff had published his book while John and George were still alive, there was always a chance that he could have been sued by John and George for writing libellous stuff about them in his book.
How realistic was it to even consider having Paul play a guitar solo at this point in time? He didn’t even own a left-handed electric guitar yet. George was a very good lead guitarist and besides, Paul’s organ solo actually gave a very nocturnal and realistic effect.
Geoff was clearly ignorant of these facts: a) George was a very skilled guitarist as well as singer and songwriter, b) John and Paul never made any effort to replace George with another lead guitarist, c) George’s guitar skills clearly suited the band’s music, d) George was very capable of playing good guitar solos and e) the only “mediocre” Beatle who got replaced was Pete Best.
The only time that George nearly got replaced was in January 1969 after he quit for a few days and John suggested bringing in Eric Clapton to replace him, but neither Paul nor Ringo agreed.
The adjective “embarrassing” is more applicable to a guitar solo that got messed up because the player was too drunk or stoned to play correctly.
I think this is one of the few Beatle songs where despite the fact that the actual song is not too fantastic, Lennon’s vocals make up for it and make the song at least pretty decent…I would also look at It’s Only Love, You’re Gonna Lose That Girl, Yes It Is, Run For Your Life, etc, as other songs that he is just such a presence which makes up for the song quality.
“Yes It Is” is sublime
I tie it with If You’ve Got Troubles, as the less good song of them. Because, for me, there’s no bad song or worst, only weird.
This song inspires me for a girl, Lennon vocals are great, chorus great, instrumentation may lack, but it’s a great attempt though many people reject this cover.
Maybe it’s true that it’s the less good cover/song of the Fab Four, but one thinks is truth. Even that, it’s great!
funniest organ solo ever
Good point MrBig. The organ solo sounds like a roller rink!
This song would have done better on With The Beatles because then the previous album wouldn’t have been all original and there wouldn’t Be that ” This is what followed AHDN”
These are some of the best comments I’ve seen on Mr.Moonlight. From the first time I’ve heard the song, I thought John’s vocals were really good and Paul’s bass was fantastic. This is in my top 20 Beatles songs.
I always thought this tune was on the album as a gag. There are so many campy, cheesy elements to it. The warbling harmonies, especially at the end. The skating rink organ solo. The floor tom “bomb” on the second beat at the end of the verses. I think they were laughing their balls off while doing this tune.
Agreed. They put their all into it nevertheless. I think they did not think everything was so intense and heavy as their legacy sometimes seems to many from a distance in time now. They cut up quite a bit, they “mach schau” on many songs/performances. Lennon readily admitted he didn’t think too much of several of his compositions – some because they were “craftwork”/filler, others because they weren’t message-laden – particularly from the early years. It’s quite natural that the same feelings would extend to cover tunes. Obviously they liked the tune. That did not stop them from taking off/flaking out on a particular rendition.
Put me in the camp of, other than the novelty factor, this one is not that interesting/compelling. John’s vocal is nice but it’s not something you can’t hear on a least a few other tracks – Bad Boy someone already mentioned. I think the arrangement is set to highlight that dynamic vocal breakout, but what precedes it “Mr. Moonlight, come back to me,” etc. is just kind of monotonous. This may be by design, to then showcase the vocal, but it doesn’t relieve it of the monotonous quality.
Did you know there are three versions of Mr. Moonlight? Why don’t I show you the list?
Mono 2:33
Stereo 2:36 (Longer)
US Stereo 2:40 (Longest of All)
So what do you think? I think the US stereo mix of Mr. Moonlight which is the longest of all might be the October 27th mix so do you have any answers on this mix?
I think I’ll Follow The Sun is a much more “Annoying” or whatever term you want to use than Mr. Moonlight. Just my opinion
Would “Mr. Moonlight” be a good choice for Flo Rida in the winter of 2012? No. How about including it in your live set in England in 1963-4? It depends on how the audience responds. Imagine yourself 17 years old with John delivering that performance right in front of you, with that special someone right beside you. If it comes right before “Till There Was You” and right after “The Honeymoon Song,” I think your date has a good chance of turning out alright. Give it a go, lads.
I always liked this song and performance, despite the negative criticism. The Beatles did surprising “curveballs” every so often (A Taste of Honey, ‘Till There was You, etc.), to show that they weren’t just any typical 60’s rock/pop band. This is perhaps the most zany of their cover versions. The song is quite unique, actually. It surprised me immensely to find it had been the flip of an R&B single. Lennon’s searing vocal is alone worth the price of admission. It’s not very nuanced, but it’s Lennon at his most exaggerated and intense. The intro is almost kind of intimidating, “Mistaaaaaaaaaaaaaah Moonlight.”
I’m not really getting a lot of the criticism of the actual song here. It’s a perfectly acceptable R&B number with nice opportunity for the singer to show off his range, and the sentiment reminds me in a way of “Mr. Sandman.”
That said, I hate hate hated the Beatles’ recording of it for ages. It sounded lousy. None of the instruments gelled, and the only standout thing about it was John’s excellent vocals. Then I listened to the mono mix for the first time and nearly every problem I had with it resolved. It still isn’t a perfect recording and they clearly weren’t taking it entirely seriously — it’ll never make a top ten list of Beatles covers — but it’s a fun rock arrangement of a doo-woppy song, something you’d expect George or Paul to sing on Please Please Me or With The Beatles. The amazing vocals elevate the song, not to greatness, but to a rip-roaring kitschy classic.
Its interesting to note that the cartoon version had Paul as the lead singer. Why? I don”t know.
David,
With the Beatle cartoons they have Paul McCartney Solo “Live And Let Die” as a The Beatle Song. With George Harrison as the James Bond Character. And the cartoons also a few other Solo Songs as The Beatles like “With A Little Luck”. You can’t rely on The Beatles Cartoon to tell you what songs they did as The Beatles or who sung what songs. It just for kids..,
Despite the song’s cheesiness factor, undoubtedly, it is Lennon at his best on vocals. I love his tone and delivery throughout the song. McCartney is also a great vocalist, but this song shows Lennon’s edge.
I agree that this would be a difficult song for any guitarist to make a good solo out of. The tempo is very slow, it doesn’t have very many chords, and the chords that there are are pretty predictable. So what the @#$% are you going to do except stay pretty close to the stupid melody, the way Paul does on the organ?
Ive always thought of it as the worst Beatles cover of all time, with the possible exception of “Bad Boy”.
The fact that Lennon was able put so much heart and soul into such inferior material is the only thing that salvages it… but to me it also reveals another facet of his extraordinary personality, in all its glorious mixture of arrogance and humility: it’s almost like he’s secretly smirking “Get a load of this s***e— I could sing the f*****g phone book and make these mugs think it’s great!”
Interesting comments. I’ve always heard people saying how Mr Moonlight is the nadir of The Beatles recorded output but it’s never occurred to me…I could come up with a few others that I would consider worse.
I was interested to read the comment about Paul being a better guitarist at this stage…suggesting that he could have nailed the solo but instead opted to play the wonky organ solo. Not saying you’re wrong but it’s always been my impression that George had the edge at this time…dating back to the late 50s.
One of my many theme based playlists is built with songs that have “Mister” or “Mr.” in the title.
I only have one version of each title, sometimes a difficult choice, due to lots of great covers out there, but I wrote my rules, and I try to make my playlists ‘album length’ …10-12 cuts. Since they had to be songs I like, I waivered with Mr. Moonlight because I have always disliked Lennon’s opening “scream”. Even though I understand his need to scream (later revealed when he publicized the details of his psychotherapy with Dr. Arthur Janov), I STILL DON’T LIKE HEARING IT — fortunately, because of digital magic, I could, and did, amputate the offending noise. My 49 year old vinyl version of Beatles ’65 has scratches and pock marks right after I’ll Follow the Sun where I had yanked the needle arm away, a hundred times, sometimes at mid-scream, just to avoid hearing Mr. Moonlight. Without that yelp, it is a fine specimen
The list has 4 Beatles songs and the others are culled from my collection. The order doesn’t matter, because I always listen on “shuffle”. Here they are in alphabetical order:
Being for the Benefit of Mr. Kite (Beatles)
Dear Mr. Fantasy (Traffic)
Mean Mr. Mustard (Beatles)
Mr. and Mrs. (Incredible String Band)
Mr. Bojangles (Jerry Jeff Walker)
Mr. Dieingly Sad (Critters)
Mr. Moonlight (Beatles)
Mr. Spaceman (Byrds)
Mr. Tambourine Man (live Dylan version UK 1966)
Please Mister Postman (Beatles)
I would probably add the oldie Mr. Bassman, but hadn’t thought of it until now.
As stated above, this song was a staple of the Beatles’ live act for some years & it’s included on their repertoire on their Star Club, Hamburg stint in 1962. It is a regular or one of their favorite cover song on their live lineup that time so when 1964 came, they included it in the Beatles For Sale album not just an album filler.
Just my opinion.
I like this song because of John’s voice/rendition & Paul & George’s voice harmony.
The stereo mix of this tune is especially weak in comparison to the mono. One wonders whether this track would have a less despised reputation had the stereo version not become the more common listening experience in the the roughly two decade period between the stereo LP takeover and the release of the first official BfS CD release in mono.
I don’t get the hate. Sure the lyrics are corny but so what? The Beatles could’ve made The ABC Song sound good. Putting the lyrics aside, this song is ear candy at a purely pleasure level. Both the vocals and the gorgeous, gorgeous guitar playing during the vocals. (Okay, the organ solo could’ve been better, but maybe that part was meant as a joke.) So it’s not dripping with symbolism or double-meaning or drugs references, big whopping deal. The Beatles weren’t singing for a bunch of hardcore academic analysts in 2015, they were singing for a 1960s audience consisting largely of teenagers. If “Mr. Moonlight” had never been covered by the Beatles, and instead Lennon stuck something about a “Mr. Moonlight” into the lyrics for ‘I am the Walrus’, you over-critical types would be overflowing with nonsense about how meaningful and deep it was.
That’s a pretty interesting point, actually. It’s a weird song, before they were really known for doing weird songs. Like, who exactly is Mr. Moonlight?
Anyways, it’s a really bizarre song, mainly due to organ solo and stranger lyrics, but I rather enjoy it for those reasons.
Mr. Moonlight is Mr. Blue Sky in disguise. 😉
He is addressing the moonlight as if it were a person-yeah, weird. but there is NO person named Mr Moonlight
goo goo ga joob
It’ a fine cover, but superior to Leave My Kitten Alone?
NO way. Kitten to me is John at his best. same way with Bad Boy although others have paned it on this web page.
Mr Moonlight is pretty s***e, but its fun…..I dunno why John liked it so much, coz its a pretty dreadful song anyway. What makes it even worse is that it is on the same album as Eight days a week and Rock n roll music!
I prefer it to Eight Days a Week and Rock ‘n Roll music.
I remember hearing this at eight uears old, thinking that the keyboard solo sounded weird. Why that dreary organ? And that drum?
As a young kid, I was not a fan of this song at all. Over the years, I’ve come to like it much more. As stated over and over here, Lennon’s vocals are amazing.
Thank you! I always liked this song, partly because of the vocal harmonizing, and it’s simple weirdness. Not a favorite, necessarily, but always interesting to listen to.
Deservedly on most people’s lists of the worst Beatles tracks in their repertoire.
This is an absolute gem of a track. Vocal is amongst John’s very best, and the whole arrangement is for me at the very heart of what Beatles for Sale is about as an album. The organ is an inspired touch, as it more than anything provides that bridge between the amphetamine driven rock and roll of Hamburg and the first two albums with the weed drenched irony and playfulness to come on the next album. And so true the comment above about Mr Moonlight as a poetic device, bursting with imaginative possibility and so similar to much of what John was drawn towards lyrically. And with those harmonies and that Hammond humming away, it perfectly evokes the English music hall which was also so much a part of their influences….absolutely belongs in this period, no doubt.
The Beatles made very few poor recordings and this wasn’t one of them. It sounds as good in 2020 as when it was first released .Can there be a more powerful opening to a song ? Johns voice is amazing .
When I was a kid, I thought the Beatles didn’t get really good until Help!; I dismissed alot of their earlier songs, mainly due to the sameness of the lyrics. Mr. Moonlight was the highlight of cheese; played it once, skipped it forever. As I got older, and learned how to play music a little, I began to really appreciate alot of their early songs. In my 50s now, I have discovered the majesty of this song, cheese and all, mainly for the vocals. They recorded the song for some reason; maybe it was just a shout out to all their pre-fame fans. I actually kinda love it now. I understand its “most hated” status, but I’m putting it in the “win” column these days. Wonder how I will feel in 20 years?
John’s impassioned singing and George’s hilarious lounge-lizard organ-solo make this for me. In Japan where I live this song is hugely popular. Literally every time there’s a band playing in a bar they cover this. Something about the singer pleading desperately to the moon appeals to fans her. The lyrics are similar to Kyu Sakamoto’s “Sukiyuki” – which has lyrics about a singer walking alone looking at the moon, and came out around the same time.
Paul played the organ, not George, and I doubt that George was even interested in playing the organ, let alone percussion instruments, at this point in time.
I have listened to “Mr. Moonlight” and it sounds like Ringo was using the mounted tom, floor tom and hi-hats in his drum kit, not bongos. You can also hear his bass drum kick pedal squeaking, so I wonder if it’s possible that he somehow influenced Led Zeppelin’s legendary drummer John Bonham?
Going by Paul’s statement from 1964, it appears that it was actually Ringo, not George, playing the so-called African drum, so Derek Taylor must’ve made a mistake in his liner notes.
Lennon said that “With the Beatles” showcased the ‘real Beatles’. Half of “Beatles For Sale”, including Mr Moonlight, could be seen as “With the Beatles Volume 2”.
With Lennon’s rock vocals, Mr. Moonlight is perfect inside a playlist that includes Any Time At All, It Won’t Be Long, Leave My Kitten Alone, Dizzy Miss Lizzy, Everybody’s Trying To Be My Baby, Boys, I Got A Woman, Hold Me Tight, I’m Down, Kansas City, Bad Boy, Money, Rock And Roll Music, One After 909.
Maybe, the album track listing also didn’t do Mr. Moonlight any favors. Oddly placing a ballad, “I’ll Follow the Sun”, amongst rockier tracks seems strange.
I love the song – it’s sort of an early folk rock power ballad. The Anthology version and faster Star Club version both had a simple lead guitar break, which is more ‘Beatles’ than a fluffy organ. (Maybe a cover band or fan can create a nice, clean, guitar version)
I sometimes wonder if Ringo’s percussion in this song may have influenced Paul Simon’s choice of percussion sounds (prior to ‘Graceland’).