One of Rubber Soul’s most memorable songs, ‘Michelle’ was written by Paul McCartney with a little help from the wife of an old schoolfriend.
The song was one of McCartney’s oldest, having been started in around 1959. He composed the tune on his first ever guitar, a Zenith, which he still owns.
It was OK as a first guitar. Being left handed, I would play it upside down. Everyone else had right-handed guitars, but I learnt some chords my way up: A, D and E – which was all you needed in those days. I started writing songs, because now I could play and sing at the same time…All my first songs… were written on the Zenith; songs like ‘Michelle’ and ‘I Saw Her Standing There’. It was on this guitar that I learnt ‘Twenty Flight Rock’, the song that later got me into the group The Quarrymen.
Anthology
‘Michelle’ was one of McCartney’s first attempts to play with a fingerpicked guitar style, signalling a desire to experiment beyond the boundaries of rock ‘n’ roll.
‘Michelle’ was a tune that I’d written in Chet Atkins’ finger-pickin’ style. There is a song he did called ‘Trambone’ with a repetitive top line, and he played a bass line whilst playing a melody. This was an innovation for us; even though classical guitarists had played it, no rock ‘n’ roll guitarists had… Based on Atkins’ ‘Trambone’, I wanted to write something with a melody and a bass line on it, so I did. I just had it as an instrumental in C.
Many Years From Now, Barry Miles
The French element, meanwhile, was inspired by parties held by Austin Mitchell – one of John Lennon’s tutors at the Liverpool College of Art, and potentially the inspiration behind the song’s title.
He used to throw some pretty good all-night parties. You could maybe pull girls there, which was the main aim of every second; you could get drinks, which was another aim; and you could generally put yourself about a bit. I remember sitting around there, and my recollection is of a black turtleneck sweater and sitting very enigmatically in the corner, playing this rather French tune. I used to pretend I could speak French, because everyone wanted to be like Sacha Distel…Years later, John said, ‘D’you remember that French thing you used to do at Mitchell’s parties?’ I said yes. He said, ‘Well, that’s a good tune. You should do something with that.’ We were always looking for tunes, because we were making lots of albums by then and every album you did needed fourteen songs, and then there were singles in between, so you needed a lot of material.
Many Years From Now, Barry Miles
Ivan Vaughan, who introduced Lennon to McCartney in 1957, was still a friend to the group and lived in Islington, London in the mid-Sixties. Vaughan’s wife Jan taught French, and assisted McCartney with the lyrics.
I said, ‘I like the name Michelle. Can you think of anything that rhymes with Michelle, in French?’ And she said, ‘Ma belle.’ I said, ‘What’s that mean?’ ‘My beauty.’ I said, ‘That’s good, a love song, great.’ We just started talking, and I said, ‘Well, those words go together well, what’s French for that? Go together well.’ ‘Sont les mots qui vont très bien ensemble.’ I said, ‘All right, that would fit.’ And she told me a bit how to pronounce it, so that was it. I got that off Jan, and years later I sent her a cheque around. I thought I better had because she’s virtually a co-writer on that. From there I just pieced together the verses.
Many Years From Now, Barry Miles
Jan Vaughan wasn’t the only contributor, though. John Lennon wrote the middle section, inspired by a 1965 Nina Simone hit.
He and I were staying somewhere and he walked in and hummed the first few bars. with the words, and he says, ‘Where do I go from here?’ I had been listening to Nina Simone – I think it was ‘I Put A Spell On You’. There was a line in it that went: ‘I love you, I love you.’ That’s what made me think of the middle eight for ‘Michelle’: ‘I love you, I love you, I l-o-ove you.’So… my contribution to Paul’s songs was always to add a little bluesy edge to them. Otherwise, y’know, ‘Michelle’ is a straight ballad, right? He provided a lightness, and optimism, while I would always go for the sadness, the discords, the bluesy notes.
All We Are Saying, David Sheff
In the studio
The Beatles recorded the rhythm track for ‘Michelle’ in a single take, using all four available tracks on the Abbey Road tape machines. It has been suggested that McCartney may have performed most of the instruments alone thereafter.
The initial recording took place between 2.30 and 7pm on 3 November 1965. From 7pm until 11.30pm The Beatles overdubbed extra guitars and their lead and harmony vocals.
Because it was only on four little tracks, it was very easy to mix. There were no decisions to make, we’d made them all in the writing and in the recording. We would mix them, and it would take half an hour, maybe. Then it would go up on a shelf, in a quarter-inch tape box. And that was it. That was the only thing we ever did to ‘Michelle’.
Many Years From Now, Barry Miles
They played three acoustic guitars on the basic tracks:
– Epiphone Texan acoustic (Paul)
– Framus 12-string acoustic (George)
(both on the right channel)
– Ramírez nylon-string acoustic (John)
(left channel)
Paul overdubbed the bass part and George the solo on his Casino
George actually overdubbed his guitar solos using his Gibson J-160E and I’ve seen photographs taken on that day by Leslie Bryce to confirm it.
Paul also used a capo on his Rickenbacker bass when he recorded his bass overdub.
Michelle! Title song of the 1st girl I made love to!
Everytime I hear this song, even now, my eyes tear up. I think there’s only a few groups, at time who’d even ‘dare’ to record a song like this. That’s why the album “Rubber Soul”, was pivotal in ‘The Beatles career. Yes, there would be more ballads but “Michelle” stands way ahead of the rest! Thank you John, Paul,George + Ringo! What a lovely memory for ‘all’ of my life, for all to love forever!
(My Beauty!)….
Correction: Ivan Vaughan introduced John and Paul in 1957, not 1956.
Just a lovely, lovely song… it was my mom’s favorite and always reminds me of her.
Of course it was 1957 – I knew that! I’ve corrected it now. Thanks for pointing it out.
it was one of the two song i fell in love with because i liked the names. still one of my fav girl names, the other one is Gina. Thanks Paul and thanks George for that pretty guitar part.
I was named after this song – growing up my older siblings used to play it and sing it to me – felt so special to have my “own” song 🙂 The fact that my hero came up with “I Love You I Love You I Love You” just makes it all the more special
I too was named after it…it was my mums favourite song at the time…she still calls me “Michelle..ma belle”..the year I was born 1967..it won a Grammy for song of the year!
There is no record in “Grammy” archive Michelle was awarded.
It has Grammy for 1966 by Paul McCartney only.
I was named after it as well in 1973!!
Hi Michelle… Carl, hope you’re doin well!!! Loved your comment in this section about the “Michelle” I recall
you sharing that wonderful story, just before our take.” Miss your smile!”
Same, lol. I was adopted and my birth mother told me that she used it as my middle name after the song. I can only imagine how many people were named after this song! I was born in 1968.
I read somewhere that George Martin claimed to have composed the guitar solo. George Harrison was having trouble conceiving a decent sounding solo so George Martin came up with the line we hear today.
This makes sense to me; the guitar solo is very thematic and sounds like a horn line. It’s unlike any other Harrison guitar part.
I’ve read this as well. In the end, the solo is beautiful guitar work, despite whomever composed it.
Perhaps some day you could provide this site with the source of this comment.
Sir George, on the Swedish television show, “den femte Beatlen,” claimed that he composed the guitar solo which George Harrison played: “… You know, the guitar solo in Michelle is my composition. I actually, I wrote down the notes, and I played it. ‘George, you can you do, do these notes with me on guitar; we’ll play in unison.’ That kind of thing.”
little correction : “sont des mots” instead of “sont les mots”
sorry, I’m french so it’s a little annoying!
That’s a great song, though! (with a cute accent)
Thanks for the clarification Annie. I won’t change the text, as it’s a quotation by Paul, but it’s useful to know!
You could add (sic) in the quote. 😉
Until today, I would have sworn that Paul sang “sont les mots” instead of “sont des mots” on Rubber Soul. I’ve had it wrong for 55 years. But note that he did sing “sont les mots” during his White House performance (dedicated to Michelle Obama) on June 2, 2010.
Being a bit of a pedant, I’ve often been struck that if the singer is struggling even to say “I love you” to this girl it’s a bit far-fetched that suddenly his French stretches to “sont des mots qui vont très bien ensemble”! Oh well, poetic licence!
my mom used to sing this to me and replace michelle with chel. this is definitely my first beatles song, and i’m glad of that.
In 2004 I had a premature baby girl — I was only 24 weeks pregnant and she was just a tiny little thing. I have always loved the name Michelle and so that’s what I named her. She passed away one week after she was born, and The Beatles’ “Michelle” will always be “her” song for me. It is hard for me to sing it without tears…but I love it.
To play this song correctly on guitar, capo on the fifth fret. It’s how McCartney plays it.
Sure?
So that was composed in Cm?
Surprising , but why not
Notice the unique (and effective in its surprising unobtrusiveness) second chord of the verse: Bb7. It’s the dominant seventh; it contains D natural. If you listen closely, that note is there in the backing vocal ‘ooh.’ Against this chord, Paul’s lead vocal contains Db, suggesting Bb minor. It’s both major and minor!
I wouldn’t look at that as actually making the chord different. I would look at the chord as what is being played/sung by the harmonies and the lead line as being simply a bluesy note s opposed to the expected major third. This sort of thing is always happening in blues where you can always choose to play or sing either the minor third or major third against the root of a chord (usually the tonic chord but possibly others as well). It is sort of the mystery of the blues, at least to me, how that actually sounds good. But it does. I suppose you could look at the chord as being every note being played/sung by anybody, but I prefer to think of the melody as more of a separate line on top of the harmony. Of course, there is a chord for when you have both the minor and major third at the same time, usually with the major third in the lower register. It is the dominant 7#9 chord. Most often used in jazz and in rock most well known to be used by Jimi Hendrix such as the Purple Haze and Foxy Lady sounding chord.
There are many interesting chords and progressions in this song. I explored some of MCartney’s other work (e.g. Mull of Kintyre) but couldn’t find similar stylish quality. Suggestions would be welcome! (He IS the composer, isn’t he?)
Look-up ‘Step Inside Love’ – the song Paul wrote for Cilla Black’s tv show theme. It’s a bossa nova which he challenged himself to write and the chords are special.
Well, funny you say that – he said from the future – I was playing a session years back and I heard from a musician close to Wings explain that it was a Denny Lane song, and he offered it to Paul in return to pay off some stonking tax bill. I also heard that Lane wasn’t at all happy when it went big.
No proof, just a conversation with another muso,
Marlowe,
Go and listen to Paul McCartney Home Recordings 1974 Piano Tape on YouTube, “Mull Of Kintyre” starts around 6:00 Minutes. Where is Paul was dumping out & playing the Songs that were inside of his head. When Paul played “Mull Of Kintyre”, he play ALL of the chorus. Even Denny Lane says that Paul had the chorus. Paul had the first line of the first verse and he just humming along to the second line & he had “Mull Of Kintyre” which came at the end of the first verse. I will give the first verse to Sir Paul. So, there are last two verses in question (?). And with Paul, he so prolific and he lived in Scotland in 1970’s. The Song was written as a tribute to the “Kintyre Peninsula” in Scotland.
“Mull Of Kintyre”
Recorded; August 9, 1977
Released; November 11, 1977
Sir Paul McCartney
1) He named the Song “Mull Of Kintyre”.
2) He had gotten the Group Of Bag Pipes.
3) He wrote all the music.
4) He wrote the Chorus.
5) He wrote two verses out of three.
And
Denny Lane
1) He wrote one verse out of three.
The tonal tension you get when you use minor thirds in a major key song is one of the most common expressions of the blues. It doesn’t work the other way around though; using a major third in a minor key song just sounds dissonant and “wrong”.
It seems Paul forgot about John’s contribution.
Many Years from Now should have been titled What’s Mine is Mine, What’s Yours is Mine.
Oh well, at least Paul has the comfort of knowing that his groundbreaking Wings material has his name alone attached to it.
Rachel, just try and keep your bias under control.
What contribution excactly did he forget?
The article says it was written by Paul alone in 59. He DOES mention John’s inspiration for the “French stuff”.
What’s your problem?!
Ok, you talk about the middle eight.
Please quote Paul to verify your claim: Where does he claim that he wrote Michelle alone, including the “I love you” part?
Paul did not mention that Lennon wrote the “I love you, I love you, I love you” part. It’s not paranoia or bias. Everything Lennon wrote, McCartney states “We” wrote this and that, everything Paul writes, McCartney states, “I wrote that …” There is a legitimate reason for the criticism, that’s all.
Did John Lennon mention ALL of the Contributions from Paul McCartney? From Donovan (Julia)? How about Derek Taylor (Happiness Is A Warm Gun)? Or to any another person who gave a word or a phrase or a melody line? In All of his Interviews, No!!!
The general description on the song in question and the quotes made in it are totally partial and provocative, taking into account only McCartney’s point of view and mentioning as the only collaboration of importance that of Jan Vaughan over that of Lennon himself, who is only pitifully cited in the last part of the description. Whoever did that did it in very bad faith. In late 1971 Lennon gave a series of interviews in Tittenhust Park, which appeared a year later on Hit Parader. In these interviews, he was asked to elaborate on his role as a composer within the Lennon / McCartney duo; there Lennon provided details of which songs had been composed by him, by Paul McCartney or by both. Regarding “Michelle” Lennon said: “Everyone thinks this is from Paul, it’s not true, we wrote it together.” When Paul McCartney was asked to review the details provided by Lennon, he only disagreed on one song: “In my life.” Taking into account that McCartney himself agreed with Lennon that they had both composed “Michelle”, how is it possible that after the years have passed and once Lennon is dead, he has changed his mind? Misrepresenting reality, accommodating and changing things by taking them to the side that is convenient for someone, in this case Paul McCartney and his fans, constitutes plain and simple a crime, especially considering that Lennon cannot defend himself, for reasons that have been in the public domain for more than 40 years.
Novberto Javier Alvarez;
There is more than one Song that Paul and John disagree on “In My Life” AND “Eleanor Rigby”.
And
In “Eleanor Rigby”, John Lennon LIED about that he had written 70% of “Eleanor Rigby”. John had claim in his 1972 “Hit Parader” and his 1980 “Playboy” interview.
Some Points that TELL ME that John Lennon was LYING:
1. Pete Shotton – A lifelong friend of John – He said John contribution on “Eleanor Rigby’ was “Virtually Nil”.
2. In Allen Klein 1971 “Playboy” interview – It was Allen Klein who was the one WHO INITIALLY “REMINDED” Lennon his AUTHORSHIP of “Eleanor Rigby”. “John wrote 60 or 70% of the lyric on ‘Eleanor Rigby.’ He just didn’t remember until I sat him down and had him sort through it all.”
3. George Martin has always identified “Eleanor Rigby” as a McCartney Song. Just like he always identified “From Me To You”, “She Love You” and “I Want To Hold Your Hand” as Songs Written by BOTH John Lennon and Paul McCartney. And George Martin is a Extremely Credible Source.
4. Donovan claimed that he Witnessed Paul McCartney working on “Eleanor Rigby”. Where the character name was “Ola Na Tungee”. Did anybody see Lennon work on “Eleanor Rigby”? NO!
5. William Burroughs, a friend of Paul McCartney’s recounts Witnessing McCartney attempting to write lyrics that fit the Song’s “Eleanor Rigby” already-written melody.
6. Paul McCartney said that he name the Song “Eleanor Rigby” after Eleanor Bron the leading Actress in “Help”. And “Rigby” came from the name of a store in Bristol, “Rigby & Evens”.
*But, Subconscious Paul made have remember seeing the gravesite of “Eleanor Rigby” when he was just a boy.*
7. Paul McCartney had Father McCartney as a character in “Eleanor Rigby” and decided to change it to Father McKenzie from a phone book. Paul thought that people will think that Father McCartney was his Dad.
8. Ringo added a line “Darn His Socks”.
9. Also, George Harrison added a line “Ah, Look At All The Lonely People”
10. On a Press Conferences on a American Tour it was ask what had inspired “Eleanor Rigby” and John answer “Two Queers”. What? No, it was not!
11. In 1966, McCartney told “Sunday Times” journalist Hunter Davies how he got the idea for HIS Song: “The first few bars just came to me. And I got this name in my head – ‘Daisy Hawkins picks up the rice in the church where a Wedding has been.’ I don’t why … I couldn’t think of much more so I put it away for a day. Then the name “Father McCartney’ came to me – and ‘all the lonely people’. But I thought people would think it was supposed to be my Dad, sitting knitting his socks. Dad’s a happy lad. So I went through the telephone book and I got the name McKenzie.”
12. In 2021 article in “The New Yorker” Paul McCartney confirmed that he used to go over to an old lady who lived alone and he got to know very well that her name was Daisy Hawkins.. He would go shopping for her and sit in her kitchen listening to stories. He said “just hearing her stories enriched my soul and influenced the Songs I would write”.
13. If John had written 70% of “Eleanor Rigby” then why didn’t not tell that Hunter Davies, who wrote the book “The Beatles: The Authorised Biography”.
So, “Eleanor Rigby” was Written Primarily by Paul McCartney!
And
With “Michelle”, John may have written the line “I Love You, I Love You, I Love You” BUT he did NOT CO-WRiTE (50% to 50%) the Song of “Michelle” – It was mainly written by Paul McCartney!
Who cares if George Martin `wrote’ the guitar solo. It could have been played many different ways. They way George plays it is perfect: lovely, warm, flowing.
(As an opinion only), that guitar solo makes this song along with the harmony. I think it is very important who created it since it is so influential on the song.
I always thought it was a bass solo, particular since it was such a Paul song and he was the best musician in the band. Are we sure it’s guitar in like a “cool-jazz” kind of sound, muted treble to get that smooth sound?
The soulful part Lennon wrote (“I love you I love you I love you…” etc.) is a HUGE part of this song. Break down the lyrics and find that McCartney’s part consists only of “Michelle, ma belle, these are words that go together well, my Michelle” – which, really, mean nothing. “Michelle” is just as much Lennon’s song.
Wow… The bias level is just amazing.
The rest part of the song was nothing aside from the “I love you 3X”?
Un… freaking… believable!
So the melody, harmony, lyrics, composition, arrangement, finger picking, also George contribution to the solo was nothing? Woww… just wow…
How if i say that the part of “Woke up, get out of bed”, the midde-eight part of “A Day In The Life” was the one who made the song and the rest is nothing, would you also agree to that?
The “Woke up, get out of bed…”, the midde-eight part of “A Day In The Life” was Paul contribution BTW.
Would you also agree that the rest of the song was nothing because of this, and the song is just as much as Paul song because of that?
It’s George Martin’s written part that really makes the song.
A friend of mine who speaks french said that the “bien” was pronounced in canadian accent french in this song. Is this true?
Paul actually pronounces “bien” very well, but not like Canadian French. His anglophone accent certainly plays a part in making it sound different, which is why it doesn’t sound exactly like normative Fench.
i need HELP!! How many backing vocals does michelle have? THANKS
Check the Frudua youtube – I think there are 7
in ana answer to your question, CHECK THIS GUY’S WORK: MARVELLOUS CHANNEL: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cUKinpqEeAM
Often wondered if the solo is actually played on the bass (perhaps with the capo on)?
Check the video in the article.
As I was younger I thought the two first chords of the melody would be E7 Am, but it’s definitively E7 A7. Isn’t it ? It kind of changes the perception of the tune, which acquires a “bluesy” feel that the arrangement does not suggest. The guitar solo plays a do against the A7, but not in a bluesy way. Anyone is in my tree on that ?
This song shows, again how wnderful and deep was the cooperation between Lennon and Mccartney. John made sure that this beautiful song would come to be plus adding the middle eight. One must realize that John and Paul really were partners eaven in the later years. The real magic of the Beatles is this partnership.
I totally agree with you…That partnership is what made the Beatles so unique
I agree they worked out ideas with each other more than they would admit in later years.
“but it’s definitively E7 A7.?” maybe not.
I’ve always played Am7, taken from several music scores.
The ‘C’ note fits in perfectly, both as vocal or guitar solo.
The verse is a gentle, flowing melody, and minor 7th
gives the perfect coloring. The A7 would be a little too
bluesy or harsh, besides not fitting the melody.
The middle section definitely feels good beCAUSE of the
bluesy turn.
Amazing to realize such a beautiful melody was created
back in the 50s, in Paul’s early years as song writer.
Goes to show what lengths one goes to, to get chicks…
Despite all the complimentary comments above, surely this song is one of the Beatles’ cheesiest efforts. It almost ruins one of their best albums.
Despite your opinion, surely it’s a fine effort indeed. It fits right in with one of their best albums.
If it’s cheese………It’s a wonderful stilton.
Lovely Paul McCartney composition. I love the opening guitar work. Another gem off the brilliant “Rubber Soul” album that was released 50 year’s a go this month.
Among the Beatles’ most unique strengths as artists was their musical diversity. This beautiful song, from the same guys who wrote Helter Skelter, or Tomorrow Never Knows versus Here, There and Everywhere. Incredible artistry -and respect for music.
The Beatles will always be the definitive band of all time.
The fact that we are still discussing their musical diversity is testament to this.
Will ‘Take Thatt’ or today’s over-hyped, talent free bands who copy them today be remembered by true music fans?
I don’t think so!!
Every band who came after the Beatles are just pretenders to the throne.
Why I believe the Beatles are legends:
John Lennon- a flawed and troubled soul, witty, politically outspoken and a warm heart and soul.
Paul McCartney- business-like, hard working, one of the most impressive and unique bass players.
George Harrison- a fine technician on guitar that even impressed the likes of Eric Clapton et al, witty, down to earth but spiritual.
Ringo Starr-despite anyone’s comments regarding his drumming, was actually another fine technician on his instrument (tomorrow never knows is proof of this)! Witty and very affable.
The Beatles will forever be seen as the classical music of the 20th century.
I’m a fanatic about reading interviews where one of the Beatles reflects upon “who wrote what.” And there are definitely articles out there in which Paul mentions John’s “I love you, I love you, I love you” contribution.
Since you are a fanatic, it seems likely that you remember the sources. Please share. They would go a long way towards dispelling some of the “what’s yours is mine” rhetoric.
Here you go… from “Many years from Now”:
Paul: “The ‘I love you, I love you, I love you’ wasn’t in the original. The original was just the chorus. That sounds like Nina Simone, I can see that. I’ll give him ten points for that.”
just me but does the opening guitar riff sound a bit like ‘A Taste of Honey’ by Paul Desmond?
Wow, I was just listening to A Taste of Honey and didn’t even realize how similar the two openings sound. Had to see if anybody else heard the same thing!
Usually McCartney gets the whole credit of a song he didn´t compose alone. When he started to compose the song, he got stuck and went to Lennon and asked, “where do I go from here?” Then Lennon pupped up with “I love you I love you, thats all i want to know…” and so on.
McCartney always said that he wrote the song, until he is reminded that Lennon did the middle part. Without that, the song had became without structure and tension.?
Good grief, johan. READ the whole article and try and comprehend.
Your twisting and turning and conjuring in your relentless obsession to bad-mouth McCartney would be hilarious if it weren’t just so sad.
Despite your opinion, surely it’s a fine effort indeed. It fits right in with one of their best albums.
The general description on the song in question and the quotes made in it are totally partial and provocative, taking into account only McCartney’s point of view and mentioning as the only collaboration of importance that of Jan Vaughan over that of Lennon himself, who is only pitifully cited in the last part of the description. Whoever did that did it in very bad faith. In late 1971 Lennon gave a series of interviews in Tittenhust Park, which appeared a year later on Hit Parader. In these interviews, he was asked to elaborate on his role as a composer within the Lennon / McCartney duo; there Lennon provided details of which songs had been composed by him, by Paul McCartney or by both. Regarding “Michelle” Lennon said: “Everyone thinks this is from Paul, it’s not true, we wrote it together.” When Paul McCartney was asked to review the details provided by Lennon, he only disagreed on one song: “In my life”. Taking into account that McCartney himself agreed with Lennon that they had both composed “Michelle”, how is it possible that after the years have passed and once Lennon is dead, he has changed his mind? Misrepresenting reality, accommodating and changing things by taking them to the side that is convenient for someone, in this case Paul McCartney and his fans, constitutes plain and simple a crime, especially considering that Lennon cannot defend himself, for reasons that have been in the public domain for more than 40 years.
Norberto Javier Alvarez,
“In late 1971 Lennon gave a series of interviews in Tittenhust Park, which a year appeared later on Hit Parader. In these interviews, he was asked to elaborate on his role as composer within the Lennon / McCartney duo; there Lennon provided details of which songs had been composed by him, by Paul McCartney or by both. Regarding ‘Michelle’ Lennon said ‘Everyone thinks this one is from Paul, it’s not true, we wrote it together.’ When Paul McCartney was asked to review the details providing by Lennon, he only disagreed on one song: ‘In My Life’. Taking this account that McCartney himself agreed with Lennon that they both composed ‘Michelle’, how is this possible that after years have passed and once Lennon is Dead, he has changed his mind????”
John Lennon Interview 1972 Hit Parade Magazine (A Section) –
This is what it really said – A list of songs and you get to –
“Norwegian Wood”: Me but Paul helped me on the lyric.
“Michelle”: Both of us. I wrote the MIDDLE with him.
“What Goes On”: Me. A very good song of mine. Ringo and Paul wrote a new middle eight together when we recorded it.
Paul McCartney thinking that is the MIDDLE EIGHT on “Michelle” “I Love You, I Love You, I Love You” which he gave to Lennon.
You are thinking specifically that Lennon helped out more? Lennon saying Middle and Paul taking that on as the Middle-Eight. I think it is the same thing. And I seriously doubt it that Lennon contribute more words.
And Paul McCartney said there were two songs “In My Life” and Eleanor Rigby” that he had a problem with.
Before ..”cheesy” became a fad term…folks enjoyed beautiful songs…Many early Beatles songs were beautiful cheesy.
Never liked it. The way Paul sings it makes it into a dreary dirge.
Opinions vary.