4.24pm
Reviewers
Moderators
1 May 2011
5.03pm
18 April 2013
Toxic34 said
I think we just have to admit to ourselves that this song will not come out. Nor, in my opinion, should it. Let’s face it, even the most hardcore Beatles fans can barely tolerate Revolution 9 , which is basically the same idea as Carnival Of Light . So if this ever came out, nearly one to one, the response would be, “this sucks so hard,” and basically vindicating George’s decision to veto the track from Anthology 2 .Of course there are some among us who would easily pay obscene sums for a real life recording of Paul brushing his teeth, like the “Weird Al’ parody sketch for “Anthology 17.”
Actually I love Revolution 9 . Not a huge fan of Two Virgins though.
"If you're ever in the shit, grab my tit.” —Paul McCartney
5.10pm
25 August 2021
Actually I love Revolution 9 . Not a huge fan of Two Virgins though.
Well, more power to you for that, naturally. In my experience, a lot of people, including my late uncle who really turned me on to The Beatles, can’t stand the track.
2.22am
25 February 2020
Revolution 9 is a top 10 White Album track idc
The following people thank Vera Chuck and Dave for this post:
William Shears Campbell8.53am
6 May 2018
Revolution 9 has its appeal.
The following people thank Richard for this post:
William Shears CampbellAnd in the end
The love you take is equal to the love you make
9.07am
17 June 2021
Revolution 9 is my least favourite Beatles recording, but it has its place.
Winner of Most Hardcore Beatles Bible Fan 2021
10.03am
9 October 2021
Rube said
Revolution 9 is my least favourite Beatles recording, but it has its place.
I actually think Revolution 9 is relatively creative, but this is probably not the right thread to talk about it.
The following people thank Let It Bleed for this post:
Rube, Richard, Vera Chuck and Dave, William Shears CampbellGET BACK IS HERE!
cool Beatles sites: good ‘ol Alan nice song-by-song and of course this place
Tied for most likely to derail a thread 2021 (don’t know how to post images on my sig, mods help)
11.48pm
25 February 2020
I do think it would be nice to get an official Carnival Of Light release, for historical reasons if nothing else
The following people thank Vera Chuck and Dave for this post:
Rube, Mr. Moonlight, William Shears Campbell7.41pm
26 January 2017
I want to hear it badly, but I doubt I’ll relisten that much. Whats The New Mary Jane and Revolution Nine are two different sides of avant garde Beatles music, both credited mainly to John. I wonder where Carnival falls on the spectrum between those two or if since Paul was apparently the mastermind, it takes a completely different approach. Either way I want to hear it. now!
The following people thank sir walter raleigh for this post:
Mr. Moonlight, Vera Chuck and Dave, William Shears Campbell, William Shears Campbell, William Shears Campbell"The pump don't work cause the vandals took the handles!"
-Bob Dylan, Subterranean Homesick Blues
"We could ride and surf together while our love would grow"
-Brian Wilson, Surfer Girl
3.29am
25 February 2020
sir walter raleigh said
Whats The New Mary Jane and Revolution Nine are two different sides of avant garde Beatles music, both credited mainly to John.
the bad side and the good side, respectively
The following people thank Vera Chuck and Dave for this post:
William Shears Campbell7.10am
14 June 2016
An unreleased song, a perfect time capsule, sitting there silently, patiently, all this time. If it ever gets released, it’s going to be a head trip.
The following people thank Timothy for this post:
Vera Chuck and Dave, Mr. Moonlight, sir walter raleigh, William Shears Campbell1.The Beatles 2.Sgt. Pepper 3.Abbey Road 4.Magical Mystery Tour 5.Rubber Soul 6.Revolver 7.Help! 8.Let It Be
9.A Hard Day’s Night 10.Please Please Me 11.Beatles For Sale 12.With The Beatles 13.Yellow Submarine
Most Avid John Fan 2020 and 2021:
6.13pm
11 November 2010
I think it’ll surface on bootlegs before Apple ever considers releasing it. ‘Course there have been so many fakes over the years that nobody will believe that it’s real.
The following people thank Necko for this post:
William Shears CampbellI'm Necko. I'm like Ringo except I wear necklaces.
I'm also ewe2 on weekends.
Most likely to post things that make you go hmm... 2015, 2016, 2017.
12.00am
30 August 2021
Rube said
Revolution 9 is my least favourite Beatles recording, but it has its place.
I wonder if Revolution 9 would be less reviled if they had put out the Revolution 1 /Revolution 9 single that John wanted and put the fast version and Mary Jane on the album instead.
That would leave the B-side of Hey Jude vacant, so maybe Not Guilty for that.
The following people thank Mr. Moonlight for this post:
Rube"Nothing is Beatle-proof."
8.48am
19 October 2021
Giles WILL do a Revolver remix album one day and hopefully he decides to do The Magical Mystery Tour as well, it’ll probably be the last of the Beatle catalog to be remixed (If he decides to do the first few albums first) so when he does, it’ll be the perfect opportunity to try and squeeze Carnival Of Light in there – and also the lond version of Flying !
That’s my last bit of hope, if it doesn’t happen we’ll have to take matters into our own hands….
The following people thank ayefookface for this post:
Rube5.09pm
25 February 2020
ayefookface said
Giles WILL do a Revolver remix album one day and hopefully he decides to do The Magical Mystery Tour as well, it’ll probably be the last of the Beatle catalog to be remixed (If he decides to do the first few albums first) so when he does, it’ll be the perfect opportunity to try and squeeze Carnival Of Light in there – and also the lond version of Flying !That’s my last bit of hope, if it doesn’t happen we’ll have to take matters into our own hands….
it was recorded during the Penny Lane sessions, so I could maybe see it being on MMT? I think I read somewhere it was considered for that recent deluxe version of Sgt. Pepper ‘s, but it was rejected
welcome to the forum btw!
4.40am
26 January 2017
A Revolver Remaster is a tough sell for fans because the album sounds so perfect, i mean its absolute perfection. Sgt Pepper , The Beatles, Let It Be all have controversial song choices or exclusions as well as multitrack tapes that can be re-applied with modern technology. I can’t get into the mind of Giles, but why would you want to mess with a recording so perfect? The perfect melding of technological and musical innovation that only George Martin could put his finger on the controls.
Edit: When i say “re apply with modern technology” I mean there was a huge opportunity during the Pepper remasters to take what everybody is so impressed by, the fact that they recorded it on a 4 track, and mixed it as if there was no track limit.
"The pump don't work cause the vandals took the handles!"
-Bob Dylan, Subterranean Homesick Blues
"We could ride and surf together while our love would grow"
-Brian Wilson, Surfer Girl
8.45am
17 June 2021
Mr. Moonlight said
Rube said
Revolution 9 is my least favourite Beatles recording, but it has its place.
I wonder if Revolution 9 would be less reviled if they had put out the Revolution 1 /Revolution 9 single that John wanted and put the fast version and Mary Jane on the album instead.
That would leave the B-side of Hey Jude vacant, so maybe Not Guilty for that.
Yes, it would be less criticised if it was the B-side to Revolution 1 . I prefer the fast version of Revolution and Mary Jane, but I’m not sure if The White Album would have made a difference with them included instead.
The following people thank Rube for this post:
Mr. MoonlightWinner of Most Hardcore Beatles Bible Fan 2021
6.09am
30 August 2021
Rube said
I prefer the fast version of Revolution and Mary Jane, but I’m not sure if The White Album would have made a difference with them included instead.
No, it wouldn’t make much difference to the album overall but Mary Jane is at least a song – if an unusual one – and the statement that John wanted to make would get more prominence – and hopefully more clarity – as its own standalone single.
The following people thank Mr. Moonlight for this post:
Rube"Nothing is Beatle-proof."
5.12pm
2 May 2013
The track was played at The Million Volt Light and Sound Rave, a public event so people who attended that, I’ve no idea how many, must have a clue. Surely playing the versions ‘out there’ to people who were at the event might identify if one of them sounds remotely what they heard in 1968? The starting point is to appeal to who actually went via social media to contact here I guess, then give ’em links to all the fakes and see if one actually turns out to be real after all.
The following people thank Old Soak for this post:
Rube4.22pm
14 June 2016
sir walter raleigh said
A Revolver Remaster is a tough sell for fans because the album sounds so perfect, i mean its absolute perfection. Sgt Pepper , The Beatles, Let It Be all have controversial song choices or exclusions as well as multitrack tapes that can be re-applied with modern technology. I can’t get into the mind of Giles, but why would you want to mess with a recording so perfect? The perfect melding of technological and musical innovation that only George Martin could put his finger on the controls.Edit: When i say “re apply with modern technology” I mean there was a huge opportunity during the Pepper remasters to take what everybody is so impressed by, the fact that they recorded it on a 4 track, and mixed it as if there was no track limit.
We need a rerelease with some session tracks though
Here | There | Everywhere
It's ya boi! The one and only Billy Shears (AKA Paul's Replacement)
"Sometimes I wish I was just George Harrison" - John Lennon
1 Guest(s)