Please consider registering
sp_LogInOut Log In sp_Registration Register
Register | Lost password?
Advanced Search
Forum Scope


Forum Options

Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
sp_Feed sp_TopicIcon
5 September 2021
Mr. Moonlight
St Peters Church
Forum Posts: 14
Member Since:
29 August 2021
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

It’s always said that what is commonly referred to as The White Album is really titled The Beatles.

For a long(, long, long) time I’ve been thinking that the intent is actually for it to be untitled.

It’s the opposite of Sgt. Pepper in almost every possible way: No imaginary band – hardly any band at all on some tracks; little reliance on studio trickery; no elaborate cover collage – in fact the closest you could get to no cover, even “The Beatles” is not printed on the original LPs, it’s embossed.

The idea that it also has no title would fit in well. Has this ever been raised with Paul?

The following people thank Mr. Moonlight for this post:

sir walter raleigh

"Nothing is Beatle-proof."

Forum Timezone: America/Chicago
Most Users Ever Online: 700
Currently Online:
Guest(s) 1
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
Starr Shine?: 16067
Ron Nasty: 11565
Zig: 9832
50yearslate: 8722
Necko: 7955
AppleScruffJunior: 7478
parlance: 7111
mr. Sun king coming together: 6403
Mr. Kite: 6147
trcanberra: 6064
Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 88
Members: 2678
Moderators: 5
Admins: 1
Forum Stats:
Groups: 3
Forums: 44
Topics: 5053
Posts: 361279
Newest Members:
Kaztiil, adamblack11, claudemarley, while_george_gently_eats, AndMyBirdCanSing
Moderators: Joe: 5253, meanmistermustard: 23961, Ahhh Girl: 20221, Beatlebug: 17669, The Hole Got Fixed: 8304
Administrators: Joe: 5253