The fifth song on Paul and Linda McCartney’s 1971 album Ram, ‘Uncle Albert/Admiral Halsey’ was issued as a single in the United States. It became his first post-Beatles number one single.
I’m pretty sure this song reflects a new nostalgia for family at a time when I had moved away from Liverpool. I wouldn’t see the family anywhere near as regularly. We might go back up for a New Year’s Eve party, but in general, I’d moved away from all that. It had just gone. Of all The Beatles, I was the only one who did go back. The others hardly ever went back.By this stage, I’m imagining Uncle Albert as a character in a playlet, and then I go into character – a very arrogant posh guy, instead of just a little kid from Liverpool. The shift of accent is enough. ‘Hands across the water/Heads across the sky’ refers to Linda and me being American and British.
The Lyrics: 1956 To The Present
The song was partly inspired by Albert Kendall, who had worked with McCartney’s father Jim at Liverpudlian cotton merchants A Hannay & Co. Kendall was a clerk at the business, and subsequently married Jim’s sister Milly, making him Paul’s uncle Albert.
I had an uncle – Albert Kendall – who was a lot of fun, and when I came to write ‘Uncle Albert/Admiral Halsey’ it was loosely about addressing that older generation, half thinking ‘What would they think of the way my generation does things? ‘That’s why I wrote the line ‘We’re so sorry, Uncle Albert’. There’s an imaginary element in many of my songs – to me, Admiral Halsey is symbolic of authority and therefore not to be taken too seriously. We recorded it in New York and George Martin helped me with the orchestral arrangement. I was surprised when it became a big hit.
Wingspan: Paul McCartney’s Band On The Run
McCartney also suggested that the Admiral Halsey in the lyrics was loosely based on World War II US Naval officer Fleet Admiral William Frederick Halsey Jr, commonly known as Bill or Bull Halsey. “As for Admiral Halsey, he’s one of yours, an American admiral,” McCartney said.
Admiral William Halsey Jr. was an historically important person who was appointed commander of the US Third Fleet in 1944. I don’t know exactly why he made his way into the song. I must have been reading about him somewhere.
The Lyrics: 1956 To The Present
‘Uncle Albert/Admiral Halsey’ was one of the few songs on Ram about which John Lennon spoke favourably. although he was disparaging about its multi-part arrangement.
I thought it [Ram] was awful! McCartney was better because at least there were some tunes on it, like ‘Junk’. I liked the beginning of ‘Ram On’, the beginning of ‘Uncle Albert’ and I liked some of ‘My Dog’s Got Three Legs‘. I liked the little bit about ‘Hands across the water’, but it just tripped off all the time. I didn’t like that a bit!
As suggested by the title, ‘Uncle Albert/Admiral Halsey’ was a song in two distinct halves, but contained several more unfinished fragments of tunes that McCartney weaved together. The song comprises 12 separate sections, some of which are repeated during the course of the song.
I like that format. There was an album that came out in the sixties called A Teenage Opera and it had a couple of songs where there were different sections all put together, it wasn’t a usual rock ‘n’ roll record. This was more operatic in its form and I always liked that. You sometimes want to change something, you want to write a ballad, or you’re feeling a rocking thing, or sometimes a folk thing and then you want to put them together. It’s a format that I really enjoy writing, because it allows you to stretch. It’s something that I use quite often, like in ‘Band On The Run’.‘Uncle Albert’ was a little message to my real Uncle Albert – it was symbolising my family, basically saying ‘I’m so sorry I don’t live up there anymore, and I’ve got a completely different lifestyle to all you guys. I’m sorry, Uncle Albert!’ Like a tongue-in-cheek apology, and then with Admiral Halsey, well, it just all went mad after that when he entered the picture. Again, we come back to the word free – it was very free and that made this record very enjoyable.
paulmccartney.com
The mid-tempo opening two minutes are McCartney at his most melodious, showing doubters that his songwriting skills hadn’t died with The Beatles. It also featured the New York Philharmonic Orchestra, arranged by The Beatles’ producer George Martin.
The song’s second half featured the ‘Admiral Halsey’ motif, three instances of the “Hands across the water/Heads across the sky” refrain, and the “Live a little, be a gypsy, get around” passage. The outro alone is in two distinct parts, the first with country and western guitar licks, moving into a segue that marks the beginning of ‘Smile Away’.
Well, we worked at it. Because that’s what you do when you work on a record, you want it to sound right. Linda told me that she used to be a member of a glee club in America, when she was in college. Like the TV series Glee! I’d never heard of a glee club before, because in Britain we didn’t have that, and she explained that they would sing together and they used to go to a bell tower at the school because it had a good acoustics. She knew certain things about it, so when it came to writing and recording, she would naturally just sing a harmony or I would suggest one and we’d harmonise at home. Then when we would get into the studio, we’d work a little bit harder to try and get it right.Looking back at the records we made together, I think our harmonies were a really individual sound, and a very special sound. Probably because she wasn’t a professional singer, that gave her an innocence to her tone that comes through on the records. I’d be singing ‘hands across the water’ and she’d echo ‘water, water’ and do this funny little American accent, and we’d put it in! We were having fun.
paulmccartney.com
‘Admiral Halsey’ was notable for its production, which contained various sound effects: rain, a vocal approximation of a telephone tone, sea birds and wind. Paul and Linda also demonstrated their best upper class English accents (“We haven’t done a bloody thing all day”; “Butter pie?”).
If you listen carefully, you’ll hear Paul gurgling right before the telephone voice comes in. That sound was his imitation of a British telephone ring. He was supposed to give the engineer a cue when he wanted the lowpass filter dropped in for the Admiral Halsey character. The engineer made the switch too early and the filter came in on one of the gurgles! Paul didn’t care, though. To him, it was all about the feel of the music.
Mix magazine
Fascinating detail about that filter effect on the final fake telephone ring – it functions just like a sudden cut in a movie, unintended or not. A “happy accident” worthy of the Beatles!
Am I the only one that hears Paul doing a bit of John Cleese in this song
Nope, I hear it too!
No, you hear nothing of the sort. Cole Porter is the person he’s channelling, not John Cleese. As if. Too much ignorance on these boards.
And too many intolerant, egotistical pricks!
I was thinking the same thing as I listened to the song but an hour ago. Intentionally or not, Paul sounds very much like John Cleese in that passage.
NNo you are not. Have always looked for a cameo credit for J.C.
Look this isn’t an Argument!
I’m very sorry but you didn’t pay. 🙂
I always thought it sounded like Cleese
Cette chanson est, et de loin, une des plus belles de son époque.
Paul McCartney is the best musician in the world! The only thing you did wasn’t Yesterday! Kudos Paul! Keep going!! Buddy Haughwout!
John Lennon was so jealous and bitter at Paul’s genius and talent, that he just couldn’t help himself with the constant bashing of his musical soulmate. I think that Lennon recognized that McCartney, who loved, admired and hero worshipped him as a teen and young adult, started to catch up, then surpass Lennon with his songwriting skills, that Lennon feared that McCartney wouldn’t need/want him anymore, so Lennon just criticized and put down just about everything Paul did, running to the press and running off at the mouth, with the music press poison pens dripping and at the ready, to heap vitriol at McCartney’s works, as if THEY could create anything better musically themselves.(unlikely)
I think that John truely loved Paul, but was just too envious and wanted to ALWAYS to be perceived as the best……but he wasn’t.
Sorry but John was a music genius too and there are countless great examples of this during his Beatles years,and some during his solo career.Please go listen to his beautiful,brilliant music in his 1974 song, Number 9 Dream, the music is beautiful and brilliant with beautiful melodies and harmonies and John’s usual beautiful singing voice.John produced and arranged this song by himself and the very good album it’s on,Walls and Bridges too. And John’s beautiful Hawaiian type music in this song, You Are Here, from his Mind Games album.
Lennon´s critique of McCartney´s material was almost always fair. He knew what he was talking about. I agree totally with the Lennon citation above, about Uncle Albert and the Ram and McCartney LP:s.
Lennon was better than McCartney at hearing if the basic material of a song was good or not. He was able to think past, and not be fooled by, a slick production.
I really think Lennon wanted McCartney to make good and fully developed songs and was disappointed when he almost never did.
When Paul almost never wrote good and fully developed songs? Paul wrote *many* of these in his early solo/Wings career.And John didn’t always write these type of songs in his solo career either.
On the McCartney LP Maybe I´m amazed and Every night are really good. That would be something is good but definitely not fully developed.
Junk is okay but melodically too predictable. That goes for Teddy boy to. whch does not have very good lyrics, because McCartney did not bother to develop it or did not understand that he should do so.
Man we was lonely has good verses but a rather tedious chorus. The two parts differ too much emotionally to fit together.
Kreen Akrore is interesting but not a real song. What else is there on that LP? Not much.
Ram is even worse: Uncle Albert is good, as is the verse-refrain in The back seat of my car, but that is all, in my opinion.
Wild life is a right out terrible LP. Red rose speedway has the not so bad, but also not very good, My love and When the night.
Band on the run is overrated. The two first parts of the Band on the run song are good as is Denny Laines No words, but the rest of the songs are mediocre compared to McCartney´s Beatles production.
Venus and Mars… I can´t be bothered. Speed of Sound has Let ’em in which is not so bad.
London Town, Back to the egg, McCartney II… Not much substance there.
Tug of war is a good LP in many ways, for a change.
Pipes of peace is not very good. And so on.
I think you’re right. Uncle Albert, as even Paul admitted, was a collection of odds and ends of bits and pieces sewn together to make a song. John saw right through it and called him on it, mentioning what he liked and what he didn’t. John could be very unfair sometimes, but on this count he was just calling it like he saw it.
…and obviously, Lennon’s critique of this song was right on…. NOT!! This was a huge hit. It was odd, and a little goofy, but very much like many Beatles songs. It’s a shame John had to be so critical/jealous.
I really like Uncle Albert, but Paul should not have coupled it with Admiral Halsey, as this is a lesser song.
have to agree , i remember throwing RAM in the garbage, awful album , with the exception of uncle Albert and one or two others like too many people . . red rose speedway , just terrible . actually i never kept any of paul’s solo albums. but they all did have a few masterpieces on each one . but mostly just elevator music on them . having said that , Lennon should have kept his mouth shut . he had alot of bad things to say about alot of people .I remember when he said cancer had whipped John wayne , well i guess he got whipped to . At least Paul was cool and just did his own thing .
If you think John knew whether a basic song was any good or not, then God knows why he wrote Woman is the N of the World. McCartney’s judgement was affected by too much weed, not the presence or absence of Lennon.
At the end of the day, the ultimate judge of music is the public, regardless of how many experts pontificate over its intrinsic worth. (If this were not true, “Happy Birthday to You” would have sunk faster than a Led Zeppelin. I dislike the cheesy world music “You’re The Voice” more than any other song, but am prepared to admit the majority rules on this piece). No music would ever be released, except to the eclectic philosophical cognoscenti to argue over to their hearts’ content.
Surely you realize there is no objective determination on whether a song is “good” or not. Some people will enjoy it and some won’t. This song went to number one, so quite a lot of people enjoyed it. Simple as that.
Perhaps people hear John Cleese because the whole thing sounds like something from Monty Python and I love it.
Maybe it’s just me but this song just screams John. I know that Paul had an Uncle Albert who this was suppose to be about and maybe to some extent it was. To me however, “Albert” is John, who at the time was referring to himself as a genius (like Albert Einstein) and he, John, was so busy rubbing his “love cloud” goings on with Yoko in Paul’s face as if to say “I don’t need you anymore, I have Yoko” Paul hits back with, in essence, “Sorry, I’m too busy for you, I’ve got to check on tea” (We’re so easily called away)
The ending part makes me think of Yoko “Little, little be a gypsy get around…”) The whole tune is extremely clever but it is a dig at both Lennon and Ono. At least that is what I get from it. Love it though.
Nah. McCartney explicitly stated what the song’s about – nothing to do with J & Y. That’s your imagination running amok.
Because Paul and other musicians will openly admit every detail about every word put into a song, especially if its a dig at former bandmates…right?
One of my favorite songs by paul. What a genius.
I’ve always loved the song! One of my favorite along with Magneto from Venus and Mars. Love you Paul!
I too like Magneto and Titanium man, though the lyrics is silly.
That’s Paul all over — genius melodies, juvenile lyrics.
I’m dying to know “What is that sound effect when he says the word “wa-ter”?? The song Admiral Hasley? For several years I wanted to know how did that weird vocal effect..”Land, across the water “wa-ter”, land across the sky”…
That was Linda McCartney’s vocal, “water”, and it was passed through modulated reverb and mixed in separately from the main backing track.
Who does the voice over on the talking part? Sounds like John Cleese. Is it?
Certainly sounds like Paul, no?
McCartney made a mistake when coupling Uncle Albert with Admiral Halsey. The former is much better and one should never connect a good to a lesser song.
I don’t like the combination either. I’d have much preferred a “full” Uncle Albert beautiful ballad, and a separate “full” Admiral Halsey comedy/weird song.
Other McCartney songs are medleys, but there isn’t the same tonal clash (Band on the Run, You never give me your money, Golden Slumbers/Carry that weight/The end etc)
Lennon´s critique of McCartney´s material was almost always fair. He knew what he was talking about. I agree totally with the Lennon citation above, about Uncle Albert and the Ram and McCartney LP:s.
Ram has been critically reappraised in the last few years. I’d say it was John who got it wrong. Much of Paul’s solo work has better stood the test of time in my opinion. That said, I’m not keen on this song. I never liked Paul’s silly voice songs or Linda’s singing when she yells ‘hands across the waterrr’. She does it in other songs too.
How do we know that John didn’t any influence in the “Uncle Albert” song? And in meaning representation was Einstein. I understand Paul’s comments concerning his uncle and Admiral Halsey. But very deep in my gut something tells me that John had a bit of influence for his own reasoning. They both may of agreed on the lyrics for separate reasons. John was a visionary and Paul would take an idea from time to time I’m sure. Not saying Paul to be fair was a ladder stepper for his own reasons, but was an amazing artist himself but was the first to be the business man.
I had the 45 back in the day. This is just a fun listen, nothing spectacular or meaningful. Not a great piece of art, but one to just hum or sing to, however meaningless the lyrics are.
And then I’ll put a flower right over here, magnificent work of art.
It’s a cute collection that has stood the test of time. It had to be done exactly that way.
The claim that this song was the first number one song by an ex-Beatle is factually incorrect. George Harrison was the first ex-Beatle to score a number one hit in 1970 with “My Sweet Lord”. This song hit number one in 1971.
Interesting fact: George was also the last Beatle to score a number one hit. The final number one for any former Beatle was in 1988 with “Got My Mind Set on You” by George.
I didn’t claim it was the first Beatles solo number one. The article says: “It became his first post-Beatles number one single”, and that it was “the first in a string of McCartney’s number one singles throughout the 1970s and 80s”. Those are both correct.
I got this single at the time and remember the video of it on the JPM tv special. I always enjoyed his various medleys and the way he transitioned the song parts and especially enjoyed his imitation of a British telephone here. I notice there’s usually always the same folks regularly bashing Paul and his music on this site and referencing the perfect John who who never attempted a song like this or many of the other types of songs on Ram say like “Dear Boy” with its complex vocal overlays. Had John paid more attention to his own music rather than to regularly bashing Paul’s in the seventies, John could have accomplished so much more musically in his short time left.