Log In
Register
6.35pm
30 August 2013
Offline
mod note: A couple of duplicate threads on this topic exist elsewhere on the forum so this thread has been locked. One (also now locked) is here; the other, in which you can also continue the discussion, can be found here.
So I was searching the web and happened to come across a discussion on what would the world be like if The Beatles had never existed
A lot of people were saying ‘There would have been another big hit band instead of them’
If so, do you really think they would have accomplished as much? Would this other band have went from Rock pop to Psychedelic to Soft rock etc?
Would they have been so prolific? What if they had only lasted as long as the height of Beatlemania?
This proves we are so lucky that The Beatles were born
Favourite band: The Beatles
Favourite song: Yesterday
Favourite album: Rubber Soul
Favourite member: Paul McCartney
10.51pm
Reviewers
29 August 2013
Offline There have been a lot of bands who sell lots of records, but I think it was a combination of the 4 personalities, massive talents and the times that led to the whole Beatles phenomenon – so I disagree with the premise. If this mythical other band would have occurred, then they would have also occurred when the Beatles did – maybe they are the Stones, who had a big impact but just not as big?
==> trcanberra and hongkonglady - Together even when not (married for those not in the know!) <==
4.32pm
30 August 2013
Offline trcanberra said
There have been a lot of bands who sell lots of records, but I think it was a combination of the 4 personalities, massive talents and the times that led to the whole Beatles phenomenon – so I disagree with the premise. If this mythical other band would have occurred, then they would have also occurred when the Beatles did – maybe they are the Stones, who had a big impact but just not as big?
Oh yeah! I hadn’t thought about bands who actually did exist and were pretty big lol :p
Favourite band: The Beatles
Favourite song: Yesterday
Favourite album: Rubber Soul
Favourite member: Paul McCartney
4.34pm
Moderators
Members
Reviewers
20 August 2013
Offline TheBeatlesJohn said
trcanberra said
There have been a lot of bands who sell lots of records, but I think it was a combination of the 4 personalities, massive talents and the times that led to the whole Beatles phenomenon – so I disagree with the premise. If this mythical other band would have occurred, then they would have also occurred when the Beatles did – maybe they are the Stones, who had a big impact but just not as big?Oh yeah! I hadn’t thought about bands who actually did exist and were pretty big lol :p
I think this forum is so neat in the way it helps youth and experience come together. We have so much we can learn from each other.
Can buy Joe love! Amazon | iTunes
Check here for "how do I do this" guide to the forum. 
(2017) 
(2018)
10.41am
2 January 2017
Offline
I reckon the Dave Clark Five or The Hollies or a band similar to them would have still sparked off a British Invasion somehow, someway, but probably a little earlier or later than The Beatles did. Maybe a British Invasion never would have even happened, meaning Elvis and other veteran artists careers might have disintegrated a lot slower than they did. Just my opinion.
"Some kind of happiness is measured out in miles... "
2017:
11.00am
1 November 2013
Offline 
Maybe the origonal beatles could be super heroes instead of musicians.
The following people thank Starr Shine? for this post:
SgtPeppersBulldog
11.18am
2 January 2017
Offline Starr Shine? said
Maybe the origonal beatles could be super heroes instead of musicians.
Peaceman? @Ahhh Girl
The following people thank SgtPeppersBulldog for this post:
Ahhh Girl, WeepingAtlasCedars"Some kind of happiness is measured out in miles... "
2017:
