Log In
Register
7.19pm
28 February 2016
Offline
Example
https://www.youtube.com/watch?.....38;index=9
list=PLkjgqG82wWaOGzGG6FuJUG1SShZhMSR6h&index=20
I think this could be a great way to get The Beatles music introduced to a new generation and of course they'd go back to hearing the original songs but it allows The Beatles' music to be played in settings that it wouldn't normally be played
7.30pm
Reviewers
17 December 2012
Offline
No, and am still yet to.
Atrocious, in my humble opinion.
The following people thank Ron Nasty for this post:
WeepingAtlasCedars, Beatlebug, The Hippie Chick"I only said we were bigger than Rod... and now there's all this!" Ron Nasty
To @ Ron Nasty it's @ mja6758
The Beatles Bible 2020 non-Canon Poll Part One: 1958-1963 and Part Two: 1964-August 1966
7.32pm
28 February 2016
Offline Ron Nasty said
No, and am still yet to.Atrocious, in my humble opinion.
I had a feeling it wouldn't be to the liking of everyone, and some would find it quite distasteful but the Beatles lyrics set to music in the format of what the kids are listening to this day can only be a good thing for their enduring legacy
7.33pm
14 June 2016
Offline This is just my opinion, but I feel like all Remixes of this style sound the same no matter what song it is.
Here | There | Everywhere
The one and only Billy Shears (AKA Paul's Replacement)
2016:
2017:
"He still remains active while being away."
7.41pm
Reviewers
17 December 2012
Offline Ask @Beatlebug or @WeepingAtlasCedars or many others if they are listening to that, or had any interest in wanting to, I'm sure the answer would be no.
They are Trojan Horses devoid of the soul, spirit and beauty of The Beatles.
You do not have to, and should not, twist The Beatles music to appeal to every sub-market?
Those who need The Beatles in their lives, and will be enriched by their music, they shall find it as The Beatles left it for us to hear.
There are lots of young Beatles fans on here. They're not losing their appeal too much.
The following people thank Ron Nasty for this post:
WeepingAtlasCedars, William Shears Campbell, Ahhh Girl, The Hippie Chick"I only said we were bigger than Rod... and now there's all this!" Ron Nasty
To @ Ron Nasty it's @ mja6758
The Beatles Bible 2020 non-Canon Poll Part One: 1958-1963 and Part Two: 1964-August 1966
7.47pm
Moderators
15 February 2015
Offline 
Ron Nasty said
Ask Silly Girl or WeepyC or many others if they are listening to that, or had any interest in wanting to, I'm sure the answer would be no.
Why us? Just because we're young people? Neither of our tastes run to electronic noise, thank you very much. I'm sure there are some forum members who like to listen to that kind of music, as well as (unadulterated) Beatles, but not us.
Erm, sorry if that came off as a little brusque. It's a sore spot with me, when folk assume I am supposed to like something based on the highly irrelevant factor of my age.
Now please excuse me whilst I rinse the blood from my ears. 
The following people thank Beatlebug for this post:
WeepingAtlasCedarsit verges from the sublime to the ridiculote
New to Forumpool? You can introduce yourself here.
7.53pm
10 April 2016
Offline Ron Nasty said
Ask @Beatlebug or @WeepingAtlasCedars or many others if they are listening to that, or had any interest in wanting to, I'm sure the answer would be no.They are Trojan Horses devoid of the soul, spirit and beauty of The Beatles.
You do not have to, and should not, twist The Beatles music to appeal to every sub-market?
Those who need The Beatles in their lives, and will be enriched by their music, they shall find it as The Beatles left it for us to hear.
There are lots of young Beatles fans on here. They're not losing their appeal too much.
I agree with you completely, Ron. There's no chance in hell that you'd find me listening to this.
The following people thank WeepingAtlasCedars for this post:
Ahhh Girl"WeepyC came into the fray as the premier Jimmy Page fan, and will remain." - sir walter raleigh
2016 & 2017: 
2020: 
7.55pm
Reviewers
17 December 2012
Offline @Beatlebug said
Ron Nasty said
Ask Silly Girl or WeepyC or many others if they are listening to that, or had any interest in wanting to, I'm sure the answer would be no.Why us? Just because we're young people? Neither of our tastes run to electronic noise, thank you very much. I'm sure there are some forum members who like to listen to that kind of music, as well as (unadulterated) Beatles, but not us.
Erm, sorry if that came off as a little brusque. It's a sore spot with me, when folk assume I am supposed to like something based on the highly irrelevant factor of my age.
Now please excuse me whilst I rinse the blood from my ears.
But that was the point I was making, in response to @Bullion suggesting it could introduce a "new generation" to their music. I was merely pointing out that a new generation are doing very well at discovering their music without needing it to be messed with.
The following people thank Ron Nasty for this post:
Beatlebug, WeepingAtlasCedars, Ahhh Girl"I only said we were bigger than Rod... and now there's all this!" Ron Nasty
To @ Ron Nasty it's @ mja6758
The Beatles Bible 2020 non-Canon Poll Part One: 1958-1963 and Part Two: 1964-August 1966
8.05pm
Moderators
15 February 2015
Offline Ron Nasty coughed
But that was the point I was making, in response to Bullion suggesting it could introduce a "new generation" to their music. I was merely pointing out that a new generation are doing very well at discovering their music without needing it to be messed with.
Ah, I see. I was a bit hasty. 
My point, I think, was running along parallel lines -- that I don't normally (read: ever) listen to that kind of music, so there is no reason I would be 'introduced' to the Beatles by it.
It's a bit misleading, anyway, if you think that the first ten seconds of Here Comes The Sun (which is all I could suffer through 
) sounds like that 
and then you hear the original and it is actually 'acoustic guitars, played by people, into microphones and onto tape', to snag a George quote. 
The following people thank Beatlebug for this post:
WeepingAtlasCedars, Ahhh Girlit verges from the sublime to the ridiculote
New to Forumpool? You can introduce yourself here.
8.17pm
14 June 2016
Offline Silly Girl said
Ron Nasty said
Ask Silly Girl or WeepyC or many others if they are listening to that, or had any interest in wanting to, I'm sure the answer would be no.Why us? Just because we're young people? Neither of our tastes run to electronic noise, thank you very much. I'm sure there are some forum members who like to listen to that kind of music, as well as (unadulterated) Beatles, but not us.
Erm, sorry if that came off as a little brusque. It's a sore spot with me, when folk assume I am supposed to like something based on the highly irrelevant factor of my age.
Now please excuse me whilst I rinse the blood from my ears.
I'm a young'n and I dislike this stuff too. I feel like the more active young people on this forum dislike this stuff. Probably more of the less active young'ns might be into this stuff.
The following people thank William Shears Campbell for this post:
BeatlebugHere | There | Everywhere
The one and only Billy Shears (AKA Paul's Replacement)
2016:
2017:"He still remains active while being away."
8.24pm
14 February 2016
Offline
I... don't understand. What was so bad about the original songs that they had to be made worse? 
That weird tapping noise in the beginning is the most annoying sound though...
The following people thank Evangeline for this post:
BeatlebugI am you as you are you as you are you and you are all together.
8.39pm
Moderators
Members
Reviewers
20 August 2013
Offline We didn't get that "bump" in users after that Glee show like we thought we might. Let The Beatles music stand as is. When the time comes in their life, people will find it. If they know good music, they will be swept off their feet.
The following people thank Ahhh Girl for this post:
WeepingAtlasCedarsCan buy Joe love! Amazon | iTunes
Check here for "how do I do this" guide to the forum. 
(2017) 
(2018)
8.46pm
26 January 2017
Offline No need to tarnish the Beatles with this genre. There are real artists making electronic dance music, who actually exert musical creativity when making songs. Whoever made this remix wasn't one of those artists. I'm bothered by the entire scene. It's a little bit to aggressive for me.
Not to say that there aren't diamonds in the rough. Wyatt Estes comes to mind.
The following people thank sir walter raleigh for this post:
WeepingAtlasCedars"The pump don't work cause the vandals took the handles!"
-Bob Dylan, Subterranean Homesick Blues
"We could ride and surf together while our love would grow"
-Brian Wilson, Surfer Girl
2.14am
24 March 2014
Offline I just think the best way to introduce people to Beatles' music is by making them listen to the real Beatles music, maybe listening to a house remix of a Beatles song could be a nice introduction to house music style.
The following people thank Shamrock Womlbs for this post:
Ahhh Girl, William Shears Campbell, Beatlebug, WeepingAtlasCedars"I Need You by George Harrison"
11.45am
Moderators
Members
Reviewers
20 August 2013
Offline Paul McCartney's 'One on One' tour shattered sales record for Van Andel Arena
Beatles music played pretty true to the original is still pulling in the people. I know there have been lots of young people at the McCartney concerts I've been to.
The following people thank Ahhh Girl for this post:
Beatlebug, WeepingAtlasCedarsCan buy Joe love! Amazon | iTunes
Check here for "how do I do this" guide to the forum. (2017) (2018)
4.18pm
14 June 2016
Offline A lot of kids at school, while they aren't super Beatles fans, appreciate Beatles Music.
Here | There | Everywhere
The one and only Billy Shears (AKA Paul's Replacement)
2016:
2017:"He still remains active while being away."
6.39pm
Reviewers
Moderators
1 May 2011
Offline If given the choice between house remixes or myself being beaten savagely by a man with a club and then having to listen to it back i'd be choosing the latter as it would be less irritating and painful.
The following people thank meanmistermustard for this post:
Beatlebug, WeepingAtlasCedars"I told you everything I could about me, Told you everything I could" ('Before Believing' - Emmylou Harris)
7.28pm
8 January 2015
Offline Don't pick on the genre, pick on the remix. Remixes are lazy, do a house cover and inject some originality into it, that will be a lot better. Some genres just don't work with some songs, at least choose one that is open to that interpretation instead of just throwing a 140bpm kick behind it.
The following people thank ewe2 for this post:
Beatlebug, Little Piggy DragonguyI'm like Necko only I'm a bassist ukulele guitar synthesizer kazoo penguin and also everyone. Or is everyone me? Now I'm a confused bassist ukulele guitar synthesizer kazoo penguin everyone who is definitely not @Joe. This has been true for 2016 & 2017 
but I may have to get more specific in the future.
5.52am
22 September 2014
Offline Ahhh Girl said
Paul McCartney's 'One on One' tour shattered sales record for Van Andel ArenaBeatles music played pretty true to the original is still pulling in the people. I know there have been lots of young people at the McCartney concerts I've been to.
The reviewer at that concert seemed to like it:
Being in the same room as McCartney performed "Ob-La-Di, Ob-La-Da " Monday put me directly in the moment, the now, feeling like it's the only sing-along that matters – that ever mattered. Then he did it again for "Hey Jude ." And a third time for "Let it Be." These are the kind of songs so brilliant, simple and cherry-sweet, so ubiquitous, they've become part of our cultural DNA. People will be singing them long after you and I have crumbled to dust. McCartney's knighthood seems paltry. Sainthood seems more appropriate.
Jeez, was that review ghost written by @Ahhh Girl?
The following people thank georgiewood for this post:
Ahhh Girl, Beatlebug, WeepingAtlasCedarsI say in speeches that a plausible mission of artists is to make people appreciate being alive at least a little bit. I am then asked if I know of any artists who pulled that off. I reply, 'The Beatles did'.
Kurt Vonnegut, Timequake, 1997
9.39am
Moderators
Members
Reviewers
20 August 2013
Offline I'll never tell. 
The following people thank Ahhh Girl for this post:
ewe2Can buy Joe love! Amazon | iTunes
Check here for "how do I do this" guide to the forum. (2017) (2018)
