Please consider registering
Guest
sp_LogInOut Log In sp_Registration Register
Register | Lost password?
Advanced Search
Forum Scope


Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
sp_Feed sp_TopicIcon
Come And Get It: The Best of Apple Records
13 January 2012
10.12pm
Avatar
vonbontee
Inside an Apple Orchard in a Letterbox
Rishikesh
Members
Forum Posts: 4479
Member Since:
1 December 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

/2010/08/05/apple-records-best-of-compilation-bonus-material/

This is a nice collection - there was a lot of diversity on that label, and it's surprising that much of it was released as singles. But the elephant in the room that prevents it from being truly "the best" of Apple: There's no Beatles songs here! (Nor solo-Beatle songs, for that matter.) Not even "Hey Jude ", the biggest seller in the history of the damn label.

I can understand the reasoning behind keeping the Beatles singles separate from this release, though I wouldn't necessarily agree with it. Whose decision was this, I wonder: an Apple exec; or Paul/Ringo/Yoko/Olivia? Or a combo, or someone else entirely? Was this decision a good thing or a bad thing? Do you care at all? I'm interested in your opinions if you have them!

GEORGE: In fact, The Detroit Sound. JOHN: In fact, yes. GEORGE: In fact, yeah. Tamla-Motown artists are our favorites. The Miracles. JOHN: We like Marvin Gaye. GEORGE: The Impressions, Marvin Gaye. PAUL & GEORGE: Mary Wells. GEORGE: The Exciters. RINGO: Chuck Jackson. JOHN: To name but eighty. 

                      Von-Bontee-2017.png

https://rateyourmusic.com/~Myo.....Von_Bontee

13 January 2012
11.21pm
Avatar
meanmistermustard
Here when I am. Not when I am not.
Moderator
Members

Reviewers


Moderators
Forum Posts: 23287
Member Since:
1 May 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

 I guess the idea was to show that Apple werent just The Beatles but had other strong artists once upon a time, not that [m]any of the artists lasted for a period of time on Apple.

As for the omission I dont particularly care, and would have been more surprised if they were represented. As for where the decision came from it was probably right from the beginning of the project and The Beatles and their representitives were happy to go along with it ie couldnt care less. It may have sold a few more copies if the beatles were on it but i doubt it would have been a massive amount.

"I told you everything I could about me, Told you everything I could" ('Before Believing' - Emmylou Harris)

13 January 2012
11.35pm
Avatar
Into the Sky with Diamonds
New York
Candlestick Park
Members
Forum Posts: 1908
Member Since:
9 August 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

When we list our "Favorite 25 songs" we start by excluding the Beatles.

Apple must have done the same thing for same reason. That's my guess!

The following people thank Into the Sky with Diamonds for this post:

vonbontee

"Into the Sky with Diamonds" (the Beatles and the Race to the Moon – a history)

14 January 2012
3.15am
mr. Sun king coming together
Nowhere Land
Apple rooftop
Members
Forum Posts: 6403
Member Since:
19 September 2010
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

My guess is that EMI holds the masters, so they might have been unable to get them on, or b) they wanted to do the "Best of Apple" without removing perfectly good songs for rehashes they just rereleased.

As if it matters how a man falls down.'

'When the fall's all that's left, it matters a great deal.

16 January 2012
9.10am
Avatar
Joe
Pepperland
Admin
Forum Posts: 5121
Member Since:
31 March 2008
sp_UserOnlineSmall Online

I don't have a problem with it. If they'd put Beatles or solo Beatles songs on it, that'd mean a large proportion of buyers would be getting songs again that they already owned. Whatever they decided some people would probably complain, so Apple can't win, though I think they got it right.

Can buy me love! Please consider using these links to support the Beatles Bible: Amazon | iTunes
Or buy my paperback/ebook! Riding So High – The Beatles and Drugs

Don't miss The Bowie Bible – now live!

16 January 2012
11.14pm
Avatar
Von Bontee
A Hole In The Road
Rishikesh
Members
Forum Posts: 4474
Member Since:
14 December 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Well, I guess with ANY label sampler, you're taking the chance of some duplication - though when the label roster is largely "THE BEATLES!! and whoever else" that's more inevitable than usual, true.

My thinking is that "Hey Jude " was considered worthy of sharing a box with "Thingumybob" and "Sour Milk Sea" and "Those Were The Days" in 1968, so that - assuming there's no reason to suspect any latter-day song-snobbery taking place - including it as the lead-off track, followed by the latter three (all of which are present) would be a nice historical full-circle gesture. And of course it would help display the full breadth of the label more accurately. (As would a track or two by the Modern Jazz Quartet, but that's neither here, there or everywhere. Plus which, the MJQ didn't release any singles, as far as I can tell) But mostly I just admit that I think it'd be cool to see a compilation featuring The Beatles on it, that's my greedy reasoning.

One day, a tape-op got a tape on backwards, he went to play it, and it was all "Neeeradno-undowarrroom" and it was "Wow! Sounds Indian!"
-- Paul McCartney

                 Winner-Funniest-Post-and-Most-Creative-Contribution-2017-1.pngfunniest-post-badge2018.png

16 January 2012
11.41pm
Avatar
meanmistermustard
Here when I am. Not when I am not.
Moderator
Members

Reviewers


Moderators
Forum Posts: 23287
Member Since:
1 May 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

I like how the beatles dont appear on compilations nowadays (tho i do remember seeing a compilation album years and years ago which had The Beatles songs All You Need Is Love and Here Comes The Sun on it (and have found wikipedia has an article on that very compilation!). For me its a rare and cool stance for any group to undertake with their catalogue, that they are able to stand without appearing on some rubbish cd. And does the world need to have Let It Be on 'the best ballads in the world… ever'?

"I told you everything I could about me, Told you everything I could" ('Before Believing' - Emmylou Harris)

25 May 2020
10.36pm
Avatar
Dingle Lad
Detroit Rock Citizen
Carnegie Hall
Members
Forum Posts: 610
Member Since:
28 February 2020
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

I've always enjoyed the heck out of this. There's no need for Beatles and solo Beatle additions, unless they were on seperate discs

Sour Milk Sea is one of the lost classics of the 60s; not because George gave it away, but because this version is that good and it didn't sell squat. Jackie Lomax is backed up by the Threetles, Eric Clapton, and Nicky Hopkins and they're all on fire. 

I've never really thought about a Apple only Beatles disc but I've made a couple different Apple Solo Beatles mixes.

What is happening? And tell me how you've been.

Forum Timezone: America/Chicago
Most Users Ever Online: 700
Currently Online: Joe, Jolly Jimmy, Timothy, sir walter raleigh, Tony Japanese
Guest(s) 1
Top Posters:
Starr Shine?: 15940
Ron Nasty: 10928
50yearslate: 8628
Necko: 7911
AppleScruffJunior: 7225
parlance: 7111
mr. Sun king coming together: 6403
Mr. Kite: 6147
trcanberra: 6064
sir walter raleigh: 5141
Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 87
Members: 2591
Moderators: 6
Admins: 1
Forum Stats:
Groups: 3
Forums: 44
Topics: 4914
Posts: 351477
Newest Members:
redhed100, the_chomby, Sexy Sadie, The rose on the hill, Hello little quarrygirl
Moderators: Joe: 5120, Zig: 9812, meanmistermustard: 23287, Ahhh Girl: 19503, Beatlebug: 17352, The Hole Got Fixed: 7969
Administrators: Joe: 5120