Please consider registering
Guest
sp_LogInOut Log Insp_Registration Register
Register | Lost password?
Advanced Search
Forum Scope


Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
sp_Feed sp_TopicIcon
Best solo albums the first ones after Let It Be?
10 January 2014
11.48am
Avatar
Ron Nasty
Apple rooftop
Members

Reviewers
Forum Posts: 12534
Member Since:
17 December 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

meanmistermustard said
The question was “Best solo albums the first ones after Let It Be (8th May 1970)?”.

However, trcanberra who asked the question, qualified his framing, “I chose after Let It Be  because that was when they all had the weight of doubt and secrecy lifted from them.”

Given Paul’s press release with McCartney, there can be no doubt he knew The Beatles had split at the time of the album’s release, and that saw the secrecy lifted. By the 8 May everyone knew The Beatles were no more, Paul had told the world so.

That would only put Sentimental Journey under question. On that I’d say Ringo knew The Beatles were no more, so there was no “weight of doubt”, but agree that it came a few weeks before the secrecy was lifted, which would make it an… ummm… ah…. can be argued both ways.

"I only said we were bigger than Rod... and now there's all this!" Ron Nasty

To @ Ron Nasty it's @ mja6758
The Beatles Bible 2020 non-Canon Poll Part One: 1958-1963 and Part Two: 1964-August 1966

10 January 2014
12.24pm
Avatar
trcanberra
Oz
Apple rooftop
Members

Reviewers
Forum Posts: 6064
Member Since:
29 August 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Thanks for the replies all – I was just doing some thinking out loud about whether the formal public announcement had a liberating effect on everyone, even if they knew that the end had come some time earlier – and whether that led to some of the best music of their solo years.  As it turns out, my question was not too fully thought out – but it has resulted in some interesting discussion on the music around that time.

==> trcanberra and hongkonglady - Together even when not (married for those not in the know!) <==

10 January 2014
3.29pm
Avatar
Ahhh Girl
sailing on a winedark open sea
Moderator

Moderators

Members

Reviewers
Forum Posts: 22221
Member Since:
20 August 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

trcanberra said
Thanks for the replies all – I was just doing some thinking out loud about whether the formal public announcement had a liberating effect on everyone, even if they knew that the end had come some time earlier – and whether that led to some of the best music of their solo years.  As it turns out, my question was not too fully thought out – but it has resulted in some interesting discussion on the music around that time.

Yes, it has. I love all the ideas that come from so many walking, breathing, posting Beatles encyclopedias on this forum. I’ve not ceased to be amazed.

Paul’s glad you all are concerned about keeping it real and factual here.

images?q=tbn:ANd9GcST8AULWQmnbQyLsdOU68poLGoHeIVs1AW2hC9UVxFKyCWmoUT3YwImage Enlarger

“Hell, yeah, these people care!” he can be heard exclaiming.

 

10 January 2014
6.45pm
Avatar
acmac
Royal Command Performance
Members
Forum Posts: 229
Member Since:
1 August 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

ivaughan said
 
I can certainly understand that opinion and it’s a popular one. And certainly Band On The Run is a great album and up there with the best Beatles solo album. For me personally, though, I feel that Paul lost just a little something special when he started to go the stadium-rock route which essentially began with this record. There is a kind of specialness with the first few solo McCartney albums – something about them that seems almost more authentically McCartney than anything else he ever did – that went away when he started making those bigger albums, if you know what I mean. Of course, though, there’s so much great stuff on BOTR – the title track, Bluebird, Let Me Roll It , 1985, and, yes, have to say, love Jet as well.

Well said, I completely agree. There’s an honest exuberance in McCartney I and Ram which I think got kicked out of him a little bit when they were panned. :( He was very much doing his own thing, in his own weird Paul way, which actually meant that his darker feelings and pains and insecurities peeked out more — albeit also in his weird Paul way. I find those elements lacking on BOTR, excellent though it is. He sounds a little rigid with determination, a little “gird up thy loins” — and it also feels less like a cohesive album to me. That’s why I like McCartney II and Electric Arguments so much; he’s just doin’ his weird Paul thing again. His anxieties and desire-to-please get in his way as an artist sometimes, I think. He was insulated from it with the Beatles, because he had the other lads around him and they were, you know, wildly successful.

10 January 2014
7.47pm
Avatar
Linde
The Netherlands
Rishikesh
Members
Forum Posts: 2781
Member Since:
21 November 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Yeah, I don’t even understand how there could be any confusion about that. AFTER Let it be. If you people just would’ve read the title of the thread, there wouldn’t have been any confusion.

10 January 2014
9.43pm
Avatar
trcanberra
Oz
Apple rooftop
Members

Reviewers
Forum Posts: 6064
Member Since:
29 August 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Linde said
Yeah, I don’t even understand how there could be any confusion about that. AFTER Let it be. If you people just would’ve read the title of the thread, there wouldn’t have been any confusion.

Ha ha – thanks for the support Linde.  As mja noted my hero Ringo threw a spanner in the works by having his Blues album come out so close to that event that it clouded the issue :)

 

==> trcanberra and hongkonglady - Together even when not (married for those not in the know!) <==

10 January 2014
11.25pm
whobeatle
Casbah Coffee Club
Members
Forum Posts: 20
Member Since:
5 December 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Hello all. So far as each of the 4 beatles first solo albums being their best. I would say not. Arguably, I would say the first masterpiece from each solo Beatle would be as follows

 

1-Ringo        1973

2 ATMP  1970

 

3 Band On The Run late 73

 

4 Plastic Ono/Imagine a tie, bookend albums

 

Yes Ram is great, and many fans love that album. ATMP is great, but sounds like it was recorded in a cave. All the echo and massive overdubbing sound warm and big, but lacks any transparency or clarity. Maybe the best clutch of post Beatles songs, but recorded badly too much echo. I can’t seperate Plastic Ono from Imagine , bookend albums. One produced, one just raw, but both full of personal, political, and social statements. Another factor, can we rewrite history, and add the non album singles and B sides to the proper album to strengthen them. If you add Another Day and Oh Woman Oh Why to Ram , and perhaps delete two weak songs like 3 Legs or the long one thats out of tune, you definitely make Ram a stronger LP. Ringo had no non album singles, but Back Off Boogaloo came out the year before, that would def strengthen Ringo. I don’t think Ringo has a bum track on it. Def his best album, although Ringorama and Goodnight Vienna are both good. I think Brainwashed and Cloud Nine might be just as good as ATMP . I think Walls And Bridges might be as good as Imagine or Plastic Ono. McCartney has a number of albums that arguably compete with Band On The Run or Ram

Forum Timezone: Europe/London
Most Users Ever Online: 700
Currently Online: Timpetus
Guest(s) 1
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
Starr Shine?: 16105
Ron Nasty: 12534
Zig: 9832
50yearslate: 8759
Necko: 8043
AppleScruffJunior: 7583
parlance: 7111
mr. Sun king coming together: 6402
Mr. Kite: 6147
trcanberra: 6064
Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 88
Members: 2858
Moderators: 5
Admins: 1
Forum Stats:
Groups: 3
Forums: 44
Topics: 5519
Posts: 380514
Newest Members:
katybphoto, sleeptalker, Lovethebeatles, vtrop, nickygrangery
Moderators: Joe: 5694, meanmistermustard: 24964, Ahhh Girl: 22221, Beatlebug: 18182, The Hole Got Fixed: 8410
Administrators: Joe: 5694