4.41pm
Members
18 March 2013
TheWalrusWasBrian said
If it was smaller and didn’t have the goddamn turtle neck I would buy it.
That’s Stella’s big runway problem IMO, practically everything she displays is oversized (cuffs going well below fingers, trousers edging the floor). Not flattering whatsoever. The girl trained at Savile Row, she knows a lot about tailoring, her women’s suits are fabulous yet her models look like they’re 3-year-olds dressing in mummy’s clothes.
A lot of her bespoke clothing is gorgeous yet her runway collections can be very much hit and miss (don’t start me on her shoes, I’ve written here before about how I hate Stella McCartney shoes!!).
That grey on the Yellow Sub tee is also a terrible choice. It’s hard to not make a Yellow Sub shirt look tacky but she’s managed to multiple it by 50 on the tackiness scale.
The following people thank AppleScruffJunior for this post:
Beatlebug
INTROVERTS UNITE! Separately....in your own homes!
***
Make Love, Not Wardrobes!
***
"Stop throwing jelly beans at me"- George Harrison
5.03pm
15 November 2018
But grey is the most psychadelic color there is! Clearly it was the perfect choice.
I agree with you completely ASJ
Love one another.
- - -
(I'm Fiddy, not Walrian)
- - -
2018: 2019:
2020:
5.12pm
Members
18 March 2013
50yearslate said
But grey is the most psychadelic color there is! Clearly it was the perfect choice.
I agree with you completely ASJ
You wouldn’t mind but if she had gone full Hawaiian and made it a blue background or even a clashing-green, it would at least accept it’s a stupid design and you’d be more willing to buy it for it’s full-blown tackiness (and for showing you’re a rich person).
Also @TheWalrusWasBrian do you have the couple of hundred dollars that that t-shirt will cost? It’ll surprise me if it’s less than $300.
The following people thank AppleScruffJunior for this post:
50yearslate, Beatlebug
INTROVERTS UNITE! Separately....in your own homes!
***
Make Love, Not Wardrobes!
***
"Stop throwing jelly beans at me"- George Harrison
6.17pm
Reviewers
Moderators
1 May 2011
Ahhh Girl said
“Oh,womanStella, what have you done?”That cloud. Maybe I should have posted this in the 50 Shades thread.
That’s revolting for so many reasons, tho presumably the vile turtleneck is not part of the actual item.
It’s obviously going to be vastly overpriced and shoved in a wardrobe never to be adorned by whoever buys it.
Out of interest, do any of the main items presented on the catwalk actually get worn by anyone as often they are impractical and hideous.
"I told you everything I could about me, Told you everything I could" ('Before Believing' - Emmylou Harris)
6.44pm
5 September 2017
7.59pm
Reviewers
17 December 2012
What I’ve always respected about Stella, although not a great fan of her clothes (but then they’re not aimed at me), is that she has never seemed to too overtly trade on her dad being Beatle Paul, but her Fall 2019 menswear collection (and, to a lesser extent, her pre Fall 2019 womenswear collection) has her fully trading on her Beatle connections, and her ability to get permissions others would have difficulty obtaining…
The following people thank Ron Nasty for this post:
Beatlebug, 50yearslate, Richard, vonbontee"I only said we were bigger than Rod... and now there's all this!" Ron Nasty
To @ Ron Nasty it's @ mja6758
The Beatles Bible 2020 non-Canon Poll Part One: 1958-1963 and Part Two: 1964-August 1966
10.18pm
18 December 2017
AppleScruffJunior said
50yearslate said
But grey is the most psychadelic color there is! Clearly it was the perfect choice.
I agree with you completely ASJ
You wouldn’t mind but if she had gone full Hawaiian and made it a blue background or even a clashing-green, it would at least accept it’s a stupid design and you’d be more willing to buy it for it’s full-blown tackiness (and for showing you’re a rich person).
Also @TheWalrusWasBrian do you have the couple of hundred dollars that that t-shirt will cost? It’ll surprise me if it’s less than $300.
haha no i did not mean that literally. i’ll stick with my less than ten bucks beatles Ts, thank you.
|
| I don’t know how to put it here. hello for the love of god hello
~~~
The Concert for Bageldesh
~~~
Walrian here! Not Fiddy, or anyone else, actually.
4.14am
Members
18 March 2013
@meanmistermustard said
Out of interest, do any of the main items presented on the catwalk actually get worn by anyone as often they are impractical and hideous.
It depends on what collection & designer you are looking at, Stella is a prêt-à-porter/ready-to-wear designer, what you see on the runway is what you can buy online and in shops.
Others designers do both RTW and haute couture. These are about art rather than practicality, they show what the designer can do with the human body rather than showing wearable items. An excellent example is Alexander McQueen’s (who was an absolute genius, if you ever want to watch a runway show for whatever reason, watch any McQueen from the ’90’s) ‘La Poupée’- the doll.
INTROVERTS UNITE! Separately....in your own homes!
***
Make Love, Not Wardrobes!
***
"Stop throwing jelly beans at me"- George Harrison
4.59am
Reviewers
Moderators
1 May 2011
Ron Nasty said
What I’ve always respected about Stella, although not a great fan of her clothes (but then they’re not aimed at me), is that she has never seemed to too overtly trade on her dad being Beatle Paul, but her Fall 2019 menswear collection (and, to a lesser extent, her pre Fall 2019 womenswear collection) has her fully trading on her Beatle connections, and her ability to get permissions others would have difficulty obtaining…
I don’t have or see the problem. Stella has been so successful in her own right that any rumblings of favouritism due to or trading on her dad are petty. Apple would have been happy to allow such usage due to the publicity and prestige having a designer such as Stella using The Beatles. Both sides win. The losers are anyone who knows anyone who buys and wears them as they are all horrible.
"I told you everything I could about me, Told you everything I could" ('Before Believing' - Emmylou Harris)
6.30am
Reviewers
17 December 2012
My problem, such as it is, @meanmistermustard, is that in previous examples of such clothing lines – eg. Pretty Green’s White Album 50th Anniversary Collection in association with Apple – they have always had to have a Beatles reference within the Collection title and numerous Apple references all over the publicity. I’m never keen when someone is exempted from the usual terms and conditions just because of who they’re related to.
It’s also disappointing that, after years of largely avoiding Beatles connections (she has done a few charity things that have played on Beatles imagery), within a year of buying her partner out and gaining full control of her business, she’s going down the road of Beatles-themed collections.
"I only said we were bigger than Rod... and now there's all this!" Ron Nasty
To @ Ron Nasty it's @ mja6758
The Beatles Bible 2020 non-Canon Poll Part One: 1958-1963 and Part Two: 1964-August 1966
7.49am
Reviewers
Moderators
1 May 2011
Ron Nasty said
My problem, such as it is, @meanmistermustard, is that in previous examples of such clothing lines – eg. Pretty Green’s White Album 50th Anniversary Collection in association with Apple – they have always had to have a Beatles reference within the Collection title and numerous Apple references all over the publicity. I’m never keen when someone is exempted from the usual terms and conditions just because of who they’re related to.It’s also disappointing that, after years of largely avoiding Beatles connections (she has done a few charity things that have played on Beatles imagery), within a year of buying her partner out and gaining full control of her business, she’s going down the road of Beatles-themed collections.
Maybe Apple saw the finished designs and decided that they were so hideous not even they wanted to put the Beatles references all over them.
Anyway, I’m still on the side of not caring.
The following people thank meanmistermustard for this post:
Ahhh Girl"I told you everything I could about me, Told you everything I could" ('Before Believing' - Emmylou Harris)
1.36pm
1 January 2017
8.53am
Reviewers
17 December 2012
Wednesday night (10 April), the Claypool Lennon Delirium playing the Danforth Music Hall in Toronto, joined by Rush bassist Geddy Lee, take on Tomorrow Never Knows for nine-and-a-half minutes!!!!
Gob(officially)smacked!!! Stunning!!!
The following people thank Ron Nasty for this post:
Beatlebug, QuarryMan, vonbontee"I only said we were bigger than Rod... and now there's all this!" Ron Nasty
To @ Ron Nasty it's @ mja6758
The Beatles Bible 2020 non-Canon Poll Part One: 1958-1963 and Part Two: 1964-August 1966
11.33am
1 December 2009
So I guess you’re officially a Rush fan, now, EH?
The following people thank vonbontee for this post:
BeatlebugGEORGE: In fact, The Detroit Sound. JOHN: In fact, yes. GEORGE: In fact, yeah. Tamla-Motown artists are our favorites. The Miracles. JOHN: We like Marvin Gaye. GEORGE: The Impressions PAUL & GEORGE: Mary Wells. GEORGE: The Exciters. RINGO: Chuck Jackson. JOHN: To name but eighty.
11.52am
Reviewers
17 December 2012
@vonbontee said
So I guess you’re officially a Rush fan, now, EH?
Erm, no change. I’ve never suggested the members of Rush couldn’t play their instruments, weren’t to be admired for how well they could play their instruments, but have suggested that the music they wrote and performed, their canon, has never caught my interest.
The above above is a cover of perhaps the hardest Beatles track to do justice to live, the drums alone being daunting enough.
A nice spacey vocal and psych lead guitar from Sean, Les and Geddy trading bass, those drums mighty, the band slowly disappearing to roadies and feedback.
Who’s EH? I do prefer RN!
The following people thank Ron Nasty for this post:
vonbontee, Beatlebug"I only said we were bigger than Rod... and now there's all this!" Ron Nasty
To @ Ron Nasty it's @ mja6758
The Beatles Bible 2020 non-Canon Poll Part One: 1958-1963 and Part Two: 1964-August 1966
1.42pm
1 December 2009
Ha just kidding…you were quite emphatic in your demand that Rush be turned down “below zero!” on the appropriate thread a couple of months ago, I thought the sudden invocation of Geddy Lee was kinda funny. But yeah, cool performance.
(“EH” should’ve been “eh?”, i.e. something a Canadian would likely say. I should’ve corrected that )
The following people thank vonbontee for this post:
Beatlebug, QuarryManGEORGE: In fact, The Detroit Sound. JOHN: In fact, yes. GEORGE: In fact, yeah. Tamla-Motown artists are our favorites. The Miracles. JOHN: We like Marvin Gaye. GEORGE: The Impressions PAUL & GEORGE: Mary Wells. GEORGE: The Exciters. RINGO: Chuck Jackson. JOHN: To name but eighty.
8.13pm
Moderators
15 February 2015
@QuarryMan said somewhere I am not derailing
I suppose, but then again you are doing that with the knowledge that Clapton was one of the most significant musicians of the era. He was famous on his own merit before he met George, whereas I don’t think many of the Beatlekids would have risen to fame without their parentage.
Eh, sure. I don’t really care about that element personally when it comes to my liking something.
The following people thank Beatlebug for this post:
QuarryMan([{BRACKETS!}])
New to Forumpool? You can introduce yourself here.
If you love The Beatles Bible, and you have adblock, don't forget to white-list this site!
8.25pm
Reviewers
17 December 2012
It’d be like turning ’round and saying, “His dad was a good baker, loved his bread, but his dad’s bread was so good I’ll not bother tasting his bread because I probably wouldn’t know about him making bread if his dad wasn’t such a great baker.” Or something like that.
You’re missing some great, interesting and challenging music should you not investigate the music careers of Sean Lennon and Dhani Harrison, @QuarryMan, both of whom are always interesting and often surprising.
The following people thank Ron Nasty for this post:
Tangerine, Beatlebug, QuarryMan"I only said we were bigger than Rod... and now there's all this!" Ron Nasty
To @ Ron Nasty it's @ mja6758
The Beatles Bible 2020 non-Canon Poll Part One: 1958-1963 and Part Two: 1964-August 1966
8.53pm
Moderators
15 February 2015
^Spot on, RN. (Especially because those are the two Beatlekids whose music I’ve actually heard and liked. )
([{BRACKETS!}])
New to Forumpool? You can introduce yourself here.
If you love The Beatles Bible, and you have adblock, don't forget to white-list this site!
5.41am
26 January 2017
Ron Nasty said
It’d be like turning ’round and saying, “His dad was a good baker, loved his bread, but his dad’s bread was so good I’ll not bother tasting his bread because I probably wouldn’t know about him making bread if his dad wasn’t such a great baker.” Or something like that.You’re missing some great, interesting and challenging music should you not investigate the music careers of Sean Lennon and Dhani Harrison, @QuarryMan, both of whom are always interesting and often surprising.
I will be sure to give them my full attention at some point, but it’s really a question of priorities for me because since I’m not really a Beatles completist like a lot of people here, I’m just more interested in investigating new genres I haven’t explored before and that sort of thing. Also, bear in mind that I made those comments with regard to Julian’s music which I’m not a fan of.
The following people thank QuarryMan for this post:
BeatlebugI've been up on the mountain, and I've seen his wondrous grace,
I've sat there on the barstool and I've looked him in the face.
He seemed a little haggard, but it did not slow him down,
he was humming to the neon of the universal sound.
1 Guest(s)