Log In
Register
9.42pm
18 April 2013
Offline
http://www.washingtonpost.com/…..story.html
This editorial by a musician in the Washington Post whines about how popular the Beatles are even after all these years and says it’s time we all stopped loving them for a change. It mentions a book about how the Beatles destroyed Rock and Roll, in which the author laments that 12 year olds have nothing better to listen to than The Beatles these days.
I wonder if the author of this editorial would be interested to know that I, an avid music fan who has followed indie rock for the last twenty years, have started listening to The Beatles and find them infinitely more satisfying than 90% of the music that is being recorded today. I believe that The Beatles are still popular today because the quality of contemporary music is diminishing, and The Beatles represent a pinnacle of achievement.
12 years olds hear it. I hear it. What’s wrong with this guy’s ears?
"If you're ever in the shit, grab my tit.” —Paul McCartney
10.59pm
14 December 2009
Offline
Well, he’s “Justin Moyer, a musician” so he must know what he’s talking about. /sarcasm
Paul: Yeah well… first of all, we’re bringing out a ‘Stamp Out Detroit’ campaign.
11.08pm
21 November 2012
Offline I love how all the comments on the article on the website itself are negative too. Dafuq is even his point? One of the most ridiculous articles I have ever read. Fail.
11.15pm
Reviewers
Moderators
1 May 2011
Offline He might as well of shouted “hey, over here, Look At Me !!!!. Here I am, woo-hoo!!” and done a dance naked.
"I told you everything I could about me, Told you everything I could" ('Before Believing' - Emmylou Harris)
12.09am
1 November 2012
Offline Von Bontee said
Well, he’s “Justin Moyer, a musician” so he must know what he’s talking about. /sarcasm
We need to stop having musicians named “Justin”. I think I’ll write an editorial making that case… 
Faded flowers, wait in a jar, till the evening is complete... complete... complete... complete...
3.37pm
21 November 2012
Offline meanmistermustard said
He might as well of shouted “hey, over here, Look At Me !!!!. Here I am, woo-hoo!!” and done a dance naked.
At least that would’ve been slightly entertaining. And if he’d have a nice body, at least we’d have something to look at.
6.36pm
5 November 2011
Offline I don’t understand what the point was. The Beatles were a really fantastic band, is everybody supposed to forget about them and stop listening just because they’re old?
All living things must abide by the laws of the shape they inhabit
6.44pm
16 August 2012
Offline This is just an example of a Millennial rebelling against his parents.
E is for 'Ergent'.
8.22pm
14 December 2009
Offline 
Grandparents too, maybe.
Funny Paper said
Von Bontee said
Well, he’s “Justin Moyer, a musician” so he must know what he’s talking about. /sarcasmWe need to stop having musicians named “Justin”. I think I’ll write an editorial making that case…
Well, as far as (my fellow Ontario native) Bieber is concerned, try making the case for him as a musician first.
Paul: Yeah well… first of all, we’re bringing out a ‘Stamp Out Detroit’ campaign.
2.16pm
Reviewers
29 November 2012
Offline
What a twat the author of that article is. What is this, 1965? “12 yr olds have nothing better to listen to than the Beatles?” Well, on that he’s right, most modern music is total shit! 
But who can argue with this turd of wisdom in the article?:
“When headshots of John, Paul, George and Ringo — two deceased, two septuagenarians — adorn adolescents’ walls from 1963 to 2013, something is either wrong with pop culture or wrong with teenagers”
That’s more an indictment on the absolute shit that is being produced today than anything against the Beatles. I love how almost all of the comments are destroying the idiot author, though…good stuff! 
"I know you, you know me; one thing I can tell you is you got to be free!"
Please Visit My Website, The Rock and Roll Chemist
Twitter: @rocknrollchem
Facebook: rnrchemist
