Log In
Register
1.16pm
25 August 2012
Offline
Anybody know how With The Beatles was settled on as the album’s title? It seems a little odd, as it’s a prepositional fragment rather than a complete sentence/thought/concept/etc.
11.27pm
26 March 2012
Offline
I have no idea of how it was actually settled on or whose decision it was, but I feel it has a lot to do with the “involvement” strategy that John and Paul claimed were hallmarks of their songwriting around the period. The immediate and conversational lyrics of the early pop songs intentionally invited and reached out to the listener – the “From Me To You ” factor. With The Beatles , as an album title, has a similar effect; as an incomplete sentence it drops the listener right in the middle of the Beatles experience, and suggests that the record’s content will bring him or her up close and personal to the faces on that dark and intimate album cover.
SHUT UP - Paulie's talkin'
6.36am
14 December 2009
Offline
I don’t know if they were putting much thought into their own album titles as far back as 1963, whether they were consciously considering them as part of an artistic statement, or if they even thought up those earliest ones themselves. I think Parlophone primarily wanted to make sure the titles maximized the promotional aspect by featuring the title of the hit single, movie, or just the band itself – most literally in BFS. But it’s easy for me to believe that they suggested that last one themselves, somewhat cynically. I think pop music album titles were pretty innocuous or even inane in those pre-art days. Stuff like “Dream Date With The Beatles !” would seem to be more the standard. (Still I could be wrong and maybe Ben’s right that they did put some consideration into WTB, what do I know?)
Just to change the topic a little, as far as album titles go, anbody else ever fantasize about what “Rubber Soul “, “Revolver ” and “Abbey Road ” may have sounded like if they were songs that were written and recorded as title cuts? I read a blog piece once from where some guy was talking about “12-Bar Instrumental” and he speculated on how “Rubber Soul ” may have been its working title, since the phrase was going around at the time.
Paul: Yeah well… first of all, we’re bringing out a ‘Stamp Out Detroit’ campaign.
3.31am
25 August 2012
Offline Of course, the titles of nearly all their other ‘early’ (i.e. pre-Rubber Soul ) albums are fairly obvious: Please Please Me was named for their most recent hit single, A Hard Day’s Night and Help ! were named for the movies for which their releases accompanied. And, of course, the stories behind the titles for all of their subsequent albums are all fairly well-documented. That leaves only With The Beatles and Beatles For Sale whose title origins are not entirely clear. The explanation given for the latter in its respective forum mostly makes sense given the circumstances surrounding its release, but for the former still remains the most mysterious, IMO.
5.04pm
Reviewers
14 April 2010
Offline 
All interesting explanations/theories. Also consider that back in the day, many of their influences titled albums in such a fashion. Among the ones I was able to find are The Buddy Holly Story, Coast Along with The Coasters, Chuck Berry Is on Top and Here’s Little Richard.
I’m sure there are many other examples.
To the fountain of perpetual mirth, let it roll for all its worth. And all the children boogie.
8.25pm
Reviewers
29 November 2012
Offline
Yeah, I think With the Beatles was simply reflective of the times…Zig mentioned all of those titles. There were also “The Rolling Stones NOW!” “England’s Newest Hitmakers: The Rolling Stones,” “The Who Sings My Generation,” etc. I don’t think there was any special reason for calling it With the Beatles other than it fit in with a lot of other album titles of its era. Plus it’s a cool title and a stunning album cover.
"I know you, you know me; one thing I can tell you is you got to be free!"
Please Visit My Website, The Rock and Roll Chemist
Twitter: @rocknrollchem
Facebook: rnrchemist
5.28pm
26 March 2012
Offline It seems to me though that the title being “simply reflective of the times” only strengthens my original point. So many albums of the era had these kinds of titles because they were good selling points. To take two of the aforementioned examples, “Here’s Little Richard!” and “The Rolling Stones NOW!” sound good. They are dynamic and imminent and establish a kind of co-existence, an exciting happening between artist and audience. John and Paul admitted they tried to achieve that effect with their songwriting, and “With the Beatles”, twinned with its mysterious and alluring cover, does the same.
The following people thank Ben Ramon for this post:
vonbonteeSHUT UP - Paulie's talkin'
4.00am
3 August 2013
Offline I thought it was supposed to a clever double meaning and a play on words. With the Beatles, as being with the group, and With the Beatles, like being with the beat of the music. Maybe I’m over thinking it.
The following people thank Tea and Sympathy for this post:
vonbonteeDon't you know? It's gonna be alright. (Shoo-bee-doo-wop)
4.19pm
Reviewers
14 April 2010
Offline If there were no overthinking on anything they did, we would not have a Forum.
The following people thank Zig for this post:
vonbonteeTo the fountain of perpetual mirth, let it roll for all its worth. And all the children boogie.
7.55am
3 August 2013
Offline Yeah, good point. Consider it a worthwhile contribution to the cause, then.
Don't you know? It's gonna be alright. (Shoo-bee-doo-wop)
5.37pm
2 April 2014
Offline Von Bontee said
Just to change the topic a little, as far as album titles go, anbody else ever fantasize about what “Rubber Soul “, “Revolver ” and “Abbey Road ” may have sounded like if they were songs that were written and recorded as title cuts? I read a blog piece once from where some guy was talking about “12-Bar Instrumental” and he speculated on how “Rubber Soul ” may have been its working title, since the phrase was going around at the time.
Funnily enough, I’ve been thinking that over the past few days. I’d love to have heard those as songs (along with Beatles For Sale ).
The following people thank MrMoonlight for this post:
vonbontee9.44pm
1 December 2009
Offline Yeah, really! Just imagine if they had their own theme song called something like “We’re The Beatles!” Of course that would probably be too meta and self-reflexive for any 1963 band. (On the other hand, Bo Diddley wrote about a half-dozen songs with “Bo Diddley” in the title before the Beatles were even formed, so why not?)
GEORGE: In fact, The Detroit Sound. JOHN: In fact, yes. GEORGE: In fact, yeah. Tamla-Motown artists are our favorites. The Miracles. JOHN: We like Marvin Gaye. GEORGE: The Impressions PAUL & GEORGE: Mary Wells. GEORGE: The Exciters. RINGO: Chuck Jackson. JOHN: To name but eighty.
3.13pm
22 December 2013
Offline It’s a really good question… It always appeared to me that part of the title was missing, after all… here in Canada we atleast got ‘Beatlemania! – With The Beatles ‘… My guess is (emphasis on the word “guess”) is that maybe this was even the intended title for the British release as well, but they ran out of time to cash in on the Christmas Market and just printed up what they had… There does seem to be a big white blank up there in the title margin, perhaps somebody said just move it (‘with the beatles’) over to the left and call it that… It does have an incompleat look to it when you compare it to the Canadian counterpart, which not only filled up the “big white blank up there” but even used the much larger black space below John for added liner notes…:-)
The following people thank Billy Rhythm for this post:
Father McKenzie5.11am
18 September 2016
Offline Not sure if it was any of the Beatles that came up with the title, since they didn’t want a header or title at all, just Freeman’s beautiful photo. They were overruled on the grounds that they weren’t famous enough to go without a title on the album. But of all the versions, I like the Parlaphone/E.M.I one, it’s the least intrusive.
The following people thank penny lane for this post:
Father McKenzie, vonbontee
“I know, Jerry, that you are as human as the rest of us, if not more so."
1 Guest(s)
