Log In
Register
Read the original blog post
4.45am
4 February 2014
Offline
Can someone explain the lyrics:
You and me burning matches / Lifting latches
and
Two of us wearing raincoats / Standing so low (solo?) in the sun
Thanks.
“Send John out first; he’s the one they want.”
~ someone said it, dammit.
Memphis, 1966
9.54am
Moderators
Members
Reviewers
20 August 2013
Offline I remembered this conversation on the forum.
Latch-lifter n. [Scouse (Liverpool) argot] 1. The price of admission, leading to the possibility of free rounds. 2. The HACKER effort expended to gain initial access to a site
=>The Stoic ethics of Merseyside pub crawling demands that you pay for your first bevvy (drink), figuratively "lifting the latch" and gaining a valued place at the bar as a bona-fide customer. Thereafter, endless ploys are available to sponge from friend and stranger. Thus, you may challenge all upstanding (if any) to name the last man to box Gentleman Jim (the undertaker); seek the dead center of town (Anfield Cemetery); or ask who played for both Liverpool and Everton at the same derby soccer match (the Royal Marines Band). Additionally, there are many bets you can place on factual (name the referee and linesmen at the 1913 FA Cup Final) or Smullyan-type (is A telling the truth about what B is saying about Pascal?) trivia.
Hummmm, the undertaker drew a heavy sigh seeing no one else had come.
As far as the second part of your question, I always think of it as SOLO in the sun. The Beatles are at the end and Paul and John are now going solo. I don't know about the raincoat part. If I discover anything ("I think of everything to be discovered"), I'll add it to the thread.
The following people thank Ahhh Girl for this post:
C.R.A., Beatlebug, The Hippie Chick, WeepingAtlasCedarsCan buy Joe love! Amazon | iTunes
Check here for "how do I do this" guide to the forum. 
(2017) 
(2018)
1.57am
4 February 2014
Offline Seem to recall something about McCartney writing this song with Linda in mind.
But in light of the lyrics... not sure how that can be.
“Send John out first; he’s the one they want.”
~ someone said it, dammit.
Memphis, 1966
12.17am
17 October 2013
Offline Probably bit of both Linda and John.......As I'm sure you're thinking Paul would definitely not write......'You and I have memories longer that the road that stretches out ahead' to his new wife!
The following people thank Wigwam for this post:
Beatlebug11.46am
14 March 2016
Offline Whatever the song is about, it always puts me in a mood to just go for drive.
The following people thank Reklo87 for this post:
Beatlebug"No Beatles collection is too big or age restricted!"
12.47pm
28 March 2014
Offline 
C.R.A. said
Seem to recall something about McCartney writing this song with Linda in mind.But in light of the lyrics... not sure how that can be.
In the Wingspan DVD (made by Paul), at the 8:40 mark, he say's it was Linda that gave him the inspiration for the song, when they just took off and went for a car ride.
BEATLES Music gives me Eargasms! 
1.14pm
Reviewers
Moderators
1 May 2011
Offline Bongo said
C.R.A. said
Seem to recall something about McCartney writing this song with Linda in mind.But in light of the lyrics... not sure how that can be.
In the Wingspan DVD (made by Paul), at the 8:40 mark, he say's it was Linda that gave him the inspiration for the song, when they just took off and went for a car ride.
Yeah. Paul and Linda would just jump in the car and drive to get lost and away from everything. Part of the song is obviously referring to Paul's friendship with John, the other is his travels and adventures with Linda.
The following people thank meanmistermustard for this post:
Zig, C.R.A."I told you everything I could about me, Told you everything I could" ('Before Believing' - Emmylou Harris)
8.59am
Moderators
15 February 2015
Online
I don't think I ever quite appreciated how raw this recording is until last night, I listened to it (multiple times) on headphones. You can hear somebody bumping into his mike a couple times.
Normally I am fond of audiophilic overproduction, but this song sounds really fab.
The following people thank Beatlebug for this post:
Bongoit verges from the sublime to the ridiculote
New to Forumpool? You can introduce yourself here.
10.26am
14 June 2016
Offline @Beatlebug said
I don't think I ever quite appreciated how raw this recording is until last night, I listened to it (multiple times) on headphones. You can hear somebody bumping into his mike a couple times.Normally I am fond of audiophilic overproduction, but this song sounds really fab.
mic*
Here | There | Everywhere
The one and only Billy Shears (AKA Paul's Replacement)
2016:
2017:
"He still remains active while being away."
10.49am
Moderators
15 February 2015
Online @William Shears Campbell I have it on good authority that 'mike' is a correct and accepted short form of 'microphone'.
The following people thank Beatlebug for this post:
Bongo, Little Piggy Dragonguyit verges from the sublime to the ridiculote
New to Forumpool? You can introduce yourself here.
2.43pm
10 November 2010
Offline Both are correct, I think. Scrabble takes "mike" as a word.
The following people thank Necko for this post:
BeatlebugI'm Necko. I'm like Ringo except I wear necklaces.
I'm also ewe2 on weekends.
Most likely to post things that make you go hmm... 2015, 2016, 2017. 
5.22pm
1 November 2013
Online Both are write.
The following people thank Starr Shine? for this post:
Bongo
7.51pm
5 November 2011
Offline Starr Shine? said
Both are write.
But this is not.
The following people thank Little Piggy Dragonguy for this post:
NeckoAll living things must abide by the laws of the shape they inhabit
7.16am
27 February 2017
Offline For me, Paul's voice on Two Of Us and When I'm Sixty-Four sounds quite different to the voice he usually has in other songs. It got quite obvious as he spoke at the end of Two Of Us , where his voice sounds "normal" again. Am I only imagining it or is this a special recording method or a certain way of singing?
If anyone knows, I would be glad!
Not once does the diversity seem forced -- the genius of the record is how the vaudevillian "When I'm 64" seems like a logical extension of "Within You Without You" and how it provides a gateway to the chiming guitars of "Lovely Rita. - Stephen T. Erlewine on Sgt Pepper's
10.06am
14 February 2016
Offline I've always thought his voice sounded strange on Two Of Us as well. It sounds like he had a head cold at the time.
As for the reason, the song was recorded live at Apple Studios. That might be why his voice sounds strange.
For When I'm Sixty-Four , Paul had his voice sped up so he would sound like his teenage self.
The following people thank Evangeline for this post:
Martha, BeatlebugI am you as you are you as you are you and you are all together.
11.13am
27 February 2017
Offline Ah, Thank you, it makes sense now. I didn't know that bit about being recorded live.
Not once does the diversity seem forced -- the genius of the record is how the vaudevillian "When I'm 64" seems like a logical extension of "Within You Without You" and how it provides a gateway to the chiming guitars of "Lovely Rita. - Stephen T. Erlewine on Sgt Pepper's
12.49pm
Reviewers
17 December 2012
Offline 
Available in other colours.
Yep! That's the actual Charles Hawtrey, British comic actor famous for his roles in the Carry On... films, if you don't know...
The following people thank Ron Nasty for this post:
SgtPeppersBulldog, Beatlebug, WeepingAtlasCedars, Elementary Penguin"I only said we were bigger than Rod... and now there's all this!" Ron Nasty
To @ Ron Nasty it's @ mja6758
The Beatles Bible 2020 non-Canon Poll Part One: 1958-1963 and Part Two: 1964-August 1966
12.57pm
18 April 2013
Offline I'll be buying one of those.
"This Beatles talk bores me to death.” —John Lennon
1.09pm
Moderators
Members
Reviewers
14 April 2010
Offline I just did. In blue.
Thanks, @Ron Nasty !
To the fountain of perpetual mirth, let it roll for all its worth. And all the children boogie.
1.34pm
Reviewers
17 December 2012
Offline I just love that it is cleverer than any official Apple merchandise.
If Apple was this intelligent about how they sold The Beatles, @meanmistermustard and I would have much less to complain about.
The following people thank Ron Nasty for this post:
William Shears Campbell, Beatlebug, WeepingAtlasCedars"I only said we were bigger than Rod... and now there's all this!" Ron Nasty
To @ Ron Nasty it's @ mja6758
The Beatles Bible 2020 non-Canon Poll Part One: 1958-1963 and Part Two: 1964-August 1966
