12.33pm
8 February 2022
I was struck by the intro drum fill on Drive My Car from a recently discover post of Drive My Car take 4 . It was startling because the mix on Ringo’s drum includes much more of the upper frequencies. It struck me as the sound of a car starting.
Compare it to this:
2.55am
7 November 2022
two of the repeated harmony examples are
“you can do something in between”
and
“but I can show you a better time”
I don’t know that much about music, but my sense is that two Beatles (John and Paul?) are singing two different notes in unison for these lines — and whatever the two notes are, they are only one whole step apart, like A+G. I see now that the chord during those lines is A7 with a sharp 5th (= F natural) so that kind of throws a monkey wrench into my theory: Is one of the two singers singing the weird note F? If so, what is the other note being sung in close proximity (I think a whole step — so it would be logically G)?
Or maybe it’s 3 Beatles — Paul, John & George — singing F-G-A.
Now today I find, you have changed your mind
1.50pm
Moderators
Members
Reviewers
20 August 2013
^ The original topic title for Sea Belt’s question was “Question about one repeated 2-part harmony in “Drive My Car “
Hopefully someone will come along with the answer.
The following people thank Ahhh Girl for this post:
Sea BeltCan buy Joe love! Amazon | iTunes
Check here for "how do I do this" guide to the forum. (2017) (2018)
3.15am
6 May 2018
Paul, John and George are singing three-part harmony for those lines, @Sea Belt, but I don’t know the specific notes they are singing.
Here is Galeazzo Frudua’s video about Drive My Car :
The following people thank Richard for this post:
Sea BeltAnd in the end
The love you take is equal to the love you make
4.47am
7 November 2022
Richard said
Paul, John and George are singing three-part harmony for those lines, @Sea Belt, but I don’t know the specific notes they are singing.Here is Galeazzo Frudua’s video about Drive My Car :
Thanks I’ll check out that link. My sense is that whatever the three notes are they sound clustered close together in terms of the scale, and I get a distinct sense of that sound you get when if you are in the key of A for example, you hit the notes A and G together and the effect that has on the ear. (Part of the song “Chopsticks” has that.) And since the chord is supposedly an A7 augmented (F natural being the extra note to make it augmented), the F natural would be the natural extra note for the third singer to sing.
Now today I find, you have changed your mind
4.56am
7 November 2022
5.58am
6 May 2018
6.23am
7 November 2022
6.57am
6 May 2018
@Sea Belt, Drive My Car is definitely in the key of D Major.
That’s an unusual bar (with C natural and F natural), again according to ‘The Beatles – Complete Scores’, which is not necessarily correct.
The following people thank Richard for this post:
Sea BeltAnd in the end
The love you take is equal to the love you make
3.04am
7 November 2022
Richard said
@Sea Belt, Drive My Car is definitely in the key of D Major.That’s an unusual bar (with C natural and F natural), again according to ‘The Beatles – Complete Scores’, which is not necessarily correct.
The Ultimate Guitar website, which isn’t necessarily reliable (though they do agree it’s in D), says the chord during that part “but you can do something in between” is A7#5 — the sharp fifth being an F natural. So that chord has two of the notes (F and G), but it does not have the C natural, unless the Complete Scores meant to say C sharp which is what it should be for an A7#5 . That said, the Beatles could have been outside the box enough to throw in a C natural even in an A major chord.
The following people thank Sea Belt for this post:
RichardNow today I find, you have changed your mind
5.08am
6 May 2018
According to https://www.virtualsheetmusic……-5977.html
that vocal varies between C natural and C# (so the corresponding chord varies between A7 and A7#5).
The score can be played on that webpage for the details.
The following people thank Richard for this post:
Sea BeltAnd in the end
The love you take is equal to the love you make
6.55am
7 November 2022
Richard said
According to https://www.virtualsheetmusic……-5977.htmlthat vocal varies between C natural and C# (so the corresponding chord varies between A7 and A7#5).
The score can be played on that webpage for the details.
The following people thank Sea Belt for this post:
RichardNow today I find, you have changed your mind
7.07am
7 November 2022
8.29pm
7 November 2022
The three part harmony on that link Richard provided has one mystery which I don’t know because of my musical ignorance. And that is the second line, the one in between (pun intended) shows basically all the syllables are the note F, however, the first note of each stanza or measure is denoted natural. Now I’m assuming that this means that ONLY the first note is natural and the rest are to revert to their normal sharp. In the key of D major, there are two sharps, C and F. So that means this middle singing part goes
F natural F sharp F sharp F sharp F sharp, F natural F sharp F sharp.
If this is so, that means that he’s not merely clustered closely with the dominant G part which is the top part on the musical notations page, but clustered as close as possible — G and F sharp sung together several times — which is clearly dissonant, and I’m not sure I’m hearing that on the record, but maybe I am.
Now the problem with the other theory, that that first natural sign on the middle singing part indicates that all the F notes in that singing line are to be natural, that means that the note for the word “can” would be F natural which would be sung with the top line F sharp yet another dissonant cluster. I’m going to go with theory number one and assume that they’re singing in that dissonant cluster all along except for the initial notes which go with the words “you” and “in”. By comparison, the bottom singing part with its variation on C natural and C sharp, is less problematic. It’s common in bluesy music for the major third which is a sharp compared to a minor third to be toyed around with by dipping down to its minor third. In fact, the minor third in a major key is one of the main “bluesy” notes.
The following people thank Sea Belt for this post:
RichardNow today I find, you have changed your mind
5.24am
6 May 2018
@Sea Belt, here is a reference on the subject you raised:
Adding Necessary Accidentals
Basically, an Accidental applies to each note on that line or in that space until it is cancelled by another Accidental or a Bar Line.
So, for that example score pictured in your post, the notes are:
high vocal: G F# G G G (F grace note) G G G
middle vocal: F F F F F F F F
low vocal: C# C C C C C C C
The corresponding chords are: A7#5 Am6#5 Am7#5
but, as indicated on thar musical score, a general A7 backing chord could be played with the variations just occurring in the vocals.
I think that’s all correct, and I hope that helps.
Sea Belt said
The three parts are amazing.
I agree. The vocal harmonies, particularly some of the three-part harmonies sung by John, Paul and George, are an important aspect of the Beatles’ success.
The following people thank Richard for this post:
Sea Belt, RubeAnd in the end
The love you take is equal to the love you make
7.31am
7 November 2022
I guess that makes sense, given what the notation shows, but it seems weird for that second word (“can”) to be sung as F sharp and F together. The 3rd line C is not problematic. I guess what I’ll have to do next time I come upon a piano (I don’t have one at home) is just play those three parts together simultaneously and see if they sound like the song — or better yet get three singers together to do it faithfully. Or perhaps if someone could make a YouTube where they show 3 singers independently singing those notes, and then show them singing it all together.
Also, it seems unprofessional of that person who did the notation on that middle line at the very beginning — there’s no need to put a sharp on the C note, since it’s in the key of D which already sharps the C — and you can see the C sharp sign like a quarter of an inch away! It’s like the guy who did the notation was worried “oh no, what are people going to do when they see a natural sign on the second note? we better make sure that they…” what? Of course they’re going to assume (correctly) that the first note that DOESN’T have a natural sign must be the normal sharp C.
The following people thank Sea Belt for this post:
RichardNow today I find, you have changed your mind
8.04am
6 May 2018
Sea Belt said
I guess that makes sense, given what the notation shows, but it seems weird for that second word (“can”) to be sung as F sharp and F together. The 3rd line C is not problematic. I guess what I’ll have to do next time I come upon a piano (I don’t have one at home) is just play those three parts together simultaneously and see if they sound like the song — or better yet get three singers together to do it faithfully. Or perhaps if someone could make a YouTube where they show 3 singers independently singing those notes, and then show them singing it all together.
This online piano might help:
Online Pianist
Sea Belt said
Also, it seems unprofessional of that person who did the notation on that middle line at the very beginning — there’s no need to put a sharp on the C note, since it’s in the key of D which already sharps the C — and you can see the C sharp sign like a quarter of an inch away! It’s like the guy who did the notation was worried “oh no, what are people going to do when they see a natural sign on the second note? we better make sure that they…” what? Of course they’re going to assume (correctly) that the first note that DOESN’T have a natural sign must be the normal sharp C.
Yes, agreed – and this score is not necessarily correct anyway.
The following people thank Richard for this post:
Sea BeltAnd in the end
The love you take is equal to the love you make
1 Guest(s)