Please consider registering
Guest

sp_LogInOut Log In sp_Registration Register

Register | Lost password?
Advanced Search

— Forum Scope —






— Match —





— Forum Options —





Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

sp_Feed sp_TopicIcon
Wikipedia error?
No permission to create posts
11 September 2012
8.55am
frylock
A Beginning
Forum Posts: 4
Member Since:
11 September 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

On the Dear Prudence article it says: "Lennon recorded additional layers to his vocals. Handclapping, tambourine and cowbell were then added by McCartney and Harrison." Seems to me, from what I just read in the Lewisohn book, Lennon only added double tracked vocals, while Paul and George added the additional vocals. Thought I'd post here first... Maybe there is another source, as http://www.pophistorydig.com/?.....nce-farrow has many sources listed. The latter about additional vocals could be fixed regardless I think. Thanks

11 September 2012
2.42pm
Avatar
Von Bontee
A Hole In The Road
Rishikesh
Forum Posts: 2857
Member Since:
14 December 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

So, are you going to edit the Wikipedia article yourself?

One day, a tape-op got a tape on backwards, he went to play it, and it was all "Neeeradno-undowarrroom" and it was "Wow! Sounds Indian!"
-- Paul McCartney

11 September 2012
5.52pm
Avatar
meanmistermustard
Moderator



Forum Posts: 19678
Member Since:
1 May 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Wiki isnt the best place to go as its not entirely accurate, it doesnt help that over the years numerous books and authors have claimed someone played something only for another book to contradict it so there are differing sources offering different details. Even now recording details are being questioned. Should also add that Lewisohn has admitted to there being errors in his books due to deadline pressures, not that theyre flatally flawed and should be ditched, they are still some of the best beatle books about.

 

Going off topic, there was a story recently about an author (Philip Roth) who spotted an error in the background influences section for one of his books, wrote to wiki to get it changed and was declined saying he wasnt a sufficient source, they needed another. You can read about it here.

"I told you everything I could about me, Told you everything I could" ('Before Believing' - Emmylou Harris) 

"Don't make your love suffer insecurities; Trade the baggage of "self" to set another one free" ('Paper Skin' - Kendall Payne)

11 September 2012
8.54pm
Avatar
The Walrus
Working for the national health
Candlestick Park
Forum Posts: 1024
Member Since:
4 December 2010
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

meanmistermustard said
Wiki isnt the best place to go as its not entirely accurate, it doesnt help that over the years numerous books and authors have claimed someone played something only for another book to contradict it so there are differing sources offering different details. Even now recording details are being questioned. Should also add that Lewisohn has admitted to there being errors in his books due to deadline pressures, not that theyre flatally flawed and should be ditched, they are still some of the best beatle books about.

 

Going off topic, there was a story recently about an author (Philip Roth) who spotted an error in the background influences section for one of his books, wrote to wiki to get it changed and was declined saying he wasnt a sufficient source, they needed another. You can read about it here.

Having read the article's chat page, Roth was making a fuss over nothing. Wikipedia reported that various critics had seen the similarity with Broyard, and that Roth had said he wasn't his inspiration. Here is the article before the open letter: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/inde.....=508328139

Wikipedia is generally a very good source. Fears of its inaccuracy are often overstated. Vandalism is usually removed very quickly, and a study in Nature found that it contained a similar number of serious errors to Encyclopaedia Britannica.

The horse has bolted!

stay-on-topic

And I neeeeeeeeed her all the time

13 September 2012
7.34am
frylock
A Beginning
Forum Posts: 4
Member Since:
11 September 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Von Bontee said
So, are you going to edit the Wikipedia article yourself?

Not in any rush if anyone wants to beat me. Yeah, Wiki is generally good. And that error, if an error, is not a pressing matter.

Forum Timezone: America/Chicago

Most Users Ever Online: 597

Currently Online: HMBeatlesfan
43 Guest(s)

Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)

Top Posters:

Starr Shine?: 13207

Silly Girl: 9145

parlance: 7065

mr. Sun king coming together: 6429

Mr. Kite: 6133

trcanberra: 5944

Necko: 5905

Ron Nasty: 5850

mithveaen: 4618

AppleScruffJunior: 4271

Member Stats:

Guest Posters: 87

Members: 2143

Moderators: 4

Admins: 2

Forum Stats:

Groups: 3

Forums: 42

Topics: 4087

Posts: 237638

Newest Members:

agungp, 50yearsofbeatlemania, Maxwelledison, jpgrthe4th, closeEyesHugh

Moderators: Ahhh Girl: 13026, meanmistermustard: 19678, Zig: 8923, Joe: 4604

Administrators: Joe: 4604, Ellie: 4

Members Birthdays
sp_BirthdayIcon
Today: None
Upcoming: IveJustSeenAFaceo, chrisredditch, Georgous, fourcoolbeatles