15 February 2015
If I'm out of the house Apple earphones do the job just fine, as I feel rather self conscious going about with a huge pair of headphones on my head looking like some sort of cyborg.
I really don't care how I look with my headphones -- I got over that ages ago. I do care about having to haul them around, though, bulky things they are.
Personally, I'm a bit of an audiophile, but it doesn't bother me if I have to listen in less-than-ideal conditions on occasion. I feel like I've heard their stuff enough to earn my right to low fidelity on occasion.
It verges from the sublime to the ridiculote
New to Forumpool? You can introduce yourself here.
7 November 2017
didn't have time to read all the pages here, but assume there'd be some consensus that the early stuff in particular is best heard in mono, back when the stereo pan placements were often very extreme left & right. We have been conditioned to expect vocals panned in the middle, along with bass, kick & snare, with a nice wide spread on the drum kit, recorded on different channels (which were in far shorter supply), and other parts balanced on either side. From what I understand, the Fabs themselves paid far more attention to the mono mixes, and the stereo mixes were an afterthought, looked after by G M & the engineer, if I recall correctly.
Even the later stuff has some of those 60's peculiarities with the stereo mixing, but we do get more isolation of parts, which can be cool in listening to what an individual part is doing. It can seem disjointed however, particularly on headphones.
Would love to try what I read about Graham Nash visiting Neil Young at his farm, and Neil wanting to show them his latest recording project:
He's a Clean Man