Paul's wife Nancy vs. Linda | Page 2 | Fab Forum | The Beatles Bible

I wouldn’t. Yoko and John loved each other and genuinely cared about each other where on the other hand, Heather took advantage of Paul, I don’t know exactly what she did but I think she married him for the money and she seems to be infatuated with greed. Paul is a very nice loving and caring man and he let this girl into his life only for her to ruin it, here’s something from Wikipedia:

Wikipedia says
After dismissing Anthony Julius, a Mishcon de Reya lawyer, Mills stated she would represent herself in the upcoming divorce hearing,^[77] with help from her sister Fiona, David Rosen (a solicitor-advocate), and Michael Shilub, an American attorney.^[78] In leaked documents, Mills complained that McCartney was often drunk, smoked cannabis, stabbed her with a broken wine glass, pushed her over a table, and pushed her into a bathtub when she was pregnant.^[79] Referring to her part in the marriage, Mills said that she had been a full-time wife, mother, lover, confidante, business partner and psychologist to McCartney.^[80] McCartney’s lawyers studied Mills’ book: Life Balance: The Essential Keys to a Lifetime of Wellbeing (published on 25 May 2006), as it contradicted many of her claims, such as when she praised McCartney for “Bringing me breakfast in bed every morning, no matter how he feels, and I do the dinner, so we’ve got that agreement. It’s thoughtfulness”.^[81] Mills’ father reconciled with his daughter after meeting her and McCartney, when they introduced him to his granddaughter, Beatrice. After their separation, he said that it “took guts to represent yourself at the High Court”, and that he was proud of his daughter, even though he thought she would be “torn to shreds” by McCartney’s lawyers.^[82]

The case was heard in court 34 at the Royal Courts of Justice in London.^[83] At the start of the proceedings Mills asked for £125 million, but McCartney offered £15.8 million.^[84] Before the court case, Mills had employed the accountancy firm Lee and Allen to examine McCartney’s publishing company, business assets and properties, claiming that she had a tape recording of McCartney admitting his true worth, but the presiding judge, Mr Justice Bennett, based his decision on a forensic valuation of McCartney’s finances completed by accounting firm Ernst & Young.^[85]

The hearing took six days, finishing on 18 February 2008, with the judgment being made public on 17 March 2008.^[18] Mills was eventually awarded a lump sum of £16.5m, together with assets of £7.8m, which included the properties she owned at the time.^[86] The total was £24.3 million (nearly $50 million in US currency^[87]), plus payments of £35,000 per annum, for a nanny and school costs for their daughter.^[88] In his judgment, Justice Bennett stated: “The husband’s evidence was, in my judgment, balanced. He expressed himself moderately though at times with justifiable irritation, if not anger. He was consistent, accurate and honest. But I regret to have to say I cannot say the same about the wife’s evidence. Having watched and listened to her give evidence, having studied the documents, and having given in her favour every allowance for the enormous strain she must have been under (and in conducting her own case) I am driven to the conclusion that much of her evidence, both written and oral, was not just inconsistent and inaccurate but also less than candid. Overall, she was a less than impressive witness.”^[18] Regarding her career, the judge said: “I find that, far from the husband dictating to and restricting the wife’s career and charitable activities, he did the exact opposite. He encouraged it and lent his support, name and reputation to her business and charitable activities. The facts as I find them do not in any way support her claim.”^[89] In anger at the judgment, Mills threw a pitcher of water on the head of Fiona Shackleton, McCartney’s solicitor, in the courtroom. ^[90]

The divorce was granted on 12 May 2008, and the preliminary divorce decree was finalised six weeks later.^[91][92]

During their marriage she was known as Heather Mills McCartney, but after her divorce she reverted to Heather Mills, although she should still be correctly referred to as Lady McCartney; as the former wife of a knight, she technically retains that title.^[93] She was addressed as such by Lord Justice Leveson, during the Leveson Inquiry.^[94]

I genuinely feel bad that Paul had to give anything to Heather, I would’ve made that peg leg live in a dumpster for taking advantage of such a nice man. First of all, her claims are clearly false, this is Paul McCartney , not Ozzy Osbourne, Paul wouldn’t dare stab his wife with a broken wine glass or throw a pregnant woman into a bathtub, how stupid did she think the judge was, Linda has never complained about Paul abusing her, nor Jane. Also, if Paul threw Heather into the bathtub while she was pregnant, Beatrice would’ve been born with problems.

I should know. When I was 6, I hit my mother in the stomach while she was pregnant with my brother, which made him mentally retarded (not bad enough where he can’t talk or isn’t potty trained, but bad enough where he was given actually given this diagnosis by a doctor or whoever diagnoses people with disabilities), my mother blames vaccines but I blame myself. That was from a 6 year old, Paul is a fully grown man so the fact that Beatrice is perfectly fine proves to me that Heather was lying.

Also, Paul goes on to state that no matter how pissed off he was, he always made Heather breakfast in bed, doesn’t sound abusive to me at all.

Heather reminds me of a person named Anita Sarkeesian, both of them will stretch the truth or even lie to make themselves look good and make the people of whom they hate look bad. In Heather’s case, it’s Paul, in Anita’s case, it’s video games. For example, Anita claims that Mario saving Princess Peach is sexist when in reality it’s not.

Finally, Paul’s children from Linda all seem to hate Heather.

In conclusion, John and Yoko loved each other whereas Paul and Heather was a big mistake.

To be honest, I would just call her Heather but if someone wants to call her one legged or amputee, I’m fine with it. I agree that it seems stupid to make it seem like Paul was abusive to Heather despite the fact that he never was abusive to Linda. Can we change the title of this thread to Paul’s wives because we’ve talked more about Heather in this thread than Nancy or Linda.

Also, why did they give Heather any settlement at all, I would’ve gave her nothing. What especially pisses me off is why did they let Heather have custody over Beatrice. Sure Paul has just as much custody over her but shouldn’t he have all of the custody. If I were Beatrice, I’d much rather be with my father who is a rich yet loving and caring person who sang and played many instruments (most notably guitar, bass, and piano) in The Beatles then my mother who is some jerk off amputee who took advantage of her disability and married my father just for the wealth and then lied and claimed that he was abusive, why should Heather have any custody over her daughter Beatrice. Hell, I wouldn’t be surprised if Beatrice hated her mother.

Joe said
Wow, you seem like a deeply unpleasant person. And while I have no problem calling you out on your noxious personality, I wouldn’t bring in your physical appearance because it’s not relevant to anything. Neither is Heather Mills’s. What you both have in common is the potential to change and improve your character, but it’s a tad harder to, say, grow a leg back or cure cerebral palsy. As the saying goes, play the ball not the man.

To be fair, I do have anger issues and get pissed off really easily, so I’m not always the most pleasant person to be around and suffering from depression doesn’t help those problems at all. To be fair, I would prefer to call her Heather over one legged myself and when I used the words bitch and whore in my example, I was stating that it’s just as easy to call her that, not that it would be just as acceptable.

Regardless of whether she did it in a fit of rage or while calm, she still poured water over Paul’s lawyer, which wasn’t a good thing for Heather to do. In fact, I think it makes her look stupid, especially considering that she did it in court.

No need to throw rotten eggs, we all have different opinions here and even if I wanted to, the worst I can do is show a picture of one.

It’s weird though when people prefer the look of someone when they’re older rather when they’re in their teens/20’s/30’s, reminds me of Stan Lee and how most of the pictures of him are from the last 20 or so years, although you can find pictures of him from the 1960’s when he was in his 40’s.