Log In
Register
1.08am
15 May 2015
Offline
Well, I’ve been on hiatus, so I’m late to the party. When I saw this provocative topic title, I had to see how the OP justified his claim, and how the discussion unfolded. Whether someone is a “great singer” (or great guitarist, pianist, saxophonist, etc.) is subjective and relative, even though in a community of fandom the fans rally around to bolster up their perceptions.
Nevertheless, to me, Paul is the best singer of all time — for reasons that many of the BBers above have listed, like his range. I’d also add an indefinable quality he brings to most of his songs, some kind of vocalistic genius touch, sometimes only heard in passing, touches that come in many different flavors, all satisfying.
That said, there are plenty of other singers I like as well, and I confess to moments where I can feel like they satisfy me as well, if not better, than Paul (examples, Ray Charles or Neil Diamond or Phoebe Snow…).
Aside from range, there is his talent in screaming (we had a whole thread about that alone). I frankly don’t find anyone in the pop/rock galaxy as accomplished in screaming as Paul (the closest is Robert Plant, imo).
And also, “range” doesn’t just mean ability to sing low and high (and everywhere in between) — it also means a range of modulatory styles. It’s almost like Paul “puts on” a different voice to suit the ambiance of a particular song, and I don’t know how many changes of clothes Paul’s voice has (I haven’t sat down to count). I first became aware of this by the remarkably subtle transformation of his voice for the song “Tomorrow” — a kind of plaintive, slight warble caught in the front of the throat sound (compare that with “Mumbo” just from the same album).
The following people thank Pineapple Records for this post:
Mademoiselle Kitty >^..^<, Beatlebug, O Boogie, Evangeline, KaleidoscopeMusicA ginger sling with a pineapple heart,
a coffee dessert, yes you know it's good news...
11.54am
8 April 2015
Offline 
What a total ignorant,stupid,inaccurate thing to say even if *wasn’t* on a Beatles and or Paul McCartney fan site! Ironically this article,which I had read on another site years ago, was posted on this very site about the recording of Uncle Albert Admiral Halsey , and Tim Geelan a studio engineer from Mix Magazine is quoted saying what a great singer Paul was and that he sang great live right off the floor into new mics at the time.
https://www.beatlesbible.com/p…..al-halsey/
12.07pm
8 April 2015
Offline Also in Mark Lewisohn’s excellent book which is a detailed music diary of their amazing only 8 year recording career,The Beatles Recording Sessions where many of their recording engineers and tape operators are interviewed along with George Martin and there is a great 1987 interview with Paul in the beginning of the book,Mark explains that Paul amazingly recorded three totally different types of songs and singing styles in the same day,Yesterday ,I’ve Just Seen A Face and his screaming rocker I’m Down and he basically said how it demonstrated how he impressively could do such different styles like that soon after the other.
Actually I just opened the book to exactly what Mark says in the 1965 chapter about the recordings on Monday June 14th,and Mark says,that it was a remarkable day’s work,dominated by Paul McCartney and perfectly illustrating this young man’s mastery of three different styles of musical composition and singing.He says what makes Paul’s recording of Yesterday and he said the supreme melodic ballad all the more remarkable is that it directly followed the taping of I’m Down which Mark says is a quasi-soul/rock and roll song delivered by Paul in the most larynx-tearing,chord-shredding style imaginable.
Paul used to have a great sounding love song voice,an in between love song and rock song voice,and a great rock and even hard rock voice and he many times sang all these styles in the same song great.John was also a great singer and he had an more unique beautiful voice even when he spoke.
Paul sang great into his 50’s and still good into his 50’s but he sadly barely has a voice left to talk,because he kept singing rock songs live and in the studio into his 60’s and now 70’s.The Beatles are not only in the Song Writing Hall of Fame but the Vocal Hall of Fame too and for great valid reasons.It’s really hard to believe and understand how anyone especially a genuine fan could say such nonsense.
12.48pm
8 April 2015
Offline NME News
Bob Dylan talks of Beatles friendship
12.59pm
8 April 2015
Offline Wings Over Australia full concert this speaks,or should I say sings for itself,well Paul definitely does and great!
1.06pm
8 April 2015
Offline Here is another amazing example of what a great singer (and song composer) Paul is,he’s singing his great piano rock song 1985 from the Band On The Run album live in the studio.
The following people thank Randie for this post:
Ahhh Girl1.37pm
8 April 2015
Offline Here is their August 15,1965 Shea Stadium performance of I’m Down with Paul doing a great rocking singing and screaming voice.
2.12pm
8 April 2015
Offline Here is another of the countless examples of what a great singer Paul really was,here Paul and Wings are playing Paul’s beautiful acoustic song Bluebird which is even a better version than on The Band On The Run album.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?…..6rTnPQDf_8
And here Paul’s singing great in another style, his best song Arrow Through Me on the last Wings 1979 album,
And I could go on and on,including with countless examples from Paul’s early to later Beatles career too,even from their live performances with the very limited,primitive sound systems of only 30 watt amplifiers,and as George Harrison said in The Beatles Anthology video series that special 100 watt amplifiers were built for their August 1965 Shea Stadium concert. They also had no feedback monitors so they couldn’t even hear themselves singing and playing but amazingly they still sang in sync with each other.But then they were so great they would have sounded good playing out of a cave.
Here is a very good live performance of Paul’s very good rock song I’m Down from August 14,1965 at The Ed Sulivan Theatre one night before they performed it at their Shea Stadium concert.
3.25pm
27 March 2015
Offline
And of course, there’s this little gem…
Paul’s got 99 problems, but lyrics ain’t one of them 
(also known as: who the *bleep* needs lyrics when you got that voice?)
The following people thank Mademoiselle Kitty >^..^< for this post:
pepperland, BeatlebugFormerly Known As JPM-Fangirl --
2016
'Out There' - 07-06-2015 - Ziggo Dome Amsterdam -- 'One On One' - 12-06-2016 - Pinkpop Festival Landgraaf
7.29pm
21 January 2016
Offline It was unfair of me to single out Paul. He’s on par vocally with George and Lennon.
I wouldn’t call any of the Beatles great singers. Amazing songwriters, amazing lyricists, amazing composers. Their singing, very good, but not amazing.
It’s nothing against them. They did the most they could with their voice. God just didn’t give them the same pipes he gave black singers.
The following people thank Derek_Francis for this post:
Little Piggy Dragonguy8.29pm
Moderators
Members
Reviewers
20 August 2013
Offline Still subjective. A little added “in my opinion” would go a long way in the above post. That’s where I will leave my comments.
The following people thank Ahhh Girl for this post:
O Boogie, BeatlebugCan buy Joe love! Amazon | iTunes
Check here for "how do I do this" guide to the forum. 
(2017) 
(2018)
8.30pm
5 November 2011
Offline Ahhh Girl said
Still subjective. A little added “in my opinion” would go a long way in the above post. That’s where I will leave my comments.
“In my opinion” would be redundant. It’s already implied that it is his opinion because he is the one saying it.
The following people thank Little Piggy Dragonguy for this post:
Derek_Francis, BeatlebugAll living things must abide by the laws of the shape they inhabit
9.01pm
Moderators
Members
Reviewers
20 August 2013
Offline But others have been giving thought-out, objective reasons when making their case. I suppose I would like the OP to do the same. So, with such strong, factual posts from others in this thread, an added “in my opinion” by the OP after a statement like that last sentence would be appreciated. That’s all I’m saying. Just seems kind and civil.
The following people thank Ahhh Girl for this post:
O Boogie, BeatlebugCan buy Joe love! Amazon | iTunes
Check here for "how do I do this" guide to the forum. (2017) (2018)
9.41pm
Moderators
Members
Reviewers
20 August 2013
Offline Forum rule #4. “Don’t be a troll. If you think The Beatles suck, please don’t bother letting us know.”
Can buy Joe love! Amazon | iTunes
Check here for "how do I do this" guide to the forum. (2017) (2018)
9.48pm
1 November 2013
Offline
Ahhh Girl said
Forum rule #4. “Don’t be a troll. If you think The Beatles suck, please don’t bother letting us know.”
I don’t think this is a troll topic.
The following people thank Starr Shine? for this post:
Derek_Francis
9.59pm
Moderators
Members
Reviewers
20 August 2013
Offline OK, AD40. Your opinion is noted. 
Post 70 just went too far in my opinion.
Can buy Joe love! Amazon | iTunes
Check here for "how do I do this" guide to the forum. (2017) (2018)
10.24pm
5 November 2011
Offline In my opinion is not needed. You are the one saying it so it’s already implied that it is your opinion. It does not make it sound like you’re being nicer nor does it change the statement from being objective to subjective. If it does anything at all, it weakens the statement it is paired with and makes the speaker sound unsure.
And I don’t opine that Derek went too far in post seventy. He said that The Beatles are very good singers but that he doesn’t think they are amazing singers (he never said they suck). That’s a fair thing to say. I don’t necessarily agree with it, but that does’t make his opinion of less value. Are people only allowed to express their opinions on this forum when they are extolling The Beatles?
All living things must abide by the laws of the shape they inhabit
10.31pm
14 February 2016
Offline There always has to be a not-exactly-kind-but-not-exactly-negative thread to keep things at an even atmosphere. Too many “love posts” would be dead grotty. (I’d better put “in my opinion” on here so people don’t get angry) *ahem* in my opinion at least.
I am you as you are you as you are you and you are all together.
11.17pm
Moderators
Members
Reviewers
20 August 2013
Offline “Un-extolling views are fine occassionally. When the “un-extolling” and confrontationalness are noticed as *patterns* from a particular person by others and they comment on the behavior, I take notice. I’m a bit of an overprotective hen when it comes to the user experience on the forum.
LOL, @Evangeline. You’re fine. You’ve proven yourself to me and to the group. You don’t have any bad patterns that I’ve ever noticed or that anyone has ever brought to my attention.
Can buy Joe love! Amazon | iTunes
Check here for "how do I do this" guide to the forum. (2017) (2018)
11.35pm
Moderators
Members
Reviewers
20 August 2013
Offline unknown said
In my opinion is not needed. You are the one saying it so it’s already implied that it is your opinion. It does not make it sound like you’re being nicer nor does it change the statement from being objective to subjective. If it does anything at all, it weakens the statement it is paired with and makes the speaker sound unsure.
Interesting view, @Little Piggy Dragonguy. Maybe …I’ve just let myself get too upset over all of this. I know when some people are stating an opinion. When I’ve had a chance to get to know them and see inner goodness in them, and know that they are on the forum for a good reason it is easy to get the jist/vibe of what they are saying and to go on with my life. This situation just feels different to me. Very different. That’s why I am now going to remain silent on the matter. I emailed the three guys and told them I’m backing away from this whole situation.
The following people thank Ahhh Girl for this post:
Mademoiselle Kitty >^..^<, BeatlebugCan buy Joe love! Amazon | iTunes
Check here for "how do I do this" guide to the forum. (2017) (2018)
