Log In
Register
10.32am
14 December 2009
Online
I found it relatively hard to read too, just because I was compelled to read both the reproductions of the letters themselves and the accompanying verbatim transcriptions, which made for a bit of tedium. Always fun to see the little doodles and asides and throwaway jokes he packs into even something as minor as a postcard.
I was watching the JL: Imagine doc recently and was struck by Cynthia's referring to a letter of regret she'd gotten from John wherein he chastises himself for missing Julian's childhood - then realizing that the very same letter was in the book.
Also loved John's various repeated requests that Fred Seaman buy him albums by Bowie and Blondie and McCartney and whoever else...I love that he was keeping an ear open even as he was producing nothing for the public himself. I've read that he often bought three copies of an album he liked - one to play, one to lend, and one to file away on the shelves.
The following people thank Von Bontee for this post:
Shamrock Womlbs, Expert Textpert, Beatlebug, Elementary PenguinOne day, a tape-op got a tape on backwards, he went to play it, and it was all "Neeeradno-undowarrroom" and it was "Wow! Sounds Indian!"
-- Paul McCartney
11.11am
24 March 2014
Offline
I asked for this book as a Xmas present.
I think it'll be fun even though all the mistakes and stuff.
"I Need You by George Harrison"
12.09pm
18 April 2013
Offline Shamrock Womlbs said
I asked for this book as a Xmas present.
I think it'll be fun even though all the mistakes and stuff.
It’s worth it in spite of the transcription errors. Get a magnifying glass and you might be able to make out some words that Davies didn’t make out. I was able to decipher a few.
The following people thank Expert Textpert for this post:
Shamrock Womlbs, Beatlebug"If you're ever in the shit, grab my tit.” —Paul McCartney
12.24pm
Reviewers
17 December 2012
Offline The important thing about the book is that it provides the primary sources. It is a shame you often have to ignore the annotation, but the source tells you the annotation is wrong, not the source. An example being the "Imagine /Ram " postcard to Julian I referenced earlier in the thread, which Hunter dates as 1971, and says was received by the 8-year-old Julian, despite Sean being part of the signature. Hunter dates it by the postcard, ignoring the fact that John may have had a pile of the postcards he was working his way through. But Sean being in the signature only changes the date, not the document.
The following people thank Ron Nasty for this post:
Expert Textpert, Shamrock Womlbs, Beatlebug"I only said we were bigger than Rod... and now there's all this!" Ron Nasty
To @ Ron Nasty it's @ mja6758
The Beatles Bible 2020 non-Canon Poll Part One: 1958-1963 and Part Two: 1964-August 1966
1.31pm
Reviewers
29 November 2012
Offline Blast from the past, but for anyone who is still interested and didn't see it a few years ago, I did review the book here --> http://rnrchemist.blogspot.com.....tters.html
The following people thank DrBeatle for this post:
Shamrock Womlbs, Beatlebug"I know you, you know me; one thing I can tell you is you got to be free!"
Please Visit My Website, The Rock and Roll Chemist
Twitter: @rocknrollchem
Facebook: rnrchemist
1 Guest(s)
