Log In
Register
5.44pm
31 March 2008
Offline
Please add any pics of The Beatles (group or individual) that you can't identify to a particular year. Good-sized and good-quality ones
preferred. I'll add them to the picture gallery section of the site.
Thanks!
Can buy me love! Please consider using these links to support the Beatles Bible: Amazon | iTunes
Or buy my paperback/ebook! Riding So High – The Beatles and Drugs
Don't miss The Bowie Bible – now live!
6.43pm
27 March 2010
Offline
These both seem like '64-'65...
I'm in love, but I'm lazy.
7.06pm
27 March 2010
Offline
<<<'63, maybe.
I'm in love, but I'm lazy.
7.35pm
27 March 2010
Offline
I'm really sorry I'm spamming 
but I just love these pictures!
I'm fairly certain that the second one is from '63.I'm in love, but I'm lazy.
11.33pm
12 November 2009
Offline
Let's try this again.
Ad hoc, ad loc, and quid pro quo! So little time! So much to know!
11.35pm
12 November 2009
Offline
Ad hoc, ad loc, and quid pro quo! So little time! So much to know!
12.44am
12 November 2009
Offline
63?
Ad hoc, ad loc, and quid pro quo! So little time! So much to know!
1.06am
3 April 2010
Offline
skye said:
63?
Probably. Could be late '62.
"The best band? The Beatles. The most overrated band? The Beatles."
1.08am
3 April 2010
Offline
"The best band? The Beatles. The most overrated band? The Beatles."
3.48am
27 March 2010
Offline
[Image Can Not Be Found]
I'm in love, but I'm lazy.
3.56pm
12 November 2009
Offline
MrBig said:
skye said:
63?
Probably. Could be late '62.
Ok, I asked the beatle photo blog. You're right - 1962.
Ad hoc, ad loc, and quid pro quo! So little time! So much to know!
5.22pm
27 March 2010
Offline
It it is, that's sooo cute! 
I'll try to find more information on the event. Mother
's day, maybe? Eek.I'm in love, but I'm lazy.
3.41am
12 November 2009
Offline
Ad hoc, ad loc, and quid pro quo! So little time! So much to know!
1.38pm
31 March 2008
Offline
That second one must be 1963, judging by the collarless suit and George's hair length. The first I'm pretty sure is 1967, though I thought John didn't have those big sideburns until the following year.
Can buy me love! Please consider using these links to support the Beatles Bible: Amazon | iTunes
Or buy my paperback/ebook! Riding So High – The Beatles and Drugs
Don't miss The Bowie Bible – now live!
2.34am
12 November 2009
Offline
Sounds good to me.
Ad hoc, ad loc, and quid pro quo! So little time! So much to know!
3.27pm
7 August 2010
Offline
Hi joe.
Dear Prudence
Giving you quality -Facepalms- , since August 7, 2010.
4.03am
12 November 2009
Offline
Should this go here? It's miscellaneous, but I can probably find a date... Either way, very cool.
I want to say 63 based on Paul's hair.
The following people thank skye for this post:
plasticAd hoc, ad loc, and quid pro quo! So little time! So much to know!
2.49pm
3 April 2010
Offline
skye said:
Should this go here? It's miscellaneous, but I can probably find a date... Either way, very cool.
I want to say 63 based on Paul's hair.
Is that Mal Evans?
"The best band? The Beatles. The most overrated band? The Beatles."
1
