Log In

Please consider registering
Guest

— Forum Scope —






— Match —





— Forum Options —





Min search length: 3 characters / Max search length: 84 characters

Register Ranks

Register Lost password?
sp_TopicIcon
anything that HASN'T been written yet?
RSS
jenny wren
32 Posts
(Offline)
41
2 December 2013 - 7.11pm

mja6758 said
There are a few fictions based on the life of The Beatles, including one - Into the Sky with Diamonds - written by one of our members here, Ronald P. Grelsamer (who posts as "Into the Sky with Diamonds"). An excellent book, which has just seen its third edition published, it tells the story of The Beatles and NASA's race to the moon via the fictional friendship (largely carried out by letter) between Beatles' roadie Mal Evans and a NASA scientist. It's a fantastic read.

I think Sam Taylor-Wood might be a bit bothered by you calling Nowhere Boy fiction. It certainly isn't intended to be. It is a biopic that- while some of the facts could be argued - attempts to tell as truthfully as possible the story of John's teenage years, and his relationship with his mother and his aunt, and was based largely on the biography of John's half-sister, Julia Baird, who was also an adviser on the film.

i meant, that it isn't a documentary, but with actors, creating characters and feelings and stuff ^^... but you're maybe right, fiction isn't the right word for "nowhere boy" either... 

Avatar
parlance
Slaggers
7065 Posts
(Offline)
42
2 December 2013 - 7.21pm

I can't find it now, but I recall an interview with Paul where he mentions that he took some exception to parts of the script, and Sam herself told him that in the end it was fiction. Or that she took artistic license, I can't find the exact phrasing.

parlance

Beware of sadness. It can hit you. It can hurt you. Make you sore and what is more, that is not what you are here for. - George

Check out my fan video for Paul's song "Appreciate" at Vimeo or YouTube.

Avatar
Ron Nasty
5566 Posts
(Offline)
43
2 December 2013 - 7.21pm

a-hard-days-night-ringo-8 Maybe faction?

"I only said we were bigger than Rod... and now there's all this!" Ron Nasty

Avatar
fabfouremily
Sitting in an English garden
2929 Posts
(Offline)
44
2 December 2013 - 7.23pm

Yeah, I saw an interview and she mumbled something about ''artistic license''. Still meant to be based on true events, though.

Moving along in our God given ways, safety is sat by the fire/Sanctuary from these feverish smiles, left with a mark on the door.

(Passover - I. Curtis)

Avatar
Ron Nasty
5566 Posts
(Offline)
45
2 December 2013 - 7.27pm

Though I do remember him or her commenting about how he'd pointed out to her that Mimi came out completely wrong in the original script, far too hard, and she changed the script in response to the insight he'd given her.

"I only said we were bigger than Rod... and now there's all this!" Ron Nasty

Avatar
fabfouremily
Sitting in an English garden
2929 Posts
(Offline)
46
2 December 2013 - 7.30pm

I think it portrays her as being too soft, from what other stuff I've read of her. What do I know, though?

Moving along in our God given ways, safety is sat by the fire/Sanctuary from these feverish smiles, left with a mark on the door.

(Passover - I. Curtis)

Avatar
trcanberra
Oz
5856 Posts
(Offline)
47
2 December 2013 - 8.30pm

mja6758 said
[SNIP]

I think Sam Taylor-Wood might be a bit bothered by you calling Nowhere Boy fiction. It certainly isn't intended to be. It is a biopic that- while some of the facts could be argued - attempts to tell as truthfully as possible the story of John's teenage years, and his relationship with his mother and his aunt, and was based largely on the biography of John's half-sister, Julia Baird, who was also an adviser on the film.

I haven't seen it and I'd still reckon it is closer to fiction than fact - I have yet to see a biopic which isn't.  The ones I have seen all show a person's life through a lens distorted by the screenwriter's and director's visions.  This can be illuminating, but very rarely impartial - and many of them make up or ignore things to try and get some 'message' across.  In my view they are all 'based upon a true story' rather than being a presentation of a true story.

==> trcanberra and hongkonglady - Together even when not (engaged for those not in the know!) <==

Avatar
parlance
Slaggers
7065 Posts
(Offline)
48
2 December 2013 - 8.41pm

trcanberra said

I haven't seen it and I'd still reckon it is closer to fiction than fact - I have yet to see a biopic which isn't.  The ones I have seen all show a person's life through a lens distorted by the screenwriter's and director's visions.  This can be illuminating, but very rarely impartial - and many of them make up or ignore things to try and get some 'message' across.  In my view they are all 'based upon a true story' rather than being a presentation of a true story.

 

I think that's an apt description.

parlance

Beware of sadness. It can hit you. It can hurt you. Make you sore and what is more, that is not what you are here for. - George

Check out my fan video for Paul's song "Appreciate" at Vimeo or YouTube.

Avatar
Ron Nasty
5566 Posts
(Offline)
49
2 December 2013 - 9.25pm

parlance said

trcanberra said
I haven't seen it and I'd still reckon it is closer to fiction than fact - I have yet to see a biopic which isn't.  The ones I have seen all show a person's life through a lens distorted by the screenwriter's and director's visions.  This can be illuminating, but very rarely impartial - and many of them make up or ignore things to try and get some 'message' across.  In my view they are all 'based upon a true story' rather than being a presentation of a true story.

 

I think that's an apt description.

parlance

But I would say that counts for all biography - be it print or screen. The only point I was making was that Sam Taylor-Wood was trying to make it as truthful to what she saw, just as much Hunter Davis, Philip Norman, Mark Lewisohn, Albert Goldman, etc. etc., gave weight to the bits that told the story they wanted to tell. Variations on a theme.

 

"I only said we were bigger than Rod... and now there's all this!" Ron Nasty

Avatar
trcanberra
Oz
5856 Posts
(Offline)
50
2 December 2013 - 9.59pm

mja6758 said

parlance said

trcanberra said
I haven't seen it and I'd still reckon it is closer to fiction than fact - I have yet to see a biopic which isn't.  The ones I have seen all show a person's life through a lens distorted by the screenwriter's and director's visions.  This can be illuminating, but very rarely impartial - and many of them make up or ignore things to try and get some 'message' across.  In my view they are all 'based upon a true story' rather than being a presentation of a true story.

 

I think that's an apt description.

parlance

But I would say that counts for all biography - be it print or screen. The only point I was making was that Sam Taylor-Wood was trying to make it as truthful to what she saw, just as much Hunter Davis, Philip Norman, Mark Lewisohn, Albert Goldman, etc. etc., gave weight to the bits that told the story they wanted to tell. Variations on a theme.

 

I'm not sure I agree.  With Lewisohn as an example, it is more obvious when he is stating a fact and when he is assembling ideas to support an interpretation.  Most of these biopics take a written biography, which may already have interpretations we are not aware of, and then further distort them with even more interpretation.  In my mind they are one step further away from the reality, and don't even attempt to tell us when they are trying to be factual and when they are telling porkies.

The books are generally describing primary or secondary evidence, the films then interpret so they are often three or four generations away from the evidence and are adding their own fictional layer over the top.

 

==> trcanberra and hongkonglady - Together even when not (engaged for those not in the know!) <==

Avatar
Ron Nasty
5566 Posts
(Offline)
51
2 December 2013 - 10.12pm

Nowhere Boy was based on Julia Baird's autobiography as I've already said. John's half-sister, and someone who had view of John's teenage years, and his relationship with his mother, that very few others had, or have written about. Lewisohn has said during interviews for the book that there are elements of the story where he is making judgements about what he thinks fits, and there are bits in the book where he shrugs his shoulders, says these are the versions, and I can't choose.

Ooo, watching Never Mind the Buzzcocks and The Beatles are on the roof doing Get Back!

Oh! That's a Beatley moment! Sorry!

"I only said we were bigger than Rod... and now there's all this!" Ron Nasty

Avatar
parlance
Slaggers
7065 Posts
(Offline)
52
9 December 2013 - 5.42pm

Still haven't found that other post I was referring to early, but Hey Dullblog recently did a review of a 1996 novel, December, by Phil Rickman.

parlance

Beware of sadness. It can hit you. It can hurt you. Make you sore and what is more, that is not what you are here for. - George

Check out my fan video for Paul's song "Appreciate" at Vimeo or YouTube.

Avatar
parlance
Slaggers
7065 Posts
(Offline)
53
31 December 2013 - 12.54am

I finally found that Hey Dullblog article, which recommends two novels:

[For great Beatles alternate history, see Mark Shipper's Paperback Writer or HD's own Michael Gerber's Life After Death for Beginners.]

parlance

Beware of sadness. It can hit you. It can hurt you. Make you sore and what is more, that is not what you are here for. - George

Check out my fan video for Paul's song "Appreciate" at Vimeo or YouTube.

Avatar
Billy Rhythm
573 Posts
(Offline)
54
31 December 2013 - 1.04am

parlance said
I finally found that Hey Dullblog article, which recommends two novels:

[For great Beatles alternate history, see Mark Shipper's Paperback Writer or HD's own Michael Gerber's Life After Death for Beginners.]

parlance

 

 

I'd personal recommend 'Paperback Writer' as well, I read it way back in the early 1980s and it's quite well done.  It hypothesizes what it would be like had The Beatles actually reunited, it almost makes you thankful that it didn't happen after reading this.  One bit that sticks out for me is when they're all playing in the studio and they're having trouble coming up with anything:

 

Paul says, "How about we do an oldie then?"

John remarks,  "OK, I believe that George knows the chords to 'He's So Fine'"

George quips back,  "I'd tell him to go to hell but I know that he's all ready going there"

 

Funny stuff aside, the writers seemed to get the characters right in this one, very enjoyable...:-)

 

Avatar
OneCoolCat
84 Posts
(Offline)
55
27 February 2014 - 7.58pm

I'd be keen to read more on the relationship between John Lennon and his Aunt Mimi. Particularly after he acquired fame right up to his death.

 

(Unfortunately, the only true perspective could come from just two people and sadly they are no longer living...)

Avatar
Billy Rhythm
573 Posts
(Offline)
56
27 February 2014 - 9.06pm

Getting Better said
Von Bontee said:

That always struck me as strange - that notion of having to choose sides, Stones or Beatles, if that really was the popular perception of the day. But maybe it made sense at the time.  (Me, I wouldn't want to deprive myself of EITHER band, but of course I'd take the Beatles if you held a gun to my head.)


Yes that also is strange to me, personally i`ve only listened to only a few Rolling Stones songs but definitely i would choose The Beatles.

I really can`t understand because it seems like the interactions between the band were friendly and with what i have read they did collaborate(not the full group) but John and Paul gave backing vocals in "We love you" a rolling Stones song and Brian Jones played the Saxophone in "You know my name(look up the number)"

 

I actually find it kinda "strange" that some of you find this ancient rivalry "strange", when we have literally 'John vs. Paul' flare-ups here on a daily basis!  And they were in the same band!  Why not the 'Stones vs. The Beatles'?!

 

In all seriousness, it's mostly something that the press cooked up and a lot of it was because of what they were both doing musically which did at times appear to be driving each other on.  It was the press, after all, who was asking the questions and I always liked Bill Wyman's response after he'd assured the interviewer that they "were the best of mates" when he said that "there was room for both bands", that always stuck with me.

 

Leave it to John Lennon to throw gasoline onto the fire with his 1970 Rolling Stone Interview though:

 

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v.....-b3fRisu50

 

Haha, You gotta love his brutal honesty, excellent...:-)  

Avatar
Von Bontee
A Hole In The Road
2829 Posts
(Offline)
57
27 February 2014 - 10.27pm

Billy Rhythm said

Getting Better said
Von Bontee said:

That always struck me as strange - that notion of having to choose sides, Stones or Beatles, if that really was the popular perception of the day. But maybe it made sense at the time.  (Me, I wouldn't want to deprive myself of EITHER band, but of course I'd take the Beatles if you held a gun to my head.)


"

 

I actually find it kinda "strange" that some of you find this ancient rivalry "strange", when we have literally 'John vs. Paul' flare-ups here on a daily basis!  And they were in the same band!  Why not the 'Stones vs. The Beatles'?!

  

No, what I specifically found strange was the notion of somebody having to choose one or the other, like in an almost peer-pressure sense. Many of us here would refuse to choose between John or Paul, and nobody finds that strange at all, whereas we're led to believe that "Stones AND Beatles" fanship was far less likely than "Stones OR Beatles" fanship, back in the day. The notion that preferring one automatically meant disliking the other rather than just liking them a little bit less.

One day, a tape-op got a tape on backwards, he went to play it, and it was all "Neeeradno-undowarrroom" and it was "Wow! Sounds Indian!"
-- Paul McCartney

Avatar
...ontherun
Massachusetts
187 Posts
(Offline)
58
4 July 2014 - 10.27pm

Zig said

    1. The Beatles – All These Years: Volume Two
      1. The Beatles – All These Years: Volume Three
        1. Joe's book

        I endorse this with the full force of whatever said endorsement is worth.

        A square is not a square when the sides are less than four...

        Avatar
        ...ontherun
        Massachusetts
        187 Posts
        (Offline)
        59
        4 July 2014 - 10.32pm

        I love a book on their relationships to one another beyond just John/Paul.   George/Paul I think is as interesting.  Also, Mark Lewisohn did a guest appearance on FAb4Free4All where the topic was specifically all that went down in the year 1974.  Anyway, he said he'd love to do a book on that year alone.  Yes, please.  AFTER volumes 2 and 3 come out, of course.

        The following people thank ...ontherun for this post:

        Starr Shine?

        A square is not a square when the sides are less than four...

        Avatar
        meanmistermustard

        19104 Posts
        (Offline)
        60
        5 July 2014 - 1.55am

        Didn't Mark say in that episode that whilst he'd love to do it he won't be as Tune In volume 3 will be his last big Beatles book undertaking?

        "I told you everything I could about me, Told you everything I could" ('Before Believing' - Emmylou Harris) 

        "Don't make your love suffer insecurities; Trade the baggage of "self" to set another one free" ('Paper Skin' - Kendall Payne)

        Forum Timezone: America/Chicago
        All RSS Show Stats

        Administrators:
        Joe
        Ellie

        Moderators:
        Ahhh Girl
        meanmistermustard
        Zig
        Joe

        Top Posters:

        Starr Shine?: 12288

        Silly Girl: 8623

        parlance: 7065

        mr. Sun king coming together: 6429

        Mr. Kite: 6131

        trcanberra: 5856

        Ron Nasty: 5562

        Necko: 5470

        mithveaen: 4618

        AppleScruffJunior: 4056

        Newest Members:

        Pauls Grandfather

        Sean

        markus567r

        herseydenvar2

        JohnBeatle

        Forum Stats:

        Groups: 3

        Forums: 42

        Topics: 4013

        Posts: 227929

         

        Member Stats:

        Guest Posters: 87

        Members: 3637

        Moderators: 4

        Admins: 2

        Most Users Ever Online: 597

        Currently Online: Midori78
        89 Guest(s)

        Currently Browsing this Page:
        1 Guest(s)

        Members Birthdays
        Today: O Boogie
        Upcoming: Amber1965