Please consider registering
Guest
sp_LogInOut Log Insp_Registration Register
Register | Lost password?
Advanced Search
Forum Scope


Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
sp_Feed sp_TopicIcon
Sgt. Peppers 50th Anniversary Celebrations - including discussions about the 2017 remixed album
28 April 2017
6.30pm
Avatar
meanmistermustard
Thankfully not where I am.
Moderator
Members

Reviewers


Moderators
Forum Posts: 24964
Member Since:
1 May 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
181sp_Permalink sp_Print

Ron Nasty said
Interesting preview of an interview with Giles Martin appearing in the June issue of Mojo, offers glimpses of what to expect.

For Lucy In The Sky With Diamonds , I had this idea of chopping up the keyboard notes so they could be spread across the stereo spectrum. Then you put them all on a plate reverb so the notes don’t sound disconnected. Then I can have the voice in the centre, because I have this stereo keyboard underneath. That’s a good example of mixing ahead in your brain.

  

So it’s washed in reverb? 

"I told you everything I could about me, Told you everything I could" ('Before Believing' - Emmylou Harris)

28 April 2017
11.06pm
Avatar
GardeningOctopus
Under the Sea
Royal Command Performance
Members
Forum Posts: 256
Member Since:
13 November 2016
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Now on Spotify….

Sgt. Pepper ‘s Lonely Hearts Club Band – Remix

Sgt. Pepper ‘s Lonely Hearts Club Band – Take 9 And Speech

With A Little Help From My Friends – Remix

With A Little Help From My Friends – Take 1/False Start And Take 2/Instrumental

 

You can also now find the Sgt. Pepper Take 9 And Speech version on YouTube!

29 April 2017
1.26am
Avatar
Ron Nasty
Apple rooftop
Members

Reviewers
Forum Posts: 12534
Member Since:
17 December 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
183sp_Permalink sp_Print

Playlisted for your convenience…

The following people thank Ron Nasty for this post:

Bongo

"I only said we were bigger than Rod... and now there's all this!" Ron Nasty

To @ Ron Nasty it's @ mja6758
The Beatles Bible 2020 non-Canon Poll Part One: 1958-1963 and Part Two: 1964-August 1966

29 April 2017
1.40am
Avatar
sir walter raleigh
In our yellow (IN OUR YELLOW) submarine (SUBMARINE AHA!)
Apple rooftop
Members
Forum Posts: 5789
Member Since:
26 January 2017
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
184sp_Permalink sp_Print

meanmistermustard said

The “I feel it” vocal sounds like it’s from elsewhere.

No idea where this came from originally, i found it elsewhere. ‘With A Little Help From My Friends takes 1 and 2. I found a site that has both of the available previews. 

 

.  

I am confused by this. Are you saying that the “take 9” being released is actually a composite of the original take and another studio chat @meanmistermustard?

"The pump don't work cause the vandals took the handles!"

-Bob Dylan, Subterranean Homesick Blues

"We could ride and surf together while our love would grow"

-Brian Wilson, Surfer Girl

29 April 2017
1.54am
Avatar
Dark Overlord
Nowhere Land
Rishikesh
Members
Forum Posts: 4470
Member Since:
10 March 2017
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
185sp_Permalink sp_Print

Take 9 seems like it’s just the backing track with the vocals and bass overdubs added, as well as a speech at the end, pretty cheap if you ask me.

If you're reading this, you are looking for something to do.

29 April 2017
2.05am
Avatar
ewe2
Inside the beat
Rishikesh
Members
Forum Posts: 3025
Member Since:
8 January 2015
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
186sp_Permalink sp_Print

Dark Overlord said
Take 9 seems like it’s just the backing track with the vocals and bass overdubs added, as well as a speech at the end, pretty cheap if you ask me.  

That’s what it sounds like to me, but I’m going on a bootleg which tried to match the recording sessions progress by following Lewisohn and taking 5.1 mixes apart as well as outfakes etc. Take 9 was instrumental without vocals or bass IIRC, but @meanmistermustard might have more details on that.

I'm like Necko only I'm a bassist ukulele guitar synthesizer kazoo penguin and also everyone. Or is everyone me? Now I'm a confused bassist ukulele guitar synthesizer kazoo penguin everyone who is definitely not @Joe.  This has been true for 2016 & 2017 Sig-Badge.png but I may have to get more specific in the future.

aus-flag-v-small.png

29 April 2017
2.22am
Avatar
Ron Nasty
Apple rooftop
Members

Reviewers
Forum Posts: 12534
Member Since:
17 December 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
187sp_Permalink sp_Print

I don’t hear the problems others are hearing with take 9. It seems to me to fit Lewisohn’s description of where it stood at the end of the second day’s work on it:

Lewisohn-Sgt-Pepper.jpgImage Enlarger

The following people thank Ron Nasty for this post:

Dark Overlord

"I only said we were bigger than Rod... and now there's all this!" Ron Nasty

To @ Ron Nasty it's @ mja6758
The Beatles Bible 2020 non-Canon Poll Part One: 1958-1963 and Part Two: 1964-August 1966

29 April 2017
3.08am
Avatar
meanmistermustard
Thankfully not where I am.
Moderator
Members

Reviewers


Moderators
Forum Posts: 24964
Member Since:
1 May 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Ron Nasty said
I don’t hear the problems others are hearing with take 9. It seems to me to fit Lewisohn’s description of where it stood at the end of the second day’s work on it:

Lewisohn-Sgt-Pepper.jpgImage Enlarger

  

The “Free Now” vocals sound distinct to the rest of the recording. We do have a bootleg of this from an acetate (Take 9, RM1), probably the one Lewisohn mentions which ends with none of the chat, so unless this is before that pre-tape reduction remix…

Dark Overlord said
Take 9 seems like it’s just the backing track with the vocals and bass overdubs added, as well as a speech at the end, pretty cheap if you ask me.  

More accurately its Take 9 + SI, pretty much the basic track without all the March overdubs. Not sure what you are expecting from an outtake, take 1 is also on the uber-deluxe and is an instrumental and the others are all incomplete. Apple are giving us the only two complete outtakes.

 

"I told you everything I could about me, Told you everything I could" ('Before Believing' - Emmylou Harris)

29 April 2017
9.57am
Avatar
Ron Nasty
Apple rooftop
Members

Reviewers
Forum Posts: 12534
Member Since:
17 December 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
189sp_Permalink sp_Print

I think it only sounds unusual because it’s unexpected, @meanmistermustard. As you say, we have a mix of take 9 that we’re familiar with, and there’s no hint of those ad-libbed vocals over the end.

I can understand those vocals not being on the mix, and the tape reduction of take 9 into take 10. They knew straight away they wouldn’t be using them. They just sound like the type of wild ad-libs that both Paul and John often came up with as recordings wound down.

This sounds to me like how it stood before the tape reduction, and that those vocals were lost during the tape reduction because they were not going to be used.

"I only said we were bigger than Rod... and now there's all this!" Ron Nasty

To @ Ron Nasty it's @ mja6758
The Beatles Bible 2020 non-Canon Poll Part One: 1958-1963 and Part Two: 1964-August 1966

29 April 2017
10.03am
Avatar
Dark Overlord
Nowhere Land
Rishikesh
Members
Forum Posts: 4470
Member Since:
10 March 2017
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
190sp_Permalink sp_Print

I’m not sure if this is off topic but where can I hear a version of Sgt. Pepper with John’s bass part instead of Paul’s, I was wondering what John’s bass sounds like and was assuming that it might on this collection.

If you're reading this, you are looking for something to do.

29 April 2017
10.09am
Avatar
Ron Nasty
Apple rooftop
Members

Reviewers
Forum Posts: 12534
Member Since:
17 December 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
191sp_Permalink sp_Print

What John bass part, @Dark Overlord? There isn’t one that I know of.

"I only said we were bigger than Rod... and now there's all this!" Ron Nasty

To @ Ron Nasty it's @ mja6758
The Beatles Bible 2020 non-Canon Poll Part One: 1958-1963 and Part Two: 1964-August 1966

29 April 2017
10.09am
Avatar
sir walter raleigh
In our yellow (IN OUR YELLOW) submarine (SUBMARINE AHA!)
Apple rooftop
Members
Forum Posts: 5789
Member Since:
26 January 2017
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
192sp_Permalink sp_Print

Does this imply that we can’t trust Giles Martin’s mixes to be legit? Or is the bootlegged take 9 I own taken from an altered source? I don’t know who to trust. 

"The pump don't work cause the vandals took the handles!"

-Bob Dylan, Subterranean Homesick Blues

"We could ride and surf together while our love would grow"

-Brian Wilson, Surfer Girl

29 April 2017
10.32am
Avatar
Ron Nasty
Apple rooftop
Members

Reviewers
Forum Posts: 12534
Member Since:
17 December 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
193sp_Permalink sp_Print

As I say above, @sir walter raleigh, it sounds right to me.

Yes, the bootlegged take 9 is genuine, the mix done to move the song from take 9 to take 10. This, to my ears, is just before they turned take 9 into take 10. I just don’t have the doubts mmm does about those vocals being original. I just think they knew from the off that they weren’t serious.

@Joe, while surprised by those vocals over in the song thread, like me doesn’t suggest they have been flown in from elsewhere.

The following people thank Ron Nasty for this post:

sir walter raleigh

"I only said we were bigger than Rod... and now there's all this!" Ron Nasty

To @ Ron Nasty it's @ mja6758
The Beatles Bible 2020 non-Canon Poll Part One: 1958-1963 and Part Two: 1964-August 1966

29 April 2017
11.24am
Avatar
Dark Overlord
Nowhere Land
Rishikesh
Members
Forum Posts: 4470
Member Since:
10 March 2017
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
194sp_Permalink sp_Print

Ron Nasty said

What John bass part, @Dark Overlord? There isn’t one that I know of.  

On the backing track, there was 2 guitars, drums, and bass. Since the guitars were played by Paul and George and the drums were played by Ringo, this means that the bass was originally played by John (presumably on George’s Burns bass he previously used during Revolver ) before being wiped by Paul’s overdub. Read this if you still don’t know what I’m talking about.

If you're reading this, you are looking for something to do.

29 April 2017
6.49pm
Avatar
meanmistermustard
Thankfully not where I am.
Moderator
Members

Reviewers


Moderators
Forum Posts: 24964
Member Since:
1 May 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
195sp_Permalink sp_Print

Dark Overlord said

On the backing track, there was 2 guitars, drums, and bass. Since the guitars were played by Paul and George and the drums were played by Ringo, this means that the bass was originally played by John (presumably on George’s Burns bass he previously used during Revolver ) before being wiped by Paul’s overdub. Read this if you still don’t know what I’m talking about.  

The bass was overdubbed by Paul after the backing track was laid down.

The backing was perfected in nine takes, with Ringo’s drums and Paul and George’s electric guitars all going onto track 1. Paul then overdubbed his bass guitar on track 2, not amplied and miked but with the signal fed directly into the recording desk.

‘That Magic Feeling’ – John C. Winn

"I told you everything I could about me, Told you everything I could" ('Before Believing' - Emmylou Harris)

29 April 2017
7.53pm
Avatar
Dark Overlord
Nowhere Land
Rishikesh
Members
Forum Posts: 4470
Member Since:
10 March 2017
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
196sp_Permalink sp_Print

According to Geoff Emmerick, John plays bass on the backing track through DI, so Paul can later overdub his own bass part, thereby wiping John’s. This is also supported by Mark Lewisohn, who claims the backing track had drums, bass, and 2 guitars, one by Paul and one by George. Sadly, I can’t find a version with John’s bass instead of Paul’s. It’s odd they did this as they recorded quite a few of the tracks from Revolver , as well as this album, without any bass on the backing track.

If you're reading this, you are looking for something to do.

29 April 2017
10.41pm
Avatar
Ron Nasty
Apple rooftop
Members

Reviewers
Forum Posts: 12534
Member Since:
17 December 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
197sp_Permalink sp_Print

Emerick is often an unreliable witness, while Lewisohn merely states the instruments that made up the backing track. An overdubbed bass would still be part of the backing track, to my mind.

However, if there was a guide bass part by John, I would expect to find it on take 1 when we get to hear it in 20-odd days.

The following people thank Ron Nasty for this post:

SgtPeppersBulldog

"I only said we were bigger than Rod... and now there's all this!" Ron Nasty

To @ Ron Nasty it's @ mja6758
The Beatles Bible 2020 non-Canon Poll Part One: 1958-1963 and Part Two: 1964-August 1966

30 April 2017
12.58pm
Avatar
Dark Overlord
Nowhere Land
Rishikesh
Members
Forum Posts: 4470
Member Since:
10 March 2017
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
198sp_Permalink sp_Print

Although I agree that Geoff’s claims should be taken with a grain of salt, especially considering he thinks that George played bass on Rock And Roll Music , but he was an eyewitness and his claim seems legitimate in this case. Also, I’m pretty sure backing track means no overdubs, so that would mean that an overdubbed bass would not be part of the backing track.

If you're reading this, you are looking for something to do.

30 April 2017
3.26pm
Avatar
Bongo
Somewhere In Time
Candlestick Park
Members
Forum Posts: 1916
Member Since:
28 March 2014
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
199sp_Permalink sp_Print

glazball said
When I checked Amazon (US) last night, the deluxe boxset was priced at ~$118.  As much as I would LOVE to have all the new tracks, that’s just too expensive for me.  And do we really need a 2017 remaster??

Alas, I’ll have to celebrate with my crummy old obsolete 2009 disc lol.

Fear not @glazball, you can just buy the 1 or 2 CD set for $10-$20 a-hard-days-night-ringo-15

  Screen-Shot-2022-10-04-at-7.52.07-PM.png   BEATLES Music gives me Eargasms!  apple01

30 April 2017
3.27pm
Uriel
A Beginning
Members
Forum Posts: 1
Member Since:
30 April 2017
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
200sp_Permalink sp_Print

We know that it will be released for the 50th anniversary of the album, a special version of Sergeant Pepper. This edition will bring, in addition to another remix of songs, some “unpublished shots” of songs and recordings in the studio.

The point here is, that very few of these shots really are “unpublished” or “never heard.” To whom I owe this post and the full investigation is to my friend David Alejandro Guarneros of Mexico, who took the trouble to inquire among different bootleg materials that abound in forums to really see that we offer with this new version.

This case had already occurred with the official bootleg album for ITunes that was released in 2013, whose songs had been for almost ten years in one of the band’s most famous bootleg compilations, the Artifacts. Among the research that was carried out, we have that only 14 songs of the unpublished takes that will contain the album are really unpublished, and this based on the bootleg material on the recordings of the album. Here the complete list of songs.

CD 2: Complete early takes from the sessions, sequenced in chronological order of their first recording dates

  1. A Day In The Life [Orchestra Overdub]
  2. A Day In The Life (The Last Chord)
  3. Sgt. Pepper ‘s Lonely Hearts Club Band [Take 1 – Instrumental]
  4. Good Morning Good Morning [Take 1 – Instrumental, Breakdown]

CD 3: Complete early takes from the sessions, sequenced in chronological order of their first recording dates

  1. Fixing A Hole [Take 1]
  2. Lucy In The Sky With Diamonds [Take 1 And Speech At The End ]
  3. Lucy In The Sky With Diamonds [Speech, False Start And Take 5]
  4. Getting Better [Take 1 – Instrumental And Speech At The End ]
  5. Within You Without You [George Coaching The Musicians]
  6. She’s Leaving Home [Take 6 – Instrumental]
  7. With A Little Help From My Friends [Take 1 – False Start And Take 2 – Instrumental]
  8. Sgt. Pepper ‘s Lonely Hearts Club Band (Reprise) [Speech And Take 8]
  9. A Day In The Life [Unreleased First Mono Mix]
  10. Lucy In The Sky With Diamonds [Unreleased Mono Mix – No. 11]
  11. She’s Leaving Home [Unreleased First Mono Mix]

With this I simply say that, I’m not saying to do not buy the album, just think about what new material of the Beatles they are offering us and if it’s really worth the expense. Every year we have new material from the band. Some things are really valuable to the collection, others are simply disposable but the same names of the Beatles and the weight of their image on us makes us believe necessary to buy those items that many times, it is the same, but re-packaged with New or summarized title (such as Eight Days A Week ).

Forum Timezone: Europe/London
Most Users Ever Online: 700
Currently Online:
Guest(s) 1
Top Posters:
Starr Shine?: 16105
Ron Nasty: 12534
Zig: 9832
50yearslate: 8759
Necko: 8043
AppleScruffJunior: 7583
parlance: 7111
mr. Sun king coming together: 6402
Mr. Kite: 6147
trcanberra: 6064
Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 88
Members: 2858
Moderators: 5
Admins: 1
Forum Stats:
Groups: 3
Forums: 44
Topics: 5519
Posts: 380548
Newest Members:
seo mavia, adamo3, katybphoto, sleeptalker, Lovethebeatles
Moderators: Joe: 5694, meanmistermustard: 24964, Ahhh Girl: 22227, Beatlebug: 18182, The Hole Got Fixed: 8410
Administrators: Joe: 5694