Log In
Register
10.05pm
25 June 2010
Offline
I was researching and i saw that love wasn't typically an album is this true?
I've got a hole in my pocket!
10.13pm
3 April 2010
Offline
The Fool On The Hill said:
I was researching and i saw that love wasn't typically an album is this true?
None of the beatles technically rerecorded for it, so no.
"The best band? The Beatles. The most overrated band? The Beatles."
10.15pm
27 March 2010
Offline 
LOVE is just a mix/compilation thing of lots of Beatles songs for a show in Las Vegas, I think. It was NOT mixed by the Beatles, they really didn't have a say in it, so No, it doesn't count as an ACTUAL Beatles album.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/L.....s_album%29
I'm in love, but I'm lazy.
10.17pm
3 April 2010
Offline It does count as an album. Just not a beatles album
"The best band? The Beatles. The most overrated band? The Beatles."
10.45pm
9 June 2010
Offline
I dunno. It goes in the sacred Beatles Box of CDs in our house.
Maybe it's a 
+ 's son Giles project.
If I seem to act unkind, it's only me, it's not my mind that is confusing things.
1.42am
21 August 2009
Offline Well, both Ringo and Paul were involved, as well as George's and John's representatives/"mouths remaining on earth" Olivia and Yoko. Plus, George Martin had a large role in the remixing, I believe.
So, maybe not a Beatle's album, but a Beatles related album- and a good one at that.
Tongue, lose thy light. Moon, take thy flight… see ya, George!
3.21pm
7 April 2010
Offline I think any album- Love, Anthologies, Live At The BBC , etc. -count as Beatles albums. Not the core 13, but they're still Beatles albums.
Writing fifty times, "I must not be soo-oo-o-ooo."
9.48pm
14 December 2009
Offline 
Exactly, this is just a semantic issue. It's not one of the canonical studio albums, but it's got their name on it, and it's got actual Beatles recordings on it, so it's a Beatles album. Simple as that. Whether or not any surviving Beatle (or Beatle-widow) had ANY input as to the contents or assembly or packaging is irrelevant.
One day, a tape-op got a tape on backwards, he went to play it, and it was all "Neeeradno-undowarrroom" and it was "Wow! Sounds Indian!"
-- Paul McCartney
10.00pm
Moderators
Members
Reviewers
14 April 2010
Offline Von Bontee said:
It's not one of the canonical studio albums
Canonical? Nice word use. Your erudition is most impressive!
To the fountain of perpetual mirth, let it roll for all its worth. And all the children boogie.
10.12pm
3 April 2010
Offline Most conquisitive of you VonBontee (Yes that's a real word)
"The best band? The Beatles. The most overrated band? The Beatles."
10.20pm
14 December 2009
Offline Heh, I never employ a word until I've seen it used frequently enough by others to become confident that I can use it properly!
One day, a tape-op got a tape on backwards, he went to play it, and it was all "Neeeradno-undowarrroom" and it was "Wow! Sounds Indian!"
-- Paul McCartney
10.35pm
3 September 2009
Offline I count it as a Beatles album, sure. But as Von Bontee stated so eliquently and I agree with, "It's not one of the canonical studio albums".
Love counts just as much as A Collection Of Beatles Oldies.
Look Up The Number
11.50pm
9 June 2010
Offline Von Bontee said:
Heh, I never employ a word until I've seen it used frequently enough by others to become confident that I can use it properly!
Heh, I'm usually the one who uses a word as soon as I become aware of its existence, definition, and spelling!
You wouldn't believe how many times I've seen "incompetent" misspelled. 
If I seem to act unkind, it's only me, it's not my mind that is confusing things.
1.36am
12 November 2009
Offline Heh. That's why I don't put "detailed oriented" on anything describing me - it guarantees at least two typos.
Ad hoc, ad loc, and quid pro quo! So little time! So much to know!
12.54pm
31 March 2008
Offline For my money, I count PPM to Let It Be , as well as Live At The BBC , Anthologies 1, 2, 3, LIB Naked and Love all to be part of The Beatles' output. I don't really bother with compilations, nor do I count the Yellow Submarine Soundtrack. As a rule of thumb, if it's an official release and it offers something that wasn't heard before, it goes in.
Can buy me love! Please consider using these links to support the Beatles Bible: Amazon | iTunes
Or buy my paperback/ebook! Riding So High – The Beatles and Drugs
Don't miss The Bowie Bible – now live!
3.22pm
1 May 2010
Offline Joe said:
For my money, I count PPM to Let It Be , as well as Live At The BBC , Anthologies 1, 2, 3, LIB Naked and Love all to be part of The Beatles' output. I don't really bother with compilations, nor do I count the Yellow Submarine Soundtrack. As a rule of thumb, if it's an official release and it offers something that wasn't heard before, it goes in.
Which YS album you don't count Joe? The one in the Stereo Box Set or the Songtrack?
Here comes the sun….. Scoobie-doobie……
Something in the way she moves…..attracts me like a cauliflower…
Bop. Bop, cat bop. Go, Johnny, Go.
Beware of Darkness…
5.30pm
Moderators
Members
Reviewers
14 April 2010
Offline skye said:
Heh. That's why I don't put "detailed oriented" on anything describing me - it guarantees at least two typos.
Thanks for making me spit out my coffee - you owe me a new tie.
To the fountain of perpetual mirth, let it roll for all its worth. And all the children boogie.
6.17pm
31 March 2008
Offline Sorry, I wrote Soundtrack but meant Songtrack.
Can buy me love! Please consider using these links to support the Beatles Bible: Amazon | iTunes
Or buy my paperback/ebook! Riding So High – The Beatles and Drugs
Don't miss The Bowie Bible – now live!
4.13am
27 March 2010
Offline Ahhh, okay. I didn't know Paulie, Ringo, Olivia and Yoko were involved. I guess that makes it legitimate-r...
Joe said:
As a rule of thumb, if it's an official release and it offers something that wasn't heard before, it goes in.
Hmm... interesting thought. (This is me trying to sound all intelligent) It's not really something that wasn't heard before, but yeah, I guess I get where you all are coming from.
It's kind of like "Real Love " and all that... it's not Beatles-Beatles, but it's (still) Beatles, you know? Gahh, I confuse myself.
I'm in love, but I'm lazy.
3.49pm
1 May 2010
Offline Actually I count the Red and Blue Albums because to me it was the only way to have the Beatles on CD in early 90s (or at least in my town)
I was not a huge fan of Love but it's growing on me. My only complain is that I start dancing with Get Back and Glass Onion and then paf.. we go to Eleanor Rigby . I'm like "Argh I want more music to dance!"
Here comes the sun….. Scoobie-doobie……
Something in the way she moves…..attracts me like a cauliflower…
Bop. Bop, cat bop. Go, Johnny, Go.
Beware of Darkness…
1
