Log In
Register
11.15pm
1 November 2013
Offline
How would the albums be different if each member of the Beatles had the same amount of album space?
11.22pm
14 December 2009
Offline
Well, they'd be pretty damned short, considering that it took Ringo forever to write two full songs!
The following people thank Von Bontee for this post:
Starr Shine?, ewe2, BeatlebugOne day, a tape-op got a tape on backwards, he went to play it, and it was all "Neeeradno-undowarrroom" and it was "Wow! Sounds Indian!"
-- Paul McCartney
11.23pm
Reviewers
31 October 2013
Offline
Von Bontee said
Well, they'd be pretty damned short, considering that it took Ringo forever to write two full songs!
Maybe you can just count the lead vocal, instead of writer considering Ringo's shortcoming there.
The following people thank IveJustSeenAFaceo for this post:
Starr Shine?, Beatlebug(This signature brought to you by Net Boy and Net Girl. Putting messages in modems since 1996.)
2.44pm
3 May 2012
Offline
Not as good, I imagine. We'd have just a few songs of each Beatle, and a big difference in quality between J&P and G&R, or for the first few years anyway.
It's just fine as it is.
The following people thank fabfouremily for this post:
Starr Shine?Moving along in our God given ways, safety is sat by the fire/Sanctuary from these feverish smiles, left with a mark on the door.
(Passover - I. Curtis)
4.23pm
Reviewers
Moderators
1 May 2011
Offline
Hard to accommodate since it was 14 tracks per LP at the beginning and 4 into 14 don't go - unless George and Ringo have to share.
The following people thank meanmistermustard for this post:
Starr Shine?"I told you everything I could about me, Told you everything I could" ('Before Believing' - Emmylou Harris)
"Don't make your love suffer insecurities; Trade the baggage of 'self' to set another one free" ('Paper Skin' - Kendall Payne)
4.24pm
1 November 2013
Offline
meanmistermustard said
Hard to accommodate since it was 14 tracks per LP at the beginning and 4 into 14 don't go - unless George and Ringo have to share.
I would think that since John and Paul share writing credit that they would share a song or two
4.27pm
Reviewers
Moderators
1 May 2011
Offline
Yeah, they could do. Further down the road when their ego's get in the way tho
They weren't too happy giving George more room.
The following people thank meanmistermustard for this post:
Starr Shine?, Beatlebug"I told you everything I could about me, Told you everything I could" ('Before Believing' - Emmylou Harris)
"Don't make your love suffer insecurities; Trade the baggage of 'self' to set another one free" ('Paper Skin' - Kendall Payne)
9.50pm
9 March 2017
Offline
This is an interesting idea.
The Beatles Learn To Share
Side A:
Side B:
12 Bar Original
Cry For A Shadow
If you're reading this, you are looking for something to do.
6.08am
1 November 2013
Offline
Yo
U need one more song.
12.21pm
9 March 2017
Offline
Why would i need one more song, there's a song for John, Paul, George, Ringo, and 3 instrumentals.
If you're reading this, you are looking for something to do.
6.44pm
5 November 2011
Offline
But Ringo doesn't even play in Cry For A Shadow, so I think to make it fair you need to add With A Little Help From My Friends , but acapella-style, with just Ringo singing to make up for his absence on Cry For A Shadow.
All living things must abide by the laws of the shape they inhabit
9.58pm
9 March 2017
Offline
Forgot that Ringo didn't play drums on that song, sorry about that.
If you're reading this, you are looking for something to do.
7.34pm
14 March 2017
Offline
It is an interesting thought. Made hard by the fact that they had fourteen track albums for the most part so I would imagine that they would have three songs each and two songs that either John and Paul share the vocals, all four could sing on one song, or they could have instrumentals.
And in the end the lunch you take is equal to the lunch you bake.
1
1 Guest(s)
