The Beatles Bible

The Beatles Bible
The Beatles Bible
  • Share this page:
  • Share
  • Home
  • History
  • Songs
  • Albums
  • Discography
  • People
  • Features
  • Books
  • Map
  • Gallery
  • Fab forum
  • Store
  • Subscribe:
  • RSS icon RSS
  • Email envelope icon Email
  • Twitter icon Twitter
  • Facebook icon Facebook
iTunes & App Store
Home > The Beatles' songs > Why Don't We Do It In The Road?

Why Don't We Do It In The Road?

The Beatles (White Album) album cover artwork Written by: Lennon-McCartney
Recorded: 9, 10 October 1968
Producer: Paul McCartney
Engineer: Ken Townsend

Released: 22 November 1968 (UK), 25 November 1968 (US)

Paul McCartney: vocals, acoustic guitar, lead guitar, piano, bass, handclaps
Ringo Starr: drums, handclaps

Why Don't We Do It In the Road? - The Beatles (White Album)Available on:
The Beatles (White Album)
Anthology 3

Recorded during the late stages of work on the White Album, Why Don't We Do It In The Road? was a spontaneous recording by Paul McCartney with assistance from Ringo Starr.


The song was recorded while John Lennon and George Harrison were working on other songs. Lennon later described McCartney's decision as hurtful, explaining that it represented the fragmented way in which the group's members had taken to recording songs in 1968.

That's Paul. He even recorded it by himself in another room. That's how it was getting in those days. We came in and he'd made the whole record. Him drumming. Him playing the piano. Him singing. But he couldn't - he couldn't - maybe he couldn't make the break from the Beatles. I don't know what it was, you know. I enjoyed the track. Still, I can't speak for George, but I was always hurt when Paul would knock something off without involving us. But that's just the way it was then.
John Lennon, 1980
All We Are Saying, David Sheff

McCartney later defended himself, pointing out that Lennon had worked alone on Revolution 9 and Julia either side of Why Don't We Do It In The Road?.

It wasn't a deliberate thing. John and George were tied up finishing something and me and Ringo were free, just hanging around, so I said to Ringo, 'Let's go and do this'...

Anyway, he did the same with Revolution 9. He went off and made that without me. No one ever says that. John is the nice guy and I'm the bastard. It gets repeated all the time.

Paul McCartney
The Beatles: The Illustrated And Updated Edition, Hunter Davies

Ringo Starr later pointed out that The Ballad Of John And Yoko was recorded without him and Harrison.

Why Don't We Do It In The Road? was just Paul and me, and it went out as a Beatle track too. We had no problems with that.
Ringo Starr
Anthology

The song was inspired by an incident observed by McCartney in Rishikesh, India.

I was up on the flat roof meditating and I'd seen a troupe of monkeys walking along in the jungle and a male just hopped on to the back of this female and gave her one, as they say in the vernacular. Within two or three seconds he hopped off again, and looked around as if to say, 'It wasn't me,' and she looked around as if there had been some mild disturbance but thought, Huh, I must have imagined it, and she wandered off. And I thought, bloody hell, that puts it all into a cocked hat, that's how simple the act of procreation is, this bloody monkey just hopping on and hopping off. There is an urge, they do it, and it's done with. And it's that simple. We have horrendous problems with it, and yet animals don't. So that was basically it. Why Don't We Do It In The Road? could have applied to either fucking or shitting, to put it roughly. Why don't we do either of them in the road? Well, the answer is we're civilised and we don't. But the song was just to pose that question. Why Don't We Do It In The Road? was a primitive statement to do with sex or to do with freedom really. I like it, it'd just so outrageous that I like it.
Paul McCartney
Many Years From Now, Barry Miles

In the studio

Why Don't We Do It In The Road? was recorded over two days, on the first of which McCartney worked alone apart from tape operator Ken Townsend.

On 9 October 1968 he recorded five takes of the song, which began with just acoustic guitar and lead vocals. Onto the fifth take - the first to feature raucous vocals throughout - he then overdubbed a piano part.

Take four, which sees McCartney alternating between gentle and strident vocals with each verse, can be heard on Anthology 3.

The next day, while Lennon and Harrison were supervising the string overdubs for Piggies and Glass Onion, McCartney added more vocals, handclaps, lead guitar and bass to the song. Ringo Starr also recorded a drum part and handclaps.

  • Share this page:
  • Share
Related articles:

  • Recording, mixing: Run For Your Life, We Can Work It Out, The Word, I'm Looking Through You
  • I Want To Tell You
  • Recording: Here Comes The Sun, Something
  • Recording, mixing: The Continuing Story Of Bungalow Bill, Long Long Long, Why Don't We Do It In The Road
  • Recording, mixing: The Word, You Won't See Me, Girl, Wait, I'm Looking Through You

23 responses to “Why Don't We Do It In The Road?”

  1. B.H.Z. says:
    Friday 4 December 2009 at 3.17am

    This song is so damn awesome. "Raunchy Paul" at his best. Simplistic, rockin' genius.

    The origin story also enhances it. One of my White Album favourites, but then I'm weird like that.

    Reply to this comment
  2. Jack says:
    Sunday 7 February 2010 at 6.18pm

    Another good song but too short.

    Reply to this comment
    • Vonbontee says:
      Monday 8 February 2010 at 7.12pm

      I guarantee it took longer to record than to write! Nice vocal but I really don't think is very good at all. Still, I guess you could make a claim that it looked ahead to those Lennon exercises in minimalism "I Want You" (She's So Heavy)" and "You Know My Name (Look Up The Number").

      Reply to this comment
      • Joseph Brush says:
        Sunday 13 February 2011 at 12.43am

        "You know my name (look up the number") was originally recorded over a year before "Why don't we do it in the road?"

        Reply to this comment
        • mr. Sun king coming together says:
          Sunday 13 February 2011 at 2.16pm

          The vocals (Tthe parts where the minimalism would matter) were recorded in 1969, after Why don't we do it in the road.

          Reply to this comment
          • Joseph Brush says:
            Sunday 13 February 2011 at 8.03pm

            Vocals were recorded in May 1967. Additional vocals were recorded April 1969.

            Reply to this comment
            • Joe says:
              Sunday 13 February 2011 at 8.15pm

              Not true. The 1967 sessions were for the backing track only. All the vocals were recorded on 30 April 1969.

              Reply to this comment
              • Joseph Brush says:
                Sunday 13 February 2011 at 11.50pm

                I must be reading your description of the story behind the recording of this particular song all wrong.

              • Joe says:
                Monday 14 February 2011 at 8.14am

                Fair point. The YKMN article was written before I'd fully researched the recording sessions. I've amended it now. But can we please keep this page for discussions abut Why Don't We Do It In The Road?

              • Vonbontee says:
                Tuesday 25 October 2011 at 4.40pm

                Anyways, I had release dates in mind when I said "looking ahead"; I wasn't implying any creative influence.

  3. SgtPepper1909 says:
    Monday 8 February 2010 at 10.36pm

    This has got to be one of Paul's edgiest numbers, along with "Big Boys Bickering". Paul stereotype is laid-back ballads, styirring love songs, and relaying happy-go-lucky stories of beautiful everyday people---a la "Ob-la-di, Ob-la-da", "Lovely Rita", "Paperback Writer" . John once complained about this writing technique of his; and yet the "White Album" showcased "Helter Skelter", "Wild Honey Pie", and this number, not-so-innocent tracks. I was entranced by the song's raunchy style and composition with its array simple instrumentation. However, it was soon inquired if I knew what the song's incantation meant.

    Reply to this comment
  4. BeatleMark says:
    Tuesday 9 February 2010 at 3.23am

    I agree, Jack. Too short. I think this is one of those that John wished that Paul would have let him sing.

    Reply to this comment
  5. BOYER says:
    Sunday 10 October 2010 at 7.58am

    I can't hear the acoustic guitar. If it was present in the first take(s), I guess it was not in the last one.

    Reply to this comment
  6. Guinnevere says:
    Sunday 13 February 2011 at 12.13am

    Errrr......what does Paul want to ''Do in the road''???

    Reply to this comment
    • Joe says:
      Sunday 13 February 2011 at 12.25am

      Have you read the article on this page? If you still don't get it, read it again.

      Reply to this comment
      • Guinnevere says:
        Monday 14 February 2011 at 1.02am

        Ohhhhhhh. :L Didnt see that before...

        Reply to this comment
  7. mr. Sun king coming together says:
    Monday 14 February 2011 at 8.07pm

    Back to the Point, I wish John had sung it.

    Reply to this comment
    • JP says:
      Monday 24 October 2011 at 3.58pm

      Agreed. This and Oh Darling were McCartney songs John felt he could have done better. It would have been great if they had done that more - allowing the other to take the lead vocal even if it wasn't the lead singer's song. Still, would John have let Paul take lead on one of his songs had Paul made such a request?

      Reply to this comment
      • paulsbass says:
        Tuesday 25 October 2011 at 10.20pm

        Agreed on Oh Darling, couldn't disagree more on this one.

        Reply to this comment
      • James says:
        Thursday 27 October 2011 at 1.03am

        The thing that's the coolest to me about Paul McCartney the musician is that he could do just about anything, which is opposed to John who could still do an awful lot, but he had more of a "wheelhouse" than Paul did, meaning that he was really good at doing specific things. Oh Darling and maybe this song (although I really think Paul is quite good on this one) could have been times where John would just rip an incredible take like Twist and Shout or Instant Karma or something like that. But they were different musicians, John was more in the moment and Paul liked to assemble the parts much more methodically, which is generally why Paul's stuff has less emotion than John's.

        Reply to this comment
  8. Tweeze says:
    Monday 26 September 2011 at 12.46pm

    It's just a blues format retread. There's nothing wrong with that but it's certainly not a genius piece of work. Paul's vocal is what makes this work - therein lies the genius.

    Reply to this comment
  9. Mean_Mr_Mustard says:
    Friday 18 November 2011 at 11.14pm

    Funny how the word `genius' gets tossed around so carelessly. I really like this track -- it's a lot of fun -- but `genius'? Let's not get carried away. How about if we reserve that term for his numerous other songs which truly deserve that title.

    Reply to this comment
  10. aak says:
    Wednesday 1 February 2012 at 5.38am

    Is there a slide guitar being played on the record? I wonder how he got that sound.

    Reply to this comment

Leave a reply

Please note that there may be a delay before comments can be approved for publication. We reserve the right to edit for length and/or content. Comments not in the English language may be discarded, and offensive, irrelevant or spam ones will be ignored. For more information please read the full comments policy.
Click here to cancel reply.


  • Latest posts

    • Paul McCartney's star unveiled on Hollywood Walk of Fame
    • Paul McCartney to headline Queen's diamond jubilee concert
    • US album release: Kisses On The Bottom by Paul McCartney
    • UK album release: Kisses On The Bottom by Paul McCartney
    • Abbey Road to offer studio time to wealthy hotel guests
    • US publishing rights for six early Beatles songs are sold
    • Paul McCartney live at Echo Arena, Liverpool
    • Paul McCartney live at Manchester Evening News Arena, Manchester
    • Paul McCartney live at Olimpiyskiy Arena, Moscow, Russia
    • Paul McCartney live at Hartwall Areena, Helsinki, Finland
  • On this day in Beatles history

    • 1966: John Lennon and Ringo Starr visit Scotch Of St James nightclub, London
    • 1964: Live: Carnegie Hall, New York City
    • 1963: Live: Astoria Ballroom, Oldham

    Want more? Visit the Beatles history section.

  • Twitter updates

  • Things we said today

    • Lars-Olof Ström on Let It Be... Naked
    • Christopher Hight on Revolution 9
    • Tubescreamer on All My Loving
    • Christopher Hight on I Want You (She's So Heavy)
    • Christopher Hight on Being For The Benefit Of Mr Kite!
  • From the forum

    • Forum changes in Getting better
      By Joe, 2 hours ago
    • You know you're a hardcore Beatles fan when... in Yesterday... and today
      By cool.story.mum., 2 hours ago
    • Miscellaneous/unidentified in Beatles pics
      By cool.story.mum., 3 hours ago
    • Beatley Moments in Yesterday... and today
      By mr. Sun king coming together, 4 hours ago
    • The "Incredibly Impossible to Derail This Thread" thread in All together now
      By meanmistermustard, 5 hours ago
  • In the gallery

    beatlemania-museum_14 6011_hamburg_12 John Lennon's bedroom at Mendips - 251 Menlove Avenue, Liverpool (2010) The Beatles at Tittenhurst Park, 22 August 1969
  • Translator

  • Beatles for sale

  • Top Ten Club

    • Fab forum
    • The Beatles' songs
    • Beatles photo gallery
    • The Beatles and drugs
    • The Beatles' albums
    • The Abbey Road cover photography session
    • Days in the life: The Beatles' history
    • Kisses On The Bottom
    • John Lennon and Yoko Ono record Two Virgins
    • Beatles discography
  • Can buy me love

    The Beatles Bible is run for the love of anything and everything to do with The Beatles. If you've learned something new about the band and wish to show your appreciation, why not make a small donation via PayPal? It'll help with server costs, Beatles books etc...
  • Thinking of linking

    • thebeatles.com
    • johnlennon.com
    • paulmccartney.com
    • twitter.com/paulmccartney
    • paulmccartneyofficial.tumblr.com
    • georgeharrison.com
    • twitter.com/GeorgeHarrison
    • ringostarr.com
    • applerecords.com
      Beatles Bible logo by Yer Logos/The Beatles In 3D
  • Come together

    This site is in no way associated with or endorsed by The Beatles, Apple Corps Ltd, associated organisations or any members of The Beatles or their representatives. It is intended as a tribute to the greatest group of all time, to try - in a small way - to help introduce their music to new generations of fans.

© 2008-2012 The Beatles Bible. All rights reserved. | Contact us | About this site | Privacy policy | Words of love: 1,111,140

Top of page

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.