The Beatles Bible

The Beatles Bible
The Beatles Bible
  • Home
  • History
  • Songs
  • Albums
  • Discography
  • People
  • Features
  • Books
  • Map
  • Gallery
  • Fab forum
  • Store
  • Subscribe:
  • RSS icon RSS
  • Email envelope icon Email
  • Twitter icon Twitter
  • Facebook icon Facebook
iTunes & App Store
You are here: Home » The Beatles' songs » Revolution

Revolution

Past Masters album artworkWritten by: Lennon-McCartney
Recorded: 9-12 July 1968
Producer: George Martin
Engineer: Geoff Emerick

Released: 30 August 1968 (UK), 26 August 1968 (US)

John Lennon: vocals, lead guitar, handclaps
Paul McCartney: bass, Hammond organ, handclaps
George Harrison: rhythm guitar, handclaps
Ringo Starr: drums, handclaps
Nicky Hopkins: electric piano

Available on:
Past Masters
Love

The b-side to Hey Jude, Revolution was John Lennon's response to the popular calls for uprising in the US and Europe, and a revision of the version already recorded for the White Album.

Revolution - Past Masters, Vols. 1 & 2

Although taped after Revolution 1, this faster, louder version was the first to be released. The song was written in India while The Beatles were studying meditation in Rishikesh.

I wanted to put out what I felt about revolution. I thought it was time we fucking spoke about it, the same as I thought it was about time we stopped not answering about the Vietnamese war when we were on tour with Brian Epstein and had to tell him, 'We're going to talk about the war this time, and we're not going to just waffle.' I wanted to say what I thought about revolution.

I had been thinking about it up in the hills in India. I still had this 'God will save us' feeling about it, that it's going to be all right. That's why I did it: I wanted to talk, I wanted to say my piece about revolution. I wanted to tell you, or whoever listens, to communicate, to say 'What do you say? This is what I say.'

John Lennon
Rolling Stone, 1970

While Revolution 1 found Lennon uncertain about whether to join the struggle, on Revolution he emphatically demanded to be excluded.

Count me out if it's for violence. Don't expect me on the barricades unless it's with flowers.
John Lennon, 1980

The urgency of the new arrangement was a result of McCartney's resistance to Lennon's hopes of Revolution 1 being The Beatles' next single after Lady Madonna. With the backing of Harrison, McCartney argued that the recording was too slow, inspiring Lennon to re-record it in an up-tempo, distorted and spontaneous outburst of anti-revolutionary fervour. After two years lost in an LSD haze, and newly energised in his love for Yoko Ono, Lennon gladly rose to the challenge he perceived.

The Beatles were getting real tense with each other. The first take, George and Paul were resentful and said it wasn't fast enough. Now, if you go into the details of what a hit record is and isn't, maybe. But The Beatles could have afforded to put out the slow, understandable version of Revolution as a single, whether it was a gold record or a wooden record. But, because they were so upset over the Yoko thing and the fact that I was again becoming as creative and dominating as I was in the early days, after lying fallow for a couple of years, it upset the applecart. I was awake again and they weren't used to it.
John Lennon
Anthology

In the studio

Revolution featured the most distortion on any Beatles recording, particularly in the twin fuzz-toned guitars plugged directly into the Abbey Road desk and deliberately played loud to overload the meters.

We got into distortion on that, which we had a lot of complaints from the technical people about. But that was the idea: it was John's song and the idea was to push it right to the limit. Well, we went to the limit and beyond.
George Martin
Anthology

On 9 July 1968, following a remake of Ob-La-Di, Ob-La-Da, The Beatles began the remake of Revolution, rehearsing the song and trying out the new arrangement.

Although the rehearsal was taped, the next day they wiped the tape and recorded 10 takes afresh, with handclaps and another drum track overdubbed afterwards. The drums were as hard-hitting as the guitars were distorted, being compressed and put through limiters to give a claustrophobic air.

John Lennon also added his two vocal tracks on this day. He double tracked key words during the song, leaving in the odd mistake to emphasise the spontaneous sound of the recording, and also added the screaming introduction.

11 July saw the addition of bass and electric piano, the latter played by ace session musician Nicky Hopkins. The song was completed the following day (or, more accurately, on the morning of 13 July; the session started at midnight), with another bass part and some more lead guitar, performed by McCartney and Lennon.

Related articles:

  • Recording: Ob-La-Di, Ob-La-Da, Revolution
  • Revolution 1
  • Ob-La-Di, Ob-La-Da
  • Recording, mixing: Don't Pass Me By, Ob-La-Di, Ob-La-Da, Revolution
  • Unreleased 11-minute mix of Revolution 1 surfaces

10 responses to “Revolution”

  1. BeatleMark says:
    Wednesday 2 December 2009 at 3.56pm

    Yes, the single version of this song (in mono) is what John Lennon preferred. He listened to the stereo version on The Beatles 1967-70 and stated that the song lost it's heaviness in the transition. "They took a heavy record and turned it into a piece of ice cream!" He stated. Although the version on "Love" brings buried guitars out in the open, it's heavily edited and not the full song.

    Reply to this comment
    • Joseph Brush says:
      Wednesday 16 December 2009 at 2.21am

      Revolution was John's answer not only to the political unrest in France and America in the spring of 1968, but also an answer to Jean-Luc Godard and the New Left who said the Stones were more responsive to the times with "Street Fighting Man" than the Beatles were in the spring and summer of 1968.
      In fact, Godard filmed a movie with the Stones entitled One Plus One.
      Lennon may have been thinking about leaving the Beatles by that time but that didn't mean he wasn't going to let anyone criticize the Beatles without a response.

      Reply to this comment
      • Vonbontee says:
        Monday 24 January 2011 at 3.46pm

        I doubt this track had anything to do with the Rolling Stones at all. It was recorded about the same time as "Street Fighting Man" and released earlier, so John wouldn't even have been aware of the Stones song unless he visited them during the recording sessions (admmittedly not impossible.)

        Reply to this comment
    • McLerristarr says:
      Friday 12 February 2010 at 1.19pm

      I don't have a very finely-tuned musical ear (I'm a drummer - although that's not a very good excuse!) and I can't hear the difference between the normal version and the Love version other than the loudness and the length; however, on the DVD-audio version of Love, there are longer versions of Revolution and Back In The U.S.S.R.

      Reply to this comment
      • BeatleMark says:
        Saturday 13 February 2010 at 1.00am

        Man! I need to get that DVD then! I think that the "Love" version sounds wonderful it's just that they cut out a huge portion of it on the cd. (I'm guessing the edited "Love" version goes along with the show?)

        Reply to this comment
  2. EltonJohnLennon says:
    Monday 7 June 2010 at 12.57pm

    Is there really a Hammond organ on this track? I can't hear it.

    Reply to this comment
  3. Juan L. Bellot says:
    Tuesday 8 June 2010 at 4.52am

    There is another difference between the Revolution 1 and Revolution versions: the latter was increased to a half semitone higher (from A to A#), isn´t it?

    Reply to this comment
  4. Beatless says:
    Thursday 1 July 2010 at 7.50pm

    The fuzziest recording ever made. Awesome.

    Far better than "Revolution 1".

    Reply to this comment
  5. Jammy_jim says:
    Friday 4 November 2011 at 11.12pm

    What I absolutely love about the "Love" version: the 2 guitars are separated, where the original stereo version had them both in the same channel. Listen with headphones... awesome.

    Reply to this comment
  6. horse to the water says:
    Wednesday 21 December 2011 at 12.58am

    All this time when i was hearing the single version and although i loved the song i always felt like something is missing,
    until yesterday when i discover the love version.... just what it needed to make this song as amazing as it should be.
    I wonder why they didn't make it sound that way in the first place

    Reply to this comment

Leave a reply

Please note that there may be a delay before comments can be approved for publication. We reserve the right to edit for length and/or content. Comments not in the English language may be discarded, and offensive, irrelevant or spam ones will be ignored. For more information please read the full comments policy.
Click here to cancel reply.


  • Latest posts

    • Paul McCartney live at Zócalo de la Ciudad de México, Mexico City, Mexico
    • Paul McCartney live at Estadio Azteca, Mexico City, Mexico
    • Paul McCartney live at Estadio Omnilife, Guadalajara, Mexico
    • Paul McCartney live at Estádio da Ressacada, Florianópolis, Brazil
    • Paul McCartney live at Estádio do Arruda, Recife, Brazil
    • Paul McCartney live at Estádio do Arruda, Recife, Brazil
    • Paul McCartney live at Estadio El Campín, Bogotá, Colombia
    • Paul McCartney live at Estadio Defensores del Chaco, Asunción, Paraguay
    • Paul McCartney live at Estadio Centenario, Montevideo, Uruguay
    • World première of Paul McCartney's My Valentine videos
  • On this day in Beatles history

    • 2010: Paul McCartney to receive Gershwin Prize at the White House
    • 1969: John Lennon and Yoko Ono fly to Barbados
    • 1968: Demo recordings for the White Album
    • 1967: The Beatles watch Procol Harum perform in London
    • 1963: Live: Granada Cinema, Walthamstow, London
    • 1963: Radio: Pop Go The Beatles
    • 1962: Live: Star-Club, Hamburg
    • 1961: Live: Top Ten Club, Hamburg

    Want more? Visit the Beatles history section.

  • Twitter updates

  • Things we said today

    • Fred Schlip on Octopus's Garden
    • pinio65 on Germany discography
    • pinio65 on Germany discography
    • Cristobal on Picasso's Last Words (Drink To Me)
    • 48569 on Octopus's Garden
  • From the forum

    • The birthday topic! in All together now
      By mithveaen
    • Sgt. Pepper in The albums
      By "Into the Sky with Diamonds"
    • Strongest Beatle per album in The albums
      By "Into the Sky with Diamonds"
    • top 3 macca post beatles albums in Paul McCartney
      By lettherebbeatles4ever
    • George's best vocal performances with The Beatles in George Harrison
      By meanmistermustard
iTunes & App Store
  • Top Ten Club

    • Fab forum
    • The Beatles and drugs
    • The Beatles' songs
    • The Abbey Road cover photography session
    • Days in the life: The Beatles' history
    • The Beatles (White Album)
    • The Beatles' albums
    • Beatles photo gallery
    • I Am The Walrus
    • Abbey Road album artwork
  • Can buy me love

    The Beatles Bible is run for the love of anything and everything to do with The Beatles. If you've learned something new about the band and wish to show your appreciation, why not make a small donation via PayPal? It'll help with server costs, Beatles books etc...
  • Thinking of linking

    • thebeatles.com
    • johnlennon.com
    • paulmccartney.com
    • twitter.com/paulmccartney
    • georgeharrison.com
    • twitter.com/GeorgeHarrison
    • ringostarr.com
    • applerecords.com
      Beatles Bible logo by Yer Logos/The Beatles In 3D
  • Come together

    This site is in no way associated with or endorsed by The Beatles, Apple Corps Ltd, associated organisations or any members of The Beatles or their representatives. It is intended as a tribute to the greatest group of all time, to try - in a small way - to help introduce their music to new generations of fans.

© 2008-2012 The Beatles Bible. All rights reserved. | Contact us | About this site | Privacy policy

Top of page