The Beatles Bible

The Beatles Bible
The Beatles Bible
  • Share this page:
  • Share
  • Home
  • History
  • Songs
  • Albums
  • Discography
  • People
  • Features
  • Books
  • Map
  • Gallery
  • Fab forum
  • Store
  • Subscribe:
  • RSS icon RSS
  • Email envelope icon Email
  • Twitter icon Twitter
  • Facebook icon Facebook
iTunes & App Store
Home > The Beatles' songs > Only A Northern Song

Only A Northern Song

Yellow Submarine album cover artwork Written by: Harrison
Recorded: 13, 14 February; 20 April 1967
Producer: George Martin
Engineer: Geoff Emerick

Released: 17 January 1969 (UK), 13 January 1969 (US)

George Harrison: vocals, organ, effects
John Lennon: piano, glockenspiel, effects
Paul McCartney: bass, trumpet, effects
Ringo Starr: drums

Only a Northern Song - Yellow SubmarineAvailable on:
Yellow Submarine
Anthology 2
Yellow Submarine Songtrack

Recorded in 1967 during the Sgt Pepper sessions, George Harrison's Only A Northern Song wasn't released until the Yellow Submarine soundtrack album in early 1969.



The song's lyrics, although light-hearted, continue Harrison's established themes of introspection and slight misanthropy. The title was a pun on The Beatles' hometown and the company which published their songs.

Northern Songs was founded in 1963 by The Beatles, their manager Brian Epstein, and music publisher Dick James to publish Lennon and McCartney's songs. Harrison and Ringo Starr were essentially writers-for-hire until their contracts expired in 1968.

Only A Northern Song was a joke relating to Liverpool, the Holy City in the North of England. In addition, the song was copyrighted Northern Songs Ltd, which I don't own, so: 'It doesn't really matter what chords I play... as it's only a Northern Song'.
George Harrison
Anthology

During 1966 Harrison had become disenchanted with being a Beatle, and contributed relatively little to Sgt Pepper. Only A Northern Song, while conceived as a joke, also served as a complaint against the dominance of the Lennon-McCartney partnership and the few songs he was allowed to record each year.

I realized Dick James had conned me out of the copyrights for my own songs by offering to become my publisher. As an 18 or 19-year-old kid, I thought, 'Great, somebody's gonna publish my songs!' But he never said, 'And incidentally, when you sign this document here, you're assigning me the ownership of the songs,' which is what it is. It was just a blatant theft. By the time I realized what had happened, when they were going public and making all this money out of this catalog, I wrote Only A Northern Song as what we call a 'piss-take,' just to have a joke about it.
George Harrison

Only A Northern Song didn't make the grade for Sgt Pepper, and so was held over for an unspecified future release until the creators of the Yellow Submarine film needed more songs for the soundtrack.

[The filmmakers] wanted some new songs from us, so we recorded Only A Northern Song in Abbey Road. I remember playing a silly trumpet. My dad used to play. I can't, but I can mess around a lot - and that song gave me the perfect framework. It was very tongue in cheek.
Paul McCartney
Anthology

The song became one of The Beatles' most psychedelic recordings, featuring a host of unusual instruments including timpani, glockenspiel and chimes, and a phasing effect caused partly by the mixing together of two versions of the same rhythm track.

In the studio

The Beatles began recording Only A Northern Song on 13 February, with the working title Not Known. They taped nine takes of the rhythm track, four of which were complete. The best was take three, onto which Harrison overdubbed two lead vocals the following day.

It was returned to on 20 April, after The Beatles had completed Sgt Pepper. They discarded the vocals from 14 February, and in their place added bass, trumpet and glockenspiel. They then made another mix with new vocals, known as take 11. The two versions were then mixed together in sync to make the final mono version.

A new, slightly faster mix of the song was included on Anthology 2 in 1996. It was made up of the basic track from 13 February. with organ, bass, drums, and the vocals - featuring slightly different lyrics - that Harrison later re-recorded. The bass and guitar from the 20 April session was also incorporated in the mix.

A stereo version of Only A Northern Song wasn't made available until 1999, when Apple released the Yellow Submarine Songtrack collection.

  • Share this page:
  • Share
Related articles:

  • Recording, mixing: Sgt Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band (Reprise), Only A Northern Song
  • Recording, mixing: A Day In The Life, Only A Northern Song
  • Mixing: Hey Bulldog, All Together Now, All You Need Is Love, Only A Northern Song
  • Mixing: Good Morning Good Morning, Only A Northern Song
  • Recording, mixing: Only A Northern Song, Sgt Pepper run-out groove

29 responses to “Only A Northern Song”

  1. Roger says:
    Wednesday 5 August 2009 at 2.39am

    The beginning of "Only A Northern Song" sounds like U2.

    Reply to this comment
  2. Joseph Brush says:
    Sunday 16 August 2009 at 5.49pm

    You mean the U2 sounds like the Beatles.

    Reply to this comment
    • Matt says:
      Wednesday 26 August 2009 at 2.51am

      Oh, don't insult the poor Beatles like that. :P

      Reply to this comment
  3. Matt R says:
    Tuesday 15 September 2009 at 3.41pm

    This song transcends all other musical compositions. There simply isn't anything like it at all... and there probably never will be. Beatles at their creative peak I'd say.

    Reply to this comment
  4. Rufus says:
    Friday 18 September 2009 at 4.08am

    Always thought this was BY FAR the weakest Beatles song -- but then had a listen tonight, and realized it's actually not that bad. And its value, as a document of George's real frustrations as a member of the band, is kind of incredible. It's like George's 'Glass Onion.'

    Reply to this comment
  5. Vlad says:
    Sunday 27 September 2009 at 9.29pm

    Always haunted and attracted me, for all its supposed mediocrity (I disagree). Love listening to the remastered version.

    Reply to this comment
  6. Marty in Boulder says:
    Monday 4 January 2010 at 5.55am

    Can someone shed any light on the mix found on the original CD (1987) version of "Yellow Submarine" soundtrack" The original vinyl LP (1969) had this track in fake stereo. The new remastered CD has it in mono. The remixed "Yellow Submarine Songtrack" CD (1999) has it in real stereo. What mix appears on the first CD version?

    Reply to this comment
    • TheOneBeatle says:
      Monday 25 January 2010 at 5.21am

      In the first cd Version appeared the fake stereo/duophonic version that appeared in 1969. Unfortunately they remastered it in mono on the 2009 Remasters.

      Reply to this comment
  7. Craig says:
    Monday 1 March 2010 at 7.35pm

    The stereo version from the 1999 Yellow Sub is so much better than the hissy mono one on the new remasters. They should have used the stereo one again. But then again I think they should have re-mixed all the new remasters and balenced out the L/R channels, anyway!

    Reply to this comment
  8. StarrTime says:
    Tuesday 27 April 2010 at 7.28am

    People complain about this songs mediocrity, but listen to the lyrics...that's sort of the point of the song, "it doesn't really matter what chords I play..."

    Reply to this comment
  9. paulsbass says:
    Saturday 12 June 2010 at 8.37am

    Wow, I didn't know that crazy trumpet was played by McCartney.
    That man can always surprise you with ANOTHER great part on ANOTHER instrument.

    Reply to this comment
    • J. D. Mack says:
      Monday 30 August 2010 at 10.15pm

      The trumpet is recorded at half speed. But it certainly sounds impressive!

      Reply to this comment
  10. beatleKen says:
    Thursday 29 July 2010 at 12.32am

    i read somewhere once that Brian Jones of the Stones had something to do with the "weird horns" and played the glockenspiel.

    Reply to this comment
  11. Max says:
    Sunday 15 August 2010 at 4.25am

    I have "Yellow Submarine" on VHS (the U.S. re-release!) and I always fast-forwarded past this song because the animations in that scene always freaked me out. I like this song because it's such a slap in the face.

    And truly if The Beatles recorded them screaming & breaking glass and put on the A-side of a single it would go ot the top 10.

    Reply to this comment
  12. Doug Lindsay says:
    Tuesday 24 August 2010 at 4.15am

    I have always felt this is one of the Beatles and certainly George's most psychedelic songs. The barrage of non-rock type instruments, the lack of a "pretty little melody" and the catchy hook being a total piss-take add up to a total disregard for convention. It's also nice that they can't be accused of taking themselves seriously on this one. It probably helps that the first few times I heard it I was "listening late at night" but I thought the band quite right.

    Reply to this comment
  13. Denton says:
    Thursday 2 September 2010 at 12.30pm

    To me this is the BEST Beatles song. IT just incredible how uncoordinated songs can mix and sync themselves to produced a brilliant song. Splendid.

    Reply to this comment
  14. Cassie says:
    Thursday 2 September 2010 at 2.39pm

    Isn't there a bit of folklore with this tune in that Ringo is apparently so drunk for one of the sessions, he sings or slurs something & falls into the glokenspiel? I believe you can hear some of this in the background...too funny! But a GREAT tune...nice chord changes going into the refrain...very cool!

    Reply to this comment
  15. Debauchee69 says:
    Friday 29 October 2010 at 6.37am

    Now that Rock & Roll is Dead (2010), the Beatles are consigned to the ashheap of history we loving know as ROCK-N-Roll. Fifty year out, I still don't understand their fame. They were the Premier Mersy Beat Band of 1963 but Mersy beat died by 1965. The Beatles should have died along with Mersy Beat (Chad&Jeremy, Lulu, Billy J.) but they MORPHED into Folk-Rock (Rubber Soul), Psychedelic (Revolver/SGTPepper), AOR (White LP) and Symphonic Rock (Abby Road). For the life of me, I can't figure why they were so restless and inventive---why didn't they just take the money and run back in 1965? Why did the Beatles feel so compelled to push the out limits of RockNRoll? Mark my words, you will NEVER see a group as Advengard as that of the Beatles again.

    Reply to this comment
  16. Tom Wotus says:
    Saturday 13 November 2010 at 3.49pm

    NOT a strong "George Song" to me,but I can certainly appreciate its origin,and his motivation behind writing it.Giving it a more Beatle-ish sound, in hindsight, would have heightened George's disdain and feelings of an "after-thought" composer, because he certainly wasn't.The campy-psycho arrangement really robbed the song of it's true quality..but it fit the times, as they say. BUT how well-received would it have been, otherwise?

    Reply to this comment
  17. Jeff says:
    Saturday 13 November 2010 at 6.41pm

    Whether some consider this song weak or not, I have always like it for some reason. I only first heard it in '96 when the 2nd Anthology collection was released. George is my favorite Beatle and I have always felt that his contributions to the Beatles were never fully appreciated. This song is just pure 1967 Beatles - weird, pyschedelic, a bit disjointed but brilliant. The famous Harrison wit, or contempt, providing the song's inspiration and perhaps deciding its fate.

    Reply to this comment
  18. Márcio Ivam says:
    Wednesday 8 December 2010 at 9.20am

    The bass line is great.

    Reply to this comment
  19. Paul says:
    Friday 25 March 2011 at 11.34am

    I much prefer the basic track found on Anthology. Without all the added sounds, the organ is constantly audible and makes it a very psychedelic and atmospheric song.

    Reply to this comment
  20. carlos says:
    Wednesday 11 May 2011 at 8.41pm

    Was the official final version (which appears in the 1969 YELLOW SUBMARINE LP) actually mixed in 1967 or was it eventually re-mixed in 1968 instead ?

    Reply to this comment
  21. Art Connor says:
    Tuesday 7 June 2011 at 4.50pm

    It's fun to include this and Penny Lane and Strawberry Fields in a Sgt Pepper playlist. The three missing songs! Where would you sequence them?

    Reply to this comment
    • TheOneBeatle says:
      Wednesday 5 October 2011 at 7.02pm

      After Lovely Rita:
      Strawberry Fields Forever
      Penny Lane
      Only A Northern Song
      Then: Good Morning Good Morning...and so on. It's sounds great like that!

      Reply to this comment
      • Vonbontee says:
        Thursday 6 October 2011 at 5.08pm

        Hm. I'd do it this way:

        SPLHCB/WALHFMF/LSD/Getting Better/Fixing A Hole/Only a Northern Song/She's Leaving Home/BFTBOMK!/Within You Without You/When I'm 64/Strawberry Fields Forever/Penny Lane/Lovely Rita/Good Morning Good Morning/SPLHCB (reprise)/A Day In The Life

        (Damn, that was harder than I thought! The idea of a single album containing both "Strawberry Fields Forever" and "A Day In The Life" is something I can barely contemplate.)

        Reply to this comment
        • Drake says:
          Thursday 26 January 2012 at 1.24am

          SPLHCB/WALHFMF/LSD/Getting Better/Fixing A Hole/She's Leaving Home/BFTBOMK!/Penny Lane/Only A Northern Song/Within You Without You/When Im 64/Good Morning Good Morning/Lovely Rita/SPLHCB reprise/Strawberry Fields Forever/A Day In The Life

          Reply to this comment
          • Joe says:
            Thursday 26 January 2012 at 11.50am

            I'm slightly reluctant to have a load of lists of song titles on this page - it clogs up the comments section. This discussion would be far better in the Fab Forum - please go there if you'd like to continue, and keep this page about Only A Northern Song. Thanks!

            Reply to this comment
  22. Happiness is a warm gun says:
    Friday 18 November 2011 at 3.34pm

    I can't claim to like this song. Certain elements of the recording and information about the song are interesting and I an appreciate intellectually, but aesthetically it's a dud for me. I just don't enjoy listening to it.

    I will say that I would have liked it better on Sargent Pepper than on Yellow Submarine--I had not known this was written during that time until I read this, but that very fitting IMO. Its acerbic tone is evident to me and that made it always seem out of place with the Yellow Submarine set. Had it been included on Sargent Pepper, I think that would have helped play down the Gilbert and Sullivan vibe of that album that I never care for much either.

    The other thing is this song's background kind help me fill out my understanding of George's evolution as a songwriter. Being in a band with a pair of egos like John and Paul, with their own intense dynamics and drama between them, would have been at times insufferable for someone less assertive, I'm sure. So for George, his only path to making being a Beatles bearable was to develop his songcraft and really stand out on his own. It was a sink-or-swim situation for him. I mean, he may have dismissed this as a piss-take, but it didn't make the cut while the tedious "She's Leaving Home" and the irritating ...Mr. Kite" did. I bet that stuck in George's craw when they revisited this song in the studio. I have to wonder if that helped motivate him more to write songs the other Beatles couldn't dismiss so easily.

    Reply to this comment

Leave a reply

Please note that there may be a delay before comments can be approved for publication. We reserve the right to edit for length and/or content. Comments not in the English language may be discarded, and offensive, irrelevant or spam ones will be ignored. For more information please read the full comments policy.
Click here to cancel reply.


  • Latest posts

    • Paul McCartney's star unveiled on Hollywood Walk of Fame
    • Paul McCartney to headline Queen's diamond jubilee concert
    • US album release: Kisses On The Bottom by Paul McCartney
    • UK album release: Kisses On The Bottom by Paul McCartney
    • Abbey Road to offer studio time to wealthy hotel guests
    • US publishing rights for six early Beatles songs are sold
    • Paul McCartney live at Echo Arena, Liverpool
    • Paul McCartney live at Manchester Evening News Arena, Manchester
    • Paul McCartney live at Olimpiyskiy Arena, Moscow, Russia
    • Paul McCartney live at Hartwall Areena, Helsinki, Finland
  • On this day in Beatles history

    • 1966: John Lennon and Ringo Starr visit Scotch Of St James nightclub, London
    • 1964: Live: Carnegie Hall, New York City
    • 1963: Live: Astoria Ballroom, Oldham

    Want more? Visit the Beatles history section.

  • Twitter updates

  • Things we said today

    • Lars-Olof Ström on Let It Be... Naked
    • Christopher Hight on Revolution 9
    • Tubescreamer on All My Loving
    • Christopher Hight on I Want You (She's So Heavy)
    • Christopher Hight on Being For The Benefit Of Mr Kite!
  • From the forum

    • The "Incredibly Impossible to Derail This Thread" thread in All together now
      By kedame, 5 hours ago
    • Did John have any disorders? in John Lennon
      By The Strawberry, 13 hours ago
    • New Member in Forum rules and help guides
      By mithveaen, yesterday
    • I Don't Blame Yoko in Yesterday... and today
      By MeanMrsMustard, yesterday
    • The best Beatles cover versions in Yesterday... and today
      By Elmore James, yesterday
  • In the gallery

    Outtake from the Sgt Pepper photoshoot John Lennon's bedroom at Mendips - 251 Menlove Avenue, Liverpool (2010) John Lennon 611217_12
  • Translator

  • Beatles for sale

  • Top Ten Club

    • Fab forum
    • The Beatles' songs
    • The Beatles and drugs
    • The Beatles' albums
    • The Abbey Road cover photography session
    • Beatles photo gallery
    • John Lennon and Yoko Ono record Two Virgins
    • Kisses On The Bottom
    • Days in the life: The Beatles' history
    • Beatles discography
  • Can buy me love

    The Beatles Bible is run for the love of anything and everything to do with The Beatles. If you've learned something new about the band and wish to show your appreciation, why not make a small donation via PayPal? It'll help with server costs, Beatles books etc...
  • Thinking of linking

    • thebeatles.com
    • johnlennon.com
    • paulmccartney.com
    • twitter.com/paulmccartney
    • paulmccartneyofficial.tumblr.com
    • georgeharrison.com
    • twitter.com/GeorgeHarrison
    • ringostarr.com
    • applerecords.com
      Beatles Bible logo by Yer Logos/The Beatles In 3D
  • Come together

    This site is in no way associated with or endorsed by The Beatles, Apple Corps Ltd, associated organisations or any members of The Beatles or their representatives. It is intended as a tribute to the greatest group of all time, to try - in a small way - to help introduce their music to new generations of fans.

© 2008-2012 The Beatles Bible. All rights reserved. | Contact us | About this site | Privacy policy | Words of love: 1,111,140

Top of page

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.