Which Beatles singing voice is your favorite? | Page 2 | Yesterday... and today | Fab forum

Please consider registering
Guest

Log In Register

Register | Lost password?
Advanced Search

— Forum Scope —

  
 

— Match —

   

— Forum Options —

   

Minimum search word length is 4 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

Which Beatles singing voice is your favorite?
13 September 2010
7.42pm
mithveaen
Sitarday's room
Apple rooftop
Forum Posts: 4651
Member Since:
1 May 2010
Offline
21

I'm going to say something, it might be stupid.

 

I understand Dr. Robert's opinion about Paul. Maybe he was more "dandy" and John was more "brutal" to make the songs more different and give them their unique touch. Don't you think guys??

Here comes the sun….. Scoobie-doobie…… Something in the way she moves…..attracts me like a cauliflower… Bop. Bop, cat bop. Go, Johnny, Go. Beware of Darkness…  I believe in SH...
13 September 2010
8.07pm
mithveaen
Sitarday's room
Apple rooftop
Forum Posts: 4651
Member Since:
1 May 2010
Offline

paulsbass said:

mithveaen said:

I'm going to say something, it might be stupid.

 

I understand Dr. Robert's opinion about Paul. Maybe he was more "dandy" and John was more "brutal" to make the songs more different and give them their unique touch. Don't you think guys??


I absolutely agree that Paul COULD be "dandy" if he wanted to.

 

I can't imagine John doing "Your Mother Should Know", "Honey Pie" or "When I'm 64".

I just don't like it when he's reduced to that.


Well, John can't be just reduce to all brutal emotion. (Just like) Starting over is a good example that he could be dandy too. I always picture him with a tux dancing like in "Your Mother Should Know"
 

Ok, maybe Just like Starting Over is not dandy.. but how about Beautiful Boy?? He's quite sweet in that one. a-hard-days-night-john-2

Here comes the sun….. Scoobie-doobie…… Something in the way she moves…..attracts me like a cauliflower… Bop. Bop, cat bop. Go, Johnny, Go. Beware of Darkness…  I believe in SH...
13 September 2010
9.00pm
mithveaen
Sitarday's room
Apple rooftop
Forum Posts: 4651
Member Since:
1 May 2010
Offline

I've got a question.

 

Which range of voice do John and Paul have? I mean they are baritons, bass, tenors.. etc...

 

(I know they're not tenors, I'm just asking)

Here comes the sun….. Scoobie-doobie…… Something in the way she moves…..attracts me like a cauliflower… Bop. Bop, cat bop. Go, Johnny, Go. Beware of Darkness…  I believe in SH...
13 September 2010
10.43pm
vonbontee
Inside a Letterbox
Apple rooftop
Forum Posts: 2248
Member Since:
1 December 2009
Offline
24

Hm. Well, first of all, there's nary a moment of Beatle vocalizing in the whole catalog that I don't enjoy thoroughly. But George and Ringo clearly had limitations - Ringo was restricted to a kind of goofy lovable charm; and George didn't have the ability to really belt out the raucous rock 'n rollers. (Not that there's anything wrong with that, and anyways he was never really asked to do so.) So it comes down to John and Paul; and really, I don't think any band ever had a finer two singers.  But I gotta go with John as my ultimate favourite, for the unfair reason that Paul was so virtuosic, so able to switch effortlessly between the Little Richard screamers and the "Honey Pie" cutesiness, that it suggested that he was a mere mimic. When Paul sang "Why Don't We Do It In The Road?", especially, he sounded to me like he was trying to sound black, rather than finding his own white-soul voice. Unfairly or not, that's the impression I got sometimes.

Oh, and since this is the Beatles we're talking about here, it should go without saying that their ability to sing in harmony exponentially increased my enjoyment levels - in other words, the sum of John & Paul singing together was more than twice as good as either of them individually. And obviously the addition of George increased that even further.

I just want to play. I’d like to think I could work opposite Sinatra, B.B. King, the Beatles, or a polka band... - Jazz musician Rahsaan Roland Kirk, 1967
13 September 2010
10.48pm
MrBig
Rapture, Atlantic Ocean
Apple rooftop
Forum Posts: 1105
Member Since:
4 April 2010
Offline
25

vonbontee said:

Hm. Well, first of all, there's nary a moment of Beatle vocalizing in the whole catalog that I don't enjoy thoroughly. But George and Ringo clearly had limitations - Ringo was restricted to a kind of goofy lovable charm; and George didn't have the ability to really belt out the raucous rock 'n rollers. (Not that there's anything wrong with that, and anyways he was never really asked to do so.) 


I wouldn't really say that he didn't have the ability, he just didn't use it. There's some rock vocal in the first take of Something, and Old Brown Shoe.
"The best band? The Beatles. The most overrated band? The Beatles."
13 September 2010
11.47pm
MissLizzy
Tropical Seas
The Top Ten Club
Forum Posts: 62
Member Since:
8 August 2010
Offline

I read Joe's article about "Plastic Ono Band" and I remembered the first time I listened this song... I was about 11 o 12, but I was shocked by John's voice and the pain you feel in it...

13 September 2010
11.48pm
MissLizzy
Tropical Seas
The Top Ten Club
Forum Posts: 62
Member Since:
8 August 2010
Offline
27

c64wood said:

My choice would be when a-hard-days-night-paul-2 and a-hard-days-night-john-7 harmonize and create that third voice.

 


I totally agree with that a-hard-days-night-ringo-8
14 September 2010
7.30pm
GniknuS
Rain? I don't mind
Apple rooftop
Forum Posts: 1353
Member Since:
1 May 2010
Offline
28

paulsbass said:

I forgot to mention John best Beatle performance (imo).

That would be "Happiness Is A Warm Gun". It's all there.


That's a pretty good one, I've always enjoyed John's really honest songs though, right now I'm a Loser would have to be my favorite of his. I think that's why I've always liked John's voice a little bit more than Paul's, there's just more honesty in his voice and I'm more aware of the emotions he felt while singing or writing whatever song. I agree with vonbontee about Why Don't We Do It In The Road, it sort of seems like he's trying to be someone else, but he still sounds fantastic.

If you count solo stuff George would be my favorite, but Beatlewise John just had so many different styles that it would be almost impossible for him not to have my favorite voice of the four.

I sat on a rug, biding my time, drinking her wine
14 September 2010
8.01pm
DoctorRobert
Through the bathroom window
Shea Stadium
Forum Posts: 404
Member Since:
4 September 2010
Offline
29

Yeah, I admit Paul's voice can be brutal (oh darling springs to mind) but it lacks the honest emotion John shows. It all seems a bit plastic soul (or should that be Rubber Soul).

You all will have read that Dave Dee is no longer with us. But Mickey and Titch and I would like to carry on the good work that's always gone down in number two.
14 September 2010
10.35pm
GniknuS
Rain? I don't mind
Apple rooftop
Forum Posts: 1353
Member Since:
1 May 2010
Offline
30

paulsbass said:

DoctorRobert said:

Yeah, I admit Paul's voice can be brutal (oh darling springs to mind) but it lacks the honest emotion John shows. It all seems a bit plastic soul (or should that be Rubber Soul).


First: I LOVE your avatar! I could watch it for hours! Ok, after a few minutes you get a little dizzy...
 

I think Paul just never was as insecure and depressed and desperate as John. He's always been the ground-solid, controlled one and would never had let himself go down as John did.

He was always the happy and nice one, and while many critisize him for that, calling him dishonest or fake or false, I do like that attitude much better than any of this "everything sucks and goes to hell anyway, so f&%$ you..." attitude people like Kurt Cobain and also sometimes John showed.

People generally seem to think of depressed, "emotional" people as being cooler than happy people who are confident of themselves.

I don't agree to that. For me that's just weak, I don't like too much of that.

Paul could still do very emotional songs, but more in a distant, observing way (Eleanor Rigby, For No One). Personally I hear lots of emotion in "Hey Jude" or "Maybe I'm amazed".

"Oh darling" on the other hand would be an example of fake-emotions. He just did that one to scream, without real feeling. John would have done it better (just listen to that awful "Anthology" version where John is just fooling around and still sounds much better than Paul who just doesn't know yet how to master that song).

 

So while I acknowledge the fact that Paul almost never really opened up his inner soul I'm totally ok with that. I like his attitude and his vocal diversity which is unparalleled, imo.


Hmm, I think they both did a decent amount of "fake emotions" type songs, hell with the amount of songs both did in the course of 7 years it would be impossible for them not to do a few fake ones. The difference between John and Paul, to me, is 1st person versus 3rd person, it's fiction versus non-fiction. They both have their charms, but different people just like different things.

 I don't think John was always a depressed "emotional" person, but he was willing to let that aspect of his personality into his songwriting, whereas Paul really didn't and I really respect John for that. Despite his fame and fortune, he was still able to look at himself introspectively and tell the world what he thought of himself. Paul liked to mask his emotions behind characters or metaphors and there's nothing wrong with that, but I've always found it a bit harder to relate to.

I sat on a rug, biding my time, drinking her wine
15 September 2010
1.12am
skye
AZ
Apple rooftop
Forum Posts: 2287
Member Since:
13 November 2009
Offline
31

How many distinct voices would you say Paul has? I'm thinking about five: regular, Little Richard, romantic, silly, and emotional*, especially with the last two albums. I bet there are more, but I can't think of any.

*Which, when I'm thinking about it, makes those songs harder to listen to, because things had to have been pretty bad for him to show it.

Ad hoc, ad loc, and quid pro quo! So little time! So much to know!
15 September 2010
5.32am
mithveaen
Sitarday's room
Apple rooftop
Forum Posts: 4651
Member Since:
1 May 2010
Offline
32

I've got a question...  Which range of voice do John and Paul have?

Here comes the sun….. Scoobie-doobie…… Something in the way she moves…..attracts me like a cauliflower… Bop. Bop, cat bop. Go, Johnny, Go. Beware of Darkness…  I believe in SH...
15 September 2010
12.54pm
Joe
Pepperland
Admin
Forum Posts: 3497
Member Since:
31 March 2008
Offline
33

This is mentioned in Walter Everett's books - he explains the range each of them had. I think McCartney had the widest, followed by Lennon, Harrison and Starr. I'll try to look up the info (the Google Books previews seem to have been taken down).

Please don't spoil my day; I'm miles away

Can buy me love! Please consider using these links to support the Beatles Bible: Amazon | iTunes

15 September 2010
7.42pm
mithveaen
Sitarday's room
Apple rooftop
Forum Posts: 4651
Member Since:
1 May 2010
Offline
34

Oh thanks Joe, take your time. I thought it was an easy question to answer sorry!! a-hard-days-night-ringo-6

Here comes the sun….. Scoobie-doobie…… Something in the way she moves…..attracts me like a cauliflower… Bop. Bop, cat bop. Go, Johnny, Go. Beware of Darkness…  I believe in SH...
17 October 2010
12.56pm
Joe
Pepperland
Admin
Forum Posts: 3497
Member Since:
31 March 2008
Offline

Another thread reminded me about this. OK, here's the vocal ranges for Lennon, McCartney and Harrison, as heard on their recordings prior to 1964, according to Walter Everett's The Beatles As Musicians.

Forgive me if I get the terminology wrong – it's been a long time since I studied music theory and these days I can barely read a stave (I'm referring to this for the notes and numbers, as shown in the first picture). Bass clef > treble clef.

Lennon: C2 > G5

McCartney: Aflat2 > A5

Harrison: B2 > D5

The toppermost notes in each case are falsetto ones outside their preferred range. The highest notes in their most comfortable ranges are given as A4, D5 and G4 respectively.

If I could draw a stave here I'd do so – it would probably be more meaningful.

EDIT here's the Wikipedia image I was referring to in the letters/numbers above:

Please don't spoil my day; I'm miles away

Can buy me love! Please consider using these links to support the Beatles Bible: Amazon | iTunes

17 October 2010
2.29pm
Paulrus
Rishikesh
Forum Posts: 899
Member Since:
8 April 2010
Offline
36

Here's something that will sort of help illustrate it (in Paul's case anyway)
Well, the Ukraine girls really knock me out  They leave the West behind 
17 October 2010
10.27pm
mithveaen
Sitarday's room
Apple rooftop
Forum Posts: 4651
Member Since:
1 May 2010
Offline
37

Thank you so much for the answer Joe. I think I got it a-hard-days-night-george-10

Here comes the sun….. Scoobie-doobie…… Something in the way she moves…..attracts me like a cauliflower… Bop. Bop, cat bop. Go, Johnny, Go. Beware of Darkness…  I believe in SH...
7 November 2010
6.57pm
EltonJohnLennon
A Beginning
Forum Posts: 5
Member Since:
22 June 2010
Offline
38

Joe said:

Another thread reminded me about this. OK, here's the vocal ranges for Lennon, McCartney and Harrison, as heard on their recordings prior to 1964, according to Walter Everett's The Beatles As Musicians.

Forgive me if I get the terminology wrong – it's been a long time since I studied music theory and these days I can barely read a stave (I'm referring to this for the notes and numbers, as shown in the first picture). Bass clef > treble clef.

Lennon: C2 > G5

McCartney: Aflat2 > A5

Harrison: B2 > D5

The toppermost notes in each case are falsetto ones outside their preferred range. The highest notes in their most comfortable ranges are given as A4, D5 and G4 respectively.


Thank you for this information. So it's not true that Paul had the widest vocal range. It surprises me a bit. I like John's voice better but I always thought Paul would had the wider range.

 

Nevertheless I have a small correction: John could even reach Aflat5. He did so on "Don't Let me Down". An amazing performance.

8 November 2010
10.21am
Joe
Pepperland
Admin
Forum Posts: 3497
Member Since:
31 March 2008
Offline
39

Yes, as I mentioned, those are the ranges as heard on record before 1964. It's not necessarily all the notes they could actually achieve either.

Please don't spoil my day; I'm miles away

Can buy me love! Please consider using these links to support the Beatles Bible: Amazon | iTunes

29 November 2010
2.51am
rockmusicnut
near my laptop
The Top Ten Club
Forum Posts: 60
Member Since:
28 November 2010
Offline
40

i prefer george first even though he may not have volume followed by paul. john would be in 3rd and ringo last.

Forum Timezone: Europe/London

Most Users Ever Online: 597

Currently Online:
57 Guest(s)

Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)

Top Posters:

meanmistermustard: 10429

mr. Sun king coming together: 6916

Ahhh Girl: 5550

parlance: 5532

Annadog40: 4768

mithveaen: 4651

Zig: 4555

Mr. Kite: 4334

Ron Nasty: 3221

fabfouremily: 2949

Member Stats:

Guest Posters: 88

Members: 2686

Moderators: 4

Admins: 2

Forum Stats:

Groups: 3

Forums: 34

Topics: 3148

Posts: 140758

Newest Members: ieatglitter, phile24, ZoeLouk, arsentev78, Rocky You're a Blackbird

Moderators: Ahhh Girl: 5550, meanmistermustard: 10429, Zig: 4555, Joe: 3497

Administrators: Joe: 3497, Ellie: 1

Members Birthdays
Today: None
Upcoming: None