The Beatles vs The Rolling Stones | Page 8 | Fab Forum

Introducing the inaugural Fab Forum February Fundraiser! Click here for more details.

Please consider registering
Guest

sp_LogInOut Log In sp_Registration Register

Register | Lost password?
Advanced Search

— Forum Scope —






— Match —





— Forum Options —





Minimum search word length is 4 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

sp_Feed sp_TopicIcon
The Beatles vs The Rolling Stones
No permission to create posts
6 March 2014
12.34pm
Avatar
Ron Nasty
"Where have you been?" "I'm not telling you..."
Apple rooftop
Forum Posts: 4948
Member Since:
17 December 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

John's comments on the Stones in the 1971 Rolling Stone interview have to be put into context. The interview overall was quite a bitter one. It took place with the backdrop of the High Court case to break-up The Beatles, and John was very much still in the thrall of Allen Klein. Klein's business methods were heavily traduced during the High Court case, and Klein was about to embark on a 17-year court case with the Stones over their accusations that he had swindled them out of the rights to their pre-1971 catalogue.

So, just as with Paul McCartney, the Stones had turned on the latest of John's "father figures/gurus", and found themselves similarly on the receiving end of John's anger and dismissal.

While there are aspects of John's comparison I can agree with, the way that he said it was very much a symptom of the circumstances of 1971. Nor do John's statements entirely hold-up under scrutiny.

Take, for instance, the claim that We Love You was a rip-off of All You Need Is LoveA cursory glance and you might think, hmmm... Put the two songs alongside each other, both musically and lyrically, and there are no real similarities beyond the use of the word "love", and that they were both written by people living a very similar life, with similar influences, as part of the same social group in the same city.

However, the big flaw in John's argument here is that We Love You was recorded on 12 June 1967, with John and Paul in attendance and contributing backing vocals, while the first session for All You Need Is Love took place two days later on the 14th. The Stones could not rip off a recording that was yet to made.

@PeterWeatherby 

"I only said we were bigger than Rod... and now there's all this!" Ron Nasty

6 March 2014
2.25pm
Avatar
Billy Rhythm
Candlestick Park
Forum Posts: 575
Member Since:
22 December 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
143sp_Permalink

ivaughan said
I agree with the above two posters and just want to make it clear that I'm not arguing that The Stones were a blues band. They absolutely weren't. They were a rock and roll band. However, my point is that The Stones were far more inspired by blues music than The Beatles. In fact, it seems that a good deal of the UK pop scene was more influenced by blues music than The Beatles - The Stones, The Animals, The Kinks, The Who, The Pretty Things, and especially The Yardbirds, all betrayed their blues influences far more transparently than The Beatles. In fact, The Beatles are fairly unique for the time for not covering any blues songs. This, though, is what set The Beatles apart from the scene.

 

I think what clouds the issue further is that people have different definitions of what Blues music is, while I agree with your disagreement of Blues music "being made up of the three major chords", it's nonetheless probably the most common perception of what Blues music is.  Blues music, for me, is more about a feel than a chord progression and The Stones certainly paid homage to many of the Blues Masters, such as John Lee Hooker, Muddy Waters and others.  'Love In Vain' from 'Let It Bleed' would be one example of The Stones playing the Blues while the titles of some of their songs ('Stray Cat Blues', 'Ventilator Blues', etc.) I could see lending credence to some referencing them as a Blues Band, but yeah Rock'n'Roll was their forte and they did it well.  The big common denominator in both The Beatles/Stones' musical influences is Chuck Berry for they both covered many of Chuck's tunes, you could make an entire compilation album where each band gets a side of Chuck Berry covers and it'd be one of the greatest Rock'n'Roll records ever, it would also give you a very clear picture of the differences in each bands' musical make-up.  The Beatles were a much more polished act while The Stones had a rougher edge to their sound which is also a Blues characteristic by my definition...:-) 

6 March 2014
2.30pm
Avatar
Into the Sky with Diamonds
New York
Apple rooftop
Forum Posts: 1535
Member Since:
9 August 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
144sp_Permalink

For levity, I will re-post this from the "news" section:

http://www.ralphgardner.com/al…..e-beatles/

"Into the Sky with Diamonds" (the Beatles and the Race to the Moon – a history)
6 March 2014
2.33pm
Avatar
Ahhh Girl
sailing on a winedark open sea
Moderator


Forum Posts: 10756
Member Since:
20 August 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Into the Sky with Diamonds said
For levity, I will re-post this from the "news" section:

http://www.ralphgardner.com/al…..e-beatles/

@Into the Sky with Diamonds Your link, like my brain this morning, needs a little helping hand. It went to "page not found".

 

6 March 2014
2.51pm
Avatar
Billy Rhythm
Candlestick Park
Forum Posts: 575
Member Since:
22 December 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
146sp_Permalink

Atlas said
The Stones weren't much of a blues band………. Jagger's vocal pastiche of the blues is sometimes laughable. 

A lot of people felt that Mick was trying too hard to sound Black, which of course he wasn't, but while he may have struggled somewhat to pass the authenticity test with his vocals, his harmonica playing on the other hand was very Bluesy.  John Lennon may have been a step ahead of Mick Jagger on many fronts but when it came to the harmonica, it's not even a contest, Mick's playing is far superior and very underrated.  There's not too many who can blow some harp like Mick can...:-)

6 March 2014
4.49pm
Avatar
Billy Rhythm
Candlestick Park
Forum Posts: 575
Member Since:
22 December 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
150sp_Permalink

Here's a funny little clip of The Stones playing around with 'I've Just Seen A Face' & 'Eight Days A Week' and appear to be poking a little fun at the "competition":

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v.....W_e87-CW0o

 

Keith Richards did respond to some of John Lennon's comments from the 1970 Rolling Stone Interview about The Stones a couple years later:

 

 

And that would be about the height of any "animosity" between them which was nothing more than John & Keith speaking candidly about how they felt at that particular moment in time when being pressed on the matter by the press...:-)

7 March 2014
4.39am
Avatar
Into the Sky with Diamonds
New York
Apple rooftop
Forum Posts: 1535
Member Since:
9 August 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
151sp_Permalink
"Into the Sky with Diamonds" (the Beatles and the Race to the Moon – a history)
7 March 2014
7.29pm
Avatar
Linde
The Netherlands
Apple rooftop
Forum Posts: 2627
Member Since:
21 November 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
7 March 2014
10.13pm
Avatar
Billy Rhythm
Candlestick Park
Forum Posts: 575
Member Since:
22 December 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
156sp_Permalink

Bungalow Bob said
Keith Richards, through drugs and sheer neglect, had very bad teeth in those days. That probably accounts for some of his mumbling. I vaguely recall an article in Rolling Stone magazine that talked about Keith finally going to visit the dentist. It was titled "An old dog gets new teeth." :)  

John & George knew of a good dentist in London...:-)

Linde said
the one of them singing wasn't them trying to be mean I think.
 

Being "mean" is something different than, as I said, "poking a little fun".  There are better examples of The Stones being "mean", such as the song 'No Expectations' (chalk that as another example of The Stones doing some Blues), where the lyrics are directed towards Brian Jones who at the time was struggling immensely with extreme addiction problems and his days as a member of the group were clearly numbered:

 

Once I was a rich man

But now I am so poor

 

Ouch!  Talk about kicking someone when they're down, not that Brian didn't need a good kick, but yikes!  Both John and Keith's trading of barbs insinuate jealousy of each other's group's legacy, and I could understand John being a little envious of the Stones' Bad Boy image.  John was a "Bad Boy" before Brian Epstein gave him a new image, one that John's disdain for would grow increasingly over the years.  The Beatles couldn't get away with some of The Rolling Stones' shenanigans without heavy repercussions.  Lennon innocently comments on the decline of Christianity in Europe while donating his time to a reporter and it may very well have gotten him killed in the end, while Mick Jagger & Bill Wyman supposedly urinated on a gas pump because the attendant didn't let them use the washroom (restroom for you Americans) and everybody laughs.

 

Jealousy is a powerful emotion, and can be channeled to do much good.  John and Paul are one of the best examples of "healthy competition", instead of allowing each other's triumphs to weigh them down they used them for inspiration to reach new heights, and I think that this is certainly the case for this age old 'The Beatles vs The Rolling Stones' "rivalry", for the most part.  They were family really, and as we all know, family are some of the first to be the recipient of our frustrations in life when things aren't going so well, and life was a little crazy for John during that legendary 'Rolling Stone' Interview in 1970, while things weren't exactly going rosie for Keith in 1973 when he responded to John's rant.  Keith came ever so closely to going down the same dead end street that Brian Jones did before him, and he's probably the best example of music saving someone's life that I can think of...:-)

7 March 2014
10.54pm
Bungalow Bob
Seattle, Washington
Hollywood Bowl
Forum Posts: 356
Member Since:
16 September 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
7 March 2014
11.06pm
Avatar
Billy Rhythm
Candlestick Park
Forum Posts: 575
Member Since:
22 December 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
158sp_Permalink

I'm not as familiar with their story either, but this here about sums up Brian Jones' downfall:

 

 

An all too familiar story with so many who overindulge...:-)

No permission to create posts
Forum Timezone: America/Chicago

Most Users Ever Online: 597

Currently Online: trcanberra, Annadog40, georgiewood, Merch, sigh butterfly
42 Guest(s)

Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)

Top Posters:

meanmistermustard: 17138

Ahhh Girl: 10751

Annadog40: 9751

Zig: 7555

parlance: 7092

mr. Sun king coming together: 6980

Mr. Kite: 6092

Silly Girl: 5814

trcanberra: 5545

Ron Nasty: 4945

Member Stats:

Guest Posters: 87

Members: 3334

Moderators: 4

Admins: 2

Forum Stats:

Groups: 3

Forums: 42

Topics: 3815

Posts: 202250

Newest Members:

beatlezoe, nicklav99, pbwriter, leenawilliams, ravenswolf

Moderators: Ahhh Girl: 10751, meanmistermustard: 17138, Zig: 7555, Joe: 4390

Administrators: Joe: 4390, Ellie: 3

Members Birthdays
sp_BirthdayIcon
Today: None
Upcoming: DrBeatle