The 100 Greatest Singers of All Time | Yesterday... and today | Fab forum

Please consider registering
Guest

Log In Register

Register | Lost password?
Advanced Search

— Forum Scope —

  

— Match —

   

— Forum Options —

   

Minimum search word length is 4 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

The 100 Greatest Singers of All Time
6 April 2010
4.44am
skye
AZ
Apple rooftop
Forum Posts: 2287
Member Since:
13 November 2009
Offline

... according to Rolling Stone Magazine.

Here's the main article.

If you're like me, you'll skip to the people you care about:

John Lennon

Paul McCartney

I can't say I disagree with the top five, but I think Paul should have been higher! There are some amazing singers on this list all the same.

Ad hoc, ad loc, and quid pro quo! So little time! So much to know!
6 April 2010
6.16am
iCaramba
Guest

Yeah, I remember when that came out. I think it's pretty accurate... except that I think it should be called the 100 Greatest Rock-Related Singers of all time... I mean, how can you compare Bob Dylan to, say, Placido Domingo or some other operatic singer?

...and I don't think Jackson Browne's description does John complete justice. It's appropriately adoring, don't get me wrong... but it doesn't really get across the forceful beauty of John's voice. But it's cool John came out #5... he rocks!

6 April 2010
6.26am
Marcelo
Shea Stadium
Forum Posts: 487
Member Since:
27 February 2010
Offline

Ok, there's something fuzzy here: What makes a singer better than another?

The tone/colour of the voice? the technique? the lyrics?

I think that Paul is better singer than John (except, perhaps, the last point), but John is a greater artist.

The following people thank Marcelo for this post:

Oudis
I'd like to say "thank you" on behalf of the group and ourselves and I hope we passed the audition. John Lennon
6 April 2010
6.27am
skye
AZ
Apple rooftop
Forum Posts: 2287
Member Since:
13 November 2009
Offline

So when did this come out? I was looking all over that page for the date, but I couldn't see it.

Re: John, singers

Yes, but when you're limited to a page? a-hard-days-night-paul-7 It would be tough to do.

It's also limited time wise. I bet there was some Roman guy who would melt your heart every time he opened his mouth.

 

Ad hoc, ad loc, and quid pro quo! So little time! So much to know!
6 April 2010
7.57am
iCaramba
Guest

skye said:

So when did this come out?


 

This list came out in 2008.

 

Marcelo, the whole "Who is a better singer?" question is completely subjective. Obviously, many of us think it's John while others think it's Paul. It's an eternal debate... and one with no definitive answer. (Except we all know it's really John. a-hard-days-night-john-3 lol ~ j/k) Anyway, many famous musicians voted and this survey reflects their opinions.

6 April 2010
7.48pm
PeterWeatherby
A Park in the Dark
Carnegie Hall
Forum Posts: 245
Member Since:
5 February 2010
Offline

I think Macca got seriously short-sheeted in that article.  I understand that deciding who is "the greatest singer" is really, really a subjective thing, but there are certain objective points that can be measured, too.  I'm not saying John was better than Paul, or Paul was better than John, but I do think Paul had a stronger mastery over the technique than John did (even if John was phenomenal at just letting his voice become a conduit for his emotions).

 

Paul had a wider range of notes.  He could do the low-end stuff (listen to the way he tumbles towards the basement in "All My Loving"), and he could do the screaming high-end stuff ("Long Tall Sally" and the chorus of "Maybe I'm Amazed" come immediately to mind).  He could infuse the vocal with raw rock-n-roll growl (again, "I'm Down" or "Oh Darling" or "I've Got a Feeling"), or he could hit those exact same high notes with creamy smoothness ("My Love", or "Here, There and Everywhere").  He could even do both in the same song, as in "Too Many People".

 

I read somewhere that he recorded the vocal-shredding "I'm Down" in the same session that he recorded "Yesterday", in that order, one right after the other.  That takes some serious vocal flexibility, and that's not something John could have done (or at least, that seems to be the case - remember, he saved "Twist And Shout" until last in the session because he said he wouldn't be able to sing anything after that).

Not a bit like Cagney.
6 April 2010
9.08pm
skye
AZ
Apple rooftop
Forum Posts: 2287
Member Since:
13 November 2009
Offline

John did have a cold when he did Twist And Shout, but I agree with you about Paul's range. I'm not sure who I'd kick out to put him in the top ten. More could be said than he's an impressionist.

Ad hoc, ad loc, and quid pro quo! So little time! So much to know!
6 April 2010
9.57pm
Marcelo
Shea Stadium
Forum Posts: 487
Member Since:
27 February 2010
Offline

I'm trying to be objective here, I don't know if I could accomplish the task.

Don't take me wrong: I'm almost obsess with the life and figure of John Winston Ono Lennon. a-hard-days-night-john-6

What I say is that Paul has a beautiful singing voice, but I always feel that he put a distance between him and the song, and between him and the listener, a prudential way of being an artist and don't die in the process. John, in the opposite, developed himself to be naked in his songs: Julia, You've Got To Hide Your Love Away, I Am The Walrus and solo songs: Mother, Working Class Hero; are perfect examples of what I mean to say.

I'd like to say "thank you" on behalf of the group and ourselves and I hope we passed the audition. John Lennon
7 April 2010
12.32am
Alissa
Find me in my field of grass
Shea Stadium
Forum Posts: 401
Member Since:
21 August 2009
Offline

If we're going purely by 'best singers' I would ideally have Paul before John. I am a John girl, don't get me wrong! But singing wise... I don't know. Paul can really belt it- pitch perfect too. My heart kind of rides on the waves of his voice, and with John singing, his voice just kind of seeps right in. Others have mentioned it, John's singing leaves much more of an emotional resonance, but Paul, while his songs are about uncles or groupies, still get me because of his voice. 
I think he's great! 
a-hard-days-night-paul-5

Artist though? John would prevail any old day.

 

Tongue, lose thy light. Moon, take thy flight… see ya, George!
7 April 2010
6.10am
iCaramba
Guest

Marcelo said:

I'm trying to be objective here, I don't know if I could accomplish the task.


 

No need to be objective… this whole thing is very subjective. I like the way you put it. a-hard-days-night-paul-10Yes, Paul has excellent range. Yes, he can howl. I still think John is a better singer. He's so expressive, so forcefully gentle, so elegant, so full of character…. so unique and unmistakeable!

 

Peace and love, y'all! a-hard-days-night-george-8

Forum Timezone: Europe/London

Most Users Ever Online: 597

Currently Online: Joe, Zig, Ahhh Girl, StrawberryFieldsForever, She_is_leaving_home, georgiewood
51 Guest(s)

Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)

Top Posters:

meanmistermustard: 9966

mr. Sun king coming together: 6916

parlance: 5233

Ahhh Girl: 5229

mithveaen: 4651

Annadog40: 4367

Zig: 4232

Mr. Kite: 3857

Ron Nasty: 3107

fabfouremily: 2931

Member Stats:

Guest Posters: 88

Members: 2642

Moderators: 4

Admins: 2

Forum Stats:

Groups: 3

Forums: 34

Topics: 3154

Posts: 136630

Newest Members: MargherYRNU, william.s, georgiewood, IHeartTheBeatles, pocaloc

Moderators: Ahhh Girl: 5229, meanmistermustard: 9966, Zig: 4232, Joe: 3469

Administrators: Joe: 3469, Ellie: 1

Members Birthdays
Today: None
Upcoming: None