<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
	<title>The Beatles Bible - Topic: Quantum Leap Fab Four samples</title>
	<link>http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/yesterday-and-today/quantum-leap-fab-four-samples/</link>
	<description><![CDATA[The Beatles&#039; songs, albums, photos, places and much more, including a day-by-day guide to their career from 1957 to 1970 and beyond, plus profiles of John Lennon, Paul McCartney, George Harrison, Ringo Starr and many others.]]></description>
	<generator>Simple:Press Version 5.2.6</generator>
	<atom:link href="http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/yesterday-and-today/quantum-leap-fab-four-samples/rss/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <item>
        	<title>McLerristarr on Quantum Leap Fab Four samples</title>
        	<link>http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/yesterday-and-today/quantum-leap-fab-four-samples/#p2292</link>
        	<category>Yesterday... and today</category>
        	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/yesterday-and-today/quantum-leap-fab-four-samples/#p2292</guid>
        	        	<description><![CDATA[<p><strong>Joe said: </strong></p>
<blockquote><p>
<strong>McLerristarr said: </strong></p>
<blockquote><p>
I would be surprised if they haven't been sued for this - the songs sound very similar to the original Beatles songs. Even Neil Innes was sued for The Rutles' songs that didn't sound as close to the originals as these do. They even have similar titles: Evolution, Untogether (not even a word), etc.</p>
</blockquote>
<hr />
 <br />
Quantum Leap recreated the studio sounds, which neither The Beatles nor EMI own. They've clearly taken care to make the instrumental parts sufficiently different from the originals (normally only two consecutive chords are the same as on The Beatles' recordings, eg ...]]></description>
        	        	<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 22:50:36 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
        	<title>Joe on Quantum Leap Fab Four samples</title>
        	<link>http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/yesterday-and-today/quantum-leap-fab-four-samples/#p2279</link>
        	<category>Yesterday... and today</category>
        	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/yesterday-and-today/quantum-leap-fab-four-samples/#p2279</guid>
        	        	<description><![CDATA[<p><strong>McLerristarr said: </strong></p>
<blockquote><p>
I would be surprised if they haven't been sued for this - the songs sound very similar to the original Beatles songs. Even Neil Innes was sued for The Rutles' songs that didn't sound as close to the originals as these do. They even have similar titles: Evolution, Untogether (not even a word), etc.</p>
</blockquote>
<hr />
 </p>
<p>Quantum Leap recreated the studio sounds, which neither The Beatles nor EMI own. They've clearly taken care to make the instrumental parts sufficiently different from the originals (normally only two consecutive chords are the same as on The Beatles' recordings, eg the beginning of ...]]></description>
        	        	<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 10:41:15 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
        	<title>skye on Quantum Leap Fab Four samples</title>
        	<link>http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/yesterday-and-today/quantum-leap-fab-four-samples/#p2272</link>
        	<category>Yesterday... and today</category>
        	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/yesterday-and-today/quantum-leap-fab-four-samples/#p2272</guid>
        	        	<description><![CDATA[<p>But they're just samples, they're not selling the songs. They're selling the 'sample engine'.</p>
 ]]></description>
        	        	<pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 22:24:41 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
        	<title>Sunii on Quantum Leap Fab Four samples</title>
        	<link>http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/yesterday-and-today/quantum-leap-fab-four-samples/#p2268</link>
        	<category>Yesterday... and today</category>
        	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/yesterday-and-today/quantum-leap-fab-four-samples/#p2268</guid>
        	        	<description><![CDATA[<p><strong>McLerristarr said: </strong></p>
<blockquote><p>
 They even have similar titles: Evolution, Untogether (not even a word), etc.</p>
</blockquote>
<hr />
 </p>
<p>Ha, I am amused. What a felony. Untogether, evolution? Major-wanna-be's, I am assuming, but can you blame them? Still, I guess they shouldn't "almost steal" their music....<img class="spSmiley" src="/wp/wp-content/forum-smileys/ahdn_john_02.gif" alt="a-hard-days-night-john-2" /></p>
 ]]></description>
        	        	<pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 19:38:36 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
        	<title>McLerristarr on Quantum Leap Fab Four samples</title>
        	<link>http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/yesterday-and-today/quantum-leap-fab-four-samples/#p2257</link>
        	<category>Yesterday... and today</category>
        	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/yesterday-and-today/quantum-leap-fab-four-samples/#p2257</guid>
        	        	<description><![CDATA[<p>I would be surprised if they haven't been sued for this - the songs sound very similar to the original Beatles songs. Even Neil Innes was sued for The Rutles' songs that didn't sound as close to the originals as these do. They even have similar titles: Evolution, Untogether (not even a word), etc.</p>
 ]]></description>
        	        	<pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 11:27:04 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
        	<title>c64wood on Quantum Leap Fab Four samples</title>
        	<link>http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/yesterday-and-today/quantum-leap-fab-four-samples/#p194</link>
        	<category>Yesterday... and today</category>
        	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/yesterday-and-today/quantum-leap-fab-four-samples/#p194</guid>
        	        	<description><![CDATA[<p>The samples are way cool.&#160; I listened to them over and over and over.&#160; Thanks for sharing.&#160; A bookmark has been made.</p>
 ]]></description>
        	        	<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 03:34:11 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
        	<title>mjb on Quantum Leap Fab Four samples</title>
        	<link>http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/yesterday-and-today/quantum-leap-fab-four-samples/#p182</link>
        	<category>Yesterday... and today</category>
        	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/yesterday-and-today/quantum-leap-fab-four-samples/#p182</guid>
        	        	<description><![CDATA[<p>Wow! How I&#39;d love to play about with that.................</p>
 ]]></description>
        	        	<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 14:47:58 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
        	<title>Joe on Quantum Leap Fab Four samples</title>
        	<link>http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/yesterday-and-today/quantum-leap-fab-four-samples/#p180</link>
        	<category>Yesterday... and today</category>
        	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/yesterday-and-today/quantum-leap-fab-four-samples/#p180</guid>
        	        	<description><![CDATA[<p>My brother just sent me this: <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.eastwestsamples.com/details.php?cd_index=1027" target="_blank"></a><a href="http://www.eastwestsamples.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.eastwestsamples.com</a>.....index=1027</p>
<p><span style="font-family: Geneva,Helvetica,Arial;">"FAB FOUR is a virtual instrument inspired by the sounds of the Beatles, using the same kind of instruments and recording equipment the Beatles used to create their music."</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Geneva,Helvetica,Arial;">Just listen to the samples. It&#39;s not cheap, but any serious musicians wanting to get The Beatles&#39; sounds <em>just right</em> now know where to find them. They sound really good.</span></p>
 ]]></description>
        	        	<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 11:39:59 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
</channel>
</rss>