Topic RSS
8.38pm

19 September 2010
OfflineListen to this:
In other (sort of) Beatles news, more than 10,000 fans have signed a petition to get a street in Liverpool named after jilted “fifth Beatle” Pete Best. Best’s half-brother Roag Best says, “he did over 1,000 shows with them, which means he did more with them than Ringo Starr did in six years. In Hamburg, especially, they were doing eight or nine-hour sessions, so apart from playing more shows, he outstripped Ringo in hours played, as well.”
Just read This. This is idiotic
8.54pm
25 November 2010
Offline8.55pm

19 September 2010
OfflineStarWisher said:
**Trying not to make too many jokes about dead-end streets**
Go Ahead!!! He does not deserve a street.
8.57pm
25 November 2010
Offline9.02pm

19 September 2010
Offline9.07pm
14 April 2010
Offline9.09pm

19 September 2010
Offline10.34pm
25 November 2010
Offlinemr. Sun king coming together said:
Sure you can. Joe is not on
Nah, I'm not worried about Joe. I feel a little sorry for Pete Best, actually. Not good to make fun of easy targets.
10.48pm
14 December 2009
OfflineEh, as long as the other ten higher-ranked Beatles (and honourary Beatles) already have Liverpool streets named after them (Lennon Lane, Paul Place, Ringo Road, Harrison Highway, Evans Avenue, Brian Boulevard, Sutcliffe Street, etc), I see no harm in Pete having one of his own too.
11.11pm
1 May 2010
Offline11.47pm

19 September 2010
OfflineI don't mind if Pete gets a street, but I agree with Von. There are more important people in Beatles history. George Martin, Brian Epstein and even Mal Evans did more than Pete did. Listening to the drums on early recordings, I'd say there was a reason he was replaced anyway.
2.16am

19 September 2010
Offline5.37am
1 February 2011
Offlineskye said:
I'm not against it (it's their street to name), but it seems sad to me. He played 1,000+ shows with them, but Ringo made the difference.
Well put. One does start to feel bad for the guy, his whole life revolves around accomplishments other people made.
5.10pm

27 February 2010
Offlineskye said:
I'm not against it (it's their street to name), but it seems sad to me. He played 1,000+ shows with them, but Ringo made the difference.
Yeah, the Beatles were four chaps with an unrepeatable chemistry. If Best was the drummer, maybe they would split just after Brian's death or before. Ringo was the oil in the machine, he could chill the discussions just being him; Best could be another focus of conflict if he would be in the band.
In addition, John, Paul and George needed, as they said "the best drummer in Liverpool", and that was Ringo, they did the best choice, not for Best's (lack of) ability, but for Ringo's personality and technique.
Ringo's drumming is so unique, that is a inseparable part of Beatles' sound.
5.42pm
22 September 2010
OfflineI would have sympathised, only if they didn't drag Ringo into it and draw a comparison between the two to justify the request..
Besides, could Pete Best ever come up with things like: "Tomorrow Never Knows" or "A Hard Day's Night"?
Answer: No.
Bottom line: He doesn't deserve a street named after him 
Most Users Ever Online: 597
Currently Online:
4 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
mr. Sun king coming together: 6972
meanmistermustard: 3435
MeanMrsMustard: 2794
Egroeg Evoli: 1540
vonbontee: 1427
Von Bontee: 1374
Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 87
Members: 1683
Moderators: 5
Admins: 1
Forum Stats:
Groups: 3
Forums: 33
Topics: 2398
Posts: 73413
Newest Members: fartoons, RIGBY, WilliamCampbell, JQ, Juliana Melo
Moderators: Joe (2702), skye (2295), Ellie (1), Zig (2752), mithveaen (4675)
Administrators: Joe (2702)
Log In
Register
Home





