Number one: The Beatles. Number two: The Stones. So who's third? | Fab Forum

Please consider registering
Guest

sp_LogInOut Log In sp_Registration Register

Register | Lost password?
Advanced Search

— Forum Scope —






— Match —





— Forum Options —





Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

sp_Feed sp_TopicIcon
Number one: The Beatles. Number two: The Stones. So who's third?
No permission to create posts
3 February 2013
10.35am
The man with the foolish grin
A Beginning
Forum Posts: 6
Member Since:
16 January 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Most people round here would agree that the Beatles really were the Toppermost of the Poppermost, not just in the 60s but in their entire lifetimes. I'd guess not too many would dispute that the Stones deserve to be rated number 2. But who should come 3rd, either for the 60s or for your entire lifetime?

Using such criteria as the quality of the music and the songs, I rate The Beach Boys very high for the 60s, but most of the records are played by session musicians. Bringing in musicianship, The Who score very high for me.

Bringing in subsequent decades, for me it's pretty much a tie between Queen and 10 cc, but Freddie Mercury's charisma just shaves it for Queen.

What do other people think?

3 February 2013
11.16am
Avatar
Funny Paper
America
Candlestick Park
Forum Posts: 2093
Member Since:
1 November 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

It depends on the genre, I guess.  I'm not a "rock" fan per se.  I don't really seek out rock music, but there was something special the Beatles did with ordinary rock music that makes it attractive to me.  Thus, ordinarily I would tend to dislike songs like Helter Skelter or I Want You or Come Together or Back In The USSR -- but when the Beatles created those, I'm deeply impressed and love it.  (I do like two or three Stones songs, but not as much as other people like them; and I simply have never sought out Cream, or Led Zeppelin, or Steppenwolf, or Pink Floyd, or Queen, or etc. for my musical pleasure or needs.)

Then there's the concept of the "band" -- a unit of musicians with an identity, a charisma, an effect on culture.

So it sounds like you're asking your question from a standpoint of "best rock band".

From that standpoint, it makes sense to say Beatles #1 and Stones #2.

Now, I would propose for another decade, the 70s, I would nominate Chicago.

And in terms perhaps of "another world", I would nominate Santana.

***

However, I think there's a unique quality of the Beatles that no one else had -- and perhaps that is why no other pop/rock band has ever come close to approximating what they did in terms of that "impact" -- musically and culturally -- you are referring to here.

 

Faded flowers, wait in a jar, till the evening is complete... complete... complete... complete...
3 February 2013
3.46pm
Avatar
Sky999
On The Hill
Candlestick Park
Forum Posts: 1935
Member Since:
14 January 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Depends on the person

1. Beatles, of course

2. Stones for their longevity of touring

3. For me it would be a bunch of bands like The Who, Led Zep, Black Sabbath, Pink Floyd, etc cause like The Beatles and The Stones they are still being listen to today and some of them are still touring.

 

3 February 2013
4.25pm
Avatar
meanmistermustard
Moderator



Forum Posts: 18462
Member Since:
1 May 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Would the Stones be second? Rightly held up for their material in the 60's and early Seventies but after that its bits here and there. Touring-wise they are huge and are meant to be great live (i saw them in Glasgow and was disappointed but that might just be down to a seemingly 78 minute guitar piece bore by Richards). Have recently gotten their 3cd Grrrrr (such a pathetic title for an album that i renamed it adding a few oversights) so maybe their later music will be better than i think - have always liked Love is Strong.

Queen would be up there for their longetitivy and touring that was only cut short because of Mercury's failing health, their catalogue is every bit as good as the Stones.

Pink Floyd would have to be in the running, The Who are still going in some guise or other when the mood takes them. Oasis.

Regardless of whether you like them or not The Beatles really have to be top but they only toured for 4 years with Ringo (august '62 - august '66) and even by the end of '64 they were becoming sloppy when performing live. So would length of touring be a plus for them?

 

Don’t make your love suffer insecurities, trade the baggage of self to set another one free. ('Paper Skin' - Kendall Payne)
3 February 2013
4.39pm
Avatar
Sky999
On The Hill
Candlestick Park
Forum Posts: 1935
Member Since:
14 January 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

meanmistermustard said
Would the Stones be second? Rightly held up for their material in the 60's and early Seventies but after that its bits here and there. Touring-wise they are huge and are meant to be great live (i saw them in Glasgow and was disappointed but that might just be down to a seemingly 78 minute guitar piece bore by Richards). Have recently gotten their 3cd Grrrrr (such a pathetic title for an album that i renamed it adding a few oversights) so maybe their later music will be better than i think - have always liked Love is Strong.

 

Mick in this video states that "Nobody wants hear anything from your new album" in this Top 10 Things, that I Mick Jagger have learned in 50 years of Rock'n'Roll. I like some of their 80s stuff, but I don't think there is anything really after that.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v.....oi6G1wTyEk

 

 

3 February 2013
4.42pm
Avatar
Little Piggy Dragonguy
Nowhere Land
Candlestick Park
Forum Posts: 2372
Member Since:
5 November 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

I'm not much of a Stones fan, so I wouldn't put them at second, but whatever. Third, I would say Pink Floyd or Queen. Dino and Sinatra are above those two for me, but they're really not as consistent.

All living things must abide by the laws of the shape they inhabit
4 February 2013
3.59am
Avatar
vonbontee
Inside an Apple Orchard in a Letterbox
Rishikesh
Forum Posts: 2809
Member Since:
1 December 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

1. Beatles
2. Led Zeppelin - The Beatles of the 70s!
3. Parliament-Funkadelic - The black Beatles/Zeppelin

I remember George saying 'Blimey, he's always talking about “Yesterday”, you'd think he was Beethoven or somebody' - Paul McCartney

4 February 2013
6.28am
Avatar
Gerard
Hollywood Bowl
Forum Posts: 691
Member Since:
27 December 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

For me the third band is either The Who, The Beach Boys or the Jimi Hendrix Experience.

 

4 February 2013
7.02am
Avatar
pianomurray
A Beginning
Forum Posts: 3
Member Since:
4 February 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

bob dylan should be second, the beatles were fans of dylan and he is still making albums. For the rolling stone magazine, his song "like a rolling stone" is considered to be the best rock and roll song of all times

4 February 2013
1.35pm
Avatar
meanmistermustard
Moderator



Forum Posts: 18462
Member Since:
1 May 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

I thought Dylan would have to be up there, very influencial in a number of ways and still going.

Don’t make your love suffer insecurities, trade the baggage of self to set another one free. ('Paper Skin' - Kendall Payne)
18 February 2013
8.29pm
Avatar
Into the Sky with Diamonds
New York
Candlestick Park
Forum Posts: 1566
Member Since:
9 August 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Jimi Hendrix.

He did for the guitar what the Beatles did for music.
Led Zeppelin would be strong contenders, but in a sense were Hendrix derivatives.

 

"Into the Sky with Diamonds" (the Beatles and the Race to the Moon – a history)
18 February 2013
11.17pm
Avatar
robert
Ed Sullivan Show
Forum Posts: 415
Member Since:
19 April 2010
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

There is no number 2. It just goes straight to number 3.

"She looks more like him than I do."
19 February 2013
12.25am
Ben Ramon
Carnegie Hall
Forum Posts: 619
Member Since:
26 March 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

I wouldn't put the Stones at second, even if we're just focusing on the most acclaimed and influential periods of the nominees. Dylan would come in pretty close to the Beatles for me; his finest albums in the Sixties are full of the most beautiful and powerful songwriting ever, and there's no denying his vast influence in music and culture. I like Bowie a lot too, but I don't know if he really deserves to be put up there with Bob and the Beatles.

SHUT UP - Paulie's talkin'
19 February 2013
10.26am
Lorettamartin
A Beginning
Forum Posts: 7
Member Since:
13 February 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

I would put The Who in third, the Kinks in fourth and The Yardbirds in fifth

 

19 February 2013
10.41pm
Avatar
Egroeg Evoli
Across the universe
Candlestick Park
Forum Posts: 1825
Member Since:
6 December 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

1. Beatles

2. Solo Beatles (not gonna rank them right now)

3. Michael Jackson (I am not offended if you think that is an incredibly idiotic choice. I like his music. Sue me.)

Geometry, wisdom, tangerines... "The time is gone, the song is over, thought I'd something more to say..."

Also known as Egg-Rock, Egg-Roll, E-George, Eggy, Ravioli, Eggroll Eggrolli...

Purple stuff... ellipses...

19 February 2013
11.49pm
Avatar
Funny Paper
America
Candlestick Park
Forum Posts: 2093
Member Since:
1 November 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

I hate to be a buzzkill, but to me the choice doesn't even involve the Beatles, but rather:  Chicago, or Santana?

The reason it doesn't involve the Beatles is because to me they are so beyond any other band, there is no comparison.  It's kind of the mirror image reverse of what T.S. Eliot said about literature:

Dante had Heaven, Shakespeare had Earth: There is no third.

So, back on Earth, my choices are the above (and any other band would vie, according to your preferences).

 

Faded flowers, wait in a jar, till the evening is complete... complete... complete... complete...
20 February 2013
3.42am
Avatar
Ron Nasty
Apple rooftop
Forum Posts: 5356
Member Since:
17 December 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

The Stones, as this thread seems to be proving, do not come in second.

For me, a very close second, has to be Dylan. There was not only their pivotal influence on each other, something which changed the direction of both careers, but their influence on everybody else. You take either out of the equation and the '60s would have been a very different place.

My favourite Dylan/Stones story involves a meeting between Bob and Mick Jagger at The Ad Lib in the mid-'60s. Jagger is trying to convince Bob just how alike they are. Bob looks at Jagger, who he's not impressed by, and says something along the lines of, "While could have written Satisfaction, you could never have written Like a Rolling Stone."

"I only said we were bigger than Rod... and now there's all this!" Ron Nasty

20 February 2013
3.45am
Avatar
Egroeg Evoli
Across the universe
Candlestick Park
Forum Posts: 1825
Member Since:
6 December 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

a-hard-days-night-ringo-8  :D

Geometry, wisdom, tangerines... "The time is gone, the song is over, thought I'd something more to say..."

Also known as Egg-Rock, Egg-Roll, E-George, Eggy, Ravioli, Eggroll Eggrolli...

Purple stuff... ellipses...

Forum Timezone: America/Chicago

Most Users Ever Online: 597

Currently Online: Zig, Ahhh Girl, Starr Shine?, Shamrock Womlbs, leoc
60 Guest(s)

Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)

Top Posters:

Starr Shine?: 11650

Silly Girl: 7724

parlance: 7095

mr. Sun king coming together: 6980

Mr. Kite: 6133

trcanberra: 5776

Ron Nasty: 5356

Necko: 4875

mithveaen: 4630

AppleScruffJunior: 4005

Member Stats:

Guest Posters: 87

Members: 3499

Moderators: 4

Admins: 2

Forum Stats:

Groups: 3

Forums: 42

Topics: 3938

Posts: 218966

Newest Members:

jrehor, TheFifties, bmw8282, man on the flaming pie, herseydenvar

Moderators: Ahhh Girl: 11826, meanmistermustard: 18460, Zig: 8371, Joe: 4476

Administrators: Joe: 4476, Ellie: 3

Members Birthdays
sp_BirthdayIcon
Today: None
Upcoming: wallflower1996