An allegory of the Lennon/McCartney symbiosis & synergy -- and of their "break-up" | Yesterday... and today | Fab forum | The Beatles Bible

A A A

Please consider registering
guest

Log In Register

Register | Lost password?
Advanced Search:

— Forum Scope —



— Match —



— Forum Options —




Wildcard usage:
*  matches any number of characters    %  matches exactly one character

Minimum search word length is 4 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

Topic RSS
An allegory of the Lennon/McCartney symbiosis & synergy -- and of their "break-up"
15 November 2012
6.10am
Funny Paper
America
Apple rooftop
Forum Posts: 1687
Member Since:
1 November 2012
Offline

I couldn't post this topic in the Lennon section, or in the McCartney section, since I'm referring to a certain level on which the two of them were fused in artistic synergy, during those "golden years".

 

The allegory my title refers to may make some of you chuckle with amusement.  There was an old Star Trek episode (from the original series) where Captain Kirk gets split into two Kirks -- a good Kirk, and a bad Kirk.  The problem with the good Kirk, however, was that although he had qualities of kindness and intelligence, he was too wimpy and passive and could not take charge when the ship needed him.

 

The problem with the bad Kirk was that although he was quite capable of being aggressive and taking command, he was also arrogant, rude and sometimes hot tempered.

 

I think you guys know where I'm going with this…

 

At the end of the episode (if memory serves me) the two Kirks confront each other, and they realize that neither one of them alone is any good, and that they need to "fuse" again into one.

 

Of course, the post-Beatles McCartney is the "good Kirk", and the post-Beatles Lennon is the "bad Kirk".a-hard-days-night-paul-10

 

As for George, I think he would have made a good Spock.a-hard-days-night-george-4

 

(I'm sorry I have no place for Ringo on board the Enterprise -- unless "Scotty" the engineer would do:  We all live in a Yellow Star Ship, a Yellow Star Ship, a Yellow Star Ship…)a-hard-days-night-ringo-14

 

Okay, I'm going now.

Mundo paparazzi mi amore cicce verdi parasol.
15 November 2012
4.59pm
kedame
Miles above you
Candlestick Park
Forum Posts: 530
Member Since:
23 January 2011
Offline

I think most people who have worked with Paul would probably argue that he has lots of the "bad Kirk" qualities, such as bossiness (ask George), controlling tendencies (again, ask George), and ego (according to George M.).

While interesting, I feel this scenario plays right into the old trope that Paul was the soft, good guy, while John was the badass, edgy guy. They could both be both, I think.

I watched the 2009 Star Trek movie around the time I started listening to The Beatles, and I always saw Paul as Kirk and John as Spock.

"You can manicure a cat but can you caticure a man?" John Lennon- Skywriting by Word of Mouth
15 November 2012
7.22pm
Funny Paper
America
Apple rooftop
Forum Posts: 1687
Member Since:
1 November 2012
Offline

kedame said
I think most people who have worked with Paul would probably argue that he has lots of the "bad Kirk" qualities, such as bossiness (ask George), controlling tendencies (again, ask George), and ego (according to George M.).

While interesting, I feel this scenario plays right into the old trope that Paul was the soft, good guy, while John was the badass, edgy guy. They could both be both, I think.

I watched the 2009 Star Trek movie around the time I started listening to The Beatles, and I always saw Paul as Kirk and John as Spock.

Yes, but my point is that Paul was that way because he was "with John" in the Beatles context.  The post-Beatles context is where their imperfect selves began to flounder, because each one was "less than whole" without the other.

 

That's the theory, anyway.  I realize it's exaggerating things, but I think on a certain level they were kind of that way.  It's a way certain lovers feel -- they are so close they feel as though one.  John probably felt that way about Yoko, Paul about Linda -- but on a certain unique level, perhaps no one in the universe could have supplied for Paul what John did, and vice versa, during those golden years of music-making.

Mundo paparazzi mi amore cicce verdi parasol.
15 November 2012
7.31pm
meanmistermustard
Apple rooftop
Forum Posts: 7156
Member Since:
1 May 2011
Offline

You cant put John into this category and Paul into this as thats not how people are.

Paul was very capable of taking command and to be in the beatles you couldnt be passive. You cant call Paul passive when he stood up to the other 3 beatles when he believed, correctly they were being screwed by Klein; his refusal to sign caused a huge division between the 4. It would have been easier to bend and give in. 

And John had a very tender, loving side to his character.

"Well, probably we'll sell less records, less people'll go to see the film, we'll write less songs, and we'll all die of failure" (John Lennon 8/64)
15 November 2012
7.37pm
Funny Paper
America
Apple rooftop
Forum Posts: 1687
Member Since:
1 November 2012
Offline

meanmistermustard said
You cant put John into this category and Paul into this as thats not how people are.

Paul was very capable of taking command and to be in the beatles you couldnt be passive. You cant call Paul passive when he stood up to the other 3 beatles when he believed, correctly they were being screwed by Klein; his refusal to sign caused a huge division between the 4. It would have been easier to bend and give in. 

And John had a very tender, loving side to his character.

That's what I said in my reply to kedame above.  I'm not saying Paul -- during part of the Beatles time -- was wimpy and passive; that's because he was "fused" with John.  Obviously, I don't mean that literally, and I've already expressed all the caveats I could possibly express, yet people will still misinterpret.  Oh well.

Mundo paparazzi mi amore cicce verdi parasol.
15 November 2012
11.23pm
meanmistermustard
Apple rooftop
Forum Posts: 7156
Member Since:
1 May 2011
Offline

Paul was very controlling over most things Wings related and that caused issues between himself and other members leading to some quitting plus he has built up a very prolific business empire worth hundred of millions. Plus you could say John was very passive with all things related to Yoko thru-out the 70's.

Again even if its outside of the beatles era you cant put people in a bracket and say this is them, no person works to a forumula. Undoubtedly John and Paul had different personalities, fitted beautifully together as a friendship and partnership, and offered different aspects to the beatles but you cant say that they didnt have the other qualiities after the split. Paul could be a bigger ass than John and talk down to people outside of the beatles; he was a manipulator in being able to make people agree with him and get his way. 

 

I remember reading a story that the guy who played the solo in My Love, cant remember his name, wanted to do it differently every night when Wings played it live. Paul stubbornly refused and insisted that the solo must match the record, the guy got pissed off but played it straight however it added to the flames and eventually he quit. And Paul didnt bend to the public and not add Linda to Wings.

"Well, probably we'll sell less records, less people'll go to see the film, we'll write less songs, and we'll all die of failure" (John Lennon 8/64)
Forum Timezone: UTC 0

Most Users Ever Online: 597

Currently Online: Linde, DrBeatle, salviandres, Annadog40, vectisfabber
54 Guest(s)

Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)

Members Birthdays
Today None
Upcoming None

Top Posters:

meanmistermustard: 7156

mr. Sun king coming together: 6972

mithveaen: 4678

parlance: 3620

MeanMrsMustard: 2803

Ron Nasty: 2517

skye: 2295

LongHairedLady: 1891

IveJustSeenAFaceo: 1885

Von Bontee: 1797

Member Stats:

Guest Posters: 87

Members: 2327

Moderators: 5

Admins: 1

Forum Stats:

Groups: 3

Forums: 33

Topics: 3058

Posts: 109566

Newest Members: imtheTaxman, Ani, onlyanorthernsong

Moderators: Ahhh Girl (3293), fabfouremily (2941), Zig (3292), Joe (3201), Ellie (1)

Administrators: Joe (3201)