14 April 2010
You are welcome my friend. I'm not a musician either, but have the advantage of having heard the song at least a zillion times since I was 4 years old in 1967!
As for Ringo's drumming, it is amazing! If you don't have the Anthology version, listen to it here.
1 May 2010
You also have to consider that George Martin essentially combined the two different versions which Zig mentioned were on Anthology. This is why that dissection video was so cool, but unfortunately they took it down. So the first version had more guitar than the second and that's why there's only so much guitar in the final album version. I will say that I absolutely love the guitar in the first minute or however long it lasts in the song, so dreamy and psychedelic.
The original version had slide guitar and Lennon's fingerpicked electric (listen to takes 1 and 7 on Anthology 2), but they combined it with a drum-heavy take to create the final edit. It's true, there isn't much guitar on it but I still think the arrangement is perfect.
There are the licks at the end, and don't forget Lennon's guitar throughout the first minute.
13 November 2011
Ok, so I read somewhere that John later accused Paul of sabotaging Strawberry Fields Forever. I read somewhere else that Strawberry Fields Forever is about John Lennon's childhood. So I think John told him that and Paul knows about John's childhood. So, Paul thought it should be dark and mysterious. But, John's early takes are bright and happy. I think Paul made the song sound like John's actual childhood, but John meant for it to sound like where he went in his childhood. Strawberry Fields is used to represent John Lennon's mind. When he's in a bad place, he goes to his mind, or, Strawberry Fields, where nothing is real because it's in his head.
Really think about that for a second.
16 February 2011
Perhaps, but... Your starting point is that the song tells about John's childhood. I'm not so sure of that. Yes, there was a place called "Strawberry Field", but If I remember correctly it was used by nuns as a sort of sanctuary.... Or something similar. Other than that mention, it's very hard to imagine what parts of the song could be about anyone's childhood, it's so absurd. Then again, maybe John wanted to see his childhood like that. I don't know. John did say that song was somewhat "honest", at least in the Rolling Stone article, but I took it as to represent his mental state at the time rather than childhood memories.
24 November 2011
The Strawberry said:
So, Paul thought it should be dark and mysterious. But, John's early takes are bright and happy.
IMO, not one of the early takes sound bright and happy. They all sound a bit sad and melancholic to me. It's hard to tell if it's only about John's childhood. I think it's a mixture of positive memories, his state of mind at the time written (and I wouldn't underestimate the drug intake) and the wish to go to a place into his mind when the outside world becomes too stressful. Similar thoughts can be found in "There's A Place" several years earlier.
13 November 2011
1 May 2011
It comes down to when John accused Paul. John often changed his mind about many things usually leading to looking like he was contradicting himself.
Im pretty sure that John was behind the song having the orchestral work and he certainly asked George Martin to make both versions come together to make 1 distinct entity.
When Strawberry Fields was written John was in Spain filming How I Won The War feeling alone and isolated, Ringo went to cheer him up. So his mindset would have been low at that time. The phrase "take you down" was originally 'take you back' so it had that going back theme and Strawberry Field was where he played as a child, so there is a definate link with going back to his when he was a child. And nothing is real could be the imagination that children have when playing cowboys and indians or pirates. But then the drugs kick in. Tho that is all speculation and could be complete nonsense.
Some of the lyrics are not about his childhood but some relate to it. "No one i think is in my tree" was John referring to even when he was younger he believed he was different from all the other kids.
1 May 2010
A couple thoughts, first where did you read that John accused Paul of sabotaging the song? I know he said later to George Martin that he would like to remix the song and make it less psychadelic, but I've never read or heard anything about Paul's role on the song. How would he have sabotaged it? It seems like it was pretty much a completed song lyrically when John was filming How I Won the War…
Certainly the song is meant to be dark and mysterious and meant to represent John's mind, just take a look at a few of the quotes from John on this /songs/strawberry-fields-forever-2/
1 May 2011
Found a transcript of Johns Playboy in 1980 where John talks about subconscious sabotage.
LENNON: The Beatles didn't make a good record of "Across The Universe." I think subconsciously we -- I thought Paul subconsciously tried to destroy my great songs. We would play experimental games with my great pieces, like "Strawberry Fields," which I always felt was badly recorded. It worked, but it wasn't what it could have been. I allowed it, though. We would spend hours doing little, detailed cleaning up on Paul's songs, but when it came to mine -- especially a great song like "Strawberry Fields" or "Across The Universe" -- somehow an atmosphere of looseness and experimentation would come up.
LENNON: Subconscious sabotage. I was too hurt. . . . Paul will deny it, because he has a bland face and will say this doesn't exist. This is the kind of thing I'm talking about where I was always seeing what was going on and began to think, Well, maybe I'm paranoid. But it is not paranoid. It is the absolute truth. The same thing happened to "Across The Universe." The song
was never done properly. The words stand, luckily.
1 May 2010
Hmmm, thanks for that mmm...he is right that there is more of a feel of experimentation in the final products of John's songs as opposed to Paul's, but like John said he allowed it, whereas Paul pushed for the little details and ending up annoying the other members (Maxwell's Silver Hammer). But who would want a cleaned up John Lennon song? Certainly not me. So if anything Paul did a service to John's songs.
Across The Universe is a much more interesting topic than Strawberry Fields because clearly that song could have been done better, but I always wonder if I would like a cleaned up version better. The '68 Anthology version is a pretty magical recording and the song just didn't really fit on Let it Be. But certainly Paul and the others could have shown more of an interest, although John showed little to no interest on the album to begin with so what could he really have expected?
1 May 2011
Certainly in the later years Paul generally had the finished song in his head, however it may have taken 76 takes to get it and driven everyone barmy in the process to get it on record. John was generally more open to ideas for his songs from the other, whether he really wanted to take them on board was another matter entirely. He is on record as saying that Tomorrow Never Knows didnt sound like what he had in his head, that of monks chanting on a hill. George generally had to spur the others to be bothered enough to take his songs seriously.
The problem with Across The Universe is that its such a beautiful other world song how do you record it as the song deserves and requires? Certainly in 1968. I dont recall John saying he found a way of mastering it when helping Bowie out in 1974.
And if any song was treated terribly by non-composer Beatles it was George's All Things Must Pass during the Get Back sessions in 1969. John himself couldnt gather up enough enthusiasm for Across The Universe during that time so its no surprise the other 3 couldnt either.
24 October 2011
Strawberry Fields started out originally as a simplistic arranged song with harmonies. I'm glad John Decided to start over from scratch to remake and create a masterpiece version. Years later John said he wished every Beatles song was remade which upset George Martin. If Jack Douglas is to be believed, John was experimenting with new arrangements off SFF for his planned 1981 tour. It's a great paradoxical John song but he was never specific in the way Paul was in conveying to George Martin or maybe even the band exactly what he wanted the way Paul did.
1 May 2011
Was it not George Martin who wished the original dreamy version of SFF was used or was that another song?
I think John recorded a demo of Help! at a slower tempo in the 70's as he disliked how the beatles had sped it up to be more 'commercial' in 1965. He certainly expressed his desire to re-record it.
20 September 2011
I love the demo of SSF, it's less psychedelic but more otherworldly and yet realer at the same time. Despite the fact that the final version's a recording masterpiece, I almost prefer the earlier one. But it's a close choice.
1 May 2011
Any of the takes of Strawberry Fields as well as the demo on Anthology could have been released and it would still have been a fantastic, acclaimed song. However with the changing of tempo, mood and everything else i still find that the released version is the winner. There is so much going on that you cannot get bored with it. Just when you think you've heard all of whats in there something else hits your ears and makes you appreciate it even more.
4 December 2010
With Strawberry Fields, maybe they could have made the vocals a touch more prominent, and sorted out the ending a bit. I agree with MMM about the tempo change, musically it's fantastic as a quick listen to the song in a foreign language should verify.
As for Across The Universe, I like the Let It Be arrangement (it's much better than the WWF one). The pacing isn't right on the Anthology version, but John's vocal is bare, which is probably how it should be. Let It Be with a barer vocal would be excellent IMO.
9 August 2011
I'm surprised by how many people "hate" this version or that version of a song...
14 November 2011
I would prefer if SFF in Magical Mystery Tour album was less experimental and more clear like John's Demo from Spain.Although i still like the released version ( in MMT and as a single), i think it's too heavy and has too many music elements...
20 September 2011
I agree with you there. I also think he sounds better vocally on some of the takes than he does on the final.
Most Users Ever Online: 597
Currently Online: Necko, trcanberra, Matt Busby, The Faul On The Hill
Currently Browsing this Page:
Ahhh Girl: 8322
mr. Sun king coming together: 6931
Mr. Kite: 5976
Ron Nasty: 4013
Guest Posters: 88
Newest Members: euiselva, hendersons, BrotherJohn, tssajuttethere, Holy Roller
Moderators: Ahhh Girl: 8322, meanmistermustard: 13603, Zig: 5920, Joe: 4006
Administrators: Joe: 4006, Ellie: 1