Something | The songs | Fab forum

Please consider registering
Guest

Log In Register

Register | Lost password?
Advanced Search

— Forum Scope —

  
 

— Match —

   

— Forum Options —

   

Minimum search word length is 4 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

5 February 2012
3.03pm
Another One
Iran
Ed Sullivan Show
Forum Posts: 154
Member Since:
20 January 2012
Offline

You know I love that woman of mine
And I need her all of the time
Now I'm telling you
That woman, the woman don't make me blue

 

I can't understand why the part above , was splitted in original version

...They've forgotten all about God He's the only reason we exist...
5 February 2012
3.22pm
meanmistermustard
Moderator



Forum Posts: 11263
Member Since:
1 May 2011
Offline

I think George was right to omit them in the final recording as they seem to jar the song. It flows better without them, going from the solo straight to the final verse.

Don’t make your love suffer insecurities, trade the baggage of self to set another one free. ('Paper Skin' - Kendall Payne)
6 February 2012
8.40pm
unknown
Nowhere Land
Apple rooftop
Forum Posts: 1245
Member Since:
5 November 2011
Offline

I think it makes the song seem a bit more profesionals without those ones, and I don't think that the song would flow as nice as it does had he left them in.       

All living things must abide by the laws of the shape they inhabit
6 February 2012
10.36pm
The Walrus
Working for the national health
Apple rooftop
Forum Posts: 1009
Member Since:
4 December 2010
Offline

The lyrics to that section are quite weak and forced, even though George sings them very well.

And I neeeeeeeeed her all the time
9 February 2012
4.04am
Elmore James
The Jacaranda
Forum Posts: 34
Member Since:
9 February 2012
Offline

Undoubtedly one of the all-time greatest songs.

9 February 2012
5.19am
Happiness is a warm gun
Buddyhollyland
The Indra
Forum Posts: 38
Member Since:
11 September 2011
Offline

Honestly, I don't think George was ever that consistent of a lyricist and I'm sure he scrapped a lot of lyrics like that which were just obviously low quality like that verse. As for the song itself, I have to dissent for the popular opinion--I think it is a very well-recorded and well-performed song on the album, but the song itself is kind of weak and boring compositionally. It's why no one has ever done a decent cover it (I think Frank Sinatra's version plenty much killed the song for me for all eternity). A well-written song should be able to be performed by many different musicians and hold up. George wrote plenty of songs of that quality--WMGGW, I Me Mine, My Sweet Lord to name a few--but this one just don't hold up being performed beyond the original recording. That makes it a classic recording, but not much else.

I'm not a girl who misses much.
8 March 2012
3.39pm
Joe
Pepperland
Admin
Forum Posts: 3757
Member Since:
31 March 2008
Offline

I'm trying to find a quote about Something which I remember reading recently. Can anyone help? If I remember correctly, Harrison mentions how he recorded the solo when he was drunk, then forgot all about it until he came to hear it back another time. When he did he was pleasantly surprised at how it sounded.

Does that sound familiar? Can anyone provide the actual quote? I thought I'd have put it in the Something article, but for some reason I didn't.

Please don't spoil my day; I'm miles away

Can buy me love! Please consider using these links to support the Beatles Bible: Amazon | iTunes

14 January 2014
2.11am
russb
St Peters Church
Forum Posts: 12
Member Since:
8 January 2014
Offline

Why did the Beatles release Something as a double-A side rather than give it its own 45?

I've always wondered about that.  It's so great.  As I recall, Come Together was more played, shouldn't have been.

14 January 2014
3.38am
ivaughan
The Top Ten Club
Forum Posts: 62
Member Since:
9 January 2014
Offline

It is great. I agree. However, it never occurred to me that they were giving Something short shrift by pairing it up with Come Together. Several Beatles singles were double-A's. I don't Day Tripper or Eleanor Rigby or Strawberry Fields suffered particularly because they were double A's. And while I prefer Something myself, I do think that Come Together deserved to be an A-side too.

14 January 2014
5.19am
Ron Nasty
"Where have you been?" "I'm not telling you..."
Apple rooftop
Forum Posts: 3422
Member Since:
17 December 2012
Offline

It is important to remember that Something/Come Together was not so much a Beatles single as an Allen Klein single. Its release saw, for the first time in the group's history, UK product released to make money. While there was the occasion (Eleanor Rigby/Yellow Submarine and Revolver) when material included on an album was released as a single on the same day as the album, there was not one example in their run of UK singles of one being released featuring album material after the album had been released.

The fact that Klein was restricted to choosing material from Abbey Road limited his choices. He had no unreleased track that he could get approval to use as a b-side, and choosing a song by each of his most important supporters in the group was a good political move. Giving George his first a-side would strengthen his influence with George, but making the John song a b-side would not have gone down well with John. So you end up with a double a-side.

"I only said we were bigger than Rod... and now there's all this!" Ron Nasty
14 January 2014
8.13am
Atlas
Carnegie Hall
Forum Posts: 215
Member Since:
17 October 2013
Offline
11

Excellent assessment mja.

14 January 2014
5.32pm
Ron Nasty
"Where have you been?" "I'm not telling you..."
Apple rooftop
Forum Posts: 3422
Member Since:
17 December 2012
Offline
12

Atlas said
Excellent assessment mja.

Thanks. It is just my view of it though, doesn't mean someone else might not come up with a better explanation.

"I only said we were bigger than Rod... and now there's all this!" Ron Nasty
14 January 2014
5.38pm
Bungalow Bob
Seattle, Washington
Hollywood Bowl
Forum Posts: 356
Member Since:
16 September 2013
Offline
13

mja6758 said
It is important to remember that Something/Come Together was not so much a Beatles single as an Allen Klein single. Its release saw, for the first time in the group's history, UK product released to make money. While there was the occasion (Eleanor Rigby/Yellow Submarine and Revolver) when material included on an album was released as a single on the same day as the album, there was not one example in their run of UK singles of one being released featuring album material after the album had been released.

The fact that Klein was restricted to choosing material from Abbey Road limited his choices. He had no unreleased track that he could get approval to use as a b-side, and choosing a song by each of his most important supporters in the group was a good political move. Giving George his first a-side would strengthen his influence with George, but making the John song a b-side would not have gone down well with John. So you end up with a double a-side.

This is fascinating information, mja. Thanks for your insights into this. From a purely marketing, money-making angle, I wonder why the Beatles' bean-counters weren't able to insist on an unused track to occupy the b-side of the Something single. It seems to me that if they had put an abandoned leftover, like "What's The New Mary Jane" on the flipside, that the single would have sold more units just based on the many collectors' desires for rarities. Maybe that thinking was too new for that era.

All this talk about the "double-A sided single" makes me think of how The Rutles would have crafted a comedy bit about the extremely rare "Double-B sided single." :)

14 January 2014
6.22pm
Ron Nasty
"Where have you been?" "I'm not telling you..."
Apple rooftop
Forum Posts: 3422
Member Since:
17 December 2012
Offline
14

Bungalow Bob said 

From a purely marketing, money-making angle, I wonder why the Beatles' bean-counters weren't able to insist on an unused track to occupy the b-side of the Something single.

 The simple answer to that is that The Beatles themselves had to say yes to UK releases. They themselves were not at all keen on seeing the single released in the UK, and it took lots of persuading and badgering from Klein (bean-counter #1 at the time) to get their agreement. That this argument was going on is shown by the time-lag of around three weeks between the US and UK release of the single.

Capitol had no need to worry about what The Beatles thought — as was constantly shown by their '60s releases — but EMI, who believed they were still an active group, and their Golden Egg, did.

The bean-counters could insist on nothing in the UK that The Beatles themselves did not agree to.

 

"I only said we were bigger than Rod... and now there's all this!" Ron Nasty
14 January 2014
7.50pm
Billy Rhythm
Candlestick Park
Forum Posts: 520
Member Since:
22 December 2013
Offline
15

Bungalow Bob said 

All this talk about the "double-A sided single" makes me think of how The Rutles would have crafted a comedy bit about the extremely rare "Double-B sided single." :)

 

As comical as this idea may sound, it nearly did happen only months after the 'Something/Come Together' single appeared.  There were stories of 'You Know My Name (Look Up The Number)' being targeted for the "A-Side" to 'What's The New Mary Jane?' before they decided on using the single version of 'Let It Be' instead, which differs from the album version, that would've been a "Double-B sided single" if there ever was one!..:-)   

14 January 2014
8.03pm
Ron Nasty
"Where have you been?" "I'm not telling you..."
Apple rooftop
Forum Posts: 3422
Member Since:
17 December 2012
Offline

Billy Rhythm said

Bungalow Bob said 
All this talk about the "double-A sided single" makes me think of how The Rutles would have crafted a comedy bit about the extremely rare "Double-B sided single." :)

 

As comical as this idea may sound, it nearly did happen only months after the 'Something/Come Together' single appeared.  There were stories of 'You Know My Name (Look Up The Number)' being targeted for the "A-Side" to 'What's The New Mary Jane?' before they decided on using the single version of 'Let It Be' instead, which differs from the album version, that would've been a "Double-B sided single" if there ever was one!..:-)   

That was happening virtually parallel. The new mixes of Mary Jane were made a month before Something/Come Together on 11 September while the final work on it and You Know My Name happened a month after, on 26 November. John wanted them released as a Plastic Ono Band single ("[with instrumental backing from a group] of many of the greatest show business names of today"). A date was set, 5 December 1969, a catalogue number assigned, APPLES 1002, copies pressed, and then the others blocked Beatles recordings being released as Plastic Ono Band recordings.

"I only said we were bigger than Rod... and now there's all this!" Ron Nasty
14 January 2014
9.19pm
russb
St Peters Church
Forum Posts: 12
Member Since:
8 January 2014
Offline
17

They should've made Walrus a double A side.  Meanwhile, even though Daytripper is listed as a double A-side, Cashbox Magazine and others did not include it in their chart listings.

14 January 2014
9.24pm
Ron Nasty
"Where have you been?" "I'm not telling you..."
Apple rooftop
Forum Posts: 3422
Member Since:
17 December 2012
Offline
18

Day Tripper did make #5 on the Billboard chart however, which is the chart used for US chart statistics nowadays.

"I only said we were bigger than Rod... and now there's all this!" Ron Nasty
15 January 2014
5.08pm
Billy Rhythm
Candlestick Park
Forum Posts: 520
Member Since:
22 December 2013
Offline
19

mja6758 said

Billy Rhythm said

Bungalow Bob said 
All this talk about the "double-A sided single" makes me think of how The Rutles would have crafted a comedy bit about the extremely rare "Double-B sided single." :)

 

As comical as this idea may sound, it nearly did happen only months after the 'Something/Come Together' single appeared.  There were stories of 'You Know My Name (Look Up The Number)' being targeted for the "A-Side" to 'What's The New Mary Jane?' before they decided on using the single version of 'Let It Be' instead, which differs from the album version, that would've been a "Double-B sided single" if there ever was one!..:-)   

That was happening virtually parallel. The new mixes of Mary Jane were made a month before Something/Come Together on 11 September while the final work on it and You Know My Name happened a month after, on 26 November. John wanted them released as a Plastic Ono Band single ("[with instrumental backing from a group] of many of the greatest show business names of today"). A date was set, 5 December 1969, a catalogue number assigned, APPLES 1002, copies pressed, and then the others blocked Beatles recordings being released as Plastic Ono Band recordings.

 

I wonder how many "copies pressed" there were, they'd be worth their weight in gold today, it would have been most interesting to see just how well that single would've performed on the charts of the day...:-)

25 October 2014
9.05pm
ieatglitter
A Beginning
Forum Posts: 2
Member Since:
25 October 2014
Offline
20

Hello everyone,

I am currently in an intro to music class. We have been asked to do a musical analysis of a favorite song and I have chosen "Something."

We have had to answer questions about the form, dynamics, etc.

I'm just confused on the tempo. Not sure if I am counting it right, but I think it is 66 or 67 BPM. We have to the describe the tempo in an Italian term...so the song is in Adagio tempo. 

Anyways, we also have the explain the mood, story, and the intended audience of this song. 

In my opinion, this is hard to answer as we can all have certain attachments to songs and hear them differently than others. Therefore it is hard to take a favorite song and break it down with music terminology. :/

So, looking at all aspects of this song from the lyrics to the tempo and dynamics...

It's the inner dialogue of the idea of loving a woman. He is troubled, he may want to move on, but he can't because there is something about her. 
She knows this too "Something in her smile she knows." 

And this thus creates a conflict that we get to hear in the bridge of the song:
"Your asking me if my love will grow.
 I don't know, I don't know.
 You stick around now it may show.
 I don't know, I don't know."

The change in rhythm, dynamic and lyrics tell us that:

She is asking him if his love for her will grow, but he doesn't know. He tells her if she sticks around it may show, but he can't be sure. 
This is, in general, about every relationship. Will a couple, in a relationship, still love each other down the road, but no one knows for sure unless both people wait it out. 
He is agitated by the question, because truthfully life doesn't work this way. We can't make promises because life can change abruptly in many ways and so can our feelings. 
I feel as if this song is for anyone who is in love, whether it be a new love or a love that has been going on for years. 

I would love to know anyone else's idea of the meaning of this song. 

Forum Timezone: Europe/London

Most Users Ever Online: 597

Currently Online: Inner Light, Duke_of_Kirkcaldy, Annadog40
56 Guest(s)

Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)

Top Posters:

meanmistermustard: 11263

mr. Sun king coming together: 6935

Ahhh Girl: 6294

parlance: 5965

Annadog40: 5518

Mr. Kite: 5132

Zig: 4924

mithveaen: 4633

Ron Nasty: 3422

fabfouremily: 2951

Member Stats:

Guest Posters: 88

Members: 2821

Moderators: 4

Admins: 2

Forum Stats:

Groups: 3

Forums: 34

Topics: 3299

Posts: 147982

Newest Members: MaMaladeSkyze, Barbara123654, Zmos, Crazmos, leansbeans

Moderators: Ahhh Girl: 6294, meanmistermustard: 11263, Zig: 4924, Joe: 3757

Administrators: Joe: 3757, Ellie: 1

Members Birthdays
Today: LSDTripper
Upcoming: When Im 64