Topic RSS
I have a feeling this could be a contentious issue but here goes- In retrospect were some of George Martins touches a tad heavy handed? I have two cases in point, first 'In My Life's piano break ( a nice piece from George Harrison would have been perfect) which, in my opinion, is too formal and dates the song significantly and , similarly, in "Not A Second Time" where the clunky piano solo appears out of place, 'aeolian cadences' and all!
Let me stress that I believe George Martin to be the fifth Beatle and his contributions were absolutely essential to the group but, like everyone else he's only human and makes mistakes like everyone else. What do you all think?
4.24pm

19 September 2010
OfflineIf the piano solos and everything else he may have screwed up with were so bad, how come they approved of the songs? He's A genius, and those two parts Exemplify his genius.
*9*
5.00pm
23 January 2011
Offline5.53pm
9 June 2010
OfflineMarkoS said:
'In My Life's piano break, in my opinion, is too formal and dates the song significantly.
I don't think a guitar solo (I'm assuming that's what you meant by a piece by George Harrison) would have been "perfect" for the song. I think the GM piano bit is a better touch, and it gives a timeless feel to the song.
mr. Sun king coming together said And yes, YouTube comments are stupid. But hilariously so.
9.00pm
1 May 2010
OfflineIn My Life wouldn't be In My Life without that solo.
His intro to You Like Me Too Much is my least favorite contribution of his, although that's my least favorite Beatles song so it's not all George's fault. 
I like his solo in Piggies a lot. I do kind of wish they would have given him an oboe part in some song, maybe they could have had a nasty oboe solo to end Bungalow Bill rather than just the repetition that ends the song. It could have been like the end of Hide Your Love Away…too bad.
9.47pm
1 May 2010
OfflineMarkoS said:
first 'In My Life's piano break ( a nice piece from George Harrison would have been perfect) which, in my opinion, is too formal and dates the song significantly
I disagree with you about the "dated" sound of the piano solo. I think it makes it timeless. Check this.
And then in the moment I was going to say "A guitar solo?" I thought "mhh why not?" and I went to youtube to search it. I found this gem. It would have worked.
And I found this.
And then something hit me. The piano solo is IMHO perfect. But what makes this song timeless is the melody. It's beautiful and it has that yearning feeling for the past that you have when you have lived so long, or lost so much.
11.52pm
4 December 2010
Offline12.07am

19 September 2010
OfflineI found a list online of the top music producers, and
was #1. It said because he transformed the Beatles from 4 scruffy lads from Liverpool n to the Beatles.
12.08am
23 January 2011
Offlinekedame said:
I couldn't imagine In My Life without that piano solo. I think he added just the right touches at just the right points. I
.
Same. I think that piano solo makes the song even better, if that is possible.
12.10am

19 September 2010
OfflineNigel the good dog said:
kedame said:
I couldn't imagine In My Life without that piano solo. I think he added just the right touches at just the right points. I
.
Same. I think that piano solo makes the song even better, if that is possible.
Have you heard it in the isolated rockband Multi Tracks? It adds a beauty to the whole song, especially the solo.
11.52am
18 January 2011
OfflineA couple of points I noticed from 'Revolution in the Head – The Beatles Records and the Sixties' by Ian MacDonald
Long Tall Sally – the piano backing is straight and doesnt fit in with the swung feel of the song.
Slow Down – The piano backing drops out briefly at one point
Day Tripper – start of third verse it cuts out in one channel
Ye Blues – funny edit that moves abruptly to drums in the outtro
I'm sure I'll ifnd more on futher reading. However these are minor blips. Martin is a genius and there is not a Beatle-song I actively dislike
12.55pm

19 September 2010
OfflineLook, the Beatles had final veto on all songs. If these parts were so bad, they would have vetoed that take and remade it (see Ob-La-Di Ob-La-Da).
2.25pm
1 May 2010
Offlinemr. Sun king coming together said:
I found a list online of the top music producers, and
was #1. It said because he transformed the Beatles from 4 scruffy lads from Liverpool n to the Beatles.
And I think that's the best description of him. 
Edit : I realized something: The solos of guitar I posted are the same solo of piano, but in guitar. Ah silly Mith 
4.44pm
20 December 2010
OfflineGeorge Martin is a genius. In my opinion, the songs would never have been the same without him. He gave them a mature direction and was always willing to work with all four of them during the recording and mastering of all their songs. Between Martin and Epstein, they were able to take these scruffy lads and mold them into a most unique band.
My only complain against Martin is that I felt he was too hard on Harrison.
5.58pm

19 September 2010
OfflineInner Light said:
My only complain against Martin is that I felt he was too hard on Harrison.
Something he admitted was wrong.
9.10pm
4 December 2010
OfflineMost Users Ever Online: 597
Currently Online: Scoun, Linde, Egroeg Evoli, HeyTrud, AppleScruffJunior
1 Guest(s)
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
mr. Sun king coming together: 6972
meanmistermustard: 3419
MeanMrsMustard: 2794
Egroeg Evoli: 1509
vonbontee: 1427
GniknuS: 1365
Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 86
Members: 1677
Moderators: 5
Admins: 1
Forum Stats:
Groups: 3
Forums: 33
Topics: 2387
Posts: 72998
Newest Members: Victor Sepúlveda, TheNoWhereMan5870, darinh, timboslice, moreplasticsoul
Moderators: Joe (2698), skye (2295), Ellie (1), Zig (2752), mithveaen (4675)
Administrators: Joe (2698)
Log In
Register
Home





