Come And Get It: The Best of Apple Records | The songs | Fab forum

Please consider registering
Guest

Log In Register

Register | Lost password?
Advanced Search

— Forum Scope —

  

— Match —

   

— Forum Options —

   

Wildcard usage:
*  matches any number of characters    %  matches exactly one character

Minimum search word length is 4 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

Come And Get It: The Best of Apple Records
13 January 2012
10.12pm
vonbontee
Inside a Letterbox
Apple rooftop
Forum Posts: 2215
Member Since:
1 December 2009
Offline

/2010/08/05/apple-records-best-of-compilation-bonus-material/

This is a nice collection - there was a lot of diversity on that label, and it's surprising that much of it was released as singles. But the elephant in the room that prevents it from being truly "the best" of Apple: There's no Beatles songs here! (Nor solo-Beatle songs, for that matter.) Not even "Hey Jude", the biggest seller in the history of the damn label.

I can understand the reasoning behind keeping the Beatles singles separate from this release, though I wouldn't necessarily agree with it. Whose decision was this, I wonder: an Apple exec; or Paul/Ringo/Yoko/Olivia? Or a combo, or someone else entirely? Was this decision a good thing or a bad thing? Do you care at all? I'm interested in your opinions if you have them!

I just want to play. I’d like to think I could work opposite Sinatra, B.B. King, the Beatles, or a polka band... - Jazz musician Rahsaan Roland Kirk, 1967
13 January 2012
11.21pm
meanmistermustard
Moderator



Forum Posts: 9716
Member Since:
1 May 2011
Offline

 I guess the idea was to show that Apple werent just The Beatles but had other strong artists once upon a time, not that [m]any of the artists lasted for a period of time on Apple.

As for the omission I dont particularly care, and would have been more surprised if they were represented. As for where the decision came from it was probably right from the beginning of the project and The Beatles and their representitives were happy to go along with it ie couldnt care less. It may have sold a few more copies if the beatles were on it but i doubt it would have been a massive amount.

"Well, probably we'll sell less records, less people'll go to see the film, we'll write less songs, and we'll all die of failure" (John Lennon 8/64)
13 January 2012
11.35pm
Into the Sky with Diamonds
New York
Apple rooftop
Forum Posts: 1283
Member Since:
10 August 2011
Offline

When we list our "Favorite 25 songs" we start by excluding the Beatles.

Apple must have done the same thing for same reason. That's my guess!

"Into the Sky with Diamonds" (the Beatles and the Race to the Moon – a history)
14 January 2012
3.15am
mr. Sun king coming together
Nowhere Land
Apple rooftop
Forum Posts: 6916
Member Since:
19 September 2010
Offline

My guess is that EMI holds the masters, so they might have been unable to get them on, or b) they wanted to do the "Best of Apple" without removing perfectly good songs for rehashes they just rereleased.

I tried to think of something powerful and moving… and failed.  "You were given a choice between war and dishonor - you chose dishonor, and you shall have war" - Winston Churchill
16 January 2012
9.10am
Joe
Pepperland
Admin
Forum Posts: 3450
Member Since:
31 March 2008
Offline

I don't have a problem with it. If they'd put Beatles or solo Beatles songs on it, that'd mean a large proportion of buyers would be getting songs again that they already owned. Whatever they decided some people would probably complain, so Apple can't win, though I think they got it right.

Please don't spoil my day; I'm miles away

Can buy me love! Please consider using these links to support the Beatles Bible: Amazon | iTunes

16 January 2012
11.14pm
Von Bontee
A Hole In The Road
Apple rooftop
Forum Posts: 2169
Member Since:
14 December 2009
Offline

Well, I guess with ANY label sampler, you're taking the chance of some duplication – though when the label roster is largely "THE BEATLES!! and whoever else" that's more inevitable than usual, true.

My thinking is that "Hey Jude" was considered worthy of sharing a box with "Thingumybob" and "Sour Milk Sea" and "Those Were The Days" in 1968, so that – assuming there's no reason to suspect any latter-day song-snobbery taking place – including it as the lead-off track, followed by the latter three (all of which are present) would be a nice historical full-circle gesture. And of course it would help display the full breadth of the label more accurately. (As would a track or two by the Modern Jazz Quartet, but that's neither here, there or everywhere. Plus which, the MJQ didn't release any singles, as far as I can tell) But mostly I just admit that I think it'd be cool to see a compilation featuring The Beatles on it, that's my greedy reasoning.

One day, a tape-op got a tape on backwards, he went to play it, and it was all "Neeeradno-undowarrroom" and it was "Wow! Sounds Indian!" -- Paul McCartney
16 January 2012
11.41pm
meanmistermustard
Moderator



Forum Posts: 9716
Member Since:
1 May 2011
Offline

I like how the beatles dont appear on compilations nowadays (tho i do remember seeing a compilation album years and years ago which had The Beatles songs All You Need Is Love and Here Comes The Sun on it (and have found wikipedia has an article on that very compilation!). For me its a rare and cool stance for any group to undertake with their catalogue, that they are able to stand without appearing on some rubbish cd. And does the world need to have Let It Be on 'the best ballads in the world… ever'?

"Well, probably we'll sell less records, less people'll go to see the film, we'll write less songs, and we'll all die of failure" (John Lennon 8/64)
Forum Timezone: Europe/London

Most Users Ever Online: 597

Currently Online: UnidentifiedFiendishThingy
59 Guest(s)

Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)

Top Posters:

meanmistermustard: 9716

mr. Sun king coming together: 6916

parlance: 5105

Ahhh Girl: 4937

mithveaen: 4651

Annadog40: 4105

Zig: 4099

Mr. Kite: 3647

Ron Nasty: 3025

fabfouremily: 2934

Member Stats:

Guest Posters: 88

Members: 2589

Moderators: 4

Admins: 2

Forum Stats:

Groups: 3

Forums: 34

Topics: 3163

Posts: 133704

Newest Members: estoreparka, mouse, ug3hp, tilt, JMF

Moderators: Ahhh Girl (4937), meanmistermustard (9716), Zig (4099), Joe (3450)

Administrators: Joe (3450), Ellie (1)

Members Birthdays
Today: None
Upcoming: None