Please consider registering
Guest
sp_LogInOut Log Insp_Registration Register
Register | Lost password?
Advanced Search
Forum Scope


Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
sp_Feed sp_TopicIcon
Across The Universe
sp_BlogLink Read the original blog post
31 May 2014
3.25pm
Avatar
S. B. Fields
New York
The Jacaranda
Members
Forum Posts: 30
Member Since:
26 May 2014
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Some ATU lyric pages on the web cite “shades of earth” and not “shades of life”…

…any comments?

I know when it's a dream.

31 May 2014
3.48pm
Avatar
Ron Nasty
Apple rooftop
Members

Reviewers
Forum Posts: 12534
Member Since:
17 December 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

The majority of lyric websites use transcriptions rather than using the published, or even checking what they’ve got against the published, lyric. Some of the lyrics you find on those sites are just plain weird. They’re almost like that game where you take a lyric, get a translation program to translate it into a foreign language, and see what you get when you translate it back, at times.

"I only said we were bigger than Rod... and now there's all this!" Ron Nasty

To @ Ron Nasty it's @ mja6758
The Beatles Bible 2020 non-Canon Poll Part One: 1958-1963 and Part Two: 1964-August 1966

31 May 2014
3.49pm
Avatar
MrMoonlight
Alone in the clouds all blue...
Shea Stadium
Members
Forum Posts: 832
Member Since:
2 April 2014
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Ron Nasty said
The majority of lyric websites use transcriptions rather than using the published, or even checking what they’ve got against the published, lyric. Some of the lyrics you find on those sites are just plain weird. They’re almost like that game where you take a lyric, get a translation program to translate it into a foreign language, and see what you get when you translate it back, at times.

Hello new thread ideaa-hard-days-night-george-10

The following people thank MrMoonlight for this post:

Starr Shine?, Mr. Kite
31 May 2014
3.51pm
Avatar
Starr Shine?
Waiting in the sky
Apple rooftop
Members
Forum Posts: 16105
Member Since:
1 November 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Should this be in songs place?

https://youtu.be/52nwiTs7bk8

Brainwashed by RadiantCowbells.

If you can't log in and can't use the forum go here and someone will help you out.

31 May 2014
5.11pm
Avatar
meanmistermustard
Thankfully not where I am.
Moderator
Members

Reviewers


Moderators
Forum Posts: 24960
Member Since:
1 May 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Annadog40 said
Should this be in songs place?

Yes.

@Ahhh Girl, fancy doing the duties?

"I told you everything I could about me, Told you everything I could" ('Before Believing' - Emmylou Harris)

31 May 2014
6.09pm
Avatar
Ahhh Girl
sailing on a winedark open sea
Moderator

Moderators

Members

Reviewers
Forum Posts: 22221
Member Since:
20 August 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

I noticed that we had a thread in the songs section for ATU so I moved this conversation to it.

The following people thank Ahhh Girl for this post:

meanmistermustard
18 June 2014
10.57am
Avatar
MrMoonlight
Alone in the clouds all blue...
Shea Stadium
Members
Forum Posts: 832
Member Since:
2 April 2014
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

One thing I don’t get: on a lot of lyrics sites and cover versions, they say it’s “they slither while they pass, they slip away…”. However, on all Beatles recordings, I hear it as “they slither wildly as they slip away…”.

The following people thank MrMoonlight for this post:

Bulldog, Egroeg Evoli
18 June 2014
12.27pm
Avatar
Bulldog
The Rhythm Revue
Candlestick Park
Members
Forum Posts: 1512
Member Since:
4 June 2014
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

MrMoonlight said
One thing I don’t get: on a lot of lyrics sites and cover versions, they say it’s “they slither while they pass, they slip away…”. However, on all Beatles recordings, I hear it as “they slither wildly as they slip away…”.

@MrMoonlight Yeah, I’ve always heard it that way, and I would bet that’s the correct lyric. To me, there’s clearly no ‘P’ sound after what they say is “while they.”

If you're lonely (or not!), you can talk to me. .....Hey! Are you a new member on this fine forum and don't know where to go to introduce yourself?
Well, you can do it here! Dig it?

19 June 2014
9.18pm
Avatar
Mr. Kite
910 Penny Lane, Strawberry Fields, Pepperland
Apple rooftop
Members

Reviewers
Forum Posts: 6147
Member Since:
4 February 2014
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Bulldog said

MrMoonlight said
One thing I don’t get: on a lot of lyrics sites and cover versions, they say it’s “they slither while they pass, they slip away…”. However, on all Beatles recordings, I hear it as “they slither wildly as they slip away…”.

@MrMoonlight Yeah, I’ve always heard it that way, and I would bet that’s the correct lyric. To me, there’s clearly no ‘P’ sound after what they say is “while they.”

I’ve always heard it like that too.

The following people thank Mr. Kite for this post:

Bulldog

If I spoke prose you'd all find out, I don't know what I talk about.

Can buy Joe love!
If you're shopping at one of these two websites use the links below to support the Beatles Bible:

Amazon | iTunes

21 March 2015
2.31pm
Avatar
Beatlebug
Find me where ye echo lays
Moderator

Moderators
Forum Posts: 18182
Member Since:
15 February 2015
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

This song is magic. 

It has a transcendent quality, a quality of not being quite of this world. It is suspended between albums and singles and anthologies, none of which are entirely definitive versions. It gives impressions of a greater thing outside our daily lives on Earth; simply the title is enough to conjure up images of stars and planets revolving through the galaxies as they make their way Across The Universe . It has also something of the essence of dreams; a surreality, like the workings of the mind when one is on the borderline of sleep. And in each of its none-too-definitive versions there is something of this, in different ways: this ethereal quality, that sets it apart from other songs; that it belongs nowhere in particular– it is in between. And indeed, its lyric reflects this: it was a song that happened, rather than was written. And so here is a song that transcends bounds of release, recording, production; it stands on its own. “It’s good poetry, or whatever it’s called, without chewin’ it.” 

Part 2 of an ongoing series of Speaking-In-Prose essays on the magicalness of Beatlemaniology, by Silly Girl, who isn’t always silly (just most of the time). 

The following people thank Beatlebug for this post:

ewe2

([{BRACKETS!}])
New to Forumpool? You can introduce yourself here.
If you love The Beatles Bible, and you have adblock, don't forget to white-list this site!
whiteheart.png
avatar_creative_signature_Hmm.pngStarSpangledBanner.png

21 March 2015
5.09pm
mccannon
The Indra
Members
Forum Posts: 42
Member Since:
19 February 2015
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Across The Universe is a song that I find very hard to criticise.

Ian MacDonald called it a “plaintively babyish incantation” and “rather too obviously the products of acid grandiosity rendered gentle by sheer exhaustion”. It seems too harsh to me. But even Lennon was unhappy with it: “the song was never done properly”, “we didn’t make a good record of it”, and “Paul would sort of subconsciously try and destroy a great song”.

It always sounded to me as “unfinished” in all of its version. I feel it could be a masterpiece but actually it’s incomplete and suspended. Its melody has the typical Lennon’s horizontality that worked well in many songs, but seems to be ineffective here. It deserved a better production and, maybe, a middle-eight and it would sound gorgeous. It’s not a bad song: some of the lyrics are oustanding, but I would not say it’s good poetry. They just didn’t care enough to make it a polished and finished song and Lennon in that period was probably too weak to “demand respect”.

I agree that it has a sort of “transcendent” and “ethereal” quality but after all it’s an unexpressed quality, it’s like an arrow that was never really shot and we’re still waiting for it. 

The following people thank mccannon for this post:

Beatlebug
21 March 2015
6.01pm
Avatar
meanmistermustard
Thankfully not where I am.
Moderator
Members

Reviewers


Moderators
Forum Posts: 24960
Member Since:
1 May 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

I find it very easy to criticise. Spector’s is so slow a 2-legged tortoise with a hangover could outrun it (and sound better) whilst the Wildlife mix has Johns vocal speed up horribly and some of the worst backing vocals in living memory. They are horrendously bad. 

"I told you everything I could about me, Told you everything I could" ('Before Believing' - Emmylou Harris)

21 March 2015
6.52pm
Avatar
Bongo
Somewhere In Time
Candlestick Park
Members
Forum Posts: 1916
Member Since:
28 March 2014
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

I have no problem with either version, but I do like the birds flocking at the beginning, very relaxing! a-hard-days-night-john-1

The following people thank Bongo for this post:

Beatlebug

  Screen-Shot-2022-10-04-at-7.52.07-PM.png   BEATLES Music gives me Eargasms!  apple01

21 March 2015
7.20pm
Avatar
Ahhh Girl
sailing on a winedark open sea
Moderator

Moderators

Members

Reviewers
Forum Posts: 22221
Member Since:
20 August 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

I usually have morbid thoughts when I hear this song. I’ll put them in a spoiler in case some people don’t want to read them.

The “nothing’s going to change my world” line always makes me think about the break up of the Beatles and about John’s murder…ie things that did change his world.

The following people thank Ahhh Girl for this post:

Beatlebug
21 March 2015
8.12pm
Avatar
Beatlebug
Find me where ye echo lays
Moderator

Moderators
Forum Posts: 18182
Member Since:
15 February 2015
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

mccannon announced 
Across The Universe is a song that I find very hard to criticise.

Ian MacDonald called it a “plaintively babyish incantation” and “rather too obviously the products of acid grandiosity rendered gentle by sheer exhaustion”. It seems too harsh to me. But even Lennon was unhappy with it: “the song was never done properly”, “we didn’t make a good record of it”, and “Paul would sort of subconsciously try and destroy a great song”.

It always sounded to me as “unfinished” in all of its version. I feel it could be a masterpiece but actually it’s incomplete and suspended. Its melody has the typical Lennon’s horizontality that worked well in many songs, but seems to be ineffective here. It deserved a better production and, maybe, a middle-eight and it would sound gorgeous. It’s not a bad song: some of the lyrics are oustanding, but I would not say it’s good poetry. They just didn’t care enough to make it a polished and finished song and Lennon in that period was probably too weak to “demand respect”.
I agree that it has a sort of “transcendent” and “ethereal” quality but after all it’s an unexpressed quality, it’s like an arrow that was never really shot and we’re still waiting for it. 

And that’s part of what I meant in my overly poetical prose mini-essay. That it floats, it doesn’t quite belong anywhere, because it isn’t really finished and a part of something (like a proper album that wasn’t Phil Spector trying to piece together a soundtrack out of fragments). 

Ahhh Girl sighed  
I usually have morbid thoughts when I hear this song. I’ll put them in a spoiler in case some people don’t want to read them.

The “nothing’s going to change my world” line always makes me think about the break up of the Beatles and about John’s murder…ie things that did change his world.

So did I, the first time I heard it. It nearly made me cry. Usually his murder doesn’t seem very real to me– I know it happened, but I don’t REALISE it. And when I heard this song the first time, I realised it. Just as I did, later, the first time I heard “Here Today “. Both times I got over it really quick though. a-hard-days-night-george-9

The following people thank Beatlebug for this post:

mccannon

([{BRACKETS!}])
New to Forumpool? You can introduce yourself here.
If you love The Beatles Bible, and you have adblock, don't forget to white-list this site!
whiteheart.png
avatar_creative_signature_Hmm.pngStarSpangledBanner.png

21 March 2015
9.35pm
Avatar
chrisredditch
Redditch
Royal Command Performance
Members
Forum Posts: 224
Member Since:
20 January 2015
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

What do people think of David Bowies version? With added John Lennon .

I find it more desperate than the original but a fair attempt at a difficult song

The Beatles are English - They have influences from all over - but they are English

22 March 2015
10.07pm
Avatar
Zig
The Toppermost of the Poppermost
Apple rooftop
Members

Reviewers
Forum Posts: 9832
Member Since:
14 April 2010
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

chrisredditch said
What do people think of David Bowies version? With added John Lennon .

I find it more desperate than the original but a fair attempt at a difficult song

Just listened to it for the first time – wish I hadn’t. I like Bowie a lot, but there are times when I think, “Oh David, why?”.

The following people thank Zig for this post:

Beatlebug

To the fountain of perpetual mirth, let it roll for all its worth. And all the children boogie.

22 March 2015
11.42pm
Avatar
Beatlebug
Find me where ye echo lays
Moderator

Moderators
Forum Posts: 18182
Member Since:
15 February 2015
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Zig moaned in a falsetto 

chrisredditch shouted silently    
What do people think of David Bowies version? With added John Lennon .

I find it more desperate than the original but a fair attempt at a difficult song

Just listened to it for the first time – wish I hadn’t. I like Bowie a lot, but there are times when I think, “Oh David, why?”.

I listened to the first two seconds, and then that was it. I hope those two seconds won’t be in my dreams nightmares tonight. 

([{BRACKETS!}])
New to Forumpool? You can introduce yourself here.
If you love The Beatles Bible, and you have adblock, don't forget to white-list this site!
whiteheart.png
avatar_creative_signature_Hmm.pngStarSpangledBanner.png

23 March 2015
10.56am
mccannon
The Indra
Members
Forum Posts: 42
Member Since:
19 February 2015
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Silly Girl said

Zig moaned in a falsetto 

chrisredditch shouted silently    
What do people think of David Bowies version? With added John Lennon .

I find it more desperate than the original but a fair attempt at a difficult song

Just listened to it for the first time – wish I hadn’t. I like Bowie a lot, but there are times when I think, “Oh David, why?”.

I listened to the first two seconds, and then that was it. I hope those two seconds won’t be in my dreams nightmares tonight. 

I agree… horrible.

And what about this?
It seems like no one is able to give justice to this song, for one reason or another…

23 March 2015
11.09am
mccannon
The Indra
Members
Forum Posts: 42
Member Since:
19 February 2015
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Bulldog said

MrMoonlight said
One thing I don’t get: on a lot of lyrics sites and cover versions, they say it’s “they slither while they pass, they slip away…”. However, on all Beatles recordings, I hear it as “they slither wildly as they slip away…”.

@MrMoonlight Yeah, I’ve always heard it that way, and I would bet that’s the correct lyric. To me, there’s clearly no ‘P’ sound after what they say is “while they.”

Hey you’re right! Now finally I know why “pass” sounded so strange. It’s actually they slither wildly as they slip away… apple01

Forum Timezone: Europe/London
Most Users Ever Online: 700
Currently Online: Timothy
Guest(s) 1
Top Posters:
Starr Shine?: 16105
Ron Nasty: 12534
Zig: 9832
50yearslate: 8759
Necko: 8043
AppleScruffJunior: 7583
parlance: 7111
mr. Sun king coming together: 6402
Mr. Kite: 6147
trcanberra: 6064
Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 88
Members: 2858
Moderators: 5
Admins: 1
Forum Stats:
Groups: 3
Forums: 44
Topics: 5517
Posts: 380496
Newest Members:
katybphoto, sleeptalker, Lovethebeatles, vtrop, nickygrangery
Moderators: Joe: 5694, meanmistermustard: 24960, Ahhh Girl: 22221, Beatlebug: 18182, The Hole Got Fixed: 8410
Administrators: Joe: 5694