50 Minute Version of Revolution 9? | Fab Forum

Introducing the inaugural Fab Forum February Fundraiser! Click here for more details.

Please consider registering

sp_LogInOut Log In sp_Registration Register

Register | Lost password?
Advanced Search

— Forum Scope —

— Match —

— Forum Options —

Minimum search word length is 4 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

sp_Feed sp_TopicIcon
50 Minute Version of Revolution 9?
No permission to create posts
27 February 2013
The Strawberry
The Past
Ed Sullivan Show
Forum Posts: 191
Member Since:
13 November 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

I have a bootleg album called 'Alternate Takes 1968 - A Seance In The Dark'. It contains a 50 minute version of 'Revolution 9', but it's referred to as 'Revolution 9 (The Pain at the Party)'. It starts with 'What's The New Mary Jane?'. Any info on this? Is it just an outfake? Is it a concept John was working on? If needed, I can post it, but I'm sure it's googlable.... google-able?..... able to be googled.

"Time wounds all heels." -John Lennon
27 February 2013
Ron Nasty
"Where have you been?" "I'm not telling you..."
Apple rooftop
Forum Posts: 4926
Member Since:
17 December 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
21 May 2015
Silly Girl
Find me where ye echo lays
Apple rooftop
Forum Posts: 5746
Member Since:
15 February 2015
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

A fifty-minute version of Revolution 9 would certainly be a pain at a party. Or anywhere, for that matter. a-hard-days-night-paul-3 

The following people thank Silly Girl for this post:

Bongo, JPM-Fangirl, The Faul On The Hill
Half of what I say is meaningless... but I say it just to fill the other half with Beatlerubbish. 
New to Forumpool? You can introduce yourself here
21 May 2015
Somewhere In Time
Apple rooftop
Forum Posts: 1009
Member Since:
28 March 2014
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Ron Nasty said
Without hearing it, it's a fake. I know of no mix that begins with "Mary Jane", though because of similar strange instrumentation I can see how it would be easy to weld it on the beginning. There is no real 50-minute "
Revolution 9".

Ya, with today's technology it would be way to easy to make your own bootlegs and people would buy it not knowing! paul-mccartney
Especially in CD format where you can make your own printed covers and print on the CD itself. It would be the never ending collectors nightmare!

http://i276.photobucket.com/albums/kk38/rickdelsie/The%20Beatles/parlunread_zps28270d9d.gif BEATLES Music gives me Eargasms!  apple01

21 May 2015
Apple rooftop
Forum Posts: 3993
Member Since:
10 November 2010
sp_UserOnlineSmall Online

In case Ron Nasty's not a reliable enough source for anyone (though he should be considered one), Bootlegzone also calls it a fake.

I'm Necko.  I'm like Ringo except I wear necklaces. I'm also ewe2.
21 May 2015

Forum Posts: 17120
Member Since:
1 May 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Its a fake for the simple reason it lasts 50 minutes which is way beyond the 27 minute 'Helter Skelter' which is famously the longest authentic genuine Beatles recording or mix. Forget every other source and focus on the studio documentation.

Don’t make your love suffer insecurities, trade the baggage of self to set another one free. ('Paper Skin' - Kendall Payne)
27 May 2015
Billy Rhythm
Candlestick Park
Forum Posts: 575
Member Since:
22 December 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

The Strawberry said
If needed, I can post it, but I'm sure it's googlable.... google-able?..... able to be googled.

Ideally, yes, it would be great to hear it before commenting but as others here have stated it's very likely an elaborate fake.  I'll atleast entertain the possibility of it being genuine but any leap in logic leads back to it being a fake.  Contrary to what most people think when they hear it for the very first time, the 'Revolution #9' Sound Collage was something that John Lennon spent quite a bit of time and effort on.  He wanted to paint a picture, using sound, of what he saw going on at the time and that was much chaos not only in his own world but out in the real world as well.


During 'Revolution #1' after the "Don't you know that you can count me out" lyric he quickly changes his tune to "in" immediately afterwards signaling that he hadn't yet made up his mind about supporting violence or resisting these primal urges.  I always felt that he explored both options with the other two versions, during the 'Hey Jude' B-Side version his stance seems very firm and clear that he won't be joining in and "You can Count Me Out!".  With 'Revolution #9', he fully immersed himself smack in the middle of the chaos and incited a bloody riot and appeared to even get lost in it all.  His efforts to secure World Peace soon afterward was his salvation from the violence.


Documentation on this track's evolution from start to finish is spotty and incomplete, it's entirely possible that a "50 Minute Version" or, an 'Unfinished Music #9' did exist at one point.  John culled materials from a variety of sources to deliver the desired effect, he even used bits of the Legendary 1967 'Carnival Of Light' recording according to Engineer Geoff Emerick on this track.  Cutting up tape was a common method used for editing back then, think of George Martin's infamous collection of Circus/Fairground Music where after putting it all together had it cut up into smaller pieces before "flinging them into the air and joining them all back together again" on 'Being For The Benefit of Mr. Kite'.  This creative method was used for 'Revolution #9' as well but to an obviously much larger extent, splice noise is heard all throughout.


I wouldn't be all that surprised to learn that a "50 Minute Version" or longer was a working "template" early on (but didn't make it far past John & Yoko's bedroom), but it was eventually cut (literally!) down to the 8-Minute version we all know (and love!).  It would be very unlikely that someone outside of John Lennon, Yoko Ono or George Harrison obtained a copy of the original "template" before it was heavily edited for the 'White Album'.  Still would be interested in hearing this "fake" we're discussing nonetheless...:-) 

27 May 2015

Forum Posts: 17120
Member Since:
1 May 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Sorry but there is absolutely zero chance this bootleg mix is genuine. One being the studio documentation and research done many experts over the years, the second being that if a genuine 50 minute Beatle track surfaced and was out there then it would make waves, the same way the full 10 min + 'Revolution 1' did. This mix has been out since 1998 and nothing has been mentioned of it. Its also on the TJT label, a fan label which creates their own mash-ups and has been going for years 

Don’t make your love suffer insecurities, trade the baggage of self to set another one free. ('Paper Skin' - Kendall Payne)
28 May 2015
Paris Olympia
Forum Posts: 130
Member Since:
11 November 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

The following people thank vectisfabber for this post:

Bongo, Silly Girl
Forum Timezone: America/Chicago

Most Users Ever Online: 597

Currently Online: Necko, pepperland
40 Guest(s)

Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)

Top Posters:

meanmistermustard: 17120

Ahhh Girl: 10726

Annadog40: 9698

Zig: 7531

parlance: 7092

mr. Sun king coming together: 6980

Mr. Kite: 6092

Silly Girl: 5746

trcanberra: 5528

Ron Nasty: 4926

Member Stats:

Guest Posters: 87

Members: 3329

Moderators: 4

Admins: 2

Forum Stats:

Groups: 3

Forums: 42

Topics: 3815

Posts: 201845

Newest Members:

Stockholm1955, tomomi, ttn48griff, Beatles007, Edwardo

Moderators: Ahhh Girl: 10726, meanmistermustard: 17120, Zig: 7531, Joe: 4390

Administrators: Joe: 4390, Ellie: 3

Members Birthdays
Today: VeraChuckDave
Upcoming: None