Rubber Soul Mono v. Stereo | Rubber Soul | Fab forum

Please consider registering
Guest

Log In Register

Register | Lost password?
Advanced Search

— Forum Scope —

  

— Match —

   

— Forum Options —

   

Wildcard usage:
*  matches any number of characters    %  matches exactly one character

Minimum search word length is 4 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

Rubber Soul Mono v. Stereo
3 February 2014
3.15pm
AbbeyRoadRage
Abbey Road
Forum Posts: 97
Member Since:
3 February 2014
Offline

Hello everybody.  I recently purchased the mono box set, and I really like how Rubber Soul sounds in mono, especially since the 2009 stereo remaster sounded quite uneven to me.  The original '65 stereo mix included in the set doesn't sound too bad to me either, but what do all of you think?  Do you prefer mono or stereo when it comes to Rubber Soul, and which of the stereo mixes do you prefer?  Also, does anybody know why the 2009 stereo remasters of Help! and Rubber Soul use the 1987 remix instead of the original master tapes.  Thank you.

3 February 2014
4.47pm
meanmistermustard
Moderator



Forum Posts: 9238
Member Since:
1 May 2011
Offline

AbbeyRoadRage said
Hello everybody.  I recently purchased the mono box set, and I really like how Rubber Soul sounds in mono, especially since the 2009 stereo remaster sounded quite uneven to me.  The original '65 stereo mix included in the set doesn't sound too bad to me either, but what do all of you think?  Do you prefer mono or stereo when it comes to Rubber Soul, and which of the stereo mixes do you prefer?  Also, does anybody know why the 2009 stereo remasters of Help! and Rubber Soul use the 1987 remix instead of the original master tapes.  Thank you.

George Martin didn't like the original '65 mixes when it came to releasing the cd's for '87 so he did new ones which have become the standards ever since. There is an interview floating about from that time with George M speaking about it, i have no idea where. 

I prefer the '65 ones.

"Well, probably we'll sell less records, less people'll go to see the film, we'll write less songs, and we'll all die of failure" (John Lennon 8/64)
3 February 2014
5.22pm
Inner Light
Friar Park
Shea Stadium
Forum Posts: 477
Member Since:
20 December 2010
Offline

I also prefer the 1965 Stereo mix of Rubber Soul. Too much reverb added in the remix from '87. 

Regarding mono versus stereo, I love the mono mixes. They always seem to have a little more punch to them.

 

The further one travels, the less one knows
3 February 2014
5.45pm
DrBeatle
Boston
Apple rooftop
Forum Posts: 1387
Member Since:
29 November 2012
Offline

I prefer the mono mixes of every Beatles album that has them (everything up to and including the White Album).

"I know you, you know me; one thing I can tell you is you got to be free!"

 

Please Visit My Website, The Rock and Roll Chemist

Twitter: @blackbookblur

 

3 February 2014
5.48pm
AbbeyRoadRage
Abbey Road
Forum Posts: 97
Member Since:
3 February 2014
Offline

meanmistermustard said

AbbeyRoadRage said
Hello everybody.  I recently purchased the mono box set, and I really like how Rubber Soul sounds in mono, especially since the 2009 stereo remaster sounded quite uneven to me.  The original '65 stereo mix included in the set doesn't sound too bad to me either, but what do all of you think?  Do you prefer mono or stereo when it comes to Rubber Soul, and which of the stereo mixes do you prefer?  Also, does anybody know why the 2009 stereo remasters of Help! and Rubber Soul use the 1987 remix instead of the original master tapes.  Thank you.

George Martin didn't like the original '65 mixes when it came to releasing the cd's for '87 so he did new ones which have become the standards ever since. There is an interview floating about from that time with George M speaking about it, i have no idea where. 

I prefer the '65 ones.

I see… I'll have to find that interview then.  Thanks.

3 February 2014
5.52pm
meanmistermustard
Moderator



Forum Posts: 9238
Member Since:
1 May 2011
Offline

AbbeyRoadRage said

meanmistermustard said

AbbeyRoadRage said
Hello everybody.  I recently purchased the mono box set, and I really like how Rubber Soul sounds in mono, especially since the 2009 stereo remaster sounded quite uneven to me.  The original '65 stereo mix included in the set doesn't sound too bad to me either, but what do all of you think?  Do you prefer mono or stereo when it comes to Rubber Soul, and which of the stereo mixes do you prefer?  Also, does anybody know why the 2009 stereo remasters of Help! and Rubber Soul use the 1987 remix instead of the original master tapes.  Thank you.

George Martin didn't like the original '65 mixes when it came to releasing the cd's for '87 so he did new ones which have become the standards ever since. There is an interview floating about from that time with George M speaking about it, i have no idea where. 

I prefer the '65 ones.

I see… I'll have to find that interview then.  Thanks.

A two second search brought it, well one, up.  Sorry, i should have done it earlier but was otherwise engaged.

Interview

"Well, probably we'll sell less records, less people'll go to see the film, we'll write less songs, and we'll all die of failure" (John Lennon 8/64)
3 February 2014
5.59pm
AbbeyRoadRage
Abbey Road
Forum Posts: 97
Member Since:
3 February 2014
Offline

meanmistermustard said

AbbeyRoadRage said

meanmistermustard said

AbbeyRoadRage said
Hello everybody.  I recently purchased the mono box set, and I really like how Rubber Soul sounds in mono, especially since the 2009 stereo remaster sounded quite uneven to me.  The original '65 stereo mix included in the set doesn't sound too bad to me either, but what do all of you think?  Do you prefer mono or stereo when it comes to Rubber Soul, and which of the stereo mixes do you prefer?  Also, does anybody know why the 2009 stereo remasters of Help! and Rubber Soul use the 1987 remix instead of the original master tapes.  Thank you.

George Martin didn't like the original '65 mixes when it came to releasing the cd's for '87 so he did new ones which have become the standards ever since. There is an interview floating about from that time with George M speaking about it, i have no idea where. 

I prefer the '65 ones.

I see… I'll have to find that interview then.  Thanks.

A two second search brought it, well one, up. 

Interview

 

Perfect, thanks.

Forum Timezone: Europe/London

Most Users Ever Online: 597

Currently Online:
67 Guest(s)

Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)

Top Posters:

meanmistermustard: 9238

mr. Sun king coming together: 6916

parlance: 4908

mithveaen: 4651

Ahhh Girl: 4487

Zig: 3643

Annadog40: 3556

Mr. Kite: 3192

Ron Nasty: 2954

fabfouremily: 2927

Member Stats:

Guest Posters: 87

Members: 2504

Moderators: 4

Admins: 2

Forum Stats:

Groups: 3

Forums: 34

Topics: 3187

Posts: 128983

Newest Members: Johnny Rhythm, 165721, Bibiana, Bibiana0709, Rendersen25

Moderators: Ahhh Girl (4487), meanmistermustard (9238), Zig (3643), Joe (3404)

Administrators: Joe (3404), Ellie (1)

Members Birthdays
Today: None
Upcoming: None