8 April 2014
From Robert Rodriguez's book Revolver (which I recommend):
Klaus brought the finished art over to George Martin's office at EMI in Manchester Square. Without ceremony, he set it up atop a file cabinet for the unveiling before Martin, Epstein, the four Beatles, and a secretary. There was momentary silence as they took it all in, a heavy void that only served to stir Klaus's nervousness with every passing second. It was finally broken by Paul. "Hey! That's me sitting on a toilet!" Everyone gathered closer to peer at what he'd spotted. He was right; there he was, in a photo taken in Hamburg. George Martin tsk-tsked and said, "Well, we can't have that." "No, it's great," Paul protested. (Suffice to say, the offending image was removed.)
Possibly it was this one (though he's fully clothed, so it's minimally offensive):
I don't see why this should be offensive or inappropriate!!! On the White Album there is a picture with Paul naked behind a pillar, they still left that on the back cover!
14 December 2009
Well, that wasn't the back cover, it was on the poster included. And there were still sensitivities about that sort of thing in '66, I guess.
The following people thank Von Bontee for this post:Beatleva
1 May 2011
One difference between the two is that Brian was alive in '66 and wasn't in '68. Hearing George M raising his concerns at such at image appearing on a Beatles LP might have concerned him enough to act, especially with the Butcher Cover having provided a fuss in the US.
The following people thank meanmistermustard for this post:Beatleva
Most Users Ever Online: 597
Currently Online: vonbontee, robert, trcanberra, Annadog40
Currently Browsing this Page:
mr. Sun king coming together: 6936
Ahhh Girl: 6751
Mr. Kite: 5302
Ron Nasty: 3487
Guest Posters: 88
Newest Members: SAM GUBERMAN, sagastomm, Edithmorford, Georgefan, flufflecakes
Moderators: Ahhh Girl: 6751, meanmistermustard: 11651, Zig: 5087, Joe: 3806
Administrators: Joe: 3806, Ellie: 1