Will the Remasters be Remastered (bettered)? | Page 2 | Fab Forum

Please consider registering
Guest

sp_LogInOut Log In sp_Registration Register

Register | Lost password?
Advanced Search

— Forum Scope —





— Match —





— Forum Options —





Minimum search word length is 4 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

sp_Feed sp_TopicIcon
Will the Remasters be Remastered (bettered)?
No permission to create posts
13 March 2013
11.54pm
Ron Nasty
"Where have you been?" "I'm not telling you..."
Apple rooftop
Forum Posts: 4358
Member Since:
17 December 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

unknown said
MMT wasn't conceptualized in black and white, they didn't like it being played in black and white.

But they knew it was going to be, whatever the books say. They agreed to it being shown on BBC1, with a repeat on BBC2 the following day. However they try to excuse the BBC1 showing, they knew BBC2 was the only channel that did colour at the time. They could have specified the channel they wanted it shown on. Which is why I make the mono/stereo comparison.

"I only said we were bigger than Rod... and now there's all this!" Ron Nasty

14 March 2013
12.01am
unknown
Nowhere Land
Apple rooftop
Forum Posts: 1244
Member Since:
5 November 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

mja6758 said

unknown said
MMT wasn't conceptualized in black and white, they didn't like it being played in black and white.

But they knew it was going to be, whatever the books say. They agreed to it being shown on BBC1, with a repeat on BBC2 the following day. However they try to excuse the BBC1 showing, they knew BBC2 was the only channel that did colour at the time. They could have specified the channel they wanted it shown on. Which is why I make the mono/stereo comparison.

Yeah, I know that's true, but it still wasn't conceptualized in black and white. Also, I didn't get what you were saying with the mono/stereo comparison.

All living things must abide by the laws of the shape they inhabit
14 March 2013
12.04am
DrBeatle
Boston
Apple rooftop
Forum Posts: 1485
Member Since:
29 November 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

^exactly. The mono mixes WERE HOW THEY INTENDED the albums to be heard. They never intended MMT to be a B&W film.

"I know you, you know me; one thing I can tell you is you got to be free!"

 

Please Visit My Website, The Rock and Roll Chemist

Twitter: @rocknrollchem

Facebook: rnrchemist

 

14 March 2013
1.33am
Ron Nasty
"Where have you been?" "I'm not telling you..."
Apple rooftop
Forum Posts: 4358
Member Since:
17 December 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

That was my point about the mono/stereo comparison. Their interest was concentrated on one format (colour) but they knew it was also going to be presented in another format (b&w). Though it's kind of weird, for their focus on format, for colour you can read mono, and for b&w you can read stereo. At that time they weren't interested in the b&w, though they knew its first broadcast would be on a channel that was exclusively b&w.

"I only said we were bigger than Rod... and now there's all this!" Ron Nasty

14 March 2013
4.27am
vonbontee
Inside an Apple Orchard in a Letterbox
Apple rooftop
Forum Posts: 2803
Member Since:
1 December 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Not exactly in the realm of "remastering", but it would be nice to see an expanded BBC Sessions collection. Assuming that there's more than 2 CDs worth of broadcast material still extant that's worth release, that is. I know (from reading the Beatlesbible!) that the 2-disc set only covered something like 20% or 30% or whatever of the sessions that were recorded - I don't know how much of it still exists, and how much is just alternate versions of the same songs already released. But I like to assume (imagine?) that EMI decided to just portion it out - release a double-CDs worth, see how it sells, and hold back a larger stash of it for possible later release.

Indian music can't be listened to the same way you hear rock and roll. You cannot do 'Yea Yea' and 'Go Man Go' - Ravi Shankar

14 March 2013
12.47pm
DrBeatle
Boston
Apple rooftop
Forum Posts: 1485
Member Since:
29 November 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

vonbontee said
Not exactly in the realm of "remastering", but it would be nice to see an expanded BBC Sessions collection. Assuming that there's more than 2 CDs worth of broadcast material still extant that's worth release, that is. I know (from reading the Beatlesbible!) that the 2-disc set only covered something like 20% or 30% or whatever of the sessions that were recorded - I don't know how much of it still exists, and how much is just alternate versions of the same songs already released. But I like to assume (imagine?) that EMI decided to just portion it out - release a double-CDs worth, see how it sells, and hold back a larger stash of it for possible later release.

I've got the 10CD bootleg set that has every available BBC sessions (which is about 98% of what they ever recorded for the BBC). There's some GREAT stuff on there not on the 2CD set, and for the most part the sound is excellent, but there is a LOT of repetition of songs, so I'm not sure it'd be viable for Apple to release it at this point.

 

"I know you, you know me; one thing I can tell you is you got to be free!"

 

Please Visit My Website, The Rock and Roll Chemist

Twitter: @rocknrollchem

Facebook: rnrchemist

 

14 March 2013
4.05pm
vonbontee
Inside an Apple Orchard in a Letterbox
Apple rooftop
Forum Posts: 2803
Member Since:
1 December 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

That's the main thing I was wondering - how much repitition and duplication there is among the unreleased sessions.

Indian music can't be listened to the same way you hear rock and roll. You cannot do 'Yea Yea' and 'Go Man Go' - Ravi Shankar

14 March 2013
4.12pm
parlance
Slaggers
Apple rooftop
Forum Posts: 7095
Member Since:
8 November 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

DrBeatle said

I've got the 10CD bootleg set that has every available BBC sessions (which is about 98% of what they ever recorded for the BBC). There's some GREAT stuff on there not on the 2CD set,

 

Having just gotten the 2-CD set, *iz jellus*. a-hard-days-night-john-6

parlance

 

Beware of sadness. It can hit you. It can hurt you. Make you sore and what is more, that is not what you are here for. - George

Check out my fan video for Paul's song "Appreciate" at Vimeo or YouTube.

14 March 2013
4.26pm
DrBeatle
Boston
Apple rooftop
Forum Posts: 1485
Member Since:
29 November 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

parlance said

DrBeatle said

I've got the 10CD bootleg set that has every available BBC sessions (which is about 98% of what they ever recorded for the BBC). There's some GREAT stuff on there not on the 2CD set,

 

Having just gotten the 2-CD set, *iz jellus*. a-hard-days-night-john-6

parlance

 

The full set is GREAT, no question, but there are something like 20+ different versions of From Me To You, She Loves You, Thank You Girl, etc. Which makes sense since they were plugging the singles and had to play them live. But it gets quite repetitive after a while. The cover songs are what made the 2CD set great and there are some more unreleased ones on the 10CD set that are great, like Talkin' 'Bout You, for instance, and different versions of the ones on the 2CD set.

 

"I know you, you know me; one thing I can tell you is you got to be free!"

 

Please Visit My Website, The Rock and Roll Chemist

Twitter: @rocknrollchem

Facebook: rnrchemist

 

9 April 2013
12.53am
TwoAfter908
Carnegie Hall
Forum Posts: 230
Member Since:
18 March 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

The only reason to remaster the Beatles' catalogue again is to make the songs less (i don't know what word to use here but a synonym of "static-y") and more clearer, but they are very clear and no buzzing (Are you buzzing? I knew it was you, Ringo....movie reference) already, so there's no need to remaster again.

My favourite song is 'Stairway to Heaven' by Motley Crue on their 1876 album 'Yellow Submarine'.
9 April 2013
3.06am
unknown
Nowhere Land
Apple rooftop
Forum Posts: 1244
Member Since:
5 November 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

There's always room for improvement, and one reason they would have for remastering again is for new fans. I know there have been a lot of people on the forum who got into The Beatles after their remasters and Rock Band came out. 

All living things must abide by the laws of the shape they inhabit
9 April 2013
5.58pm
vonbontee
Inside an Apple Orchard in a Letterbox
Apple rooftop
Forum Posts: 2803
Member Since:
1 December 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Grr, there SHOULDN'T be any room for improvement! They should get everything right the first time, once and for all. Will it be easy for Apple to recapture that 09/09/09 hype again if they do it again in five years? I think not.

Do they really expect that I'm gonna go out and buy FIFTH copy of Sgt. Pepper??

(Sure I will!...if they package the mono and stereo together.)

The cover songs are what made the 2CD set great and there are some more unreleased ones on the 10CD set that are great, like Talkin' 'Bout You, for instance, and different versions of the ones on the 2CD set.

There we go - that's the kind of thing I'd love to see on an expanded 3-or-4 disc version of that release! (It'd be great to hear exactly where Paul got that "I Saw Her Standing There" bassline, for one thing.)

Indian music can't be listened to the same way you hear rock and roll. You cannot do 'Yea Yea' and 'Go Man Go' - Ravi Shankar

9 April 2013
6.20pm
fabfouremily
Sitting in an English garden
Apple rooftop
Forum Posts: 2972
Member Since:
3 May 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

vonbontee said
Grr, there SHOULDN'T be any room for improvement! They should get everything right the first time, once and for all. Will it be easy for Apple to recapture that 09/09/09 hype again if they do it again in five years? I think not.

Do they really expect that I'm gonna go out and buy FIFTH copy of Sgt. Pepper??

(Sure I will!...if they package the mono and stereo together.)

Exactly. They know that most fans will jump at the chance to buy anything ''new'' with The Beatles name on it, even if they could have improved them to that standard years earlier (and we know it). This kind of thing gets on my nerves a lot.

 

Moving along in our God given ways, safety is sat by the fire/Sanctuary from these feverish smiles, left with a mark on the door.

(Passover - I. Curtis)

9 April 2013
7.59pm
meanmistermustard
Moderator



Forum Posts: 14997
Member Since:
1 May 2011
sp_UserOnlineSmall Online

I have the mono and stereo from 2009 why do i want it again? Why would i buy it again? I gave up this whole buying every concoction of a reissue with John's catalogue - excluding true remixes (Beatles only) from the master tapes done better than the Yellow Submarine Songtrack.

If they want me to rebuy any of the albums then they have to start with the outtakes - and im not talking about 2 for each or taking them from Anthology, it should be at the very least a full bonus disc of at least 60 minutes. If they have any thought for the fans we would be getting deluxe boxes of the albums with each 50th anniversary LP but its Apple so we got a botched Love Me Do single - which i flipping well bought. And for Please Please Me? Nothing. Oh wait an updated website with a documentary we already have. Wey-hey, tie me down otherwise i'll dance myself to an early grave.

It took them 22 fecking years to get around to releasing the remastered catalogue. 22 fucking years!! Still, got it down from 25 for the Anthology series so probably thought they were being generous to us.

Don’t make your love suffer insecurities, trade the baggage of self to set another one free. ('Paper Skin' - Kendall Payne)
10 April 2013
12.11am
SatanHimself
Hades-on-Leith
Candlestick Park
Forum Posts: 696
Member Since:
16 August 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

I think it *might* be fair to say that at this point we've reach the maximum fidelity that the Beatles catalogue has to offer.

I'm sure there will probably be one more format to milk the last few dollars out of us (I'm thinking an interactive Blu-Ray album-by-album release), but since physical media is on its way out, we're pretty much at the end.

As it's already been said, the only other alternative would be to bundle mono & stereo verisons, include the singles chronologically or add outtakes.

Otherwise, enjoy your music people.  Live for the moment.

E is for 'Ergent'.
No permission to create posts
Forum Timezone: America/Chicago

Most Users Ever Online: 597

Currently Online: meanmistermustard, AppleScruffJunior, trcanberra, Wigwam, Matt Busby, adam
47 Guest(s)

Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)

Top Posters:

meanmistermustard: 14991

Ahhh Girl: 9324

Annadog40: 8134

parlance: 7095

mr. Sun king coming together: 6975

Zig: 6721

Mr. Kite: 6004

mithveaen: 4633

Ron Nasty: 4353

trcanberra: 4352

Member Stats:

Guest Posters: 88

Members: 3077

Moderators: 4

Admins: 2

Forum Stats:

Groups: 3

Forums: 34

Topics: 3517

Posts: 183206

Newest Members: Living in A yellow submarine, Things We Said Today, WhenWeWasFab, ClaireIsYolk, The_Walrus_1234

Moderators: Ahhh Girl: 9324, meanmistermustard: 14991, Zig: 6721, Joe: 4057

Administrators: Joe: 4057, Ellie: 1

Members Birthdays
sp_BirthdayIcon
Today: None
Upcoming: Amber1965