Wikipedia error? | Recording and musicology | Fab forum

Please consider registering
Guest

Log In Register

Register | Lost password?
Advanced Search

— Forum Scope —

  

— Match —

   

— Forum Options —

   

Minimum search word length is 4 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

Wikipedia error?
11 September 2012
8.55am
frylock
A Beginning
Forum Posts: 4
Member Since:
11 September 2012
Offline

On the Dear Prudence article it says: "Lennon recorded additional layers to his vocals. Handclapping, tambourine and cowbell were then added by McCartney and Harrison." Seems to me, from what I just read in the Lewisohn book, Lennon only added double tracked vocals, while Paul and George added the additional vocals. Thought I'd post here first... Maybe there is another source, as http://www.pophistorydig.com/?.....nce-farrow has many sources listed. The latter about additional vocals could be fixed regardless I think. Thanks

11 September 2012
2.42pm
Von Bontee
A Hole In The Road
Apple rooftop
Forum Posts: 2181
Member Since:
14 December 2009
Offline

So, are you going to edit the Wikipedia article yourself?

One day, a tape-op got a tape on backwards, he went to play it, and it was all "Neeeradno-undowarrroom" and it was "Wow! Sounds Indian!" -- Paul McCartney
11 September 2012
5.52pm
meanmistermustard
Moderator



Forum Posts: 9964
Member Since:
1 May 2011
Offline

Wiki isnt the best place to go as its not entirely accurate, it doesnt help that over the years numerous books and authors have claimed someone played something only for another book to contradict it so there are differing sources offering different details. Even now recording details are being questioned. Should also add that Lewisohn has admitted to there being errors in his books due to deadline pressures, not that theyre flatally flawed and should be ditched, they are still some of the best beatle books about.

 

Going off topic, there was a story recently about an author (Philip Roth) who spotted an error in the background influences section for one of his books, wrote to wiki to get it changed and was declined saying he wasnt a sufficient source, they needed another. You can read about it here.

He told us not to get overwhelmed by grief and whatever thoughts we have... to keep them happy, because any thoughts we have of him will travel to him wherever he is. (John Lennon - 27/8/67)
11 September 2012
8.54pm
The Walrus
Working for the national health
Apple rooftop
Forum Posts: 1010
Member Since:
4 December 2010
Offline

meanmistermustard said
Wiki isnt the best place to go as its not entirely accurate, it doesnt help that over the years numerous books and authors have claimed someone played something only for another book to contradict it so there are differing sources offering different details. Even now recording details are being questioned. Should also add that Lewisohn has admitted to there being errors in his books due to deadline pressures, not that theyre flatally flawed and should be ditched, they are still some of the best beatle books about.

 

Going off topic, there was a story recently about an author (Philip Roth) who spotted an error in the background influences section for one of his books, wrote to wiki to get it changed and was declined saying he wasnt a sufficient source, they needed another. You can read about it here.

Having read the article's chat page, Roth was making a fuss over nothing. Wikipedia reported that various critics had seen the similarity with Broyard, and that Roth had said he wasn't his inspiration. Here is the article before the open letter: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/inde.....=508328139

Wikipedia is generally a very good source. Fears of its inaccuracy are often overstated. Vandalism is usually removed very quickly, and a study in Nature found that it contained a similar number of serious errors to Encyclopaedia Britannica.

The horse has bolted!

stay-on-topic

And I neeeeeeeeed her all the time
13 September 2012
7.34am
frylock
A Beginning
Forum Posts: 4
Member Since:
11 September 2012
Offline

Von Bontee said
So, are you going to edit the Wikipedia article yourself?

Not in any rush if anyone wants to beat me. Yeah, Wiki is generally good. And that error, if an error, is not a pressing matter.

Forum Timezone: Europe/London

Most Users Ever Online: 597

Currently Online: Hey Jude !
54 Guest(s)

Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)

Top Posters:

meanmistermustard: 9964

mr. Sun king coming together: 6916

parlance: 5229

Ahhh Girl: 5219

mithveaen: 4651

Annadog40: 4357

Zig: 4223

Mr. Kite: 3856

Ron Nasty: 3106

fabfouremily: 2931

Member Stats:

Guest Posters: 88

Members: 2642

Moderators: 4

Admins: 2

Forum Stats:

Groups: 3

Forums: 34

Topics: 3153

Posts: 136453

Newest Members: pocaloc, McBeetles, Lucy in the Sky, btzgibbonclyd, PostNoBills

Moderators: Ahhh Girl: 5219, meanmistermustard: 9964, Zig: 4223, Joe: 3465

Administrators: Joe: 3465, Ellie: 1

Members Birthdays
Today: YouKnowMyName, BobGreaves
Upcoming: None