Log In
Register
Home
Topic RSS
7.27pm
5 November 2011
Offline
I think that a great Beatles song must consist of two elements: its being primarily written by Lennon, and its being accompanied by an inspired McCartney bass line. Without this formula, I believe that we are left with songs that are either mediocre or outside of the first-rank.
To defend my view, it's necessary for me to hold that McCartney and Harrison didn't write great songs. McCartney and Harrison were good at writing hits, but this is not the same thing as writing great songs. A great song must feature both an interesting mood, and an unbanal tonal framework. Neither McCartney nor Harrison seem to me very good at these things.
One possible exception is "Helter Skelter". Paul's bass line in this song can't be praised enough for its grit, presence, and tone. Unfortunately, the recording is held back by Paul's awful vocal performance, a childish and boring guitar riff, and just dreadful drumming. A great drummer may have turned this into a great rocker, but alas.
Another exception to which I would have some sympathy is "You never give me your money". This comes the closest to breaking down my theory, in my opinion. Still, I place this one just outside of the first-rank, simply because the intro and the last half (before the wonderful "all good children go to heaven" ending) are just too "Wings-ish". And the Wings objectively suck.
Also, if I wish to defend my position, then I must also defend my view that Lennon songs are boring without a great McCartney bass riff. I support this view by pointing to such limpers as "Norwegian Wood," and to failed rockers such as "Revolution". Of course, the blame in this doesn't rest just with McCartney: Lennon often fails to give Paul an interesting framework within which to work. But consider the song "Come Together"; as with any great Beatles song, this one features that vampy Lennon mood, but Paul fails to deliver on the bass. With Paul mailing it in, a potentially great Beatles song turns into a snoozer.
Ultimately, though, I must deliver the goods by demonstrating that the greatest Beatles songs are also those that feature the formula I have laid out. And so, I now present my list of those Beatles songs which unquestionably are of the first-rank, and point out that they feature Lennon as the primary composer combined with McCartney delivering an inspired performance on bass.
- Hey Bulldog. Clearly and uncontroversially the greatest Beatles song ever produced, Paul only occasionally goes off course with too-bright melodies, while ultimately and quickly returning to the sublime. This is the perfect example of a great Beatles song: vampy Lennon framework with Paul providing the momentum and subtlety that makes the song interesting.
- I am the Walrus. Underneath all of the horrendous mixing and dubious production decisions is a really great rocker. It's one of the true mysteries in the history of music why they decided to bog this song down with that awful orchestration and those hideous special effects. When we ignore this, however, and pay attention to the real song that's underneath it, we find a true classic. Again: vampy Lennon mood with Paul filling in the gaps to drive the song and make it work.
- Being for the benefit of Mr. Kite. McCartney's bass on the instrumental part in the middle is especially noteworthy. As with the other songs from this period, almost train-wrecked by inexplicable production decisions. What were they thinking adding in that goofy carnival music?
- Sexy Sadie. If there is a perfect Beatles song, then this is obviously it. Classic Lennon vamp. Classic moody, restless, bi-polar bass playing from McCartney.
Possible exceptions include "Please Please Me". This one is pretty good, despite the awful harmonica and Paul's overly conservative bass playing. Still, "pretty good" is not "great". This one isn't in the "first-rank," but it's still really good. I would say most of these same things about "She Loves You".
"I'm so tired" is another possible exception. This song is puzzling. Everything is there for a classic, but Paul just doesn't deliver. The result is a song that can't hold my attention all that well. Still, the vocals and Lennon mood are good enough to put it up there, but not into the first-rank.
"Yer Blues" comes close, but it's rather like "I'm so tired": I find the wasted potential frustrating. Another potential great one that suffers from Paul mailing it in. I like the flange on Harrison's guitar though. One of his better performances, I think.
Strawberry Fields might be the most obvious exception. Paul's bass is pretty ordinary in this one, but John comes close to carrying it into the first-rank. Still, I would say: close but no cigar.
7.34pm
19 September 2010
Offline
Anderson said:
One possible exception is "Helter Skelter". Paul's bass line in this song can't be praised enough for its grit, presence, and tone. Unfortunately, the recording is held back by Paul's awful vocal performance, a childish and boring guitar riff, and just dreadful drumming. A great drummer may have turned this into a great rocker, but alas.
Another exception to which I would have some sympathy is "You never give me your money". This comes the closest to breaking down my theory, in my opinion. Still, I place this one just outside of the first-rank, simply because the intro and the last half (before the wonderful "all good children go to heaven" ending) are just too "Wings-ish". And the Wings objectively suck
First, Wings doesn't suck because you dislike them. Second, John's on bass on Helter Skelter, and third, have you ever heard While My Guitar Gently Weeps
7.36pm
19 September 2010
Offline
Oh, and please don`t use words like obviously when expressing an opinion. It gets annoying.
7.45pm
1 May 2011
Offline
To say Paul and George have not written great songs is just nonsense. You might not like them but that is something different entirely. The Beatles didnt get to where they got to by replying on hits and John songs. To say songs like Yesterday, While My Guitar Gently Weeps, Taxman, Hey Jude, Here Comes The Sun, Something, We Can Work It Out are mediocre or not outside the first rank is a very sweeping way to cut away a lot of songs that are considered as classics. And there are so many more.
Not liking them is another matter and down to opinion but to say that Paul and George could only write hits and not classic songs is completely not the case. A song shouldnt get more respect simply because its written by John.
Edit: Ok, i'll ignore the hits - For No One, I Saw Her Standing There, The End (the love you make… line).
Its all based on taste and opinion.
7.48pm
5 November 2011
Offline
While My Guitar Gently Weeps is just dreadful. Outside of <insert any Pink Floyd song here>, I know of no better example of why British rock is generally so dreary and corrupted. Too serious, too dramatic, too Clapton. Ugh. Just awful.
8.02pm
5 November 2011
Offline
meanmistermustard,
I find your subjectivism regarding aesthetics questionable and inconsistently applied. For instance, if it's true these positions are merely subjective personal tastes, then you have no grounds at all to criticize my beliefs as "daft". You're trying to have it both ways. But you have to choose: either it's all subjective tastes and no one has any grounds to make any sort of substantive claims about what is or isn't good art (i.e. Britney Spears is every bit as artistically valid as the Beatles), or else you must deal with my claims on the merits through rational discussion, as opposed to dismissing them as mere taste out of one side of your mouth, and then saying I'm wrong about my beliefs on the other.
Also: I have nothing against hits as such. I listed "Please Please Me" and "She Loves You" as two songs that are close to being in the first-rank.
8.17pm
5 November 2011
Online
Well I see music as more of a suggestion for the transitory nature of life (metaphorically, of course) rather than 'entertainment', or whatever else, so what makes a great Beatles song for me, is generally the emotion it brings to you, or me, rather. Now this also has to do with the time and place, mind you. For instance, just recently I lost one of my grandparents, and that night when I was going to sleep (I listen to my iPod in bed) Across the Universe came on and it made me immensely happy, and it was like I was drifting away into nothingness. Generally when I listen to that song it does not provoke such emotions, but at that time it did. It does not make the song any greater, though it did give me a greater appreciation for that song. I used to skip it every time it would come on, but I no longer do that.
8.19pm
1 May 2011
Offline
Firstly i edited my post as i realised that what i wrote was wrong and was therefore corrected immediately. For that i apologise, tho i still dont agree with what you wrote it is entirely down to opinion. My opinion or taste is of no greater value or weight than anyone else.
Plus my point about hits was that you say that Paul and George can only write hits when that is obviously not the case. Taxman was never a 'hit' neither was Here Comes The Sun, yet both are widely considered to be classics and far superior to songs like Hey Bulldog and Sexy Sadie (2 songs that i really do like). And the same can be said for For No One, The Fool On The Hill and Back In the USSR.
8.29pm
4 September 2010
Offline
I like him.
9.08pm
5 November 2011
Offline
meanmistermustard,
I should point out that you're still missing some distinctions, and making the exact same mistake as before (despite your claim to have realized your error). For instance, in response to my claim that McCartney and Harrison did not write great songs, you say that this is "obviously" not true, on the grounds that some of their songs — which weren't hits — are "widely considered to be classics and far superior to songs like Hey Bulldog and Sexy Sadie ". But this commits several serious errors.
First, it assumes that truth regarding aesthetics comes down to popular opinion. And yet you also say that no one's opinion on art matters any more than that of anyone else. It's plain that these two claims contradict one another. If no one's opinion matters any more than that of anyone else, then you may not appeal to popular opinion to refute my claims. Despite your edited post, you're still talking out of both sides of your mouth.
Second, the former claim is an ad populum fallacy. You've given no argument for why popular opinion is a sensible or accurate method of giving weight to the value of a work of art. So even if we put aside your on-going and blatant contradiction on the matter of artistic subjectivism, you are also committed to the extremely dubious position that the artistic merit of a work is determined by popular opinion.
Third, suppose we put aside your inconsistent ad populum attempt to argue against my position; in this case, your assertion that no one's opinion on art matters any more than that of anyone else is also dubious and misses several distinctions. For one, even if we grant that no one's opinion matters any more than that of anyone else, it wouldn't necessarily mean that I am wrong. Your position may just be taken as saying that there are objective truths about art, but that human beings just can't know them. Perhaps these truths exist in some abstract philosopher's heaven, while we are all in the same epistemological boat of cluelessness in regards them. In this case, it would be true that I would have no grounds for insisting that I am correct, but you would have no grounds for insisting either that I am wrong (because, for all you know, I could be right), or that these things are subjective.
Finally, you could simply go whole-hog subjectivism, and argue that no work of art is any more artistically skillful than any other. In this case, barring some convincing argument from the subjectivist, I would dismiss this claim on the grounds of extreme implausibility. Because if whole-hog artistic subjectivism is true, then it follows that the work of Picasso has no more artistic merit than some mindless doodle I could draw up in five seconds right now. But the artistic superiority of Picasso's work to my mindless doodle seems almost as certain as any other piece of knowledge I believe I can claim. And I'm not going to simply throw aside something which seems relatively certain to me without a good argument.
For these reasons, I reject your rejoinders.
9.27pm
16 February 2011
Offline
I think pay you much attention to melodies and bass lines, Anderson. Perhaps it's because I, who know almost nothing about instruments on technical level that I think songs such as "While my guitar gently sweeps" or "She's leaving home" are superb. If I actually learned to play guitar or knew more about the rock traditions, maybe my opinion would change. But as it is, I'm glad that I don't have to worry while listening to Beatles how "orthodoxic" it is. To me, great Beatles songs are those that evoke strong emotions (not "this truly sucks", though), do not break my ears because they are so out of sync (though I must say, I rather enjoy "Wild honey pie"), have meaningful or witty lyrics and whose vocals interpret the song's meaning. Actually, vocals are the only part in Beatles songs that I have something to say about regarding how "good" they are. Perhaps it's because of this that I do not think Ringo made any "fantastic" Beatles piece, although Octopus's garden is quite heart warming.
10.41pm
12 March 2010
Offline
Wow, you DO know how to make friends here, don't you!! Welcome to the board!
You sound like willing to start some uproar here, let's see how people respond…
For my own part, I liked the thread title and wanted to write my thoughts about it.
But I think for now I'm just too baffled by the way you arrogantly dismiss most of the world's greatest band's songs, based on VERY subjective and questionable observations and reduce their success to a formula that is so obviously wrong I don't know where to start to correct you.
And of course I won't go through ALL your stuff, otherwise my head would explode, so I will stick to some of the first paragraphs.
Anderson said:
I think that a great Beatles song must consist of two elements: its being primarily written by Lennon, and its being accompanied by an inspired McCartney bass line. Without this formula, I believe that we are left with songs that are either mediocre or outside of the first-rank.
One possible exception is "Helter Skelter". Paul's bass line in this song can't be praised enough for its grit, presence, and tone. Unfortunately, the recording is held back by Paul's awful vocal performance, a childish and boring guitar riff, and just dreadful drumming. A great drummer may have turned this into a great rocker, but alas.
Ok, so you seriously call "Yesterday" and "Hey Jude" mediocre songs, to name the two most obvious examples.
Remarkable. I wonder what drove the thousands of artists who covered Yesterday instead of Sexy Sadie (easily in my top 10 of the weakest Beatles tracks, btw)…
Then, Helter Skelter. Someone else pointed out already that you're wrong about McCartney on the bass, it's John.
Calling Paul's vocal performance "awful" totally disqualifies you and robs you of any credibility in my book, but you don't stop there, you call (one of) the heaviest guitar performance of the 60s AND 70s (harder than Zep or Who) "childish and boring" and Ringo's blistering drums "dreadful", dismissing him as a non-great drummer. 
Wow, you're full of yourself, aren't ya?!
I don't feel totally comfortable with dissing a new poster with 5 postings, but either you VERY quickly change your tone and attitude or you won't have a happy time here.
And believe me, Joe won't let some arrogant punk go wild on the board.
Peace! 
Edit:
Ok, I just read the next part of your op (remember, to keep my head from exploding), and after your dismissal of "Come together"s bassline I'm quite sure you don't WANT to be taken seriously, you just want to troll.
Prove me wrong!
10.45pm
12 March 2010
Offline
Anderson said:
meanmistermustard,
I should point out that you're still missing some distinctions, and making the exact same mistake as before
etc. etc.
For these reasons, I reject your rejoinders.
Hey Anderson, are you familiar with "The Big Bang Theory"? ARE you Sheldon??
11.17pm
1 May 2010
Offline
paulsbass said:
Anderson said:
meanmistermustard,
I should point out that you're still missing some distinctions, and making the exact same mistake as before
etc. etc.
For these reasons, I reject your rejoinders.
Hey Anderson, are you familiar with "The Big Bang Theory"? ARE you Sheldon??
Lol.
I actually kind of agree with Anderson, although I don't agree that Sexy Sadie is the Beatles best song even though it is really good. Music is subjective, but I'd consider Cry Baby Cry to be one of my favorites for a few of those reasons. Tremendous bass work, actually the entire rhythm section is fantastic, and an ominous sort of mood set by John, although I do sort of wish they just ended the song, but the end is still cool. At the same time, I'd consider a song like Mother Nature's Son to be one of my favorites for its simplicity, so it just depends on what you like.
I think George made an interesting point on Anthology that John usually had a way to give his songs some type of edge, and I like his songs so much because they have an interesting way of sticking with you. So this is why I like Norwegian Wood so much, and from Paul's perspective why I like Penny Lane so much.
Still, let's try to keep this civil, all three wrote very good songs and it's up to the individual listener to decide if they think a song is great or not.
11.19pm
12 March 2010
Offline
unknown said:
Well I see music as more of a suggestion for the transitory nature of life (metaphorically, of course) rather than 'entertainment', or whatever else, so what makes a great Beatles song for me, is generally the emotion it brings to you, or me, rather. Now this also has to do with the time and place, mind you. For instance, just recently I lost one of my grandparents, and that night when I was going to sleep (I listen to my iPod in bed) Across the University came on and it made me immensely happy, and it was like I was drifting away into nothingness. Generally when I listen to that song it does not provoke such emotions, but at that time it did. It does not make the song any greater, though it did give me a greater appreciation for that song. I used to skip it every time it would come on, but I no longer do that.
And you are NINE years old, according to your own introduction??
Eh, I don't think so.
Tell you what, you seem rather close to this other clown.
So what's up with you guys?
11.22pm
12 March 2010
Offline
GniknuS said:
I actually kind of agree with Anderson,
Man, you can't mean that! Did you read his stuff??
Consider your sentence suggests that you agree with his WHOLE posting!
I know that's not true, and don't tell me I'm wrong!
11.26pm
19 September 2010
Offline
paulsbass said:
Wow, you DO know how to make friends here, don't you!! Welcome to the board!
You sound like willing to start some uproar here, let's see how people respond…
For my own part, I liked the thread title and wanted to write my thoughts about it.
But I think for now I'm just too baffled by the way you arrogantly dismiss most of the world's greatest band's songs, based on VERY subjective and questionable observations and reduce their success to a formula that is so obviously wrong I don't know where to start to correct you.
That really is all I need to say. Thanks for saying it for me, Paulsbass!
11.28pm
12 March 2010
Offline
mr. Sun king coming together said:
That really is all I need to say. Thanks for saying it for me, Paulsbass!
Man, and if WE are pulling together, who's going to stop us?!
11.31pm
19 September 2010
Offline
Maybe Sheldon Cooper, through sheer annoyance. Loved the joke earlier!
11.35pm
12 March 2010
Offline
mr. Sun king coming together said:
Maybe Sheldon Cooper, through sheer annoyance. Loved the joke earlier!
Yeah, another – while fictional – example of someone who is impossible to have a normal conversation with, since he's not open for talking sense but lives in his own world of obscure constructions and beliefs and complexes.
Most Users Ever Online: 597
Currently Online: unknown, mja6758, HelloHelloHello
3 Guest(s)
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
mr. Sun king coming together: 6972
meanmistermustard: 3426
MeanMrsMustard: 2794
Egroeg Evoli: 1517
vonbontee: 1427
GniknuS: 1365
Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 86
Members: 1681
Moderators: 5
Admins: 1
Forum Stats:
Groups: 3
Forums: 33
Topics: 2390
Posts: 73195
Newest Members: HelloHelloHello, JQ, Juliana Melo, musicfreak21, Victor Sepúlveda
Moderators: Joe (2698), skye (2295), Ellie (1), Zig (2752), mithveaen (4675)
Administrators: Joe (2698)
