<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
	<title>The Beatles Bible - Topic: Question about Studio Mic'ing</title>
	<link>http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/recording-and-musicology/question-about-studio-micing/</link>
	<description><![CDATA[The Beatles&#039; songs, albums, photos, places and much more, including a day-by-day guide to their career from 1957 to 1970 and beyond, plus profiles of John Lennon, Paul McCartney, George Harrison, Ringo Starr and many others.]]></description>
	<generator>Simple:Press Version 5.2.6</generator>
	<atom:link href="http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/recording-and-musicology/question-about-studio-micing/rss/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <item>
        	<title>DrBeatle on Question about Studio Mic'ing</title>
        	<link>http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/recording-and-musicology/question-about-studio-micing/#p61639</link>
        	<category>Recording and musicology</category>
        	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/recording-and-musicology/question-about-studio-micing/#p61639</guid>
        	        	<description><![CDATA[<p>That rings a bell! Thanks!</p>
 ]]></description>
        	        	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2012 23:45:44 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
        	<title>RunForYourLife on Question about Studio Mic'ing</title>
        	<link>http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/recording-and-musicology/question-about-studio-micing/#p61630</link>
        	<category>Recording and musicology</category>
        	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/recording-and-musicology/question-about-studio-micing/#p61630</guid>
        	        	<description><![CDATA[<p>As others have mentioned, Geoff Emerick details it in <em>Here, There and Everywhere</em>. </p>
<p>It was an attempt to get an "underwater" effect on some vocals in "Yellow Submarine". He put the microphone into a condom and placed it into a tiny bowl of water. It didn't work as they'd hoped, and it didn't appear on the final record (I don't think the mic was damaged).</p>
 ]]></description>
        	        	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2012 22:10:55 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
        	<title>DrBeatle on Question about Studio Mic'ing</title>
        	<link>http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/recording-and-musicology/question-about-studio-micing/#p61194</link>
        	<category>Recording and musicology</category>
        	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/recording-and-musicology/question-about-studio-micing/#p61194</guid>
        	        	<description><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I was pretty sure it wasn't for a sound effect but for an actual vocal effect. I thought it was on Revolver...I'll have a dig through my books to see if I can figure it out.</p>
 ]]></description>
        	        	<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2012 14:06:22 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
        	<title>Ben Ramon on Question about Studio Mic'ing</title>
        	<link>http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/recording-and-musicology/question-about-studio-micing/#p61188</link>
        	<category>Recording and musicology</category>
        	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/recording-and-musicology/question-about-studio-micing/#p61188</guid>
        	        	<description><![CDATA[<p>I know that John blowing bubbles in a glass of water through a straw was one of the nautical sound effects in Yellow Submarine, could it have been then? I've always just assumed the mic was recording normally, rather than in the water.</p>
<p> EDIT: found it, on this rather sensationalist celebrity-oriented website which seems more interested in the appropriation of a condom than anything else: </p>
<p><a href="http://www.starpulse.com/news/index.php/2006/03/31/john_lennon_used_condom_to_record_song_u" rel="nofollow"><a href="http://www.starpulse.com/news/" rel="nofollow">http://www.starpulse.com/news/</a>.....ord_song_u</a></p>
<p>The source seems to be Emerick, so I'm assuming it's from Here, There and Everywhere, which I've not read.</p>
 ]]></description>
        	        	<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2012 11:31:54 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
        	<title>Funny Paper on Question about Studio Mic'ing</title>
        	<link>http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/recording-and-musicology/question-about-studio-micing/#p61181</link>
        	<category>Recording and musicology</category>
        	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/recording-and-musicology/question-about-studio-micing/#p61181</guid>
        	        	<description><![CDATA[<p>Maybe that's how they got that underwater bubbly sound in "Octopus's Garden" <img class="spSmiley" alt="blue-meanie" src="http://cdn2.beatlesbible.com/wp/wp-content/forum-smileys/blue-meanie_01.gif" /></p>
<p>&#160;</p>
 ]]></description>
        	        	<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2012 03:20:39 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
        	<title>DrBeatle on Question about Studio Mic'ing</title>
        	<link>http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/recording-and-musicology/question-about-studio-micing/#p61169</link>
        	<category>Recording and musicology</category>
        	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/recording-and-musicology/question-about-studio-micing/#p61169</guid>
        	        	<description><![CDATA[<p>I remember reading years ago that one of the innovative ways George Martin and his engineers mic'ed the Beatles to get a sound they wanted was to suspend a small microphone (wrapped in plastic) into a glass of water and record the vocals through that. I remember reading that George was taking a big risk doing this because it was a very expensive mic and he was risking the wrath of the higher-ups at EMI if something happened to it.</p>
<p>I cannot for the life of me remember which song it was for, though! I know it's one of the loads ...]]></description>
        	        	<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2012 00:31:32 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
</channel>
</rss>