Log In
Register
9.05pm
16 August 2012
Offline
My go-to will always be the stereo mixes, especially the 2009 masters. I save the mono mixes for those times I *really* want to sit down and pay attention to the fine details. Revolver , Sgt. Pepper and The White Album are all essential mono experiences.
E is for 'Ergent'.
4.30am
1 December 2009
Offline
That’s funny you should say that – I would think the stereo was more ideallly suited for the fine details, and the mono for the totality. As far as singling out individual instrumental contributions, I find it much easier if I can concentrate on them if they’re isolated and concentrated primarily in a single stereo channel.
The following people thank vonbontee for this post:
OudisGEORGE: In fact, The Detroit Sound. JOHN: In fact, yes. GEORGE: In fact, yeah. Tamla-Motown artists are our favorites. The Miracles. JOHN: We like Marvin Gaye. GEORGE: The Impressions PAUL & GEORGE: Mary Wells. GEORGE: The Exciters. RINGO: Chuck Jackson. JOHN: To name but eighty.
4.43am
27 December 2012
Offline 
I would only listen to stereo if the sounds come from loud speakers where the nuances aren’t noticed that much.
10.38pm
6 December 2012
Offline
Stereo, usually, considering I like the effect of sound coming out of different speakers and panning across the speakers. But my opinion isn’t worth much; I don’t know much about technical recording stuff.
Also known as Egg-Rock, Egg-Roll, E-George, Eggy, Ravioli, Eggroll Eggrolli...
~witty quote~
10.15pm
1 December 2009
Offline I’m of the opinion that whatever your ears tell you is best…is best.
The following people thank vonbontee for this post:
Oudis, Bongo, Matt BusbyGEORGE: In fact, The Detroit Sound. JOHN: In fact, yes. GEORGE: In fact, yeah. Tamla-Motown artists are our favorites. The Miracles. JOHN: We like Marvin Gaye. GEORGE: The Impressions PAUL & GEORGE: Mary Wells. GEORGE: The Exciters. RINGO: Chuck Jackson. JOHN: To name but eighty.
2.48pm
Reviewers
29 November 2012
Offline
Agreed. For me, however, the reason I like the mono mixes is that they sound more natural and integrated…especially on the stuf from Rubber Soul onward, many of the overdubs stick out like a sore thumb on top of the whole mix in the stereo versions (like Paul’s great bassline in Hey Bulldog , the piano solo on In My Life , etc) whereas in the mono mixes they sound more like they were recorded all together with the rest of the songs and sound more “real” (if that makes sense?).
Plus, on the earlier albums, it’s my opinion that the mono mixes have better vocal mixing and the bass and drums have more “punch.” That’s not even taking into account the longer fade-outs and the extra goodies/effects on the mono that are lacking in the stereo. The only thing I miss from the stereo is the extra minute at the end of Helter Skelter .
Again, these are just my opinions…to each his own! 
"I know you, you know me; one thing I can tell you is you got to be free!"
Please Visit My Website, The Rock and Roll Chemist
Twitter: @rocknrollchem
Facebook: rnrchemist
12.12pm
8 August 2014
Offline DrBeatle said
Agreed. For me, however, the reason I like the mono mixes is that they sound more natural and integrated…especially on the stuf from Rubber Soul onward, many of the overdubs stick out like a sore thumb on top of the whole mix in the stereo versions (like Paul’s great bassline in Hey Bulldog , the piano solo on In My Life , etc) whereas in the mono mixes they sound more like they were recorded all together with the rest of the songs and sound more “real” (if that makes sense?).Plus, on the earlier albums, it’s my opinion that the mono mixes have better vocal mixing and the bass and drums have more “punch.” That’s not even taking into account the longer fade-outs and the extra goodies/effects on the mono that are lacking in the stereo. The only thing I miss from the stereo is the extra minute at the end of Helter Skelter .
Again, these are just my opinions…to each his own!
Late to the discussion but just add my two cents. I always felt they sounded more like a band in mono than because of stereo separating insturments, it just sounds more natural then stereo just like you said.
8.57pm
8 February 2014
Offline There are some really detailed and insightful reviews of the various mono and stereo releases at amazon (who knows, maybe some of us wrote them!), c.f. this page. Some folk give song by song reviews of the different versions. Very interesting.
EDIT: Don’t follow that link and buy! Use one of the links that gives Joe a commission if you want to buy.
The following people thank Matt Busby for this post:
Mr. Kite2.52am
28 March 2014
Offline Stereo all the way. You can’t beat the 2009 stereo remasters
The Beatles made mono, ’cause that’s all they knew back then. You don’t see Macca doing solo stuff in mono.
Now that these new 2014 “analog” mono LPS are coming out, people will demand that the stereo LPs be made in “analog”, making the 2012 “digital” stereo LP worthless. 
BEATLES Music gives me Eargasms! 
3.01am
Reviewers
4 February 2014
Offline Matt Busby said
There are some really detailed and insightful reviews of the various mono and stereo releases at amazon (who knows, maybe some of us wrote them!), c.f. this page. Some folk give song by song reviews of the different versions. Very interesting.
EDIT: Don’t follow that link and buy! Use one of the links that gives Joe a commission if you want to buy.
Now my signature is here for that…
The following people thank Mr. Kite for this post:
Matt Busby7.00am
10 August 2014
Offline Just adding my two cents!
I prefer the Mono mixes of the Beatles albums until about Help ! After that, I personally like the stereo mix. The Mono mix of Sgt. Pepper is pretty phenomenal though
The following people thank paulramon1962 for this post:
Matt BusbyFavorite Beatle of the moment: Paul McCartney
6.27am
15 May 2014
Offline vonbontee said
Really, it’s just that I noticed it was always the stereo which faded earlier, and wondered if there was an explanation. But OTOH, the stereo “She’s Leaving Home ” is a semitone lower in pitch, so it must be LONGER than the mono one. And of course “Helter Skelter ” is a LOT longer than the mono one. (And now that I think of it, doesn’t the mono “Northern Song” fade earlier than the stereo? Can’t remember…) Which would make any attempt to shorten the overall playing time counterproductive in those two cases. So who knows?
As far as I know, Vonbontee, that was the case in the sixties –remember the two halves of Strawberry Fields Forever that turned into one song? The speed of the second half changed and fortunately matched the speed of the first part. But nowadays digital technology allows you to alter the pitch without changing the speed of the track. I guess that is what they’ve done in the last stereo releases. I still cannot understand why all the fast fade outs in the stereo mixes though.
Personally I have to confess that I prefer the new stereo releases because I can distinctly hear instruments or voices that were buried in the original mono mixes, they tell me how the songs were “constructed”, they give me more of the “sound collage” the Beatles used so much –although I know that in most cases The Beatles worked towards a mono version. But I have recorded in professional studios and with multitracks with friends so I have an almost “professional” interest in that kind of thing, that many people don’t have.
“Forsan et haec olim meminisse juvabit” (“Perhaps one day it will be a pleasure to look back on even this”; Virgil, The Aeneid, Book 1, line 203, where Aeneas says this to his men after the shipwreck that put them on the shores of Africa)
12.44am
Reviewers
29 August 2013
Offline I am just working through a few Beach Boys CDs at the moment which is pretty interesting in light of this whole mono / stereo discussion. Brian Wilson preferred mono and yet many of their early albums albums were also mixed in stereo (they also had the Capitol duophonic thing on some of their ‘middle period’ albums). Most of the albums are now available in both – and some which were only available in mono have been remixed in stereo by some regular BB collaborators, many of them ‘supervised’ by Brian.
The one I found particularly interesting was Pet Sounds which was originally only available in mono, I find the stereo remix preferable but the mono also sounds very good. With the great harmonies the group has many of the newer stereo remixes are revelatory, particularly for the vocals.
The following people thank trcanberra for this post:
Matt Busby==> trcanberra and hongkonglady - Together even when not (married for those not in the know!) <==
8.04pm
22 January 2014
Offline It’s been a decades long catastrophe that the greatest music of the 20th century was only available in terrible formats. Capitol in America messed with the albums (until Sgt. Peppers) themselves, depriving Americans of the opportunity to hear the album as it was intended. Those of us lucky enough to grow up before CDs got the original vinyl albums, which were decent quality. Also there were excellent German and Japanese pressings.
But it all changed in 1987. The original Beatles releases on CD were poorly digitally mastered. Subsequent remasterings only made the problem worse. Finally in 2004(?) we got a mastering with scrupulous attention to detail, and not a sloppy mess.
However, even that was a compromise, since the stereo mixes were, until the White Album , an afterthought to the Beatles. The mono mixes were done with care, but the Beatles didn’t participate in the stereo mixes until at least Sgt Pepper , and often the stereo mix was done by Emerick or whoever in a single day. To hear what the Beatles intended you to hear, you have to listen to the mono mixes. But the 2004(?) mono CD release wasn’t the original mono mixes, but an artificial mono created from the stereo mix.
So, finally, in 2014, we got releases of the Beatles music which arguably can’t be bettered: the mono mixes on 180g audiophile vinyl. Ever since I sold my massive Beatles vinyl collection in 1987 I’ve been kicking myself. I had a numbered German White Album , Japanese red vinyl Revolver and Sgt. Peppers, etc. Sold for pennies because finally we had CDs. What a disappointment. But finally, this year, I ordered the mono vinyl box set (plus a stereo vinyl White Album , Yellow Sub, Abbey Road ). Bought a decent turntable. Threw out my CDs. Finally, a happy man.
The following people thank SirHuddlestonFuddleston for this post:
Matt Busby10.46pm
Reviewers
1 November 2013
Offline The 2009 Mono remasters were absolutely the original mono mixes. They’re the same mixes as the mono vinyl box set.
(This signature brought to you by Net Boy and Net Girl. Putting messages in modems since 1996.)
12.50am
Reviewers
Moderators
1 May 2011
Offline There’s a question. George Martin made new mixes of all the ‘Help ” and ‘Rubber Soul ‘ tracks in 1987 so are those the mixes on the new vinyl’s? I presume they are.
"I told you everything I could about me, Told you everything I could" ('Before Believing' - Emmylou Harris)
1.51am
Reviewers
1 November 2013
Offline meanmistermustard said
There’s a question. George Martin made new mixes of all the ‘Help ” and ‘Rubber Soul ‘ tracks in 1987 so are those the mixes on the new vinyl’s? I presume they are.
He made new stereo mixes of those albums, and those are the ones on the stereo remastered CDs and records. The original 1965 mixes are included on the remastered Mono CDs of those albums.
The following people thank IveJustSeenAFaceo for this post:
Matt Busby(This signature brought to you by Net Boy and Net Girl. Putting messages in modems since 1996.)
1.52am
Reviewers
17 December 2012
Offline @meanmistermustard If you mean the stereo vinyls (as well as stereo CDs), then yes. The 2009 remaster remastered George Martin’s 1987 remix, with the original stereo mixes appearing as a bonus on the 2009 digital mono box on their respective albums. If you mean the new mono, then no. George Martin didn’t remix either of the mono masters in 1987 because they were not up for issue. The mono remasters (digital and the new vinyl) are both taken from the 1965 mastertape.
"I only said we were bigger than Rod... and now there's all this!" Ron Nasty
To @ Ron Nasty it's @ mja6758
The Beatles Bible 2020 non-Canon Poll Part One: 1958-1963 and Part Two: 1964-August 1966
10.39am
24 March 2014
Offline Well. i was listening to the 2009 stereo “All My Loving ” and realized that george’s guitar is missing until his solo, and after that it disappears again…John’s guitar is great but specially listening to their mono and live versions , in my opinion!, is george’s harmony wich gives that special touch and taste to the music in that track…
you can see this dude (he is just amazing) nailing harrison’s part:
Anybody noticed that too?
Thank you!
The following people thank Shamrock Womlbs for this post:
Beatlebug, Matt Busby"I Need You by George Harrison"
2.54pm
Moderators
15 February 2015
Offline That’s fab, @Shamrock Womlbs! It really makes me appreciate George’s guitar part even more (if such was possible).
Anyway, back on topic.
([{BRACKETS!}])
New to Forumpool? You can introduce yourself here.
If you love The Beatles Bible, and you have adblock, don't forget to white-list this site! 
1 Guest(s)
