Mono vs. Stereo | Page 2 | Fab Forum

Introducing the inaugural Fab Forum February Fundraiser! Click here for more details.

Please consider registering
Guest

sp_LogInOut Log In sp_Registration Register

Register | Lost password?
Advanced Search

— Forum Scope —






— Match —





— Forum Options —





Minimum search word length is 4 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

sp_Feed sp_TopicIcon
Mono vs. Stereo
No permission to create posts
16 February 2013
9.05pm
Avatar
SatanHimself
Hades-on-Leith
Candlestick Park
Forum Posts: 696
Member Since:
15 August 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
E is for 'Ergent'.
22 February 2013
2.48pm
Avatar
DrBeatle
Hershey via Boston
Apple rooftop
Forum Posts: 1492
Member Since:
29 November 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Agreed. For me, however, the reason I like the mono mixes is that they sound more natural and integrated...especially on the stuf from Rubber Soul onward, many of the overdubs stick out like a sore thumb on top of the whole mix in the stereo versions (like Paul's great bassline in Hey Bulldog, the piano solo on In My Life, etc) whereas in the mono mixes they sound more like they were recorded all together with the rest of the songs and sound more "real" (if that makes sense?).

Plus, on the earlier albums, it's my opinion that the mono mixes have better vocal mixing and the bass and drums have more "punch." That's not even taking into account the longer fade-outs and the extra goodies/effects on the mono that are lacking in the stereo. The only thing I miss from the stereo is the extra minute at the end of Helter Skelter.

Again, these are just my opinions...to each his own! :-D

"I know you, you know me; one thing I can tell you is you got to be free!"

 

Please Visit My Website, The Rock and Roll Chemist

Twitter: @rocknrollchem

Facebook: rnrchemist

 

10 August 2014
12.12pm
Avatar
mc1382
A Beginning
Forum Posts: 2
Member Since:
8 August 2014
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

DrBeatle said
Agreed. For me, however, the reason I like the mono mixes is that they sound more natural and integrated...especially on the stuf from
Rubber Soul onward, many of the overdubs stick out like a sore thumb on top of the whole mix in the stereo versions (like Paul's great bassline in Hey Bulldog, the piano solo on In My Life, etc) whereas in the mono mixes they sound more like they were recorded all together with the rest of the songs and sound more "real" (if that makes sense?).

Plus, on the earlier albums, it's my opinion that the mono mixes have better vocal mixing and the bass and drums have more "punch." That's not even taking into account the longer fade-outs and the extra goodies/effects on the mono that are lacking in the stereo. The only thing I miss from the stereo is the extra minute at the end of Helter Skelter.

Again, these are just my opinions...to each his own! :-D

Late to the discussion but just add my two cents. I always felt they sounded more like a band in mono than because of stereo separating insturments, it just sounds more natural then stereo just like you said.

10 August 2014
8.57pm
Avatar
Matt Busby
In the town where I was born
Rishikesh
Forum Posts: 901
Member Since:
7 February 2014
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

There are some really detailed and insightful reviews of the various mono and stereo releases at amazon (who knows, maybe some of us wrote them!), c.f. this page.  Some folk give song by song reviews of the different versions.  Very interesting.

EDIT:  Don't follow that link and buy!  Use one of the links that gives Joe a commission if you want to buy.

The following people thank Matt Busby for this post:

Mr. Kite
Half of what I say is meaningless... I feel good in a special way, I'm in love and it's a sunny day BeatlesBible.com earns royalties if you use these links when shopping: Amazon | iTunes
11 August 2014
3.01am
Avatar
Mr. Kite
910 Penny Lane, Strawberry Fields, Pepperland
Apple rooftop
Forum Posts: 6092
Member Since:
4 February 2014
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Matt Busby said

There are some really detailed and insightful reviews of the various mono and stereo releases at amazon (who knows, maybe some of us wrote them!), c.f. this page.  Some folk give song by song reviews of the different versions.  Very interesting.

EDIT:  Don't follow that link and buy!  Use one of the links that gives Joe a commission if you want to buy.

Now my signature is here for that...

The following people thank Mr. Kite for this post:

Matt Busby

If I spoke prose you'd all find out, I don't know what I talk about.

Can buy Joe love!
If you're shopping at one of these two websites use the links below to support the Beatles Bible:

Amazon | iTunes

11 August 2014
7.00am
Avatar
paulramon1962
Cedar City, Utah
The Kaiserkeller
Forum Posts: 53
Member Since:
10 August 2014
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Just adding my two cents!

I prefer the Mono mixes of the Beatles albums until about Help! After that, I personally like the stereo mix. The Mono mix of Sgt. Pepper is pretty phenomenal though

The following people thank paulramon1962 for this post:

Matt Busby
Favorite Beatle of the moment: Paul McCartney
3 September 2014
6.27am
Avatar
Oudis
Apple rooftop
Forum Posts: 1404
Member Since:
15 May 2014
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

vonbontee said

Really, it's just that I noticed it was always the stereo which faded earlier, and wondered if there was an explanation. But OTOH, the stereo "She's Leaving Home" is a semitone lower in pitch, so it must be LONGER than the mono one. And of course "Helter Skelter" is a LOT longer than the mono one. (And now that I think of it, doesn't the mono "Northern Song" fade earlier than the stereo? Can't remember...) Which would make any attempt to shorten the overall playing time counterproductive in those two cases. So who knows?

As far as I know, Vonbontee, that was the case in the sixties –remember the two halves of Strawberry Fields Forever that turned into one song? The speed of the second half changed and fortunately matched the speed of the first part. But nowadays digital technology allows you to alter the pitch without changing the speed of the track. I guess that is what they’ve done in the last stereo releases. I still cannot understand why all the fast fade outs in the stereo mixes though.

Personally I have to confess that I prefer the new stereo releases because I can distinctly hear instruments or voices that were buried in the original mono mixes, they tell me how the songs were “constructed”, they give me more of the “sound collage” the Beatles used so much –although I know that in most cases The Beatles worked towards a mono version. But I have recorded in professional studios and with multitracks with friends so I have an almost “professional” interest in that kind of thing, that many people don’t have.

Forsan et haec olim meminisse juvabit” (“Perhaps one day it will be a pleasure to look back on even this”; Virgil, The Aeneid, Book 1, line 203, where Aeneas says this to his men after the shipwreck that put them on the shores of Africa)

4 September 2014
12.44am
Avatar
trcanberra
Canberra, ACT
Apple rooftop
Forum Posts: 5522
Member Since:
29 August 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

I am just working through a few Beach Boys CDs at the moment which is pretty interesting in light of this whole mono / stereo discussion.  Brian Wilson preferred mono and yet many of their early albums albums were also mixed in stereo (they also had the Capitol duophonic thing on some of their 'middle period' albums).  Most of the albums are now available in both - and some which were only available in mono have been remixed in stereo by some regular BB collaborators, many of them 'supervised' by Brian.

The one I found particularly interesting was Pet Sounds which was originally only available in mono, I find the stereo remix preferable but the mono also sounds very good.  With the great harmonies the group has many of the newer stereo remixes are revelatory, particularly for the vocals.

The following people thank trcanberra for this post:

Matt Busby
==> trcanberra and hongkonglady - Together even when not (engaged for those not in the know!) <==
19 November 2014
8.04pm
SirHuddlestonFuddleston
St Peters Church
Forum Posts: 11
Member Since:
22 January 2014
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

It's been a decades long catastrophe that the greatest music of the 20th century was only available in terrible formats. Capitol in America messed with the albums (until Sgt. Peppers) themselves, depriving Americans of the opportunity to hear the album as it was intended. Those of us lucky enough to grow up before CDs got the original vinyl albums, which were decent quality. Also there were excellent German and Japanese pressings.

But it all changed in 1987. The original Beatles releases on CD were poorly digitally mastered. Subsequent remasterings only made the problem worse. Finally in 2004(?) we got a mastering with scrupulous attention to detail, and not a sloppy mess.

However, even that was a compromise, since the stereo mixes were, until the White Album, an afterthought to the Beatles. The mono mixes were done with care, but the Beatles didn't participate in the stereo mixes until at least Sgt Pepper, and often the stereo mix was done by Emerick or whoever in a single day. To hear what the Beatles intended you to hear, you have to listen to the mono mixes. But the 2004(?) mono CD release wasn't the original mono mixes, but an artificial mono created from the stereo mix.

So, finally, in 2014, we got releases of the Beatles music which arguably can't be bettered: the mono mixes on 180g audiophile vinyl. Ever since I sold my massive Beatles vinyl collection in 1987 I've been kicking myself. I had a numbered German White Album, Japanese red vinyl Revolver and Sgt. Peppers, etc. Sold for pennies because finally we had CDs. What a disappointment. But finally, this year, I ordered the mono vinyl box set (plus a stereo vinyl White Album, Yellow Sub, Abbey Road). Bought a decent turntable. Threw out my CDs. Finally, a happy man.

The following people thank SirHuddlestonFuddleston for this post:

Matt Busby
20 November 2014
12.50am
Avatar
meanmistermustard
Moderator



Forum Posts: 17110
Member Since:
1 May 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

There's a question. George Martin made new mixes of all the 'Help" and 'Rubber Soul' tracks in 1987 so are those the mixes on the new vinyl's? I presume they are.

Don’t make your love suffer insecurities, trade the baggage of self to set another one free. ('Paper Skin' - Kendall Payne)
20 November 2014
1.51am
Avatar
IveJustSeenAFaceo
Arrived Somewhere (But Not Here)
Apple rooftop
Forum Posts: 2847
Member Since:
31 October 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

meanmistermustard said
There's a question. George Martin made new mixes of all the '
Help" and 'Rubber Soul' tracks in 1987 so are those the mixes on the new vinyl's? I presume they are.

He made new stereo mixes of those albums, and those are the ones on the stereo remastered CDs and records. The original 1965 mixes are included on the remastered Mono CDs of those albums. 

The following people thank IveJustSeenAFaceo for this post:

Matt Busby

(This signature brought to you by Spaghetti Tuesdays. Occurring on Wednesdays since 2013.)

23 April 2015
10.39am
Avatar
lillo78
Waiting for the van to come
Candlestick Park
Forum Posts: 621
Member Since:
24 March 2014
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Well. i was listening to the 2009 stereo "All My Loving" and realized that george's guitar is missing until his solo, and after that it disappears again...John's guitar is great  but specially listening to their mono and live versions , in my opinion!, is george's harmony wich gives that special touch and taste to the music in that track...

you can see this dude (he is just amazing) nailing harrison's part:

Anybody noticed that too?

 

Thank you!

The following people thank lillo78 for this post:

Silly Girl, Matt Busby

Why don't you put it on the toast?

No permission to create posts
Forum Timezone: America/Chicago

Most Users Ever Online: 597

Currently Online: ewe2
39 Guest(s)

Currently Browsing this Page:
2 Guest(s)

Top Posters:

meanmistermustard: 17110

Ahhh Girl: 10708

Annadog40: 9656

Zig: 7531

parlance: 7092

mr. Sun king coming together: 6980

Mr. Kite: 6092

Silly Girl: 5690

trcanberra: 5522

Ron Nasty: 4916

Member Stats:

Guest Posters: 87

Members: 3327

Moderators: 4

Admins: 2

Forum Stats:

Groups: 3

Forums: 42

Topics: 3813

Posts: 201536

Newest Members:

ttn48griff, Beatles007, Edwardo, deandawes, RB

Moderators: Ahhh Girl: 10708, meanmistermustard: 17110, Zig: 7531, Joe: 4389

Administrators: Joe: 4389, Ellie: 3

Members Birthdays
sp_BirthdayIcon
Today: None
Upcoming: VeraChuckDave