<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
	<title>The Beatles Bible - Topic: Hey Bulldog 1999 remix vs. 2009 remaster</title>
	<link>http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/recording-and-musicology/hey-bulldog-1999-remix-vs-2009-remaster/</link>
	<description><![CDATA[The Beatles&#039; songs, albums, photos, places and much more, including a day-by-day guide to their career from 1957 to 1970 and beyond, plus profiles of John Lennon, Paul McCartney, George Harrison, Ringo Starr and many others.]]></description>
	<generator>Simple:Press Version 5.2.6</generator>
	<atom:link href="http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/recording-and-musicology/hey-bulldog-1999-remix-vs-2009-remaster/rss/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <item>
        	<title>TheOneBeatleManiac on Hey Bulldog 1999 remix vs. 2009 remaster</title>
        	<link>http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/recording-and-musicology/hey-bulldog-1999-remix-vs-2009-remaster/#p35431</link>
        	<category>Recording and musicology</category>
        	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/recording-and-musicology/hey-bulldog-1999-remix-vs-2009-remaster/#p35431</guid>
        	        	<description><![CDATA[<p>Another stereo remix over here, now it's All My Loving, and I fixed an really bad Paul bass mistake at around 1:19-1:20.</p>
<p>Enjoy! </p>
<p><img class="sfsmiley" src="/wp/wp-content/forum-smileys/ahdn_paul_07.gif" alt="a-hard-days-night-paul-7" /></p>
<p> </p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K3CLz0Uxv7s" target="_blank"><object width="560" height="445"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/K3CLz0Uxv7s?version=3"/><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"/><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"/><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/K3CLz0Uxv7s?version=3" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="560" height="445" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"/></object></a></p>
 ]]></description>
        	        	<pubDate>Mon, 16 May 2011 06:37:38 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
        	<title>McLennonSon on Hey Bulldog 1999 remix vs. 2009 remaster</title>
        	<link>http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/recording-and-musicology/hey-bulldog-1999-remix-vs-2009-remaster/#p34959</link>
        	<category>Recording and musicology</category>
        	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/recording-and-musicology/hey-bulldog-1999-remix-vs-2009-remaster/#p34959</guid>
        	        	<description><![CDATA[<p>Wow!</p>
<p>Love the &#039;Things We said Today&#039; One!</p>
 ]]></description>
        	        	<pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2011 10:10:21 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
        	<title>McLennonSon on Hey Bulldog 1999 remix vs. 2009 remaster</title>
        	<link>http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/recording-and-musicology/hey-bulldog-1999-remix-vs-2009-remaster/#p34958</link>
        	<category>Recording and musicology</category>
        	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/recording-and-musicology/hey-bulldog-1999-remix-vs-2009-remaster/#p34958</guid>
        	        	<description><![CDATA[<p>Intresting.<img class="sfsmiley" src="/wp/wp-content/forum-smileys/brian-epstein_01.gif" alt="brian-epstein" /></p>
<p>I&#039;ve read an article about it.</p>
<p>I&#039;ve experienced a lot differences between those two different mixes.</p>
<p>I wonder why.<img class="sfsmiley" src="/wp/wp-content/forum-smileys/ahdn_ringo_07.gif" alt="a-hard-days-night-ringo-7" /></p>
<p> </p>
<p><img class="sfsmiley" src="/wp/wp-content/forum-smileys/ahdn_ringo_08.gif" alt="a-hard-days-night-ringo-8" />What?! Here There and Everythere in new mix???</p>
 ]]></description>
        	        	<pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2011 10:07:51 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
        	<title>Joe on Hey Bulldog 1999 remix vs. 2009 remaster</title>
        	<link>http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/recording-and-musicology/hey-bulldog-1999-remix-vs-2009-remaster/#p30203</link>
        	<category>Recording and musicology</category>
        	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/recording-and-musicology/hey-bulldog-1999-remix-vs-2009-remaster/#p30203</guid>
        	        	<description><![CDATA[<p>Nice work. I think it benefits to have the description from your YouTube page:</p>
<blockquote><p>Instead of uploading only a few seconds of samples of Stereo Remixes i did of The Beatles, i decided to upload 8 full songs, Stereo Remixed by myself. These are probably the best stereo remixes you would find as i was very carefully with isolating frequencies. On some songs, some instruments had similar frequencies that made impossible to separate them, and so they share the same channel.<br />
Even when the first two albums are only two-track, and the left track has all instruments in one, i was ...]]></description>
        	        	<pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2011 10:35:07 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
        	<title>TheOneBeatleManiac on Hey Bulldog 1999 remix vs. 2009 remaster</title>
        	<link>http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/recording-and-musicology/hey-bulldog-1999-remix-vs-2009-remaster/#p30201</link>
        	<category>Recording and musicology</category>
        	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/recording-and-musicology/hey-bulldog-1999-remix-vs-2009-remaster/#p30201</guid>
        	        	<description><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;ve Made this video and remixes at the beginning of the year, I&#039;ve planned for a long time to stereo remix all Beatles songs, These were made no more than almost 3 months ago.</p>
<p><object width="600" height="494" data="http://www.youtube.com/v/Z56JrvdHcOE&#38;feature" type="application/x-shockwave-flash"><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Z56JrvdHcOE&#38;feature" /></object></p>
<p>Enjoy! <img class="spSmiley" src="/wp/wp-content/forum-smileys/ahdn_ringo_15.gif" alt="a-hard-days-night-ringo-15" /></p>
 ]]></description>
        	        	<pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2011 06:34:47 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
        	<title>McLerristarr on Hey Bulldog 1999 remix vs. 2009 remaster</title>
        	<link>http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/recording-and-musicology/hey-bulldog-1999-remix-vs-2009-remaster/#p3343</link>
        	<category>Recording and musicology</category>
        	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/recording-and-musicology/hey-bulldog-1999-remix-vs-2009-remaster/#p3343</guid>
        	        	<description><![CDATA[<p><strong>TheOneBeatleManiac said: </strong></p>
<blockquote><p>
I was amazed at first, when i listen the 1999 remasters, the stereo remixed channels did a great job, it make the songs just as i wanted, but when i heard the 2009, i was, WOW! the sound it's to the top of pureness, excellent, drum, bass, guitar and everything and vocals too of the four, they're playing just for me, the only ''but'', it's that, no remixed channels, and also other ''but'', You Know My Name, was not mixed on stereo. Why?</p>
</blockquote>
<hr />
 </p>
<p>You Know My Name (Look Up The Number) was not mixed in stereo on Past ...]]></description>
        	        	<pubDate>Tue, 04 May 2010 11:27:05 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
        	<title>TheOneBeatleManiac on Hey Bulldog 1999 remix vs. 2009 remaster</title>
        	<link>http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/recording-and-musicology/hey-bulldog-1999-remix-vs-2009-remaster/#p3334</link>
        	<category>Recording and musicology</category>
        	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/recording-and-musicology/hey-bulldog-1999-remix-vs-2009-remaster/#p3334</guid>
        	        	<description><![CDATA[<p>I was amazed at first, when i listen the 1999 remasters, the stereo remixed channels did a great job, it make the songs just as i wanted, but when i heard the 2009, i was, WOW! the sound it's to the top of pureness, excellent, drum, bass, guitar and everything and vocals too of the four, they're playing just for me, the only ''but'', it's that, no remixed channels, and also other ''but'', You Know My Name, was not mixed on stereo. Why?</p>
 ]]></description>
        	        	<pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 22:36:51 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
        	<title>Marcelo on Hey Bulldog 1999 remix vs. 2009 remaster</title>
        	<link>http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/recording-and-musicology/hey-bulldog-1999-remix-vs-2009-remaster/#p2078</link>
        	<category>Recording and musicology</category>
        	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/recording-and-musicology/hey-bulldog-1999-remix-vs-2009-remaster/#p2078</guid>
        	        	<description><![CDATA[<p>I have the "Hey Jude" LP and Past Masters on CD. If you listen both "Revolution" (single) versions, the last sounds like a sweet pop group as ABBA or Bee Gees trying to make a rock'n'roll cover; listening the first, sounds like four hooligans on drugs are breaking into your house, starts a fire with your destroyed furniture and rape your cat. Hahaha!</p>
<p> </p>
 ]]></description>
        	        	<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 21:23:55 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
        	<title>Elsewhere Man on Hey Bulldog 1999 remix vs. 2009 remaster</title>
        	<link>http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/recording-and-musicology/hey-bulldog-1999-remix-vs-2009-remaster/#p2076</link>
        	<category>Recording and musicology</category>
        	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/recording-and-musicology/hey-bulldog-1999-remix-vs-2009-remaster/#p2076</guid>
        	        	<description><![CDATA[<p>On the whole I disagree. The remixes are superior if only for the improved stereo imaging. As for the "wimpiness" of the bass &#38; drums, I'll have to take another listen.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>As for "For You Blue," the "naked" version has the essential acoustic guitar part - all of it, not just the intro. I never understood why Phil Spector did that. I don't notice any lack of warmth either on the "naked" version...</p>
 ]]></description>
        	        	<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 21:13:48 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
        	<title>alexbunardzic on Hey Bulldog 1999 remix vs. 2009 remaster</title>
        	<link>http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/recording-and-musicology/hey-bulldog-1999-remix-vs-2009-remaster/#p2072</link>
        	<category>Recording and musicology</category>
        	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/recording-and-musicology/hey-bulldog-1999-remix-vs-2009-remaster/#p2072</guid>
        	        	<description><![CDATA[<p>Similar to the "It's All Too Much" remix vs remaster discussion I've just posted, I also did a critical comparative listen to "Hey Bulldog". Even more than "It's All Too Much", "Hey Bulldog" sounds incomparably better on the 2009 remaster.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>One thing that immediately jumps at you when listening to the 1999 remix is how terribly pale and wimpy Paul's bass sounds, compared to the 2009 remaster. Why did they have to tame Paul's bass for the movie songtrack?</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The guitar is too clinical sounding on the remix. All the essential grit that is so gloriously brought to the fore on the ...]]></description>
        	        	<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 19:57:54 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
</channel>
</rss>