<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
	<title>The Beatles Bible - Topic: Chord Structure</title>
	<link>http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/recording-and-musicology/chord-structure/</link>
	<description><![CDATA[The Beatles&#039; songs, albums, photos, places and much more, including a day-by-day guide to their career from 1957 to 1970 and beyond, plus profiles of John Lennon, Paul McCartney, George Harrison, Ringo Starr and many others.]]></description>
	<generator>Simple:Press Version 5.2.6</generator>
	<atom:link href="http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/recording-and-musicology/chord-structure/rss/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <item>
        	<title>Gerell on Chord Structure</title>
        	<link>http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/recording-and-musicology/chord-structure/page-2/#p63390</link>
        	<category>Recording and musicology</category>
        	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/recording-and-musicology/chord-structure/page-2/#p63390</guid>
        	        	<description><![CDATA[<p>Jazzy chords,fancy chords and what not. But I do believe that the chords of the Beatles are easier to play and "sounds" just as great, they could progress just as fancy as those.</p>
 ]]></description>
        	        	<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2013 02:46:30 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
        	<title>Funny Paper on Chord Structure</title>
        	<link>http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/recording-and-musicology/chord-structure/page-2/#p63383</link>
        	<category>Recording and musicology</category>
        	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/recording-and-musicology/chord-structure/page-2/#p63383</guid>
        	        	<description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>
<strong>Into the Sky with Diamonds said </strong><br />
 Stevie Wonder I completely see.</p>
<p>What would be some James Taylor examples?</p>
<p>&#160;</p>
</blockquote>
<p>just a few examples:</p>
<p><strong>Chanson Francaise:</strong></p>
<p>E6 - A9 - G#m7 - C#9 - G#m7 - C#m7 - F#m9</p>
<p>D9 - E6 - F#m7 - A/B - E6 - A9 - G#m7 - (repeat rest of above)</p>
<p>B(add C#) - F#m9 - Baug - E (add F#) - E6 - Am7 - D9</p>
<p>G#aug - G#7 - C#m - G#7aug5 - C#m - F#9 - A(add B) - D9 - E6, etc.</p>
<p>&#160;</p>
<p><strong>Only a Dream in Rio</strong></p>
<p>D(add E) - E/G# - A - B - A/C# - D(add ...]]></description>
        	        	<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2013 23:40:27 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
        	<title>Into the Sky with Diamonds on Chord Structure</title>
        	<link>http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/recording-and-musicology/chord-structure/page-2/#p63365</link>
        	<category>Recording and musicology</category>
        	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/recording-and-musicology/chord-structure/page-2/#p63365</guid>
        	        	<description><![CDATA[<p>Stevie Wonder I completely see.</p>
<p>What would be some James Taylor examples?</p>
<p>&#160;</p>
 ]]></description>
        	        	<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2013 19:32:17 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
        	<title>Funny Paper on Chord Structure</title>
        	<link>http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/recording-and-musicology/chord-structure/page-2/#p63350</link>
        	<category>Recording and musicology</category>
        	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/recording-and-musicology/chord-structure/page-2/#p63350</guid>
        	        	<description><![CDATA[<p>As far as innovation and complexity with chord progressions, James Taylor and Stevie Wonder blow John and Paul utterly out of the water.</p>
<p>Just sayin'.</p>
<p>&#160;</p>
<p>&#160;</p>
 ]]></description>
        	        	<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2013 04:20:54 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
        	<title>rcsnydley on Chord Structure</title>
        	<link>http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/recording-and-musicology/chord-structure/#p63330</link>
        	<category>Recording and musicology</category>
        	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/recording-and-musicology/chord-structure/#p63330</guid>
        	        	<description><![CDATA[<div>
<div>
A great book to check out if you'd like to know about the chords the Beatles used in their writing. </p>
<p>The Song Writing Secrets of The Beatles by Dominic Pedler</p>
</div>
</div>
 ]]></description>
        	        	<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2013 22:55:39 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
        	<title>Rat Salad on Chord Structure</title>
        	<link>http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/recording-and-musicology/chord-structure/#p51856</link>
        	<category>Recording and musicology</category>
        	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/recording-and-musicology/chord-structure/#p51856</guid>
        	        	<description><![CDATA[<p>I don't prefer McCartney songs, as songs, at least not the latter ones. I prefer the Lennon and Harrison ones. As arrangements, they are less adventurous but more introspective, moody, angry. But Paul's are more amibitious, more Broadway, more polished, more likely to last, and apparently more copied and appreciated by other performers. They flatter the audience and produce a better show.</p>
<p>As chords, I can anticipate Lennon's and Harrison's. Not Pauls, but I'm no expert. Penny Lane, while not very intersting to me emotionally, is certainly a good and unexpected piece of writing.</p>
 ]]></description>
        	        	<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2012 07:13:36 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
        	<title>meanmistermustard on Chord Structure</title>
        	<link>http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/recording-and-musicology/chord-structure/#p51746</link>
        	<category>Recording and musicology</category>
        	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/recording-and-musicology/chord-structure/#p51746</guid>
        	        	<description><![CDATA[<p>Its fine for folks to love Penny Lane ive just never got it and i was actually comparing PL with Hello, Goodbye and With a Little Help, which are incidently from the same time period (not that that was deliberate in any way shape or form), in that i find it ok just nothing spectacular.</p>
<p>Maybe its a family thing as none of my family are big fans of PL either.</p>
<p>And incidently i prefer Love Me Do to She's Leaving Home tho i appreciate SLH far more after hearing the multitracks. John and Paul's vocals are lush fitting together wonderfully and the string score ...]]></description>
        	        	<pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2012 12:37:52 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
        	<title>paulsbass on Chord Structure</title>
        	<link>http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/recording-and-musicology/chord-structure/#p51745</link>
        	<category>Recording and musicology</category>
        	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/recording-and-musicology/chord-structure/#p51745</guid>
        	        	<description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><strong>Ben Ramon said </strong><br />
 It was a positive comparison- I believe he was saying that while he doesn't like Penny Lane much, it's a lot better than Hold Me Tight, which is a fair opinion to hold. Personally I've never had a problem with Hold Me Tight but I think we'd all agree Penny Lane is a better song! <img class="spSmiley" src="/wp/wp-content/forum-smileys/ahdn_george_09.gif" alt="a-hard-days-night-george-9" width="35" /></p>
</blockquote>
<p>I'm aware that he was saying PL was better than Hold me tight. In fact he was saying it was "not as dreadful and blabla awful" as HMT.</p>
<p>My point is, there's no point in comparing the ...]]></description>
        	        	<pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2012 10:04:44 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
        	<title>Ben Ramon on Chord Structure</title>
        	<link>http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/recording-and-musicology/chord-structure/#p51743</link>
        	<category>Recording and musicology</category>
        	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/recording-and-musicology/chord-structure/#p51743</guid>
        	        	<description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><strong>paulsbass said </strong></p>
<blockquote><p>
<strong>meanmistermustard said </strong><br />
 Still nowhere as dreadful and spine shivering brace yourself for the awfulness that is Hold Me Tight tho.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>How gracious. If there's anything "dreadful" about PL for you, may it be, to each his own.</p>
<p>But why do you name one of the most elaborate, most acclaimed and most successful songs from their creative and commercial peak along with one of the weakest tracks from one of their earliest and weakest albums??</p>
<p>I have no problems with other people having different opinions, but I don't get all of yours...</p>
<p>Thankfully, I don't have to!</p>
</blockquote>
<p> It was a positive comparison- ...]]></description>
        	        	<pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2012 09:20:30 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
        	<title>paulsbass on Chord Structure</title>
        	<link>http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/recording-and-musicology/chord-structure/#p51742</link>
        	<category>Recording and musicology</category>
        	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/recording-and-musicology/chord-structure/#p51742</guid>
        	        	<description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><strong>meanmistermustard said </strong><br />
 Still nowhere as dreadful and spine shivering brace yourself for the awfulness that is Hold Me Tight tho.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>How gracious. If there's anything "dreadful" about PL for you, may it be, to each his own.</p>
<p>But why do you name one of the most elaborate, most acclaimed and most successful songs from their creative and commercial peak along with one of the weakest tracks from one of their earliest and weakest albums??</p>
<p>I have no problems with other people having different opinions, but I don't get all of yours...</p>
<p>Thankfully, I don't have to!</p>
 ]]></description>
        	        	<pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2012 06:18:41 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
        	<title>Ben Ramon on Chord Structure</title>
        	<link>http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/recording-and-musicology/chord-structure/#p51729</link>
        	<category>Recording and musicology</category>
        	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/recording-and-musicology/chord-structure/#p51729</guid>
        	        	<description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><strong>paulsbass said:</strong></p>
</blockquote>
<blockquote><p><strong></strong>And since this thread is about chords, first masterstroke is the change from A to Aminor (original might be in Bb, I just play it in A), and then following chords which are basically Am with F# and then F and then E4 - E</p>
</blockquote>
<p>It's originally in B, but I totally agree with you about the brilliance of the chord progression. </p>
 ]]></description>
        	        	<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2012 23:16:51 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
        	<title>meanmistermustard on Chord Structure</title>
        	<link>http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/recording-and-musicology/chord-structure/#p51727</link>
        	<category>Recording and musicology</category>
        	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/recording-and-musicology/chord-structure/#p51727</guid>
        	        	<description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><strong>paulsbass said </strong></p>
<blockquote><p>
I get the sense that many, if not most, people on this forum think relatively poorly of "Penny Lane."</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Interesting. How did you get that sense??</p>
<p>And how and why would anyone think poorly of this song?!</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Possibly from me for one. Never got the love-in the song gets, its nice to listen to but stirs up little emotion or anything in me. One of the songs in the 'good track but there is far better aka ho hum' category.</p>
<p>When i listened to the MMT album (which now does not occur since i cut it up in my itunes library) it ...]]></description>
        	        	<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2012 22:40:20 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
        	<title>paulsbass on Chord Structure</title>
        	<link>http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/recording-and-musicology/chord-structure/#p51724</link>
        	<category>Recording and musicology</category>
        	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/recording-and-musicology/chord-structure/#p51724</guid>
        	        	<description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>
 </p>
<p>I get the sense that many, if not most, people on this forum think relatively poorly of "Penny Lane."</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Interesting. How did you get that sense??</p>
<p>And how and why would anyone think poorly of this song?!</p>
<p>For me it's among the, if not the ultimate Beatles arrangement(s).</p>
<p>The start alone with that oh-so-short prelude...</p>
<p>Fantastic, mind blowing instrumentation.</p>
<p>All these beautiful instruments, most of all the piccolo trumpet, of course.</p>
<p>That bass line, starting up high and walking down soooo easily...</p>
<p>That piano, relentless, fat...</p>
<p>That drum sound, as Ringo as it gets, laid back, simple and effective.</p>
<p>These vocals, Paul at his best, with John joining in. I ...]]></description>
        	        	<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2012 22:01:41 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
        	<title>McLennonSon on Chord Structure</title>
        	<link>http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/recording-and-musicology/chord-structure/#p51718</link>
        	<category>Recording and musicology</category>
        	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/recording-and-musicology/chord-structure/#p51718</guid>
        	        	<description><![CDATA[<p><strong>Rat Salad said; </strong></p>
<p> </p>
<blockquote>
<blockquote><p>
 </p>
<p>Actually there are 6 chords if count with the suspended ones too.</p>
<p>Analyzing the chord structure is one of my favorite things to do, but analyzing all the melodies is hell of a job. I just recently got the book "The Beatles Complete Scores" where you can look all the correct melodies in the bass, additional drum fills and more, which tends to be an fine book for me.  </p>
<p>The chord structure on "All I've Got To Do" is one of the most underrated songs you could analyze. Starting on the mystical chord E+ leading to the chord C#m ...]]></description>
        	        	<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2012 17:19:17 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
        	<title>Ben Ramon on Chord Structure</title>
        	<link>http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/recording-and-musicology/chord-structure/#p51708</link>
        	<category>Recording and musicology</category>
        	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.beatlesbible.com/forum/recording-and-musicology/chord-structure/#p51708</guid>
        	        	<description><![CDATA[<p>I can understand people thinking poorly of Penny Lane but if you ask me it's a definitive baroque-pop classic, lovely instrumentation and a very good case of ammunition against people who think Macca is a poor lyricist or cannot marry music and words in an effective way. </p>
 ]]></description>
        	        	<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2012 13:02:22 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
</channel>
</rss>