Topic RSS
4.26pm
14 January 2013
Offlineunknown said
sky090909 said
VBeat said
I think that if Rock'n'Roll arrived today you would be the ones calling it "noise", right?Depends if the "noise" is good or not.
You probably know what early rock and roll is, so it really doesn't depend, I don't think.
true
However, if rock'n'roll formed today would have been different?
4.33pm

5 November 2011
Offlinesky090909 said
unknown said
sky090909 said
VBeat said
I think that if Rock'n'Roll arrived today you would be the ones calling it "noise", right?Depends if the "noise" is good or not.
You probably know what early rock and roll is, so it really doesn't depend, I don't think.
true
However, if rock'n'roll formed today would have been different?
If it arrived today, then we wouldn't have had any Beatles, or most bands today, so I don't know. I took it as she was saying we would be the ones back then who hated rock and roll, and didn't mean today as literally today, more like if we were living back then.
4.43pm
1 May 2011
Offlineunknown said
sky090909 said
unknown said
sky090909 said
VBeat said
I think that if Rock'n'Roll arrived today you would be the ones calling it "noise", right?Depends if the "noise" is good or not.
You probably know what early rock and roll is, so it really doesn't depend, I don't think.
true
However, if rock'n'roll formed today would have been different?
If it arrived today, then we wouldn't have had any Beatles, or most bands today, so I don't know. I took it as she was saying we would be the ones back then who hated rock and roll, and didn't mean today as literally today, more like if we were living back then.
Thats how i took it but im bored by the original poster having a go at us all for not liking what she put up. Big whoop. More acting like a 5 year old going into a strop for their parents not jumping about at their latest picture.
4.47pm
14 January 2013
Offlineunknown said
sky090909 said
unknown said
sky090909 said
VBeat said
I think that if Rock'n'Roll arrived today you would be the ones calling it "noise", right?Depends if the "noise" is good or not.
You probably know what early rock and roll is, so it really doesn't depend, I don't think.
true
However, if rock'n'roll formed today would have been different?
If it arrived today, then we wouldn't have had any Beatles, or most bands today, so I don't know. I took it as she was saying we would be the ones back then who hated rock and roll, and didn't mean today as literally today, more like if we were living back then.
I kind of took it both cause I don't know what she really meant. Sorry, my brain is confusing.lol
1.42am
23 January 2013
OfflineHello everybody! This is the new Classic Mix. What do you think of it?
9.18am
17 December 2012
OfflineHi, Vanessa, how are you? Hope you're enjoying The Beatles Bible. Well, the "Classic" isn't bad. There's a nice crispness to the percussion. And none of that silliness. Not good enough to buy, and it does come with a bunch of abominations, but hey! – you've got to be admired for your sheer tenacity and refusal to give up.
11.40am
23 January 2013
OfflineHi Mja! I'm good, thankyou. And you? I'm a superfan of the Beatles so they actually "are" the Bible for me…
I'm happy you quite like the "Classic" version. This is more in the style of the Elvis Presley remixes that Spankox produced lately, more lets say close to the originals. Have you heard any of them?
5.26pm
20 December 2010
OfflineIs this an 'official' EMI release? and if so, who produced it. If it's just someone who do to public domain decided to take the song and do their own remixing, then I'm not interested. I check the Beatles website and it doesn't look like an official release.
3.25am
20 May 2013
OfflineInner Light said
Is this an 'official' EMI release? and if so, who produced it. If it's just someone who do to public domain decided to take the song and do their own remixing, then I'm not interested. I check the Beatles website and it doesn't look like an official release.
No, it's not official. It's a horrible fan re-mix. There are full reviews earlier in this thread. I like to give stuff a shot even if the reviews are terrible… huge mistake. I wish I could unlisten to these remixes.
3.31am
16 August 2012
Offline4.30am
14 January 2013
Offline5.05pm
14 December 2009
OfflineAw c'mon, this is the first time I've encountered this thread and I'm finding it hilarious! I do like VBeat's never-say-die chutzpah: "Have a listen! Care to buy it? Can't stand the free bit you heard? Try paying the whole thing, then you'll like it! Still don't want it? You must be old and ready for retirement. 2000 dancing Frenchmen can't be wrong! Still don't care? OK, I guess if you still don't care, then…here's a new Classic mix!"
Wonderful stuff, especially the apparent oxymoron "new classic"!
Hello William Campbell, welcome!
5.10pm
16 August 2012
Offline5.18pm
14 December 2009
OfflineSatanHimself said
I never thought I'd say this, but "Thank god for lawyers".It looks like EMI caught wind (a foul stench) of this crass piece of slop.
Now all we can do with this thread is remember how awful it was…
Do you have a link for that? I'd love to read about EMI's lawyers attack on this ghastly atrocity committed in the name of Beatles music!
1.16pm
1 May 2011
OfflineApple sue most folk who try and rip them off as thats what they do.
Is there anyway i get back the 3 minutes i spent listening to those remixes, eliminate the memories of having to listen to them or even see the terrible video that went with it, or the time spent on this threat?
1.34pm

5 November 2011
OfflineMost Users Ever Online: 597
Currently Online:
2 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
mr. Sun king coming together: 6972
meanmistermustard: 3444
MeanMrsMustard: 2794
Egroeg Evoli: 1549
vonbontee: 1427
Von Bontee: 1384
Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 87
Members: 1687
Moderators: 5
Admins: 1
Forum Stats:
Groups: 3
Forums: 33
Topics: 2402
Posts: 73548
Newest Members: gibbonfunky, Jay Riley, BrettB, Ralphrennick, fartoons
Moderators: Joe (2702), skye (2295), Ellie (1), Zig (2752), mithveaen (4675)
Administrators: Joe (2702)
Log In
Register
Home





